ON
← Back to feed
They rebuilt the HZZO and HZMO building in Požega. It's amazing what a mistake they made.
Croatia🏛️ PoliticsLean Progressive7 days ago

They rebuilt the HZZO and HZMO building in Požega. It's amazing what a mistake they made.

In Požega, Croatia, the renovation of the building housing the Croatian Pension Insurance Agency (HZMO) and the Croatian Health Insurance Agency (HZZO) has removed existing accessibility features for people with disabilities. The old entrance had a ramp allowing access for individuals using wheelchairs or with mobility issues, but this was replaced with stairs during the renovation. No alternative accessible solution has been provided, leaving those who rely on such access unable to enter the building independently. Local residents are questioning how such a critical infrastructure change could occur without ensuring continued accessibility, especially since these institutions serve a large portion of the population, including elderly citizens and people with various forms of disabilities. The community is demanding answers from the relevant authorities regarding when the issue will be resolved and whether accessible entry will be restored.

In Požega, two municipal buildings housing the Croatian Health Insurance Institute (HZMO) and the Croatian Pension Insurance Institute (HZZO) have undergone renovation, yet the result has sparked concern among residents and disability advocates. The renovated entrance, once accessible to individuals with mobility impairments, has been replaced by stairs, effectively removing access for wheelchair users and others who rely on ramps. This change was made during the recent refurbishment of the building, which had previously featured a ramp allowing easier entry for those with limited mobility. The issue came to light through photographs taken before and after the renovation, revealing the removal of the existing ramp. These images show how the old entrance allowed for easy access, while the new setup leaves only steps. The absence of alternative solutions for those who previously used the ramp has left many frustrated. Residents, particularly those who depend on accessible entrances, have raised questions about the decision-making process and the lack of alternatives. The affected buildings serve as public institutions providing essential services to a wide range of citizens, including older adults and individuals with disabilities. As such, they should exemplify accessibility standards and equal access to public services. However, the current situation highlights a clear gap between policy and practice. Many are questioning how such a critical piece of infrastructure could be removed without ensuring proper replacements. Residents are demanding answers from the relevant authorities regarding when the issue will be resolved and whether access will be restored. Without these assurances, those who rely on the accessible entrance continue to face barriers. The situation reflects broader challenges in maintaining accessibility in public spaces, especially in areas where renovations occur without adequate planning or consultation. Meanwhile, the HZZO continues its operations, recently announcing plans for the payment of the national allowance for elderly individuals. Starting on August 17, 2026, the allowance will be distributed to approximately 19,445 recipients, totaling over three million euros from the state budget. The allowance amounts to 160.22 euros per month, aimed at supporting elderly citizens who meet specific eligibility criteria. These include age requirements, residency conditions, and income limits, all designed to ensure the benefit reaches those in need. This financial support underscores the importance of accessible services for the elderly, yet the recent changes in Požega highlight a contradiction. While the government provides assistance to seniors, the physical barriers created by the renovation underscore the ongoing struggle for inclusive design in public infrastructure. Additionally, efforts are underway to improve accessibility nationwide, with a public call for proposals to install elevators in multi-family and commercial buildings. Over 16,800 buildings in Croatia lack elevators, significantly impacting the quality of life for disabled individuals, the elderly, and parents with young children. The program aims to address this gap by offering partial funding from both the state and local municipalities. In Zagreb alone, nearly 6,672 buildings lack elevators, with even more in other major cities. The National Association for Elevator Technology (HUDiZ) estimates that around 10,000 of these buildings could potentially accommodate elevators. Despite these figures, the challenge remains substantial, requiring careful planning and investment. While some progress has been made, the case in Požega serves as a reminder of the complexities involved in retrofitting public spaces for inclusivity. It illustrates the need for greater oversight and accountability in urban development projects, particularly those involving public institutions. As the debate over accessibility continues, the focus remains on ensuring that all citizens can navigate their communities safely and independently.

Go to the primary sources (3)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

3 reports

Jutarnji list logoJutarnji listIndependentProgressiveFactual 98Objective 9510 days ago
They rebuilt the HZZO and HZMO building in Požega. It's amazing what a mistake they made.

In Požega, Croatia, the renovation of the building housing the Croatian Pension Insurance Agency (HZMO) and the Croatian Health Insurance Agency (HZZO) has removed existing accessibility features for people with disabilities. The old entrance had a ramp allowing access for individuals using wheelchairs or with mobility issues, but this was replaced with stairs during the renovation. No alternative accessible solution has been provided, leaving those who rely on such access unable to enter the building independently. Local residents are questioning how such a critical infrastructure change could occur without ensuring continued accessibility, especially since these institutions serve a large portion of the population, including elderly citizens and people with various forms of disabilities. The community is demanding answers from the relevant authorities regarding when the issue will be resolved and whether accessible entry will be restored.

Bias read (Progressive): The article highlights a failure in public infrastructure related to accessibility standards, which is a core issue in social equity and public policy. It criticizes the lack of consideration for disabled individuals and questions the decision-making process by public institutions, implying a lackof

Why factuality (98): The article accurately reports the removal of the accessible ramp during renovations at the HZMO and HZZO building in Požega, citing the primary source document. It includes direct quotes from the original text and correctly summarizes the situation, including the lack of an alternative solution and

Why objectivity (95): The article maintains a largely neutral tone, presenting facts and quoting the original source without overt bias. However, phrases like 'nevjerojatno je kakav su propust napravili' suggest mild criticism, but this does not significantly affect overall neutrality.

N1 Hrvatska logoN1 HrvatskaIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 9211 days ago
Good news for nearly 20,000 users, the payout is coming soon.

The Croatian Pension Insurance Agency (HZMO) announced that nearly 20,000 individuals will soon receive a national pension supplement for elderly citizens starting on August 17, 2026. This payment amounts to €160.22 per month and is funded by the state budget. The eligibility criteria include being at least 65 years old, having lived in Croatia continuously for ten years prior to applying, and meeting additional conditions such as not receiving a pension or social security benefits, and having household income below twice the monthly supplement amount. Applications can be submitted in person, by mail, or through the e-Government system.

Bias read (Center): The article provides factual information about a government-funded program, outlining eligibility criteria and funding sources without apparent ideological framing or biased language. It presents the policy objectively, focusing on procedural details rather than taking a stance on the policy itself.

Why factuality (95): The article provides specific details such as the start date of the payment (17. kolovoza 2026), the amount of the allowance (160.22 euros), and eligibility criteria including age (65 years) and residency requirements. These facts align with what would be expected from an official announcement by HZ

Why objectivity (92): The tone is neutral and informative, presenting the information objectively without apparent bias. It avoids emotional language and focuses on factual details like dates, amounts, and legal conditions. However, the headline 'Dobre vijesti za gotovo 20.000 korisnika' ('Good news for almost 20,000 use

N1 Hrvatska logoN1 HrvatskaIndependentCenterFactual 50Objective 607 days ago
The contest for the installation of elevators is coming to an end.

The Croatian government has launched a public call for applications to subsidize the installation of elevators and accessibility devices in existing multi-family and residential-commercial buildings. The initiative aims to improve access for people with mobility issues, elderly individuals, and parents with young children. According to data from the Croatian Elevator Association (HUDiZ), over 16,800 buildings across Croatia lack elevators, with the majority located in Zagreb. The state will cover one-third of the total cost, while local governments like Zagreb will contribute half, leaving only 16.7% of the costs to be borne by property owners. This program follows new legislation passed last year allowing for elevator installations in existing buildings with state and local government funding.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about a government-funded infrastructure initiative aimed at improving accessibility. It includes quotes from an association representing building owners and references both national and municipal policies. There is no overtly biased language, and the tone is

Why factuality (50): The article discusses a national program for installing elevators and mentions statistics from HUDiZ about the number of buildings without elevators in Croatia. However, it does not mention the specific incident in Požeški.hr where accessible infrastructure was removed. It focuses on broader issues

Why objectivity (60): The tone is informative and reports on policy and statistics, but there is some emphasis on the challenges faced by people with disabilities, which could be seen as slightly sympathetic. The article remains largely neutral in its reporting.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories