ON
← Back to feed
Trump just ordered the first US military execution by firing squad since 1945 – here’s why
United Kingdom🏛️ PoliticsLean Conservative2 hr. ago

Trump just ordered the first US military execution by firing squad since 1945 – here’s why

President Donald Trump has authorized the first U.S. military execution by firing squad since 1945, ordering the death of convicted murderer Nidal Hasan. Hasan, a former Army major, carried out a deadly shooting at Fort Hood in 2009, killing 13 and wounding 32. Despite admitting his actions were motivated by jihad, he was convicted of murder and sentenced to death by lethal injection. After exhausting all legal appeals, Trump's approval was sought for a firing squad execution, part of a broader effort to resume military executions. This decision follows controversy surrounding the botched lethal injection execution of Christa Pike and reflects ongoing debates over the U.S. death penalty. The execution, if carried out, would mark a significant shift in military justice policy.

3 reports

Daily Mail logoDaily MailIndependentConservative2 hr. ago
Trump approves military firing squad for 'jihadist' Army sergeant major who massacred 13 at Fort Hood

The article discusses the case of Nidal Hasan, an Army sergeant major convicted of murdering 13 people during a 2009 shooting at Fort Hood. Hasan claimed his actions were motivated by anger over being deployed to Iraq and a desire to protect Islamic leaders from U.S. troops. The article mentions that President Donald Trump approved a military firing squad for Hasan, who was sentenced to death.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the approval of a military firing squad by Trump as a decisive action, emphasizing the severity of Hasan's crime and aligning with conservative narratives that support capital punishment for terrorism-related offenses. The focus on Trump's direct involvement suggests a right-wing,

iNews logoiNewsIndependentConservative3 hr. ago
Trump just ordered the first US military execution by firing squad since 1945 – here’s why

President Donald Trump has authorized the first U.S. military execution by firing squad since 1945, ordering the death of convicted murderer Nidal Hasan. Hasan, a former Army major, carried out a deadly shooting at Fort Hood in 2009, killing 13 and wounding 32. Despite admitting his actions were motivated by jihad, he was convicted of murder and sentenced to death by lethal injection. After exhausting all legal appeals, Trump's approval was sought for a firing squad execution, part of a broader effort to resume military executions. This decision follows controversy surrounding the botched lethal injection execution of Christa Pike and reflects ongoing debates over the U.S. death penalty. The execution, if carried out, would mark a significant shift in military justice policy.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the execution as a necessary step toward 'justice' and emphasizes the rarity of such actions under previous administrations. It highlights Trump's role in approving the execution, suggesting a strong alignment with conservative values regarding capital punishment. The tone leans右翼

BBC News (World) logoBBC News (World)State / PublicCenter4 hr. ago
Fort Hood shooter to be executed by firing squad, in first since World War Two

The article reports that Nidal Malik Hasan, a U.S. Army psychiatrist convicted of killing 13 people in the 2009 Fort Hood shooting, is set to be executed by firing squad. This marks the first military execution in the United States since 1961 and the first execution by firing squad since the end of World War II. The report focuses on the historical significance of the event rather than providing detailed background on Hasan or the legal proceedings.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about the execution without overtly endorsing or opposing the action. It emphasizes the historical context rather than taking a moral or ideological stance. There is no clear leaning toward either progressive or conservative viewpoints, making the framing of

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories