ON
← Back to feed
Court sets jail terms and billions in fines for Colombian doctors convicted of fake license network
CL🏛️ PoliticsCenter8/31/2026

Court sets jail terms and billions in fines for Colombian doctors convicted of fake license network

The 7th Oral Criminal Court in Santiago announced details of its 308-volume sentence against 17 individuals convicted in a trial related to the fraudulent issuance and sale of ideological medical licenses. The defendants, including Samir Enrique Rivaldo Hernández and others, were sentenced to prison terms and fines totaling millions of pesos for creating fake medical centers to issue over 50,000 fraudulent licenses between 2020 and 2022, causing significant harm to the public health system. These actions affected users of Fonasa, Chile’s public healthcare system, and generated losses exceeding 25 billion pesos. Some of the accused operated under the structure known as 'Mititem,' linked to Rivaldo Hernández’s practice. Additional penalties included fines and prison time for fraud, false medical licenses, illegal association, and money laundering. Several of the convicts received substitute sentences involving monitored freedom.

Seventeen individuals were sentenced Monday by Chile’s Seventh Oral Criminal Court in Santiago for their roles in a large-scale fraud scheme involving false medical licenses issued to users of Fonasa, the country's public health insurance system. The convictions, detailed in a 308-volume judgment, include penalties ranging from prison terms to fines totaling millions of pesos. Among the convicted was Samir Enrique Rivaldo Hernández, who received a combined sentence of more than 10 years for repeated fraud charges, including issuing fake medical licenses and money laundering. The court found that the defendants created multiple front medical centers to issue over 50,000 fraudulent licenses between 2020 and December 2022, causing damage exceeding 25 billion pesos to Fonasa. These licenses allowed individuals to access healthcare services they were not entitled to, undermining the integrity of the public health system. Additionally, approximately 10,000 false licenses were issued for users of private health insurers known as isapres. The investigation revealed that the majority of the accused operated under a structure referred to as “Mititem,” named after Rivaldo Hernández’s clinic, Doctor Mitite. This network facilitated the systematic production and distribution of forged medical documents, which were used to defraud both public and private healthcare systems. Yessica María Donado Álvarez, another key figure in the case, was fined 1.573 million pesos and received more than 15 years in prison for her involvement. All the convicted individuals were given the option to pay their fines in 12 installments, with time spent in preventive detention counted toward their sentences. Six of the convicts were granted substitute sentences of intensive supervised freedom instead of incarceration. These included Nancy Marianela Verdeja Felipes, Javiera Nicole Verdeja Felipes, Marcelo Alberto Olivares López, José Luis Araya Barraza, Miguel Ángel López Hidalgo, and Luis Alberto Jeria Hermosilla. The court also ruled that the defendants must compensate the state nearly 26 billion pesos through a civil claim brought by the Council for the Defense of the State. The tribunal emphasized that its sentencing decisions were based not only on strict legal frameworks but also on the need to reinforce the rule of law against a criminal phenomenon of unprecedented scale in the country. The trial began on July 15, 2025, and faced a procedural hurdle when Judge Alejandra García voluntarily recused herself upon learning she was one of 56 judges facing potential expulsion from the judiciary for traveling abroad using a health permit. The proceedings continued under the jurisdiction of Judges José Pérez and Grace Díaz. Prosecutors from the Metropolitan Oriental Prosecutor’s Office presented evidence showing how foreign professionals involved in the case established these front clinics to produce and distribute the fraudulent licenses. The court noted that the financial losses caused by these actions directly affected the quality, coverage, and sufficiency of healthcare services available to all citizens enrolled in the national health system. The ruling highlights the sophisticated organization behind the fraud, which spanned several years and involved multiple layers of illegal activity, including the formation of an illicit association, repeated fraud, and money laundering. The court expressed concern over the potential recurrence of such crimes and stressed the importance of imposing sanctions proportionate to the severity, duration, organizational complexity, and societal harm caused by the offenses. The convicted individuals, many of whom were medical professionals, will now face the consequences of their actions, including serving their prison sentences and paying substantial fines. Their cases serve as a warning to others considering similar fraudulent activities within the healthcare sector.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 2 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

2 reports

La Tercera logoLa TerceraIndependent🔒CenterFactual 85Objective 758/31/2026
Court sets jail terms and billions in fines for Colombian doctors convicted of fake license network

The 7th Oral Criminal Court in Santiago announced details of its 308-volume sentence against 17 individuals convicted in a trial related to the fraudulent issuance and sale of ideological medical licenses. The defendants, including Samir Enrique Rivaldo Hernández and others, were sentenced to prison terms and fines totaling millions of pesos for creating fake medical centers to issue over 50,000 fraudulent licenses between 2020 and 2022, causing significant harm to the public health system. These actions affected users of Fonasa, Chile’s public healthcare system, and generated losses exceeding 25 billion pesos. Some of the accused operated under the structure known as 'Mititem,' linked to Rivaldo Hernández’s practice. Additional penalties included fines and prison time for fraud, false medical licenses, illegal association, and money laundering. Several of the convicts received substitute sentences involving monitored freedom.

Bias read (Center): The article reports on legal proceedings involving criminal convictions and financial penalties related to fraud within the public healthcare system. It presents factual information about the court's decision, the charges, and the consequences without overtly favoring any political side. The framing

Why factuality (85): The article provides detailed information about a court case involving 17 Colombian doctors convicted for issuing fake medical licenses, including specific names, penalties, and the scale of the fraud. It mentions the involvement of foreign professionals, the creation of fake clinics, and the financ

Why objectivity (75): The article presents the facts in a straightforward manner but uses emotionally charged language such as 'megafraude' and emphasizes the severity of the penalties. The mention of judges voluntarily recusing themselves adds a layer of procedural complexity, but the overall tone remains focused on the

BioBioChile logoBioBioChileIndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 708/31/2026
17 accused convicted of megafraud to Fonasa: penalties of leader and couple add up to more than 37 years in prison

Seventeen individuals were sentenced for a large-scale fraud against Fonasa, Chile's national health service. The leader of the group and their partner received combined prison terms exceeding 37 years. This case highlights significant corruption within the healthcare system and has drawn attention to the vulnerabilities in public services. The convictions indicate a legal response to organized fraud targeting state resources. The outcome reflects the severity of the crime and the judicial action taken against those involved.

Bias read (Center): The article reports on a legal conviction related to fraud against a public institution, presenting factual information without apparent ideological framing. It does not exhibit clear bias toward any political side, focusing on the legal outcome rather than political implications.

Why factuality (80): This article summarizes the conviction of 17 individuals involved in a large-scale fraud against Fonasa, mentioning the total prison sentence for the leader and his partner. It confirms the scale of the fraud (over 50,000 fake licenses) and the financial loss. While less detailed than the first arti

Why objectivity (70): The headline and content emphasize the severity of the punishment ('más de 37 años de cárcel') which can be seen as more sensationalist. The lack of contextual background or explanation of the legal process suggests a more summary-style approach, potentially prioritizing impact over neutrality.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories