Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie w trzyosobowym składzie zawodowym wydał prawomocną decyzję o tymczasowym aresztowaniu Zbigniewa Ziobry, byłego ministra sprawiedliwości. Decyzja ta została ogłoszona 1 lipca 2026 roku, po godzinie 19. Sąd odmówił zażaleniom obrońców, którzy próbowali odroczyć postępowanie lub zmienić decyzję sądu rejonowego z lutego 2026 roku, w której zastosowano areszt wobec Ziobry. Nowa decyzja sądu umożliwia Polsce możliwość wystąpienia o ekstradycję byłego ministra z USA, gdzie on aktualnie przebywa. Decyzja sądu ma znaczący wpływ na dalszy kierunek śledztwa i postępowania ekstradowego.
Postępowanie w sprawie Ziobry rozpocząło się w lutym 2026 roku, gdy Sąd Rejonowy dla Warszawy-Mokotowa wydał decyzję o zastosowaniu tymczasowego aresztowania wobec Zbigniewa Ziobro. Decyzja ta została zaskarżona przez jego obrońców, którzy wkrótce złożyli zażalenie do Sądu Okręgowego w Warszawie. W trakcie posiedzeń, które trwały cały dzień, obrońcy składały liczne wnioski formalne, w tym o wyłączenie sędziów z składu orzekającego, oraz o zawieszenie sprawy. Jednak sąd nie uwzględnił żadnego z tych wniosków, ponieważ uważał je za bezzasadne. W szczególności, obrońcy próbowały wykazać, że sędzia, która wcześniej utrzymała areszt wobec Marcina Romanowskiego, nie powinna być częścią składu orzekającego. Sąd jednak odmówił takim wnioskom, twierdząc, że są one nieuzasadnione i nie mają wpływu na decyzję.
Decyzja sądu została potwierdzona przez rzecznika sądu, sędziankę Annę Ptaszke. Ona wyjaśniła, że sąd nie dopatrzył się przesłanek bezwzględnych, które przemawiałyby za uznaniem, że zastosowanie aresztu przez sąd rejonowy było niezasadne. Wskazała, że materiał dowodowy zgromadzony przez prokuraturę jest wystarczający, aby uzasadnić areszt. Sąd również podkreślił, że są spełnione wszystkie przesłanki do zastosowania aresztu, m.in. obawa matactwa, zagrożenie surową karą oraz przesłanka ucieczki i ukrywania się. Dlatego zastosowanie najsurowszego ze środków zapobiegawczych zostało uzasadnione i uprawnione. Sąd również odroczył na siedem dni sporządzenie pisemnego uzasadnienia decyzji, co sugeruje, że decyzja była ostrożnie i szczegółowo omawiana.
W trakcie posiedzeń prokuratura, reprezentowana przez Piotra Woźniaka, podtrzymała swoje stanowisko, że nadal istnieją podstawy do stosowania aresztu wobec Ziobry. Woźniak zwrócił uwagę na nieustanne przesłanki dotyczące ryzyka matactwa, ukrywania się i groźby wymierzenia surowej kary. Z drugiej strony, obrona, reprezentowana przez Adwokata Bartosza Lewandowskiego, twierdziła, że stosowanie aresztu jest bezzasadne. Obrona argumentowała, że zgromadzony materiał dowodowy nie uprawdopodabnia zarzucanych Ziobrze czynów. W trakcie posiedzeń obrona złożyła szereg wniosków, w tym o wyłączenie sędziów z składu orzekającego, które nie zostały uwzględnione przez sąd.
Zarzuty wobec Ziobry dotyczą decyzji Sądu Rejonowego dla Warszawy-Mokotowa z 5 lutego 2026 roku, w której zastosowano areszt wobec niego. Sprawa dotyczy decyzji dotyczącej funkcjonowania Funduszu Sprawiedliwości podczas rządów PiS. Prokuratura zarzuca Ziobrze m.in. kierowanie zorganizowaną grupą przestępczą i wykorzystywanie swojego stanowiska do działań o charakterze przestępczym. Zarzuty obejmują 26 przestępstw, w tym wydawanie poleczeń łamania prawa, by zapewnić wybranym podmiotom dotacje z Funduszu Sprawiedliwości, ingerowanie w przygotowanie ofert konkursowych i dopuszczanie do przyznawania środków nieuprawnionym podmiotom.
Ziobro, który został wypuszczony z Polski w lutym 2026 roku, znalazł schronienie na Węgrzech, gdzie otrzymał azyl polityczny od rządu Viktora Orbana. W kwietniu 2026 roku, po przegranych wyborach, Ziobro poinformował, że przebywa w USA, gdzie otrzymał status azylu. W międzyczasie, prokuratura skierowała wniosek o wydanie Europejskiego Nakazu Aresztowania (ENA). Sprawa ENA pozostaje w toku, a decyzja sądu w sprawie ENA może mieć znaczący wpływ na dalsze postępowanie. Minister sprawiedliwości Waldemar Żurek zapowiedział, że gotowy jest wniosek o ekstradycję Ziobry z USA, co może prowadzić do jego powrotu do Polski i dalszego postępowania w sprawie.
11 reports
OKO.pressIndependentLeftFactual 95Objective 752 days agoThe Warsaw District Court has issued a final ruling allowing the temporary arrest of Zbigniew Ziobro, a former Polish justice minister who is currently hiding in the United States. The court ruled on July 1, 2026, after a lengthy hearing where Ziobro’s defense team attempted to delay proceedings by requesting the removal of judges from the panel. These requests were denied, and the court upheld the decision to detain Ziobro based on allegations related to the Justice Fund scandal. The prosecution claims there is sufficient evidence to justify the arrest, citing risks of flight, obstruction of justice, and potential criminal liability. With this ruling, Poland’s Minister of Justice, Waldemar Żurek, can now formally request Ziobro’s extradition from the U.S., where he sought asylum under the Hungarian government led by Viktor Orbán. Ziobro fled to Budapest in late 2025 to avoid arrest linked to the ongoing investigation into the Justice Fund affair.
Bias read (Left): The article frames the legal action against Ziobro as part of a broader effort to hold high-profile figures accountable for corruption, aligning with progressive judicial and political narratives. While the focus is on legal procedures, the emphasis on the 'Justice Fund scandal' and the implication—
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 75): The article accurately reports the court's decision to uphold Ziobro's temporary arrest and mentions the extradition process. It provides details about the legal proceedings and the defense's attempts to challenge the ruling. However, it uses emotionally charged language like 'ukrywający się w USA'
RzeczpospolitaIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 752 days agoThe Warsaw District Court upheld the temporary detention order against former Justice Minister Zbigniew Ziobro, rejecting the defense's appeal. The court, which had previously issued the arrest order on February 5th, denied the defense’s requests to suspend proceedings or exclude judges from the panel. Ziobro, a prominent member of the ruling Law and Justice (PiS) party, faces 26 charges including running a criminal organization and abusing his position to secure state funds through the Justice Fund. His defense team argued the accusations were not sufficiently substantiated. Ziobro has been living abroad since May 10th after obtaining international protection in Hungary under Viktor Orban’s government. The case is part of a broader investigation into the functioning of the Justice Fund during PiS administrations.
Bias read (Center): While the subject involves a high-profile politician and legal proceedings, the article presents the court's decision and procedural aspects without overt ideological slant. It reports on the legal process, the charges against Ziobro, and the defense's arguments without clearly favoring either side.
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 75): The article clearly states the court upheld the arrest and gives background on the case, including the number of charges against Ziobro. It remains factual but has some minor subjective phrasing such as 'kluczowych wątków' (key points), which might imply importance beyond what is objectively stated.
Polsat NewsIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 702 days agoThe Warsaw Regional Court has upheld the temporary detention of former Justice Minister Zbigniew Ziobro, despite defense claims. The court rejected multiple defense appeals, including requests to exclude a judge who previously detained Marcin Romanowski. The decision was announced by lawyer Adam Gomoła on social media, with additional comments from court spokesperson Judge Anna Ptaszek. She noted that the court did not find sufficient grounds to revoke the detention, emphasizing that all factors justifying the measure—such as evidence strength, flight risk, and obstruction of justice—were met. The National Prosecution Office confirmed that there are no obstacles to Ziobro’s extradition from the United States. The court also postponed providing a written justification for its decision for seven days.
Bias read (Center): While the subject involves a high-profile political figure and legal proceedings, the article presents the court's decision and statements from judicial officials without overtly favoring any political stance. It includes both the prosecution's position and the defense's arguments, though the focus,
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 70): This article confirms the court's decision to maintain Ziobro’s arrest and notes the defense's arguments. It includes quotes from officials and maintains consistency with other sources. However, it emphasizes the lack of consideration for defense motions, potentially giving more weight to the prosec
TVN24IndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 702 days agoA Polish court has upheld the temporary arrest of Zbigniew Ziobro, a former justice minister and current MP from the ruling PiS party, following an appeal by his defense team. The decision was made by the Warsaw District Court, which rejected multiple requests from Ziobro's lawyers, including the removal of judges involved in the case. The court cited the seriousness of the alleged crimes, particularly those involving significant financial harm to the state, as justification for maintaining the arrest. The defense had argued that the evidence against Ziobro was insufficient and that the initial arrest decision was unjustified. The court postponed the written justification for the decision for seven days but outlined the main reasons behind its ruling.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the court's decision and the arguments from both the prosecution and the defense without overtly favoring either side. It includes direct quotes from legal representatives and explains the rationale provided by the court, offering a balanced view of the situation.
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 70): This article repeats the core facts about the court's decision and the defense's failed appeals. It includes direct quotes and maintains alignment with other reports. However, it leans into the political angle by mentioning Ziobro's party affiliation ('PiS') and uses phrases like 'dalsze kroki w spr
Polsat NewsIndependentRight12 hr. ago "They don't know anything". Ziobro spoke up about the revocation of his papers.The article reports on the revocation of asylum status and travel documents for former Polish Justice Minister Zbigniew Ziobro, his wife Patrycja Kotecka-Ziobro, and their associate Marcin Romanowski by Hungary. Polish Foreign Minister Radosław Sikorski confirmed the decision, which was communicated through social media. Ziobro, currently in Washington, criticized Hungarian authorities, claiming they were unaware of the Geneva Convention passport and that visas are independent of travel documents. He accused them of incompetence across various areas, including healthcare. The article also mentions the possibility of Ziobro’s deportation to Poland, which was not ruled out by Minister Waldemar Żurek. Additionally, a court in Warsaw upheld the temporary detention order against Ziobro, opening the door to extradition. Ziobro claimed this decision violated procedural norms and accused the judge of being influenced by political pressures.
Bias read (Right): The article frames Ziobro's criticism of Hungarian authorities as justified and highlights his accusations of incompetence, while downplaying potential legal complexities. It emphasizes Ziobro's position as a victim of bureaucratic inefficiency and portrays his claims as credible. The tone suggests,
Notes from PolandIndependentCenteryesterdayHungary has revoked the refugee status of Zbigniew Ziobro, a former Polish justice minister wanted in Poland on 26 charges, along with his associates Marcin Romanowski and Patrycja Kotecka-Ziobro. The decision follows pressure from Poland, which sought to expedite Ziobro's extradition after he fled to the U.S. using a 'Geneva passport' granted due to his refugee status. Hungary's move comes as the new Hungarian prime minister, Péter Magyar, has pledged to pursue Ziobro's extradition. Polish officials, including Foreign Minister Radosław Sikorski and Interior Minister Marcin Kierwiński, confirmed receipt of official notification from Hungary regarding the revocation of refugee status and travel documents.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual developments related to international legal proceedings involving a high-profile political figure. While the subject matter involves political figures and legal issues, the framing remains neutral, citing official confirmations and detailing the sequence of events. There
TVN24IndependentRightyesterday Poseł KO o decyzji w sprawie Zbigniewa Ziobry i Marcina Romanowskiego: Węgry wróciły na jasną stronę mocyThe article discusses the decision by Hungarian authorities to revoke the refugee status of Polish politicians Zbigniew Ziobro and Marcin Romanowski. The commentary focuses on the implications of this move, suggesting it marks the end of 'Orban-style games' and signals Hungary returning to democratic norms. The discussion takes place during a TVN24 program where lawmakers from the ruling party (KO) and the Law and Justice Party (PiS) comment on the situation. They suggest that Ziobro, who is under investigation for alleged misconduct related to the Justice Fund, might need to seek refuge elsewhere if he cannot receive a fair trial in Poland. The conversation also touches on Ukraine’s potential accession to the European Union, with comments emphasizing the need for Ukraine to meet certain conditions before being considered for EU membership.
Bias read (Right): The article frames the revocation of refugee status as a positive development marking the return of democracy in Hungary and the end of Orban-era tactics. It emphasizes the idea that Ziobro and Romanowski, who are under investigation, are using their status as refugees to avoid accountability, which
Polsat NewsIndependentRightyesterday "Nie boję się starcia przed sądem". Zbigniew Ziobro o ekstradycjiThe article reports on the decision by the Hungarian government to revoke the refugee status of Zbigniew Ziobro, Marcin Romanowski, and Patrycja Kotecka-Ziobro, along with invalidating their travel documents. Ziobro, a former Polish justice minister, was questioned about his legal status and claimed he does not possess any other documentation allowing him to reside legally in the U.S. He criticized the Polish government under Donald Tusk for blocking his bank accounts, income, and property, making his life difficult in America. Ziobro also dismissed concerns raised by Minister Waldemar Żurka about potential immigration authorities detaining him, calling such fears 'imaginations' of Tusk and Żurka. The piece highlights ongoing tensions between Ziobro and Polish officials, particularly regarding his legal status and alleged interference by the Polish government.
Bias read (Right): The article frames Ziobro’s situation as a victim of Polish government actions, portraying the ruling party (under Tusk) as obstructive and politically motivated. It emphasizes Ziobro’s claims of being targeted by the Polish state, which aligns with a right-leaning narrative that often portrays the
TVN24IndependentCenteryesterday Zbigniew Ziobro, jego żona i Marcin Romanowski utracili status uchodźców na WęgrzechPolish Foreign Minister Radoslaw Sikorski confirmed that Hungary has revoked the refugee status of Zbigniew Ziobro, his wife Patrycja Kotecka-Ziobra, and lawyer Marcin Romanowski. This decision invalidates their travel documents, complicating their legal presence in the United States. Justice Minister Waldemar Zurek stated Poland will consult U.S. authorities to determine if these individuals can remain in the country without valid documentation. Meanwhile, Ziobro remains under investigation for alleged misconduct related to the Justice Fund, where prosecutors accuse him of ordering subordinates to break laws to secure funding for selected entities. Ziobro was recently released from pre-trial detention but continues to face legal challenges.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual updates on the revocation of refugee status and ongoing legal proceedings against Ziobro without overtly favoring any side. It includes direct quotes from both Polish ministers and references to official investigations, maintaining neutrality in tone and content.
Polsat NewsIndependentCenteryesterday Węgry zdecydowały ws. Ziobry. "Koła sprawiedliwości mielą powoli"Hungary has revoked the refugee status of Marcin Romanowski, Zbigniew Ziobro, and Patrycja Kotecka-Ziobro, as well as invalidated their travel documents. Polish Foreign Minister Jacek Czaputowicz confirmed this through social media. Poland plans to contact U.S. authorities to determine if individuals without valid travel documents can legally remain in the United States. Justice Minister Waldemar Żurek stated that Poland will take action based on the situation. Ziobro was temporarily detained by Polish prosecutors after a court upheld the decision. Ziobro had obtained refugee status in Hungary under Viktor Orbán’s government but fled to the U.S. after losing power. His stay in the U.S. may now be at risk due to the revocation of his travel documents. Ziobro faces potential extradition over alleged organized crime and corruption charges related to the Justice Fund.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual updates on legal actions taken by Hungarian and Polish authorities regarding Ziobro and Romanowski. It includes direct quotes from Polish officials and provides background on the legal proceedings against Ziobro. The tone remains neutral, focusing on procedural steps and
Notes from PolandIndependentCenteryesterday Court upholds request to detain Polish ex justice minister, paving way for US extradition applicationA Warsaw court has upheld a request to detain Zbigniew Ziobro, a former Polish justice minister wanted on multiple criminal charges, clearing the way for Poland to seek his extradition from the United States. Ziobro, who previously held office under the national-conservative Law and Justice (PiS) government, faces allegations including leading a criminal group and authorizing the illegal purchase of Pegasus spyware. After his parliamentary immunity was lifted last year, he fled to Hungary, where he received political asylum. Following a change in leadership in Hungary, Ziobro moved to the U.S., but the recent court decision allows Poland to proceed with formal extradition proceedings. The court emphasized that the decision relates to the strength of the evidence, not Ziobro's guilt or innocence.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the legal process and court decision regarding Ziobro's potential extradition in a neutral manner, focusing on procedural aspects rather than taking a clear ideological stance. It includes quotes from both the court and Ziobro, providing balanced perspectives without overtly slm
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter
Poland
