ON
← Back to feed
TV channels can now run more than 12 minutes of ads under new rules
India🏛️ PoliticsCenter9 days ago

TV channels can now run more than 12 minutes of ads under new rules

India's government has removed the 12-minute limit on television advertisements, a regulation introduced in 2006 when the television market was smaller and less diverse. The change aims to promote fair competition and ease of doing business in the broadcasting sector, according to the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting. The new rules will take effect once formally published in the official gazette. Over the past 20 years, the Indian TV industry has grown significantly, expanding from 62 channels in 2006 to over 900 today, driven by digitization and the rise of DTH, HITS, and IPTV services. The previous rule, known as the '10+2' format, allowed 10 minutes of commercials and 2 minutes of self-promotion per hour. The decision follows a Delhi High Court ruling in May that upheld the 12-minute cap, but the government argues that the restriction is no longer needed due to evolving media consumption habits and the need to level the playing field with digital platforms.

India’s government has removed the longstanding 12-minute cap on television advertisements, a move aimed at fostering fair competition and easing the operational burden on broadcasters. The decision, announced on August 14, 2026, marks a significant shift in the regulatory framework governing the television industry. The Information & Broadcasting Ministry stated that the change would allow both free-to-air and pay channels to air uninterrupted blocks of advertising, removing a restriction that had been in place since 2006. The revised rules will take effect once formally notified in the official Gazette, according to the ministry. The 12-minute cap was originally established under the Cable Television Networks Rules, 1994, during a time when the Indian television market was vastly different. At that point, there were only 62 TV channels in operation, compared to over 900 today. The early 2000s saw a television landscape dominated by analog cable networks, which had limited capacity and offered minimal choice to consumers. The introduction of the cap was intended to prevent excessive commercial interruptions and protect the viewer experience, particularly during prime-time programming. Over the past two decades, the television sector has undergone dramatic transformation. The complete digitization of cable television and the rise of Direct-to-Home (DTH), High-speed Internet-based Television (HITS), and Internet Protocol Television (IPTV) platforms have significantly expanded the number of available channels. Today, these platforms offer hundreds of options to viewers, catering to diverse tastes and preferences. As a result, the government argued that the market has evolved beyond the constraints of the original regulations, necessitating a review of the advertising rules. The Information & Broadcasting Ministry emphasized that the current television ecosystem is characterized by robust competition, not just among traditional TV channels but also with digital media platforms. Unlike conventional television, digital media does not impose limits on the amount of advertising that can be aired, creating an uneven playing field. By lifting the cap, the government aims to level this field and provide broadcasters with greater flexibility in their operations. The decision follows a legal challenge that reached the Delhi High Court earlier in the year. In May 2026, the court upheld the validity of the 12-minute advertising limit, dismissing petitions from broadcasters who sought its removal. However, the government proceeded with its plan, citing changing market conditions and the need to align regulations with contemporary realities. The original framework, often referred to as the “10+2” rule, permitted up to 12 minutes of advertising per hour, comprising 10 minutes of commercial spots and 2 minutes of self-promotion. Over the years, industry stakeholders debated the effectiveness of this model. The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) had previously expressed concerns about the impact of prolonged ad breaks on the viewer experience, receiving complaints about repetitive commercials and program interruptions. Despite these concerns, the government concluded that the restriction was no longer necessary in light of the transformed media landscape. Industry groups had proposed alternative solutions prior to the government’s final decision. The Indian Society of Advertisers had advocated for a 25% advertising limit, while the Advertising Agencies Association of India supported a market-driven approach. Broadcasters, however, consistently lobbied for the complete removal of the statutory ceiling, arguing that it hindered their ability to compete effectively in an evolving marketplace. With the new rules in place, television channels are expected to adapt quickly to the changed environment. Advertisers and broadcasters alike will likely reassess their strategies to maximize the potential of extended ad slots. The move reflects broader efforts by the government to modernize regulations and support industries navigating rapid technological advancements.

2 reports

Hindustan Times logoHindustan TimesIndependentCenterFactual 87Objective 899 days ago
TV channels can now run more than 12 minutes of ads under new rules

India's government has removed the 12-minute limit on television advertisements, a regulation introduced in 2006 when the television market was smaller and less diverse. The change aims to promote fair competition and ease of doing business in the broadcasting sector, according to the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting. The new rules will take effect once formally published in the official gazette. Over the past 20 years, the Indian TV industry has grown significantly, expanding from 62 channels in 2006 to over 900 today, driven by digitization and the rise of DTH, HITS, and IPTV services. The previous rule, known as the '10+2' format, allowed 10 minutes of commercials and 2 minutes of self-promotion per hour. The decision follows a Delhi High Court ruling in May that upheld the 12-minute cap, but the government argues that the restriction is no longer needed due to evolving media consumption habits and the need to level the playing field with digital platforms.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the government's decision to remove the ad limit as a move to promote fair competition and ease of doing business, citing the growth of the TV industry and the need to align with changing media landscapes. It includes both the government's rationale and mentions opposition from播

Why factuality (87): The article confirms the removal of the 12-minute ad cap, references the 2006 origin of the rule, and mentions the growth of the TV market to over 900 channels. It includes details about the transition to digital platforms and the impact on competition, consistent with the cross-source consensus.

Why objectivity (89): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting the government's stance and supporting facts without injecting personal opinion or emotional language. It frames the policy change as a response to market evolution rather than taking sides.

The Hindu logoThe HinduIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 889 days ago
Government removes 12-minute ad duration cap for TV channels

The Indian government announced on August 14, 2026, that it would remove the 12-minute daily advertisement duration cap for television channels. This change, effective from the date of publication in the Gazette, aims to promote fair competition and ease of doing business by aligning traditional TV with digital media, which lacks such restrictions. The cap was originally introduced in 2006 under the Cable Television Networks Rules, 1994, when there were only 62 TV channels. With over 900 channels now available through digital platforms like DTH, Cable TV, HITS, and IPTV, the ministry argues that the market has evolved significantly, necessitating regulatory updates.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the government's decision as a regulatory update based on market evolution and competition concerns. It cites official statements from the Information & Broadcasting Ministry without overtly praising or criticizing the policy. While the removal of the cap could be seen as favori

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the government's decision to remove the 12-minute ad cap, citing the 2006 introduction under the Cable Television Networks Rules, 1994. It provides historical context about the number of TV channels and the shift from analog to digital platforms. While it does not incl

Why objectivity (88): The article presents the government's reasoning and background without overt bias, using neutral language. It avoids emotionally charged terms and focuses on factual explanations of the policy change and its implications.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories