On June 16, 2026, the Swedish parliament passed a new law aimed at tightening migration policies by allowing authorities to revoke residency permits based on individuals' behavior. The legislation was approved with a narrow majority—174 votes in favor and 172 against—and marks a significant shift in Sweden's approach to immigration management. This law, which has been dubbed the "good conduct law" by critics, grants officials the power to cancel residency permits for immigrants who engage in certain behaviors deemed unacceptable under the country’s legal framework.
The law applies both prospectively and retroactively, meaning that even those already holding a permit can face revocation if their actions fall under specified categories. These include unpaid debts, failure to pay taxes, involvement in criminal activities, working illegally, or having ties to extremist organizations. However, the exact criteria for what constitutes "bad behavior" remain undefined within the text of the law itself. Instead, the Migration Agency will have the authority to assess whether such behavior exists, using its discretion to determine which cases warrant action. Individuals affected by these decisions will have the right to appeal to a specialized migration court.
This measure is part of a broader effort by Sweden’s current right-leaning government, led by Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson, to tighten immigration controls ahead of parliamentary elections scheduled for September 13. The government, which won the 2022 election on promises to reduce immigration and combat crime, argues that this law is necessary to ensure that only those who comply with societal norms are allowed to reside in the country. According to government representatives, individuals who fail to meet basic expectations—such as paying taxes, avoiding criminal activity, or associating with extremist groups—are not welcome in Sweden.
Critics, however, argue that the law introduces ambiguity into the legal system and risks undermining the principle of equal treatment before the law. Organizations such as Civil Rights Defenders in Stockholm have raised concerns about the lack of clear definitions for what constitutes unacceptable behavior. They question how migrants would know which actions could lead to deportation and emphasize that the law may allow decisions to be made based on subjective interpretations rather than objective legal standards. Some opponents have labeled the law as "authoritarian" and warn that it could lead to discrimination or unfair treatment of immigrants.
In addition to revoking residency permits, the law imposes new obligations on public sector employees. Most workers in government agencies—including tax authorities, employment services, and social welfare offices—are now required to report individuals they suspect of living in Sweden without proper documentation. However, teachers, doctors, and social workers are exempt from this requirement. This provision aims to increase the visibility of undocumented residents among public officials, enabling more efficient enforcement of immigration laws.
According to official statistics from Sweden’s National Council for Crime Prevention, foreign-born individuals and those born abroad to immigrant parents are disproportionately represented among those suspected of committing crimes. In one recent analysis, approximately 51% of all suspects in criminal cases were found to have non-Swedish backgrounds. Moreover, individuals born outside Sweden were estimated to be two-and-a-half times more likely to be arrested for crimes compared to those born to Swedish parents. Violent crimes, theft, sexual offenses, and involvement in organized crime were particularly highlighted in these findings.
The passage of this law comes amid growing pressure on European countries to manage illegal migration more effectively. Similar measures have been implemented in Finland and Germany, where governments have also introduced stricter immigration control policies. In Sweden, the timing of the law coincides with political maneuvering ahead of the upcoming elections. While the ruling party, the Moderate Party, currently holds power, it is supported by the far-right Sweden Democrats, who are not formally part of the coalition but are expected to play a stronger role in shaping policy during the campaign period.
Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson has indicated openness to cooperation with the Sweden Democrats, despite their ideological differences. This potential alliance could further solidify the right-wing bloc’s position against the left-leaning opposition, which includes the Social Democratic Party and other leftist factions. As the debate over immigration continues to dominate national discourse, the implementation of this new law will likely become a focal point for discussions on legality, fairness, and the future direction of Swedish society.
5 reports
DomovinaIndependentRightFactual 95Objective 8516 days agoThe Swedish parliament has passed a law allowing authorities to revoke residency permits from migrants based on 'bad behavior,' such as unpaid debts, working illegally, or ties to extremist organizations. The law, part of the current right-leaning government's efforts to curb illegal migration, also requires public officials to report suspected cases of unauthorized residence. The left opposition criticizes it as an 'outrageous law.' The law applies retroactively and targets individuals with existing residency permits who engage in undesirable conduct.
Bias read (Right): The article frames the new law as part of a broader effort by a right-leaning government to control migration, emphasizing the government's stated goals of reducing immigration and cracking down on crime. The term 'bad behavior' is used without clear definition, which could allow broad discretion in
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 85): The article accurately reports the Swedish parliament passing a law allowing authorities to revoke residency permits based on poor behavior, citing Reuters and mentioning the government's right-wing stance. It includes quotes from both the government and opposition, providing a balanced view.
DeloIndependent🔒RightFactual 93Objective 8818 days agoThe Swedish parliament has passed a law allowing authorities to revoke residency permits for immigrants based on 'bad behavior.' The law does not specify what constitutes inappropriate behavior, but the government mentioned non-payment of debts, taxes, criminal activity, or association with extremist organizations. This law is part of a broader tightening of immigration rules by the right-wing government and its supporting party, the Sweden Democrats, ahead of September parliamentary elections. Critics, including opposition groups and human rights advocates, argue that the law lacks clear界定 of
Bias read (Right): The article frames the new law as part of a broader tightening of immigration rules by the right-wing government and its supporting party, the Sweden Democrats, which aligns with their election strategy. The law allows revoking residency permits based on unspecified 'bad behavior,' which critics say
Why these scores (Factual 93 · Objective 88): This article provides accurate details about the new law, including the lack of specific definitions for 'bad behavior' and mentions criticism from civil rights groups. The tone remains relatively neutral, though it leans slightly toward the government's perspective.
Nova24TVParty-alignedRightFactual 88Objective 8017 days agoSweden has passed new legislation aimed at stricter migration policies. The law allows authorities to revoke residency permits based on migrants' behavior, including unpaid fines, tax evasion, criminal activity, or ties to extremist groups. The Swedish Migration Board will be responsible for reviewing approved permits.
Bias read (Right): The article frames the new legislation as a response to 'mass migrations' and emphasizes the strict measures being taken by a 'right-center government.' It quotes the proponent of the law, Minister Johan Forssell, who states that those who do not behave as expected should not expect to remain in the
Why these scores (Factual 88 · Objective 80): The article accurately describes the law but uses more emotionally charged language such as 'množičnih migracij' and implies a negative view of migrants. It also includes direct quotes from officials but lacks some nuance in presenting opposing viewpoints.
RTV Slovenija (MMC)State / PublicRight17 days agoThe Swedish parliament has passed a law allowing authorities to revoke residency permits from immigrants deemed to be living 'inappropriately' according to their criteria. The law targets individuals who fail to pay taxes, have outstanding debts, work illegally, or have ties to extremist organizations. Critics argue the law lacks clarity and undermines the principle of equal treatment under the law.
Bias read (Right): The article frames the law as targeting immigrants with specific behaviors, using terms like 'neprimerno' (inappropriate) and emphasizing actions such as tax evasion, illegal work, and ties to extremists. It highlights criticism regarding lack of clarity but does not present balanced perspectives or
N1 SlovenijaIndependentRight17 days agoThe Swedish parliament has passed a law allowing authorities to revoke residency permits from immigrants deemed to be living 'unacceptably.' The law targets individuals who do not pay taxes, have outstanding debts, work illegally, or are associated with extremist organizations. Critics argue the law undermines the principle of equality before the law.
Bias read (Right): The article frames the new law as a measure targeting immigrants living 'unacceptably,' using terms like 'extremist organizations' and emphasizing actions such as tax evasion and illegal work. It quotes a right-leaning minister and highlights the law as part of the ruling conservative government's '
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter
Slovenia
