ON
← Back to feed
UGP replied to the Prime Minister: Aid to the economy is not a gift of the government, but an obligation of the state that we all pay
Croatia🏛️ PoliticsLean Progressive8 days ago

UGP replied to the Prime Minister: Aid to the economy is not a gift of the government, but an obligation of the state that we all pay

The Union of Entrepreneurs and Businessmen (UGP) has rejected Prime Minister Andrej Plenković's claim that entrepreneurs remain silent when the government limits energy prices but speak out only when they need to pay more. In a statement, UGP emphasized that the funds used for energy interventions came from taxes and contributions paid by citizens, artisans, and entrepreneurs, not from the government’s budget. They expressed gratitude for measures taken during major crises but warned against new tax burdens, calling them unfair and disproportionate. The group criticized the government for labeling increased taxes on tourism beds as symbolic, pointing out that these increases represent significant financial burdens for families already paying other fees like tourist levies, property taxes, and platform commissions. Additionally, UGP highlighted the absurdity of placing cities like Dubrovnik and smaller towns without adequate infrastructure into the same tax category, arguing that this approach fails to account for the unique challenges faced by small communities.

In response to Prime Minister Andrej Plenković's recent statement, the Croatian Association of Entrepreneurs (UGP) has emphasized that assistance to the economy is not a gift from the government, but a responsibility of the state, which entrepreneurs and citizens fund through taxes and contributions. The UGP reiterated its call for serious analyses regarding how the state spends public funds, criticizing the government’s approach to increasing tax burdens on small businesses and self-employed individuals. According to the association, the financial support provided during past crises was funded by taxpayers, not the government’s budget, and they expect the same level of dialogue and reasoning when addressing new tax measures. The UGP rejected the prime minister’s claim that entrepreneurs remain silent when the government limits energy prices but become vocal only when required to pay more. They argued that entrepreneurs fully understand the importance of energy interventions, but these funds come from their own pockets, taxes and contributions paid by citizens, artisans, and entrepreneurs. While grateful for previous measures that helped preserve the economy during major crises, the UGP stressed that the same level of engagement should be applied when warning about the consequences of new tax burdens. The UGP criticized the government for labeling increases in taxes on tourist beds as symbolic, pointing out that such increases represent substantial percentages for families already paying other fees like tourism levies, property taxes, membership fees, utilities, maintenance costs, and platform commissions. For instance, raising the tax from €100 to €150 represents a 50% increase, while moving from €70 to €100 is over 40%. This is particularly problematic for families operating only 45 to 60 days per year, who face higher expenses and lower revenues. The UGP also highlighted the absurdity of placing Dubrovnik and smaller towns with inadequate infrastructure into the same tax bracket. These smaller towns have shorter tourist seasons, lower prices, and higher operational costs compared to well-developed tourist centers. Yet, they are taxed as if they operate in the most developed tourist areas, despite lacking basic services like sewage systems, ambulances, water supply, walking paths, or regular transport links. The UGP questioned what citizens and entrepreneurs receive in return for a nearly doubled state budget. Are public services twice as efficient? Are permits faster, justice better, administration simpler, and healthcare more accessible? Entrepreneurs face penalties for delays, while institutions rarely face consequences for their own delays. The UGP warned that the announcement of an autumn protest is not political theater but a response to a policy that increases taxes on certain groups while others are left unaffected. Today, it is the self-employed and small rental operators facing changes, but tomorrow it could be someone else. The UGP remained open to dialogue but insisted on serious analysis, fairness, stable rules, and clear answers about how the state spends money. If genuine dialogue does not occur, preparations for the autumn protest will continue. The UGP concluded that the state exists because of its citizens, not the other way around. Those who contribute to the budget deserve respect, predictable rules, and decisions based on analysis rather than assumptions that they can always pay more. The Fokus party responded to the prime minister’s proposal to abolish measures that set fuel prices every 14 days, supporting this move but simultaneously calling for the removal or significant reduction of taxes and duties on fuel. Fokus argued that fuel prices should not depend on political decisions, phone meetings, or temporary regulations. Instead, an open market, real competition, and clear rules for all are needed. However, if the government truly wants to test how much it can help citizens and the economy, it must not stop at abolishing price controls. It should also eliminate or significantly reduce taxes and duties on fuel, as these constitute a large portion of the final price paid at gas stations. Fokus leader Gabrijel Deak stated that if the prime minister is serious about abolishing measures, he welcomes the suggestion. But he urged going further, abolish administrative pricing, and let the state give up part of its revenue collected from each liter of fuel. He noted that citizens and entrepreneurs today pay not just the cost of oil and the trader’s margin but also high taxes and VAT. The state takes a significant portion of the final price paid at gas stations. Therefore, his simple proposal is to abolish the government’s control over prices while also abolishing taxes and duties on fuel during periods of high energy prices. Bruno Samardžić, president of the UGP, commented on the easing of tax changes for self-employed individuals, the government’s attitude toward small entrepreneurs, anti-inflation measures, the UGP’s demands to be included in decision-making processes, and the policy of fines imposed on hospitality providers and entrepreneurs. Samardžić emphasized that the UGP continues to demand inclusion in decisions affecting small entrepreneurs, stating that they have done their part by extending hands and attempting to reach agreements. They have sent letters before the minister’s press conference and will continue doing so, targeting both the Ministry of Economy and Finance. Their letters aim to ensure their inclusion in future steps and consultations in shaping policies. Samardžić added that the UGP believes it deserves a place at the table when making decisions that affect small entrepreneurs, as they represent specific interests not adequately represented in the public sphere. He acknowledged that the Croatian Employers’ Association (HUP) and the Croatian Chamber of Artisans (HOK) have different interests, but he stressed that the interests of one group should not come at the expense of another. Small entrepreneurs have their base and must be included in discussions. While HUP has its policies and channels, ultimately, it is the small entrepreneurs who have a voice. The UGP has legitimacy through its presence on social media and in public discourse, with over 90,000 members in Facebook groups and other platforms. Samardžić pointed out that the UGP has submitted analyses of proposed measures to the government, warning about potential consequences. He emphasized that these measures would not reduce inflation in Croatia, noting that the government labeled them anti-inflationary measures because they could not be called fiscal measures. He argued that increasing business costs would have the opposite effect, potentially discouraging entrepreneurship and pushing people away from self-employment.

Go to the primary sources (1)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

7 reports

HRT (Hrvatska radiotelevizija) logoHRT (Hrvatska radiotelevizija)State / PublicCenterFactual 98Objective 9014 days ago
Plenkovic on fuel prices: Our options are limited

Prime Minister Andrej Plenković confirmed that fuel prices in Croatia will rise next week due to increased global oil prices driven by the escalation of the conflict in the Middle East and the closure of the Hormuz Strait. He acknowledged that while the government has some room to mitigate the price increases, it is not possible to completely prevent them. Plenković stated that the expected increase would still be lower than the peak levels seen over the past five months since the conflict began. The government plans to take whatever measures it can within its limited capabilities.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a direct quote from Prime Minister Andrej Plenković, who explains the reasons behind the anticipated rise in fuel prices and acknowledges the limitations of government action. There is no overtly biased language, and the framing remains neutral, focusing on the economic factors,

Why factuality (98): The article provides an accurate summary of Prime Minister Plenković's comments on fuel price increases, citing his statement about limited options and the impact of geopolitical events. The information matches other reports and is well-supported.

Why objectivity (90): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting the prime minister's statements without editorializing or taking sides. It focuses on delivering the facts without bias.

Telegram.hr logoTelegram.hrIndependentProgressiveFactual 97Objective 888 days ago
Focus replied to Plenkovic: "We can abolish the fuel measures, but also taxes and excise duties".

The article reports that members of the Fokus party support Prime Minister Andrej Plenković's proposal to abolish the government's daily fuel price controls but argue that this should be accompanied by the elimination or significant reduction of taxes and fees on fuel. They claim that current fuel prices include high state-imposed costs beyond just the cost of oil and trader margins, making gasoline effectively more expensive due to these additional charges. The party leader, Gabrijel Deak, suggests that if the government is serious about testing the impact of removing price controls, it should also remove the state’s share of revenue through taxes and fees on fuel during periods of high energy prices. This would create a more transparent and competitive market while reducing the financial burden on citizens and businesses.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the call for abolishing fuel price controls as part of a broader demand for reduced state intervention and lower costs for consumers. It emphasizes the negative impact of government-imposed taxes and fees on fuel prices, suggesting they unfairly increase the final cost paid by the

Why factuality (97): This article accurately conveys the Fokus party's response to Plenković's proposal, matching the content of article 3. It provides direct quotes and aligns with the cross-source consensus.

Why objectivity (88): The article maintains a neutral tone overall but includes phrases like 'testirajmo koliko bi gorivo bilo jeftinije' (let's test how much cheaper fuel would be), which subtly emphasizes the Fokus party's perspective.

N1 Hrvatska logoN1 HrvatskaIndependentProgressiveFactual 97Objective 888 days ago
Focus's solution: Plenkovic should abolish or drastically reduce taxes and duties on fuel

The article reports that members of the Fokus party support Prime Minister Andrej Plenković's proposal to abolish the government's practice of setting fuel prices every 14 days. They argue that fuel prices should not depend on political decisions and call for the elimination or significant reduction of taxes and fees on fuel. The party leader, Gabrijel Deak, emphasizes that citizens and businesses currently pay not only the cost of oil and trader margins but also high fees and VAT. He suggests that the state takes a large portion of the final price at the pump and urges the government to stop collecting these fees and taxes while fuel prices remain high. Deak concludes that if the government is serious about helping citizens, it should test how much cheaper fuel would be if the state reduced its revenue from fuel.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a demand for reducing government intervention in fuel pricing and lowering taxes and fees, which aligns with left-leaning economic policies advocating for market freedom and reduced state control. The emphasis on testing the impact of removing state revenue from fuel,

Why factuality (97): The article accurately summarizes the Fokus party's response to Plenković's proposal to remove fuel price controls, including their call to also reduce taxes and fees on fuel. This aligns with the content of article 4.

Why objectivity (88): The article remains relatively neutral in tone while presenting the Fokus party's position. However, it does frame the issue as a test of the government's commitment to helping citizens, which slightly influences the narrative.

HRT (Hrvatska radiotelevizija) logoHRT (Hrvatska radiotelevizija)State / PublicProgressiveFactual 95Objective 858 days ago
UGP: Helping the economy is not a gift of the government, but an obligation of the state

The Croatian business association Udruga Glas poduzetnika (UGP) responded to Prime Minister Andrej Plenković's recent statement regarding state support for businesses, arguing that such assistance is not a gift from the government but a duty of the state funded by citizens and entrepreneurs through taxes and contributions. The UGP criticized the government's claim that entrepreneurs remain silent when energy prices are capped but speak out when they face higher costs, emphasizing that energy interventions were crucial during crises and funded by taxpayers. They questioned whether new tax burdens are truly necessary and highlighted concerns over disproportionately taxing small businesses and seasonal tourism operators, particularly those in less developed areas. The group also challenged the government to explain what benefits citizens and entrepreneurs receive in return for the doubling of state revenues.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the UGP's critique of government policies as a call for accountability and fairness in taxation, highlighting perceived inequities in how different regions and types of businesses are treated. It emphasizes the burden on entrepreneurs and questions the value of increased state tax

Why factuality (95): This article accurately reflects the UGP's response to Plenković's statements, mirroring the content of article 0. It provides detailed quotes and aligns with the cross-source consensus.

Why objectivity (85): Similar to article 0, this piece presents the UGP's viewpoint with clear language and some emotionally charged terms like 'neprihvatljivo.' It supports the UGP's stance more than it balances it with opposing views.

N1 Hrvatska logoN1 HrvatskaIndependentProgressiveFactual 95Objective 858 days ago
UGP replied to the Prime Minister: Aid to the economy is not a gift of the government, but an obligation of the state that we all pay

The Union of Entrepreneurs and Businessmen (UGP) has rejected Prime Minister Andrej Plenković's claim that entrepreneurs remain silent when the government limits energy prices but speak out only when they need to pay more. In a statement, UGP emphasized that the funds used for energy interventions came from taxes and contributions paid by citizens, artisans, and entrepreneurs, not from the government’s budget. They expressed gratitude for measures taken during major crises but warned against new tax burdens, calling them unfair and disproportionate. The group criticized the government for labeling increased taxes on tourism beds as symbolic, pointing out that these increases represent significant financial burdens for families already paying other fees like tourist levies, property taxes, and platform commissions. Additionally, UGP highlighted the absurdity of placing cities like Dubrovnik and smaller towns without adequate infrastructure into the same tax category, arguing that this approach fails to account for the unique challenges faced by small communities.

Bias read (Progressive): The article presents a critical perspective toward the government's economic policies, particularly regarding taxation and energy subsidies. It frames the government's actions as disproportionately burdening entrepreneurs and small businesses while failing to provide adequate services in return. The

Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports the statements made by UGP regarding the government's energy interventions and their funding sources. It aligns closely with the content of other articles covering the same event, particularly those from HRT and Telegram.hr.

Why objectivity (85): The article presents the UGP's perspective clearly but uses some emotionally charged language such as 'neprihvatljivo' (unacceptable) and frames the issue as a conflict between the government and entrepreneurs. While not overtly biased, it leans toward supporting the UGP's position.

N1 Hrvatska logoN1 HrvatskaIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 8010 days ago
The head of the UGP on the penalties for caterers: Are we all Al Capone?!

Bruno Samardžić, predsjednik Udruge Glas poduzetnika (UGP), u intervjuu s Ninom Kljenak u 'Novom danu' komentirao je propozicije za ublažavanje poreznih obaveza za paušalne obrtnike, ponašanje vlade prema malim poduzetnicima, antiinflacijske mjere, zahtjeve UGP-a za uključivanje u donošenje odluka, te politiku kazni prema ugostiteljima i drugim poduzetnicima. Intervju je bio dio šire rasprave o ekonomskim i regulativnim pitanjima koja zadržavaju pažnju poduzetništva.

Bias read (Center): Intervju je bio neutralan u svojoj prirodi, sa fokusom na objektivno objašnjavanje pozicija UGP-a i njihovog stava prema državnoj politici. Nema jasno izraženog stranih ili domaćeg slanja u izrazima, niti su bili izraženi nepravedni stavovi prema jednoj strani. Sadržaj je ostavljan na objašnjenje st

Why factuality (90): The article accurately reports on the UGP leader's comments regarding fines for hospitality businesses, though it lacks specific details compared to other articles. It aligns with the general sentiment expressed elsewhere.

Why objectivity (80): The article uses rhetorical questions ('Zar smo mi svi Al Capone?!') and strong language, indicating a clear support for the UGP's position rather than maintaining strict neutrality.

N1 Hrvatska logoN1 HrvatskaIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 8010 days ago
The head of the UGP on the penalties for caterers: Are we all Al Capone?!

Predsjednik Udruge Glas poduzetnika (UGP) Bruno Samardžić komentirao je ublažavanje poreznih izmjena za paušalne obrtnike, odnos Vlade prema malim poduzetnicima, i zahtjeve UGP-a za uključivanje u donošenje odluka. Vlada je ublažila svoje najave izmjena u sklopu antiinflacijskog paketa, tako da će paušalnim obrtnicima s godišnjim prihodima do 40.000 eura nastojati da se ne povećaju davanja državi. Mjere trebaju biti upućene u javno savjetovanje, a njihova primjena predviđena je od 1. siječnja 2027. godine. Samardžić je naglasio potrebu za uključivanjem UGP-a u proces donošenja odluka, tvrdeći da su mali poduzetnici zastupljeni u javnosti i da imaju legitimaciju. Također je istaknuo da su UGP analizirali predložene mjere i upozorili na moguće posljedice.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced discussion between the UGP's demands for inclusion in decision-making processes and the government's actions regarding tax changes. It does not take a clear ideological stance but rather reports on the dialogue and positions of both parties. The tone remains objective

Why factuality (90): The article accurately covers the UGP leader's comments on fines for hospitality businesses and the government's proposed changes to tax policies for small business owners. It aligns with the general consensus found in other articles.

Why objectivity (80): The article presents the UGP leader's perspective with strong language and rhetorical questions, showing a clear alignment with the UGP's stance rather than offering a balanced view.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories