ON
← Back to feed
Producer Price Index Shows Zero Inflation in July
United States🏛️ PoliticsCenter10 days ago

Producer Price Index Shows Zero Inflation in July

Breitbart News reports that the U.S. Producer Price Index (PPI) remained unchanged in July compared to June, according to data released by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. This contrasts with economists' expectations of a 0.2% increase. Energy prices dropped 3.1%, marking two consecutive months of declines, while food prices fell 0.9%, the largest drop in over a year. Excluding food and energy, the PPI rose 0.2% in July, aligning closely with forecasts. Year-over-year, producer prices increased 4.7%, slightly below the expected 4.9%. The report highlights sector-specific changes, including a 1.8% decline in transportation and warehousing prices and a 6.5% surge in portfolio management services. The PPI measures prices paid to U.S. businesses, covering a broader range of transactions than the Consumer Price Index.

The U.S. Producer Price Index (PPI) showed zero change in July compared to June, marking a notable slowdown in inflationary pressures. The Bureau of Labor Statistics announced the data on Thursday, revealing that the index had fallen 0.3 percent in the previous month, signaling a decline in prices. This outcome surprised economists, who had anticipated a 0.2 percent increase. Over the past year, producer prices have risen by 4.7 percent, slightly below the 4.9 percent forecast by experts and down from June’s 5.5 percent reading. Energy prices dropped by 3.1 percent in July, continuing the trend of falling energy costs for the second consecutive month. Food prices also decreased by 0.9 percent, representing the largest decline in over a year. When excluding food and gasoline, the PPI rose by 0.2 percent in July and 4.2 percent annually. Economists had predicted a 0.3 percent monthly increase. Goods prices fell by 0.7 percent due primarily to declining fuel prices, while goods prices are up 6.5 percent compared to the same period last year. Excluding food and energy, goods prices increased by 0.1 percent. Services prices climbed by 0.2 percent, with a year-on-year increase of 3.9 percent. The increase was driven mainly by a 6.5 percent rise in portfolio management, which reflects appreciation in financial assets. The index for transportation and warehousing prices fell by 1.8 percent, and trade services declined by 0.1 percent. The PPI measures the prices paid to American businesses for goods and services, encompassing sales to consumers, households, businesses, and foreign purchasers. Unlike the Consumer Price Index (CPI), which focuses solely on consumer purchases, the PPI includes a broader range of transactions. It tracks both final demand, which involves products sold directly to end-users, and intermediate demand, which includes goods used in the production of other goods and services. The index for processed goods for intermediate demand declined 0.6 percent in July, following a 1.1 percent decrease in June. Within this category, the indexes for energy and foods and feeds declined. Excluding these, processed goods for intermediate demand increased by 0.1 percent. Services for intermediate demand climbed 0.5 percent, led by a 6.5 percent increase in portfolio management. Inflation eased further in July, with the Consumer Price Index (CPI) reporting a 3.4 percent annual increase, matching economists' forecasts. This marks the second consecutive month of moderation in inflation, following a peak of 4.2 percent in May. Core CPI, which excludes volatile food and energy prices, also slowed to a 2.5 percent annual increase from 2.6 percent in June. Despite this improvement, inflation remains significantly above the Federal Reserve’s 2 percent target and continues to outpace wage growth, which rose by 3.2 percent annually in July. The Federal Reserve faces a crucial decision regarding interest rates in September, influenced by the recent weak employment report and the ongoing inflation trends. The impact of energy prices remains a focal point, with gasoline prices averaging $4.06 per gallon in July, reflecting a substantial increase from earlier in the year. However, average daily gas prices were slightly lower in July compared to June, offering some relief to consumers. The July inflation data has sparked discussions within the Federal Reserve about the necessity of maintaining current interest rates. While some officials argue for immediate action to curb inflation, others believe the current trajectory suggests a cautious approach. The upcoming August inflation report will provide additional clarity on the direction of inflation and inform the Fed’s next steps. Stocks rose and bond yields fell sharply following the release of the July inflation report, indicating optimism on Wall Street regarding the potential for the Federal Reserve to avoid raising rates this year. The S&P 500 and Nasdaq composite index both recorded gains, with the latter surpassing 1 percent. The Russell 2000, tracking small and medium-sized companies, also saw an increase. U.S. Treasury bonds experienced a surge, with the 10-year Treasury yield dropping to 4.61 percent before rebounding slightly. The Federal Reserve’s next interest rate decision is scheduled for mid-September, with the August inflation report providing further insight into the economic landscape. The debate over inflation and its implications for monetary policy continues to evolve, with differing perspectives among policymakers and market participants shaping the outlook for future actions.

3 reports

Breitbart News logoBreitbart NewsIndependentConservativeFactual 90Objective 8510 days ago
Producer Price Index Shows Zero Inflation in July

Breitbart News reports that the U.S. Producer Price Index (PPI) remained unchanged in July compared to June, according to data released by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. This contrasts with economists' expectations of a 0.2% increase. Energy prices dropped 3.1%, marking two consecutive months of declines, while food prices fell 0.9%, the largest drop in over a year. Excluding food and energy, the PPI rose 0.2% in July, aligning closely with forecasts. Year-over-year, producer prices increased 4.7%, slightly below the expected 4.9%. The report highlights sector-specific changes, including a 1.8% decline in transportation and warehousing prices and a 6.5% surge in portfolio management services. The PPI measures prices paid to U.S. businesses, covering a broader range of transactions than the Consumer Price Index.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the PPI data in a manner that emphasizes lower-than-expected inflation, potentially supporting arguments against current economic policies. While the data itself is presented objectively, the emphasis on 'zero inflation' and the comparison to economist forecasts suggests a right-傾

Why factuality (90): Article 1 provides detailed data from the BLS, including specific percentages for different sectors and comparisons to forecasts. It accurately represents the PPI figures and includes multiple time frames (monthly and annual) as well as sectoral breakdowns, showing a high level of factual consistenc

Why objectivity (85): Article 1 maintains a neutral tone, presenting the data objectively while also noting that the results were better than expected. It avoids taking sides or using emotionally charged language, though it does highlight the positive outcome relative to forecasts, which might subtly influence interpreta

Quartz logoQuartzIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 8010 days ago
Wholesale inflation up 4.7% over the past year, BLS says

The Producer Price Index for final demand remained unchanged on a monthly basis, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). This stability was attributed to a decline in energy prices counterbalancing an increase in service costs. The annual wholesale inflation rate rose by 4.7% over the past year, indicating continued upward pressure on pricing across certain sectors. Energy price movements played a significant role in shaping the overall trend, while service sector inflation persisted despite the monthly flat reading.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual economic data without overt ideological framing. It reports on inflation trends based on official statistics from the BLS, maintaining neutrality in its presentation of the data. There is no clear emphasis on specific political agendas or partisan interpretations of the

Why factuality (85): Article 0 reports wholesale inflation at 4.7% annual increase, matching the BLS data cited. It provides monthly changes and sector-specific details like energy and services, aligning with standard economic reporting. While it doesn't include all the detailed breakdowns present in Article 1, it accur

Why objectivity (80): Article 0 presents information in a straightforward manner, focusing on the data without overtly emotional language. However, it slightly emphasizes the annual figure over the monthly change, which may suggest a more narrative approach rather than pure neutrality.

RealClearPolitics logoRealClearPoliticsIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 6013 days ago
'A Burrito Shouldn't Cost $20'

The article discusses a debate among Republicans regarding the rising cost of food, specifically highlighting a $20 burrito as an example of increasing prices. Some Republicans argue that Americans need to accept higher food costs, while others suggest this reflects a misunderstanding of American economic realities. The piece frames the discussion around differing perspectives on inflation and consumer affordability within the U.S.

Bias read (Progressive): The article presents a critical perspective toward Republican views on inflation, implying that their stance reflects a lack of understanding of American consumers' experiences. This framing suggests a left-leaning interpretation by emphasizing the potential disconnect between policymakers and the民众

Why factuality (85): The article references a real-world issue of high food prices and mentions Republicans discussing the cost of a burrito. While no primary source is available, the claim aligns with broader discussions about inflation and rising food costs. The article does not provide specific data or quotes from pr

Why objectivity (60): The article takes a partisan stance by attributing the issue to 'Republicans' and using emotionally charged language like 'they don't understand America.' This frames the discussion as a political disagreement rather than an objective analysis, reducing its objectivity.

🎬 Videos from this story (1)

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories