ON
← Back to feed
Tillis Calls Hegseth Vote His 'Biggest Regret' After Defending It Last Year
United States🏛️ PoliticsProgressive2 hr. ago

Tillis Calls Hegseth Vote His 'Biggest Regret' After Defending It Last Year

Senator Thom Tillis, a Republican from North Carolina, has publicly reversed his support for former Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. Initially, Tillis voted to confirm Hegseth in January 2025, praising his military experience and commitment to strengthening the U.S. military. However, in a recent CBS 60 Minutes interview, Tillis called his vote to confirm Hegseth his 'biggest regret' and urged Hegseth to resign. This marks a significant shift in Tillis' stance, reflecting growing concerns over Hegseth's management style and decision-making. Tillis has previously criticized Hegseth's handling of issues such as weapon shipments to Ukraine and his alleged reliance on inexperienced advisors. His criticisms have intensified in 2026, particularly regarding potential changes to military command structures under Hegseth's leadership.

Go to the primary sources (2)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

4 reports

The Hill logoThe HillIndependentProgressiveFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 756 hr. ago
Kelly: Hegseth's firings of top generals, admirals damage 'our readiness'

Senator Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.) criticized Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth for firing top generals and admirals, calling these actions 'damaging our readiness.' Kelly, a retired astronaut and Navy captain, highlighted Hegseth's plan to reduce the number of senior officers by 20%, which was announced last week. As a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, Kelly expressed concerns over the potential impact on military preparedness and leadership continuity. The move has sparked debate about the implications for command structure and operational effectiveness within the Department of Defense.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames Hegseth's personnel decisions as harmful to military readiness, using language that implies negative consequences. It emphasizes the concern from a Democratic senator with military background, suggesting a left-leaning perspective on the issue of civilian control over military人事.

Why factuality: no official source document/info detected

Why objectivity (75): The article presents Kelly's critique of Hegseth's actions but frames it through Kelly's perspective, which may introduce bias. While it does not overtly take sides, the focus on the negative impact on readiness suggests a somewhat critical stance toward Hegseth's leadership style.

The Hill logoThe HillIndependentCenter2 hr. ago
Tillis calls Hegseth vote his 'biggest regret'

Senator Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) expressed regret over his confirmation vote for Pete Hegseth as Secretary of Defense, calling it his 'biggest regret of my career.' In his upcoming memoir, Tillis acknowledged skepticism toward allegations against Hegseth but stated he chose to align with other Republicans to avoid political repercussions. Despite conducting due diligence, Tillis supported Hegseth's confirmation, citing his military experience and commitment to strengthening the armed forces. Later, Tillis endorsed an impeachment resolution against Hegseth, suggesting he should be removed from office. The senator also criticized other Cabinet appointments, including Robert F. Kennedy Jr., and warned of challenges for Republicans in future elections.

Bias read (Center): While the article discusses Tillis's personal regrets and criticisms of political figures, it presents both his past support for Hegseth and later calls for his removal, indicating a balanced portrayal of his changing stance. The framing remains neutral, avoiding overtly partisan language despite a

Newsweek logoNewsweekIndependentProgressive3 hr. ago
Tillis Calls Hegseth Vote His 'Biggest Regret' After Defending It Last Year

Senator Thom Tillis, a Republican from North Carolina, has publicly reversed his support for former Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. Initially, Tillis voted to confirm Hegseth in January 2025, praising his military experience and commitment to strengthening the U.S. military. However, in a recent CBS 60 Minutes interview, Tillis called his vote to confirm Hegseth his 'biggest regret' and urged Hegseth to resign. This marks a significant shift in Tillis' stance, reflecting growing concerns over Hegseth's management style and decision-making. Tillis has previously criticized Hegseth's handling of issues such as weapon shipments to Ukraine and his alleged reliance on inexperienced advisors. His criticisms have intensified in 2026, particularly regarding potential changes to military command structures under Hegseth's leadership.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames Tillis' reversal as a significant political development, emphasizing his growing distance from the Trump administration and his criticism of Hegseth's leadership. The language suggests a progressive critique of the Trump-era military policies and the administration's approach to国防

The Washington Times logoThe Washington TimesParty-alignedProgressive5 hr. ago
Republican Sen. Tillis calls his vote for Hegseth the 'biggest regret of my career' in a new book

Republican Senator Thom Tillis has expressed regret over his decision to support the confirmation of Pete Hegseth as Defense Secretary in January 2025, calling it the 'biggest regret of my career.' In his new book, Tillis also mentions that he should have prevented Robert F. Kennedy Jr. from being appointed as Health and Human Services secretary during the early stages of President Donald Trump's second term. These comments reflect Tillis's personal reflection on key political decisions made during Trump's administration.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames Tillis's regret as a critique of Trump-era appointments, implying potential issues with Hegseth and Kennedy Jr.'s qualifications or judgment. While the content itself is factual, the emphasis on Tillis's personal regret suggests a left-leaning perspective by highlighting potential

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories