The article discusses comments made by retired judge and CEPRIS member Savo Đurđić regarding the legal qualification 'preparation for the destruction of the constitutional order.' Đurđić claims this term originates from the 'party system of the 90s' and represents 'hostile propaganda,' which is being misused. He warns that the public will increasingly struggle to differentiate between intimidation and the actual dismantling of the constitutional order. The piece includes a call to read more and engage in discussion, but does not provide further elaboration on the legal or political implications.
Bias read (Left): The article frames the legal terminology used by political actors as 'hostile propaganda' and suggests it is being misused to intimidate rather than address legitimate concerns. This implies a critical stance toward certain political practices, aligning with left-leaning perspectives that often view
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 60): The article reports on a statement by retired judge Savo Đurđić regarding the legal qualification 'preparation of destruction of constitutional order' originating from the 'party system of the 90s,' describing it as 'hostile propaganda.' It provides context but lacks independent verification. Factua





