Tesla says it will start selling Cybercabs by end of year
Tesla announced during its third-quarter earnings call that it intends to begin selling its autonomous Cybercab to customers by the end of the year, despite an ongoing investigation by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration regarding vehicle safety standards. Vice President of Engineering Lars Moravy stated that current production units are being allocated to Tesla's internal robotaxi fleet, with sales to external customers planned to start slowly and scale based on operational learning. CEO Elon Musk clarified that the Cybercab is designed primarily as a transport-as-a-service vehicle rather than a personal asset, distinguishing it from models intended for private ownership. Additionally, Musk indicated that an unsupervised version of the Full Self-Driving software will be released to existing Tesla owners in the second quarter of next year, which implies that third-party fleets may access autonomous capabilities via the Cybercab before individual owners receive similar features in their current vehicles.
Tesla stated on Wednesday that it intends to begin selling its autonomous Cybercab vehicles to customers by the end of 2026, despite an ongoing federal investigation into the vehicle’s compliance with safety standards. During the company’s third-quarter earnings call, Lars Moravy, vice president of vehicle engineering, confirmed that while current production units are being allocated exclusively to Tesla’s internal robotaxi fleet, the company plans to transition to direct consumer sales soon. Moravy explained that Tesla will initially release these vehicles in small numbers to gather data on delivery logistics, ownership experiences, and fleet management before scaling up distribution. The Cybercab is a gold-colored, two-seat vehicle designed specifically for ride-hailing services. It lacks a steering wheel, brake pedals, and traditional mirrors, relying instead on automated systems and camera-based perception. Elon Musk, Tesla’s CEO, described the vehicle as primarily a "transport as a service" offering rather than a personal asset. He noted that the vast majority of Cybercabs would likely remain owned by Tesla, distinguishing them from conventional models like the Model 3, Model Y, and the upcoming Roadster, which are intended for private ownership. This announcement follows recent developments in Austin, Texas, where Tesla launched a limited pilot program allowing members of the public to book paid rides in the autonomous vehicles. The rollout occurred shortly after Tesla hosted a promotional event for the car earlier this month. However, the deployment faced immediate regulatory scrutiny. Hours after the vehicles began operating on public streets, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) announced it had opened an investigation. The agency is examining the technical data and processes Tesla used to self-certify the Cybercab under Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS). Existing federal regulations mandate manual controls such as brake pedals and specific mirror configurations for passenger vehicles. These rules were established decades ago for human-driven cars and currently do not explicitly accommodate vehicles designed without human intervention. While the Department of Transportation has proposed amendments to remove these requirements for fully autonomous vehicles, those changes have not yet been finalized. Consequently, current standards remain in effect. NHTSA stated it is reviewing the basis of Tesla’s certification and determining which specific standards the company deemed inapplicable. Tesla has until October 30 to respond to the agency’s inquiry. The outcome of this probe could determine whether Tesla, or any other manufacturer, can legally operate vehicles lacking manual controls on public roads. In addition to the Cybercab update, Tesla disclosed that it has begun production of its Optimus humanoid robot at its Fremont, California, factory. The manufacturing space previously dedicated to electric vehicle assembly is now producing the robots. Tesla described the initial output as "production-quality," indicating that the current manufacturing process is suitable for commercial products, although further iteration on hardware and design is planned. Musk characterized this phase as "early production," warning that the ramp-up would be slow and somewhat bumpy due to the novelty of the product. He cited the need to ensure the robots are safe, reliable, and durable enough for long-term use, noting that significant work remains regarding the artificial intelligence required for open-ended tasks. Despite these challenges, Musk projected that Tesla could manufacture 20,000 Optimus units per week by the end of 2027. Financial results for the third quarter reflected the heavy investment in these new technologies. Tesla reported total revenue of $28.04 billion, slightly below the $28.09 billion recorded in the same period last year and down approximately $200 million from the previous quarter. Electric vehicle sales remained flat year-over-year at $20 billion, with deliveries totaling 486,532 vehicles. This figure represented a modest increase of about 6,000 units compared to the prior quarter but was lower than deliveries in the same period of the previous year. Revenue from the solar and energy storage division fell 16 percent year-over-year to $2.8 billion, a decline attributed to tariff-related customer refunds. Conversely, the services segment, which includes subscriptions to the Full Self-Driving software, grew 33 percent to $4.6 billion, generating a record gross profit of $734 million for the quarter. Despite stable revenue, Tesla’s net income dropped sharply. The company reported $787 million in net income, a 43 percent decrease from the $1.37 billion earned in the same period last year. Executives attributed the profit decline to soaring expenses associated with artificial intelligence research, the Optimus robot program, and autonomous driving development. Reduced sales of regulatory credits also contributed to the pressure on profitability. Regarding the broader autonomous driving roadmap, Tesla executives indicated that an unsupervised version of the Full Self-Driving software, designated as Level 4 autonomy, is expected to roll out to customers in the second quarter of next year. Ashok Elluswamy, vice president of AI software, stated that this update would enable privately owned Teslas to join the robotaxi fleet. This timeline represents another delay, as Musk had suggested in April that the unsupervised version might arrive in the fourth quarter of this year. Currently, Tesla owners can subscribe to the supervised version of the software, which automates many driving tasks but requires the driver to remain attentive and ready to intervene. Investors reacted cautiously to the earnings report. Tesla shares declined following the call, partly because Musk offered no new details regarding potential synergies with SpaceX, a topic of significant interest among shareholders. The market response highlighted continued uncertainty surrounding the execution of Tesla’s pivot toward becoming an AI and robotics company, a strategic shift that has defined much of the company’s recent operational focus.
Go to the primary sources (1)
The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.
Tesla announced during its third-quarter earnings call that it intends to begin selling its autonomous Cybercab to customers by the end of the year, despite an ongoing investigation by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration regarding vehicle safety standards. Vice President of Engineering Lars Moravy stated that current production units are being allocated to Tesla's internal robotaxi fleet, with sales to external customers planned to start slowly and scale based on operational learning. CEO Elon Musk clarified that the Cybercab is designed primarily as a transport-as-a-service vehicle rather than a personal asset, distinguishing it from models intended for private ownership. Additionally, Musk indicated that an unsupervised version of the Full Self-Driving software will be released to existing Tesla owners in the second quarter of next year, which implies that third-party fleets may access autonomous capabilities via the Cybercab before individual owners receive similar features in their current vehicles.
Bias read (Center): The article focuses on corporate strategy, product timelines, and regulatory compliance within the automotive industry. While it mentions a federal agency investigation, the tone remains factual and descriptive, presenting executive statements and technical details without employing loaded language,
Why factuality (95): Accurately reports the core announcement from the Q3 earnings call regarding the timeline for selling Cybercabs. Correctly identifies the speaker (Lars Moravy) and quotes his statements about the initial focus on the robotaxi fleet before customer deliveries. The context regarding the shift from FSD
Why objectivity (90): Maintains a neutral, journalistic tone. Presents the regulatory investigation and the technical limitations of the vehicle (no steering wheel) as facts rather than criticisms. Avoids speculative language about the feasibility of the timeline.
TechCrunchIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 9012 hr. ago
Tesla has begun producing its Optimus humanoid robot at its Fremont, California facility, marking a shift from vehicle manufacturing to robotics. The company stated in its shareholder letter that these are the first production-quality units, though CEO Elon Musk described the initial phase as early and potentially bumpy due to the novelty of the product. Despite optimistic projections of reaching 20,000 weekly units by late 2027, Tesla reported a 43% drop in third-quarter net income to $787 million. Revenue remained nearly flat at $28.04 billion, with electric vehicle sales holding steady while the solar and energy storage division declined 16% due to tariff-related refunds. Increased expenditures on artificial intelligence and robotics significantly reduced overall profitability compared to the previous year.
Bias read (Center): The article focuses primarily on corporate financial performance and product milestones within the technology sector. While it mentions tariffs as a factor in revenue decline, the core narrative remains centered on business metrics, manufacturing progress, and executive strategy rather than partisan
Why factuality (95): Highly accurate representation of the Optimus production announcement and financial results. Correctly cites the shareholder letter and Musk's specific quotes regarding 'early production' and the 2027 target. Financial figures (revenue, profit drop) match standard reporting on the event.
Why objectivity (90): Balanced presentation of both the positive milestone (robot production) and the negative financial impact (profit drop). Uses neutral language to describe the 'muddying' of results due to heavy investment, avoiding judgment on whether the strategy is good or bad.
MarketWatchIndependentCenterFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 709 hr. ago
Tesla shares declined after CEO Elon Musk failed to provide new information regarding a potential merger with SpaceX during a recent investor interaction. The lack of updates on this specific corporate development was identified as the primary factor behind the stock drop. Investors remain focused on the possibility of combining the two companies, but Musk offered no further details or commitments on Wednesday.
Bias read (Center): The article focuses strictly on market reaction and corporate strategy rather than political ideology or partisan conflict. While Elon Musk has significant political influence, the text treats his silence on the SpaceX merger as a financial event affecting share price, using neutral terminology like
Why factuality: no official source document/info detected
Why objectivity (70): Uses slightly sensationalist phrasing ('leaves investors wanting more'). While reporting on market reaction, the framing emphasizes disappointment and lack of substance, which introduces a mild negative bias compared to a purely factual report of the earnings call content.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.