ON
← Back to feed
Trump’s DOJ gains oversight of OpenAI’s green-card employee sponsorships
United States🏛️ PoliticsCenter2 days ago

Trump’s DOJ gains oversight of OpenAI’s green-card employee sponsorships

The U.S. Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division has reached a settlement with OpenAI and its former subsidiary, Statsig, requiring three years of oversight of their hiring practices. The DOJ alleges that both companies violated the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) by failing to prioritize qualified U.S. citizens for certain roles before seeking permanent residency (PERM) for immigrant employees. As part of the agreement, OpenAI and Statsig agreed to pay a total of $3.2 million, $1.2 million as a fine and $2 million for potential restitution to affected U.S. citizens. The settlement mandates that the companies submit detailed reports on their hiring processes, including how many U.S. applicants were considered versus foreign candidates. The investigation into OpenAI and Statsig began prior to OpenAI’s acquisition of Statsig in 2025, and the DOJ noted that similar settlements have occurred under previous administrations involving other major technology firms like Facebook and Apple.

OpenAI has agreed to pay $3.2 million to resolve allegations brought by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) that it favored foreign workers over American applicants in certain job placements. The settlement comes after the DOJ accused OpenAI and its former subsidiary, Statsig, of violating immigration laws by discouraging U.S. citizens from applying for positions covered under the Permanent Employment-Based Visa Program, known as PERM. The agreement was reached following an investigation that spanned several years and included multiple instances of alleged misconduct. The DOJ's Civil Rights Division announced the resolution on Wednesday, revealing that the companies had agreed to a three-year oversight period during which they will be monitored for compliance with federal hiring regulations. Under the terms of the settlement, OpenAI and Statsig must pay a $1.2 million fine and allocate $2 million toward potential restitution for affected U.S. citizens. The restitution fund will be used to compensate individuals who may have been unfairly disadvantaged by the companies' alleged actions. While neither company admitted to wrongdoing, they accepted responsibility for adhering to the legal requirements surrounding the sponsorship of permanent resident visas. According to the DOJ, the companies engaged in practices that allegedly violated the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). These included failing to publicly post job openings on standard job boards, advertising during hours when few Americans might be available to apply, and requiring paper-based applications instead of digital submissions. The DOJ argued that these strategies effectively limited access to job opportunities for U.S. citizens, thereby undermining the intent of the INA, which mandates that employers seek qualified domestic candidates before pursuing visa sponsorship. The case involves two entities, OpenAI and Statsig, though the latter was previously a separate company before being acquired by OpenAI in September 2025. At least part of Statsig was later sold back to its original owners in May 2026. Despite this change in ownership, the DOJ initiated its investigation into both companies independently, beginning in August 2025. The agency cited five separate incidents involving OpenAI between 2023 and 2025, along with one incident related to Statsig. This settlement marks another step in the DOJ’s broader enforcement efforts regarding employment-related immigration issues. The INA, enacted in 1952, has historically been used to hold large technology firms accountable for non-compliance. For example, during the Biden administration, both Facebook and Apple faced similar settlements, though those cases involved more extensive and systemic violations. The current case, while smaller in scale, reflects a continued focus on ensuring fair access to employment opportunities for U.S. citizens. Under the oversight conditions outlined in the settlement, OpenAI and Statsig will be required to draft and obtain approval for their PERM-related hiring policies. They will also need to submit detailed semiannual reports containing data on the number of applications submitted for foreign employees, the number of U.S. citizens interviewed, and other relevant metrics. These measures aim to ensure transparency and adherence to federal labor standards.

Go to the primary sources (6)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

2 reports

Quartz logoQuartzIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 902 days ago
OpenAI agreed to pay $3.2 million to settle DOJ claims it favored foreign workers

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) alleges that OpenAI and its subsidiary Statsig discriminated against American workers by discouraging them from applying for positions covered by the PERM program. The DOJ claims these actions violated labor laws designed to protect domestic workers in the hiring process. As part of a settlement, OpenAI has agreed to pay $3.2 million to resolve the claims. The case highlights concerns about corporate practices affecting employment opportunities for U.S. citizens in technology sectors.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual allegations from the DOJ without overtly endorsing or criticizing the agency's stance. It reports on a legal settlement without taking a clear ideological position, maintaining neutrality in its framing of the issue.

Why factuality (95): The article accurately summarizes the core facts: the $3.2 million settlement, the allegations of discrimination against U.S. workers, and the involvement of the PERM program. It does not introduce any incorrect details or omit key points from the primary source.

Why objectivity (90): The article presents the information in a neutral manner, avoiding strong language or opinionated statements. It focuses on the facts without editorializing or taking sides, maintaining a balanced tone throughout.

TechCrunch logoTechCrunchIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 752 days ago
Trump’s DOJ gains oversight of OpenAI’s green-card employee sponsorships

The U.S. Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division has reached a settlement with OpenAI and its former subsidiary, Statsig, requiring three years of oversight of their hiring practices. The DOJ alleges that both companies violated the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) by failing to prioritize qualified U.S. citizens for certain roles before seeking permanent residency (PERM) for immigrant employees. As part of the agreement, OpenAI and Statsig agreed to pay a total of $3.2 million, $1.2 million as a fine and $2 million for potential restitution to affected U.S. citizens. The settlement mandates that the companies submit detailed reports on their hiring processes, including how many U.S. applicants were considered versus foreign candidates. The investigation into OpenAI and Statsig began prior to OpenAI’s acquisition of Statsig in 2025, and the DOJ noted that similar settlements have occurred under previous administrations involving other major technology firms like Facebook and Apple.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the facts of the settlement and allegations made by the DOJ without overtly favoring either side. It provides background on the legal framework (Immigration and Nationality Act), mentions past similar settlements with other corporations, and notes that the companies involved did

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the $3.2 million settlement, the involvement of OpenAI and Statsig, and the allegations of discrimination under the INA. It mentions the PERM program and the specific actions taken by OpenAI, such as not listing roles publicly and using paper applications. However, it

Why objectivity (75): The article uses phrases like 'Trump’s DOJ' which could imply political bias, though it is not explicitly biased. It frames the situation as 'oversight' and mentions that the companies 'did not admit to wrongdoing,' which adds nuance but slightly leans toward presenting the companies as non-admittin

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories