ON
← Back to feed
Criteria: Disapproval of President Kast reaches 55% and approval remains at 35%
CL🏛️ PoliticsLean Progressive7 days ago

Criteria: Disapproval of President Kast reaches 55% and approval remains at 35%

The latest survey by Criteria indicates that disapproval of Chilean President José Antonio Kast has risen to 55%, while approval remains at 35%. The percentage of respondents who do not know their stance decreased from 13% to 10%. The survey highlights concerns over security policies, with safety being the top priority among citizens, followed by public health, employment, and economic recovery. When asked to choose between security and freedom, 73% prioritized security over freedom. Political affiliation influences these views, with left-leaning individuals showing more balanced opinions compared to center and right-leaning groups. Evaluation of the government’s performance in security and migration management continues to show negative trends, with most respondents believing the administration has underperformed expectations.

The approval rating of Chile’s President José Antonio Kast has remained stagnant at 35%, while his disapproval rate has climbed to 55% according to the latest survey conducted by Criteria. This marks a three-point increase in disapproval compared to the previous week. The percentage of respondents who answered “No sé” (don’t know) dropped from 13% to 10%. The survey highlights growing public dissatisfaction with the administration's handling of key issues, particularly security. Public concerns have centered around the government’s approach to crime reduction. Security was identified as the most pressing issue, with 28% of respondents citing it as their top priority. Health care followed with 16%, employment and wages with 15%, and economic recovery with 12%. When asked to choose between security and freedom, 73% prioritized security over personal freedoms, with 27% favoring individual liberties. Political alignment influenced these responses, with left-leaning voters showing more balanced views, 51% choosing security and 49% preferring freedom, while right-wing supporters overwhelmingly favored security, reaching 86%. Despite the high level of concern, evaluations of the government’s performance in security remain largely negative. A majority of 54% believe the administration has performed worse than expected in addressing crime and maintaining order. Only 19% think the government has done better than anticipated, while 27% feel there has been no significant change. Similar trends were observed in assessments of migration management, with 47% indicating the government’s efforts have fallen short of expectations. When asked to assign responsibility for current security challenges, 35% attributed the situation primarily to problems inherited from the previous administration, 32% saw it as a combination of factors, and 27% blamed the current government directly. Political affiliation played a role in these perceptions, with right-wing respondents more likely to blame past administrations, while left-wing supporters pointed more frequently to the current leadership. In terms of policy direction, the majority of respondents, 61%, believe the government should focus on securing legislative approval for new laws and expanded powers to combat organized crime and general crime. A smaller group, 30%, emphasized the need to fully implement existing legislation, while 9% had no clear stance. Public support for specific measures, such as increasing penalties for recruiting minors into criminal activities and classifying membership in organized groups as a crime, also showed varying levels of acceptance. Meanwhile, internal communication within the executive branch has come under scrutiny. The evaluation of Claudio Alvarado, the Minister of the Interior and Secretary General of Government, continues to decline. His approval rating fell to 43%, down from 53% in June, with 41% of respondents expressing negative opinions about his capabilities. Alvarado’s main challenge remains effective communication of government decisions, which still garners 40% of respondent attention. However, this figure slightly decreased from July’s 42%. Communication issues have persisted throughout Kast’s presidency, beginning with the controversial use of the term “State in bankruptcy,” followed by missteps by former minister Mara Sedini during the early months of the year. These problems culminated in recent coordination failures between Alvarado and Jorge Quiroz, the Minister of Finance. Quiroz, despite ongoing criticism, saw a slight improvement in his evaluation, rising from 35% to 39% approval. Negative assessments of him declined from 58% to 52%. According to Camilo Feres, director of Descifra, although both ministers face generally negative evaluations, Quiroz shows signs of stabilization and potential improvement, whereas Alvarado faces continued challenges due to perceived neglect by other cabinet members during recent discussions regarding legal reforms. Quiroz remains the most mentioned minister in media and social platforms, with over two million references since July 8th, driven by his advocacy for the megareform and increased government borrowing limits. His influence appears to be growing, with a 10-point increase in relevant mentions compared to July. Alvarado, meanwhile, has gained more visibility, ranking third in online mentions with nearly nine hundred thousand references, though his ability to shape the agenda remains questionable.

4 reports

La Tercera logoLa TerceraIndependent🔒ProgressiveFactual 95Objective 907 days ago
Criteria: Disapproval of President Kast reaches 55% and approval remains at 35%

The latest survey by Criteria indicates that disapproval of Chilean President José Antonio Kast has risen to 55%, while approval remains at 35%. The percentage of respondents who do not know their stance decreased from 13% to 10%. The survey highlights concerns over security policies, with safety being the top priority among citizens, followed by public health, employment, and economic recovery. When asked to choose between security and freedom, 73% prioritized security over freedom. Political affiliation influences these views, with left-leaning individuals showing more balanced opinions compared to center and right-leaning groups. Evaluation of the government’s performance in security and migration management continues to show negative trends, with most respondents believing the administration has underperformed expectations.

Bias read (Progressive): The article presents data showing growing disapproval of President Kast, which aligns with left-leaning perspectives. While the report is factual, the emphasis on citizen dissatisfaction and the framing of security priorities as a major concern reflect a narrative that could be interpreted as favori

Why factuality (95): This article accurately reflects the same survey results as the first article, providing detailed breakdowns of public opinion and contextual information about security priorities. It aligns closely with the cross-source consensus and presents the data objectively.

Why objectivity (90): The article maintains a neutral tone throughout, discussing the survey findings and public concerns without introducing personal opinions or emotional language. The structure is informative and balanced.

BioBioChile logoBioBioChileIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 807 days ago
Criteria poll: approval of President Kast is stagnating at 35% and disapproval is climbing to 55%

A recent survey by Criteria indicates that President José Antonio Kast's approval rating has stagnated at 35%, while his disapproval rate has increased to 55%. The survey highlights growing dissatisfaction among Chileans with the current administration's policies and leadership. This marks a significant shift in public sentiment, reflecting concerns over economic management, social issues, and governance effectiveness. The findings suggest that Kast faces increasing pressure to address these challenges and improve his standing with the electorate.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual data from a survey without overtly positive or negative language. It reports the numerical changes in approval and disapproval rates without taking sides or emphasizing particular viewpoints. The framing remains neutral, focusing solely on the statistical outcome of the民

Why factuality (85): The article reports the approval and disapproval percentages of President Kast from the Criteria survey, matching the cross-source consensus. It provides the exact numbers without additional interpretation, maintaining consistency with other sources.

Why objectivity (80): The tone remains neutral, presenting the data without emotional language or bias. However, there is slight emphasis on the 'stagnation' of approval and the 'escalation' of disapproval, which may subtly frame the narrative.

La Tercera logoLa TerceraIndependent🔒CenterFactual 75Objective 608 days ago
The security agenda

The article discusses President Sebastian Kast's security agenda, which includes transferring high-risk inmates to a new prison in Talca and launching the 'Cancerbero' operation. The move was broadcast live and supported by government officials, though the opposition criticized it as a media spectacle. The piece contrasts the conservative approach, emphasizing individual responsibility and proportional punishment, with the leftist view that societal failure contributes to crime. It notes that while the security issue has real dimensions, there is also a subjective perception component. The author argues that Kast's policies align with public expectations and that the opposition should accept them since they reflect voter preferences.

Bias read (Center): While the article presents both conservative and leftist perspectives on criminal justice, it does not clearly favor one side over the other. Instead, it frames the debate as a reflection of public opinion and suggests that the opposition should accept Kast's policies because they align with voter意愿

Why factuality (75): The article provides a general overview of President Kast's security agenda, including the 'cancerbero' operation and constitutional reforms. It references political criticism from both sides but lacks specific data or official documents to verify claims. The cross-source consensus suggests these ev

Why objectivity (60): The article presents a somewhat balanced view of differing political perspectives but uses emotionally charged language such as 'show mediático' and frames the debate in a way that leans toward the author's perspective. The conclusion is left open-ended, but the overall tone suggests a preference fo

BioBioChile logoBioBioChileIndependentCenterFactual 65Objective 707 days ago
Criteria: 54% believe that the government's security management has been worse than expected

A survey conducted by Criteria indicates that 54% of respondents believe the Chilean government's handling of security has been worse than expected. This perception suggests a significant level of dissatisfaction among the population regarding current safety measures and policies. The findings highlight concerns over public safety and the effectiveness of governmental strategies in addressing crime and security issues. Such feedback could influence future policy decisions and public trust in authorities.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a survey result without explicit endorsement or criticism of the government's actions. It reports the percentage of people who feel the security management has been worse than expected but does not frame this information with clear bias towards either side. The neutrality of the

Why factuality (65): The article reports a survey result indicating that 54% of respondents believe the government's security management has been worse than expected. Since no primary source is available, factuality is judged based on consistency with cross-source reporting. The claim appears to align with similar surve

Why objectivity (70): The article presents the survey findings in a straightforward manner without overt bias or emotional language. It focuses on the statistical outcome rather than interpreting the implications, maintaining a relatively neutral tone. There is no clear editorializing or attempt to frame the issue in a p

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories