ON
← Back to feed
The first anti-war party appeared in Russia, and its ratings began to soar.
Croatia🏛️ PoliticsLean Progressive6 days ago

The first anti-war party appeared in Russia, and its ratings began to soar.

Jabloko, jedina stranka u Rusiji koja se protivi ratu u Ukrajini, bila je zabranjena da nastupa na parlamentarnim izborima nakon što je Vrhovni sud Rusije prihvatio tužbu podnesenu strankom Rodina. Tužba navodi financijske prekršaje, kršenje autorskih prava i 'znakove ekstremizma', iako nema dokaza o plaćanju stranih agenata. Sud je izbio Jabloko s izborne liste, a odluka još nije stupila na snagu. Stranka je izazvala žalbu, ali vjeruje da nemaju šanse. Rejting odobravanja Jabloka je rastao, što bi moglo pomoći u ulasku u parlament, ali su članovi stranke proglašeni 'stranim agentima' i zatvoreni. Odluka je pokazala dalju kontrolu vlasti nad političkim protivnicima.

A new anti-war political party has emerged in Russia, gaining significant public support before being swiftly banned from participating in parliamentary elections. The party, known as Yabloko, was the only registered federal-level group openly opposing Russia's war in Ukraine. Within days of its rise, the Russian Supreme Court accepted a lawsuit filed by the Rodina party, leading to Yabloko’s removal from the electoral roll ahead of upcoming parliamentary elections. The court action was initiated by Aleksey Zhuravlev, leader of Rodina, who accused Yabloko of financial violations, copyright infringement, and displaying signs of extremism. According to the ruling, Yabloko used a quote from the song "Let There Always Be Sunshine," along with the phrase "If only there were no war," without obtaining permission from the rights holders. Additionally, the court cited the use of an image generated by ChatGPT on Yabloko’s website as a violation of OpenAI’s copyrights. Another issue raised was the use of a still from Sergei Bondarchuk’s 1967 film "War and Peace," which the court deemed a breach of rights held by Mosfilm. The lawsuit also claimed that Yabloko had significantly increased its informational activities, including on platforms associated with foreign agents, though Yabloko’s leader, Grigory Yavlinsky, denied these allegations. No evidence of such payments was presented in the legal documents. Judge Vyacheslav Kirilov accepted the case and ruled against Yabloko, removing it from the election list. Kirilov previously declared Memorial, a human rights organization awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, as an extremist entity, enabling authorities to target individuals supporting its work. The court’s decision has not yet taken effect, and Yabloko plans to appeal, although they acknowledge their chances are slim given the Kremlin’s stance against opposition groups. Last time Yabloko entered the State Duma was during the 1999 campaign, securing 5.93 percent of the vote. In the 2021 parliamentary elections, the party received just 1.34 percent. According to a survey by a socio-research center cited by the newspaper Nezavisimaya Gazeta, Yabloko’s approval rating reached 9.38 percent by late July, indicating it would have secured representation in parliament. As a result, the Russian regime recently began labeling prominent members of Yabloko as “foreign agents,” stripping them of voting rights. Several key figures have been targeted, including Lev Shlosberg, who was listed in a registry of terrorists and extremists and is currently in custody on charges of spreading false information about the military. Maxim Kruglov was sentenced to seven years in prison in June under similar accusations. Yuriy Rybakov could soon face similar treatment after stating among Yabloko’s main goals the preservation of human lives and moving the world away from the brink of nuclear war. He emphasized that peaceful resolution of the conflict in Ukraine should follow as soon as possible. Irina Kopykina, deputy head of Yabloko in Moscow, concluded her speech thanking middle school students and university attendees who supported the party in court with the words: "For peace and freedom!" Julia Navalnaya, wife of the deceased opposition leader Alexei Navalny, and other exiled Russian dissidents urged Russians to support Yabloko, but the party instructed them not to interfere, citing concerns over increased threats to its members. Rodina expressed satisfaction with the Supreme Court’s decision to disqualify Yabloko from the parliamentary elections, according to RIA Novosti. Zhuravlev also criticized Yabloko, accusing it of undermining national unity.

Go to the primary sources (1)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

2 reports

Index.hr logoIndex.hrIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 706 days ago
A Russian dissident who criticized the war in Ukraine has been sentenced to 11 years in prison

Lev Šlosberg, zamjenik predsjednika ruske liberalne stranke Jabloko, osuđen je na 11 godina i mjesec dana zatvora u kaznenoj koloniji zbog kritiziranja rata u Ukrajini. Optužen je za diskreditaciju vojske i širenje lažnih informacija o njoj. Tijekom suđenja, Šlosberg je rekao da je nevin i da je žrtva političkog procesa, ponovivši poziv na prekid rata. Presuda je donesena kratko nakon što je Vrhovni sud Rusije zabranio stranci Jabloko sudjelovanje na parlamentarnim izborima.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about a legal case involving a Russian opposition politician who criticized the war in Ukraine. It does not exhibit clear bias through loaded language, one-sided sourcing, or omission of context. The framing remains neutral, focusing on the legal proceedings,

Why factuality (85): The article reports that Lev Shlosberg, deputy chairman of the Russian Liberal Party Yabloko, was sentenced to 11 years in prison for criticizing Russia's war in Ukraine. It cites Reuters as the source and mentions the charges of discrediting the military and spreading false information. The sentenc

Why objectivity (70): The article presents the sentencing as a political process and refers to Shlosberg as a 'victim,' suggesting a potential bias toward his perspective. While it remains within the bounds of reporting, the language implies some level of sympathy for the defendant, which may affect perceived neutrality.

Jutarnji list logoJutarnji listIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 6011 days ago
The first anti-war party appeared in Russia, and its ratings began to soar.

Jabloko, jedina stranka u Rusiji koja se protivi ratu u Ukrajini, bila je zabranjena da nastupa na parlamentarnim izborima nakon što je Vrhovni sud Rusije prihvatio tužbu podnesenu strankom Rodina. Tužba navodi financijske prekršaje, kršenje autorskih prava i 'znakove ekstremizma', iako nema dokaza o plaćanju stranih agenata. Sud je izbio Jabloko s izborne liste, a odluka još nije stupila na snagu. Stranka je izazvala žalbu, ali vjeruje da nemaju šanse. Rejting odobravanja Jabloka je rastao, što bi moglo pomoći u ulasku u parlament, ali su članovi stranke proglašeni 'stranim agentima' i zatvoreni. Odluka je pokazala dalju kontrolu vlasti nad političkim protivnicima.

Bias read (Progressive): Članak analizira kako ruski režim koristi sudsku sistematsku kontrolu da ograniči političke protivnike, posebno one koji se protive ratu u Ukrajini. Kritički se obrađuje proces odbijanja Jabloka, sa naglaskom na političku manipulaciju, cenzuru i ograničenje slobode izražavanja. Iako se ne izričito k

Why factuality (85): The article reports on the Russian Supreme Court ruling to remove the anti-war party Yabloko from the parliamentary ballot list, citing financial violations, copyright infringements, and 'extremist signs'. It references specific legal actions by the Rodina party and details the court's reasoning, in

Why objectivity (60): The tone is critical of the Russian government's actions, using terms like 'Putinov režim' and highlighting the court's role in suppressing dissent. The article presents the court's decision as an example of state control over political expression, suggesting a biased perspective towards the Russian

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories