ON
← Back to feed
This company’s plans to deploy space mirrors could jeopardize the night sky for many
United States🏛️ PoliticsCenter3 days ago

This company’s plans to deploy space mirrors could jeopardize the night sky for many

A US-based company named Reflect Orbital plans to launch a test satellite called Eärendil-1 later this year, which will extend a large mirror in orbit to reflect sunlight to Earth on demand. The company aims to use this technology for applications such as extending daylight for solar panels, emergency response, and military operations. However, a recent study led by astronomers Miroslav Kocifaj and colleagues warns that the deployment of these satellites could significantly alter the night sky. Their research suggests that a single satellite could appear 40 times brighter than the full moon, and 400 satellites could create a light equivalent to 10,000 full moons within a five-kilometer radius. This level of brightness could disrupt astronomical observations and affect the nighttime environment far beyond the intended target areas. Astronomers like Olivier Hainaut support the findings, noting that similar effects have been modeled before. Reflect Orbital CEO Ben Nowack disputes the study's conclusions, arguing some assumptions are inaccurate.

A US-based company, Reflect Orbital, is planning to deploy a network of large space mirrors designed to reflect sunlight onto Earth, potentially altering the night sky in ways that could harm astronomical observations and disrupt natural darkness. According to a recent study, the deployment of these mirrors could cause widespread illumination, making the night sky significantly brighter than intended. Reflect Orbital aims to launch a test satellite named Eärendil-1 later this year. This satellite will extend an 18-by-18-meter mirror in orbit, serving as a prototype for future satellites that measure 54 by 54 meters. These larger satellites are intended to reflect sunlight to Earth on demand, with applications ranging from extending daylight hours for solar panel charging to aiding emergency responses and military operations. The project has drawn criticism from astronomers and environmental groups. The Federal Communications Commission approved the launch in July, but some experts argue that the plan poses serious risks. Samantha Lawler, an astronomer at the University of Regina in Canada, stated that the initiative is incompatible with astronomy and threatens the preservation of dark skies. A team led by Miroslav Kocifaj, an astronomer at the Slovak Academy of Sciences, conducted research on the potential effects of the reflected light. Their findings, published in a paper accepted for publication in the Astrophysical Journal Letters, indicate that a single Reflect Orbital satellite could appear 40 times brighter than the full moon within its intended target area, a circular patch five kilometers across. Even at distances up to 14 kilometers from the center, the satellite would remain as bright as the full moon. When considering the cumulative effect of 400 satellites, the study suggests that the combined light would be equivalent to 10,000 full moons within the five-kilometer area, or approximately 2.4% as bright as the sun. The brightness would extend up to 80 kilometers away, creating a noticeable glow above the horizon. This means the night sky could be affected by far more people than those directly within the targeted area. Olivier Hainaut, an astronomer at the European Southern Observatory, acknowledged the significance of the findings. He noted that while the results were not entirely unexpected, the detailed modeling provided valuable insights. Hainaut had previously estimated that the reflected light could brighten the sky up to 300% globally, and this new study offers a more comprehensive understanding of the issue. Reflect Orbital CEO Ben Nowack has expressed disagreement with the study's conclusions. He argues that some of the assumptions made by Kocifaj’s team are inaccurate. Nowack emphasized that the company has implemented safeguards, including exclusion zones, to mitigate scattering of light. He claimed that Reflect Orbital has engaged with scientific concerns and incorporated feedback into its technological and operational strategies. However, Kocifaj pointed out that the company has not provided supporting data for its claims. He stated that while Reflect Orbital mentions safeguards and acknowledges scattering, it has not shared specific numerical data, model descriptions, or assumptions. Without such information, Kocifaj asserts that meaningful technical engagement is not possible, as the study’s calculations offer concrete figures. Reflect Orbial plans to position its satellites in highly inclined orbits, spanning nearly from pole to pole. This positioning allows the satellites to reflect sunlight during twilight hours, effectively extending daylight in selected regions. The company’s vision includes using this technology to enhance energy production, support emergency services, and aid military operations through extended visibility.

Go to the primary sources (6)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

1 reports

MIT Technology Review logoMIT Technology ReviewIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 703 days ago
This company’s plans to deploy space mirrors could jeopardize the night sky for many

A US-based company named Reflect Orbital plans to launch a test satellite called Eärendil-1 later this year, which will extend a large mirror in orbit to reflect sunlight to Earth on demand. The company aims to use this technology for applications such as extending daylight for solar panels, emergency response, and military operations. However, a recent study led by astronomers Miroslav Kocifaj and colleagues warns that the deployment of these satellites could significantly alter the night sky. Their research suggests that a single satellite could appear 40 times brighter than the full moon, and 400 satellites could create a light equivalent to 10,000 full moons within a five-kilometer radius. This level of brightness could disrupt astronomical observations and affect the nighttime environment far beyond the intended target areas. Astronomers like Olivier Hainaut support the findings, noting that similar effects have been modeled before. Reflect Orbital CEO Ben Nowack disputes the study's conclusions, arguing some assumptions are inaccurate.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both scientific concerns raised by astronomers and the company's defense of its project. While the issue of light pollution and its impact on astronomy is a significant concern, the article does not clearly favor one side over the other. It includes perspectives from both the研究者

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the FCC's approval of Reflect Orbital's Eärendil-1 satellite and aligns with the primary source document. It mentions the satellite's purpose, size, and planned launch timeline. However, it does not mention the FCC's conclusion that impacts on astronomy are outside its

Why objectivity (70): The article presents the criticisms from astronomers and environmentalists but frames them as 'disbelief' rather than providing a balanced perspective. It also emphasizes the potential negative impact on the night sky without presenting counterarguments from Reflect Orbital.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories