United StatesOwnership & classification
Founded: 1997
Ownership
MarketWatch launched on 30 October 1997 as a joint venture between Data Broadcasting Corporation and CBS (originally CBS MarketWatch). Dow Jones & Company acquired it in January 2005 for about $528 million. Dow Jones, and therefore MarketWatch, has been owned since 2007 by Rupert Murdoch's News Corp, sitting alongside The Wall Street Journal and Barron's.
Funding
MarketWatch is funded by advertising and digital subscriptions and is integrated into News Corp's Dow Jones financial-news business. It receives no state or party funding.
Affiliation & stance
MarketWatch is a commercial financial-news site owned by Dow Jones / News Corp, a publicly traded company controlled by the Murdoch family. It has no party or government control and maintains a market-focused, broadly centrist editorial profile, so it is INDEPENDENT (privately/commercially owned).
Editorial lean
- Our estimate
- Center
- Measured from coverage
- Centerbased on 148
73/100
Factual
71/100
Objective
279
Articles
279
reports
Top stories
Most covered right now
CNN: Why the future of oil prices will depend on China
FTC gives Musk the OK to acquire SpaceX alumni startup Mesh
Key measure of inflation climbed in May as surging oil prices pushed costs higher
Gas cost calculator: How much have higher gas prices cost you?
Some states want to regulate prediction markets. Should the feds let them?
Oil rises minimally amid new tensions in the Middle East and delayed deliveries through the Strait of Hormuz.
Comcast plans to split into two public companies by spinning of NBCUniversal and Sky
Fox enters new era with Roku deal
Takeaways from Supreme Court term: Trump's power is enhanced, but he lost some high-profile cases
Recent coverage
Google lost its final E.U. appeal over a €4.1 billion Android antitrust fine
The European Union's top court has ruled in favor of maintaining a €4.1 billion antitrust fine against Google, which was initially imposed in 2018 for anti-competitive practices related to its Android operating system. The decision marks the conclusion of Google's final appeal against the fine, which was based on allegations that Google engaged in behavior that restricted competition in the mobile device market. The ruling reinforces the EU's stance on holding major technology companies accountable for anti-competitive conduct. This case highlights ongoing regulatory scrutiny of tech giants by international authorities.
Marvell Technology stock surges after landing a spot in the S&P 500
Marvell Technology, an AI chipmaker, is set to be included in the S&P 500 index starting June 22 as part of a quarterly rebalancing. The inclusion comes alongside another electronics manufacturer, Flex, which is also being added to the index. This change reflects the companies' growing influence in the technology sector and their performance relative to other firms. The S&P 500 is a widely followed benchmark index that tracks the stocks of 500 large companies based in the United States.
Big Tech is all in on AI. Now all they need is customers.
This article discusses growing investor concerns about the sustainability of Big Tech's massive investments in artificial intelligence. The Nasdaq Composite Index has dropped nearly 5% as Wall Street questions whether the trillions of dollars spent on AI infrastructure will yield sufficient returns. Goldman Sachs estimates tech companies will invest $7.6 trillion through 2031 to build new data centers, but recent data suggests limited consumer and business willingness to pay for AI services. Experts like Kate Brennan from AI Now highlight skepticism about AI's promised benefits, noting that while usage is increasing, public perception remains largely negative, with 40% of Americans believing AI will harm society over the next two decades. Additionally, companies are laying off workers while investing in AI, raising concerns about job impacts. A Gartner study warns that replacing human workers with AI often fails to deliver expected returns.
Three things to watch amid Anthropic’s latest feud with the government
Anthropic, an AI company based in the United States, developed an advanced AI model called Mythos, which demonstrated exceptional capabilities in handling code. Concerned about potential cybersecurity risks, Anthropic shared limited access with cybersecurity experts before releasing a modified version called Fable to the public. However, the U.S. government quickly intervened, citing national security concerns and imposing export restrictions on Fable. Anthropic subsequently revoked access to both models. This incident has sparked discussions about the broader implications of AI regulation, with some arguing that the government's response was overly reactive rather than well-planned. Additionally, the event has raised questions about the reliability of American AI companies, prompting European leaders to consider accelerating their own AI development efforts. Meanwhile, open-source AI models from China have gained attention due to their affordability and accessibility, potentially influencing global AI strategies.
Crypto Don Is the President MAGA Always Wanted
This article discusses Donald Trump's significant financial gains from cryptocurrency-related ventures, highlighting a $635 million royalty from a Celebration Coins license and over $300 million from World Liberty Financial token sales. The piece frames these earnings as controversial, noting that many investors lost substantial amounts while Trump's supporters benefited. It connects Trump's financial dealings to his political persona, suggesting that his wealth and business acumen have been central to his appeal. The article references past claims about Trump's tax practices and his portrayal of himself as a successful businessman who can navigate and exploit legal loopholes. It also mentions a Reuters investigation indicating that Trump's crypto ventures operate under a model where the family licenses its name and collects revenue while external investors face losses.
Born in the U.S.A.: Protecting the right of birthright citizenship
The article discusses the legal concept of birthright citizenship in the United States, as outlined in the 14th Amendment to the Constitution. It states that anyone born in the U.S., except for children of diplomats or invading forces, is automatically a citizen. Professor Amanda Frost explains that the wording of the amendment leaves little room for interpretation. However, public opinion remains split, with roughly half of Americans supporting granting citizenship to children of undocumented immigrants and the other half opposing it. In January 2025, former President Donald Trump issued an executive order attempting to reinterpret the 14th Amendment to exclude most children of undocumented immigrants from automatic citizenship, but this was blocked by a lower court and is currently under review by the Supreme Court. The article references historical cases such as Dred Scott v. Sandford, where the Supreme Court ruled that Black individuals could not be citizens, leading to the creation of the 14th Amendment. Another landmark case, Wong Kim Ark v. United States, affirmed birthright citizenship for those born in the U.S., including children of immigrants.
U.S. stocks have delivered 8.7% a year since independence was declared in 1776
The article discusses the historical performance of U.S. stocks over the past 250 years since the Declaration of Independence in 1776. It highlights that the average annual return for American stock market investors has been approximately 8.7%. The piece likely explores how this long-term growth reflects broader economic trends, investment patterns, and the evolution of financial markets in the United States. It may also touch upon factors contributing to sustained returns, such as innovation, corporate growth, and macroeconomic policies. The analysis aims to provide perspective on the enduring strength of the U.S. economy through the lens of stock market performance.
‘She wants him gone’: My friend took in a homeless man as a caretaker. After 10 years, how can she evict him?
The article describes a personal situation where a woman has taken in a homeless man as a caretaker for over 10 years. He resides rent-free and assists her with health-related matters and other responsibilities. The headline highlights the emotional conflict between the woman and the homeless man, suggesting a complex relationship that challenges traditional landlord-tenant dynamics. The piece focuses on the legal and ethical dilemmas surrounding eviction in such circumstances.
Israel and Lebanon sign framework agreement
Israel and Lebanon signed a framework agreement on Friday in Washington, mediated by the Trump administration, marking a diplomatic breakthrough. The agreement aims to end Israel's occupation of southern Lebanon and restore Lebanon's territorial integrity, though implementation remains uncertain due to Hezbollah's continued influence. The framework includes immediate steps like pilot projects where Israeli forces will withdraw from specific areas and Lebanese troops will deploy, with U.S. involvement to ensure these zones are free of Hezbollah. A senior Israeli official emphasized maintaining security until Hezbollah is disarmed, while a Hezbollah-affiliated leader criticized the agreement, warning of potential civil conflict. The agreement comes amid a fragile ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah, with Israel conducting targeted strikes against perceived threats. U.S. officials, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio, praised the agreement as a step toward peace, promising $100 million in aid for Lebanon.
I’m a CPA and tell my clients to claim Social Security early. Am I giving them bad advice?
A certified public accountant (CPA) advises their clients to claim Social Security benefits early, which has sparked debate over whether this is sound financial advice. The CPA highlights that most individuals do not wait until age 70 to begin receiving benefits, suggesting that early claiming might be a common strategy among retirees. However, this approach could impact the total lifetime benefits received, as delaying claims typically results in higher monthly payments. The decision to claim early or later depends on various factors such as health, life expectancy, and financial needs. This discussion raises questions about the best strategies for maximizing Social Security benefits.
Why Wall Street thinks US memory maker Micron is the next Nvidia
Micron Technology, a leading U.S.-based memory chip manufacturer, has seen a dramatic surge in its stock value due to increased demand for memory chips driven by the expansion of artificial intelligence infrastructure. Micron's market capitalization temporarily surpassed those of Meta and Tesla, reaching nearly $1.27 trillion, although it later dropped slightly. This growth is attributed to a global shortage of high-bandwidth memory (HBM), essential for AI servers, which has persisted since 2026 and is expected to continue through 2027. Micron's recent financial performance includes a significant increase in revenue and profit, supported by long-term contracts with major players like Nvidia and Anthropic. However, challenges remain, as expanding production capacity is costly and time-intensive, and there is a risk of oversupply if demand decreases.
A week of wild volatility for Korean stocks brought to a rousing finale by reports of Anthropic-Samsung deal
The Korean stock market experienced a week of significant volatility, culminating in a notable surge following reports of a potential partnership between Anthropic and Samsung. Despite delivering a strong 164% return for the year up to 2026, the market has exhibited signs of exhaustion in recent months.
Wait, Trump Made HOW Much Money as President?!
The article discusses the significant increase in Donald Trump's personal income during his first year in office, citing a financial disclosure report showing he earned at least $2.2 billion in 2025—three and a half times his 2024 earnings. This includes substantial gains from cryptocurrency ventures, real estate, and legal settlements. The piece highlights potential conflicts of interest, such as Trump's influence over regulatory decisions affecting his businesses, including exemptions for his cryptocurrency projects and dealings with foreign entities. It contrasts Trump's situation with historical precedents, noting that most modern presidents avoided direct financial benefits while in office, though some had ethical concerns. The article questions whether Trump's actions represent a new level of corruption, particularly given the lack of accountability from a Republican-controlled Congress and his base.
Overlooked
Under-reported & one-sided
Nothing flagged as overlooked yet.