ON
← Back to feed
Witness Peter Tóth began to testify again, the judge had to warn Kočner to keep a "stony face"
SK👮 CrimeCenter13 days ago

Witness Peter Tóth began to testify again, the judge had to warn Kočner to keep a "stony face"

At the specialized criminal court in Slovakia, witness Peter Tóth testified about his collaboration with Marian Kočner in discrediting several journalists. He stated that Kočner and Alena Zsuzsová were accomplices in the planned murder of journalist Ján Kuciak and his fiancée Martina Kušnírová. Tóth repeated key statements he made six years ago during the first trial related to the murder case. His testimony was crucial for the investigation, as he provided investigators with Kočner’s mobile phones. The court session lasted over eight hours, and Tóth did not finish his statement. Kočner remained silent throughout much of the hearing, occasionally showing signs of disbelief, while the presiding judge noted a smile on his face at one point.

In a recent development within the ongoing trial concerning the murder of investigative journalist Ján Kuciak and his fiancée Martina Kušnírová, former associate Peter Tóth has provided critical testimony linking Marian Kočner to the crime. The proceedings took place before the Specialized Criminal Court, where Kočner remains the primary defendant accused of ordering the killing. During the hearing, audio recordings of phone calls between Kočner and Tóth were played, revealing their close communication during the investigation into the murder.

The recordings, which spanned several days, highlighted how frequently Kočner contacted Tóth—sometimes as many as seven times a day. These interactions began on September 27, 2018, the very day Tóth decided to cooperate with the police and provide information about the murder. In one call, recorded early in the morning, Kočner reacted with surprise when informed that eight suspects had been arrested in connection with the case. His response was “Fúha,” followed by a question: “Eight?”

These exchanges underscored the relationship between Kočner and Tóth, who had previously worked together on discrediting journalists. Tóth's decision to testify marked a significant shift, as he now directly implicated Kočner and Alena Zsuzsová in the planning of the murder. This testimony came after years of legal battles and investigations, with Tóth having already cooperated with authorities in previous cases involving Kočner’s activities.

During the court session, Tóth reiterated that Kočner and Zsuzsová were accomplices in the murder of Kuciak and Kušnírová. He emphasized that some individuals might refuse to accept the truth because they prefer to maintain their illusions. Tóth's testimony lasted over eight hours, excluding a lunch break, and covered multiple aspects of his collaboration with Kočner, including the motivations behind his suspicions about Kočner's involvement in the murder.

Legal representatives present at the hearing acknowledged the importance of Tóth's testimony. Roman Kvasnica, representing the families of the victims, noted that without Tóth’s cooperation, the investigation into the murder might have remained unsolved. Procurator Peter Kysel also confirmed that Tóth's personal testimony was crucial to the case, highlighting its significance in the ongoing judicial process.

Kočner, who is currently serving a 19-year prison sentence for forging television coupons, and Zsuzsová, sentenced to 21 years for her role in the murder of former mayor László Basternák, both remain incarcerated. Their presence at the trial underscores the gravity of the charges against them. While Kočner appeared composed throughout the proceedings, there were moments when he seemed to react to Tóth’s statements, though his expressions were generally controlled.

As the trial continues, further testimonies and evidence will likely be presented, potentially shedding more light on the circumstances surrounding the murder of Kuciak and Kušnírová. The court's focus remains on establishing the full extent of Kočner’s involvement and ensuring justice for the victims' families. With Tóth’s detailed account providing a new layer of insight, the legal process moves forward toward determining the final verdict in this high-profile case.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

3 reports

Denník N logoDenník NIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 8513 days ago
Kočner called Tóth several times a day from jail.

The article discusses phone calls between Marian Kočner and Peter Tóth during Kočner's imprisonment, which were played in court as part of the investigation into the murder of journalist Ján Kuciak and his fiancée Martina Kušnirová. The calls reveal intense communication between the two men, with Kočner reacting to Tóth's cooperation with police and the arrest of eight suspects linked to the murder. Tóth accused Kočner of being an accomplice in the killing, while Kočner expressed surprise at the number of arrests. These interactions highlight the relationship between the two individuals and their involvement in the case.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information from court proceedings and does not exhibit clear bias in framing or sourcing. It reports on legal evidence and testimonies without overtly favoring any side in the ongoing trial.

Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 85): This article presents detailed information about the phone calls between Kočner and Tóth, including dates, frequency, and their relevance to the investigation. It accurately reports the legal status of both individuals and quotes from the trial. The tone is mostly objective, though slightly leaning

Denník N logoDenník NIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 8014 days ago
Witness Peter Tóth began to testify again, the judge had to warn Kočner to keep a "stony face"

At the specialized criminal court in Slovakia, witness Peter Tóth testified about his collaboration with Marian Kočner in discrediting several journalists. He stated that Kočner and Alena Zsuzsová were accomplices in the planned murder of journalist Ján Kuciak and his fiancée Martina Kušnírová. Tóth repeated key statements he made six years ago during the first trial related to the murder case. His testimony was crucial for the investigation, as he provided investigators with Kočner’s mobile phones. The court session lasted over eight hours, and Tóth did not finish his statement. Kočner remained silent throughout much of the hearing, occasionally showing signs of disbelief, while the presiding judge noted a smile on his face at one point.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of the courtroom proceedings and witness testimony without overtly favoring any side. It includes direct quotes from the witness and mentions reactions from both the defendant and the court, maintaining neutrality in tone and framing.

Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 80): The article includes specific details about Tóth’s testimony, his clothing, and the duration of his statement. It references Nietzsche’s quote and highlights the importance of Tóth as a witness. While factual, it has a slight narrative tone that emphasizes the significance of his testimony.

SME logoSMEIndependentCenterFactual 65Objective 7513 days ago
The hearing of the witness Petr Toth in the case of murder of Jan Kuciak continues in court

The trial related to the murder of journalist Ján Kuciak continues with the testimony of witness Peter Toth. Among those accused present in the courtroom is only Marian Kočner.

Bias read (Center): The article provides a neutral summary of the ongoing legal proceedings involving a high-profile case linked to politics. It does not exhibit clear bias through language, sourcing, or emphasis, merely stating the current status of the trial and who is present.

Why these scores (Factual 65 · Objective 75): The article provides minimal details but mentions the ongoing interrogation of Petr Tóth and notes that only Kočner was present among the accused. It lacks specific facts about the content of the testimony or evidence presented, making it less factual compared to others. The tone is neutral.

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories