Ilaria Salis: "No to the taser, cause of death". She knows: "Incompetent".
The article discusses a debate over the use of tasers by law enforcement in Italy. EuroMP Ilaria Salis, representing the Avanguardia Sociale (Avs) party, expresses strong opposition to the deployment of tasers, citing data from the Antigone association that indicates the devices have caused severe injuries and deaths in some cases. She argues that true security involves investing in training, prevention, community strengthening, and de-escalation techniques rather than relying on potentially lethal tools. In contrast, Stefano Paoloni, secretary general of the autonomous police union Sap, strongly criticizes Salis' stance as 'incompetent' and 'prejudicial,' claiming that tasers are the safest option available to police forces. He highlights that tasers deter violence in most cases, with only minimal negative outcomes, and stresses the need for constructive proposals from politicians to support law enforcement.
The use of Tasers by Italian law enforcement has seen a significant increase over the past four years, according to a recent report by the Antigone association. The device, which was introduced during the Draghi government in March 2022, initially saw limited deployment in 18 cities before being rolled out nationwide. Since then, its usage has grown substantially, with the proportion of incidents involving actual Taser discharges rising from 40 percent in 2022 to approximately 70 percent in 2025. According to the data compiled by Antigone, the Italian State Police have fired Taser darts more than 1,091 times between March 2022 and February 2026. This dramatic rise in usage raises concerns about the potential health risks associated with the device, particularly given the lack of clear understanding regarding the long-term effects on individuals subjected to its electrical shocks.
The report highlights the uncertainty surrounding the direct causal link between Taser use and fatalities. While seven deaths have been recorded since 2022, only one case has conclusively established a connection between the Taser and the victim's death. Elton Bani, who died in Genova in 2025, was found to have succumbed to a combination of cocaine intoxication and repeated electrical stimulation. Despite this, the report emphasizes the need for further research into the lethal potential of Tasers. It calls for the establishment of a national registry and a scientific commission to assess both the effectiveness and proportionality of using such devices. The president of Antigone, Patrizio Gonnella, notes that even the manufacturer, Axon, has acknowledged uncertainties about the non-lethal nature of the Taser.
Internationally, there is growing concern about the over-reliance on Tasers among police forces, a phenomenon sometimes referred to as the "lazy cop syndrome." In the United States, experts have pointed out that the rapid deployment of Tasers often bypasses more complex de-escalation techniques. Additionally, some officers continue to target high-risk areas such as the chest, despite safety recommendations from manufacturers. These practices raise questions about the training and protocols followed by law enforcement agencies worldwide.
In Italy, the debate around Taser usage has intensified following statements made by Euro-MP Ilaria Salis, who strongly opposes the adoption of Tasers due to their potential lethality. She argues that true security should focus on prevention, community strengthening, and de-escalation techniques rather than increasing the number of potentially lethal tools available to police. Her stance has drawn criticism from Stefano Paoloni, secretary general of the Sap union, who views her comments as uninformed and prejudiced. Paoloni asserts that the Taser is currently the safest tool available to law enforcement, noting that it successfully dissuades violent behavior in most cases without causing harm. He also points out that other tools such as batons and firearms can lead to more severe consequences for individuals being apprehended.
As discussions around the appropriate use of Tasers continue, the need for comprehensive studies and transparent reporting remains critical. The situation underscores the importance of balancing public safety with the protection of individual rights, ensuring that law enforcement strategies are both effective and ethically sound. Future developments will likely depend on ongoing research, policy reviews, and the willingness of stakeholders to engage in constructive dialogue about the role of Tasers in modern policing.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.
The article discusses the increased use of Tasers by Italian law enforcement since their introduction during Prime Minister Mario Draghi's government in March 2022. According to a report by the organization Antigone, the rate of actual Taser discharges has risen from 40% in 2022 to 70% in 2025. The police have used Tasers over 1,091 times between March 2022 and February 2026. However, the health consequences of being struck by a Taser are still unclear.
Bias read (Center): The article presents statistical data without overtly favoring any political side. It reports findings from an independent organization (Antigone) and mentions the increase in Taser usage without explicitly endorsing or criticizing it. The tone remains factual and balanced.
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 65): The article presents data from Antigone regarding the increase in taser usage by police forces over four years, including statistics like 1,091 deployments and a rise in actual deployment rates from 40% to 70%. It acknowledges uncertainty around health consequences but does not provide primary sourc
Il GiornaleParty-alignedConservativeFactual 80Objective 5517 days ago
The article discusses a debate over the use of tasers by law enforcement in Italy. EuroMP Ilaria Salis, representing the Avanguardia Sociale (Avs) party, expresses strong opposition to the deployment of tasers, citing data from the Antigone association that indicates the devices have caused severe injuries and deaths in some cases. She argues that true security involves investing in training, prevention, community strengthening, and de-escalation techniques rather than relying on potentially lethal tools. In contrast, Stefano Paoloni, secretary general of the autonomous police union Sap, strongly criticizes Salis' stance as 'incompetent' and 'prejudicial,' claiming that tasers are the safest option available to police forces. He highlights that tasers deter violence in most cases, with only minimal negative outcomes, and stresses the need for constructive proposals from politicians to support law enforcement.
Bias read (Conservative): The article presents opposing viewpoints on the use of tasers but leans toward the right due to the framing of Salis' arguments as 'miope' (short-sighted) and her alignment with a left-wing party (Avs). The article emphasizes the criticism of Salis' position by a police union representative, which,
Why these scores (Factual 80 · Objective 55): The article reports on a debate between Ilaria Salis and Stefano Paoloni regarding the safety and use of tasers. While it accurately reflects their positions, it lacks neutrality in framing, particularly in labeling Salis’s stance as 'incompetente' and Paoloni’s as authoritative. Factuality is high
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.