In Split, political tensions have reached a boiling point as former mayor Željko Kerum faces accusations of orchestrating a campaign against media outlet Telegram, while local authorities struggle with the legal and financial implications of managing the Brodosplit shipyard. The situation has escalated into public discourse, involving key figures such as journalist Denis Mahmutović, who has been accused of leaking information to institutions, and current mayor Tomislav Šuta, who claims the city is suffering substantial losses due to the state of the shipyard. Meanwhile, internal divisions within the Social Democratic Party (SDP) continue to deepen, with the resignation of its Split branch president, Sandro Glumac, adding further uncertainty to the region’s political landscape. The controversy began with Kerum's controversial statement on Telegram, in which he alleged that journalist Mahmutović had instructed government agencies, including the Maritime Agency (DORH), the Inspection Service, and the Luka Kapetanija, to pursue him. This claim was part of a broader critique of the legality of certain developments in Split, including the designation of the Rožanica parking lot as illegal and the unauthorized construction on Pršut. Mahmutović responded by asserting that Kerum’s behavior has become increasingly paranoid and aggressive, particularly after his latest accusation. He emphasized that the Rožanica site was built on maritime property through a long-standing, obscure competition organized by the Šibenik-Knin County over twelve years. According to Mahmutović, the High Administrative Court ruled the entire process unlawful, prompting the Ministry of Sea to issue an order requiring Kerum to remove the structure within thirty days. Kerum, however, maintains a narrative of being a victim rather than an aggressor. Mahmutović pointed out that despite Kerum’s public portrayal as a disgraced politician, he has remained deeply embedded in the city’s power structures since his tenure as mayor. He highlighted that Kerum currently holds influence through his connections with the current mayor, Tomislav Šuta, and that without Kerum’s support, there would be no alternative majority in the City Council. Mahmutović described Kerum as “probably the safest political figure in Croatia,” suggesting that even if Kerum were to fall from power, his allies would still pose a challenge to the ruling party, HDZ. Meanwhile, the fate of the Brodosplit shipyard continues to dominate discussions among officials and citizens alike. Mayor Šuta has repeatedly called for urgent action, citing millions of euros in losses attributed to the company’s mismanagement. He argues that the shipyard’s current operations are unsustainable and that the city must reclaim control over parts of the facility to serve public interests. Šuta has demanded immediate intervention from relevant state bodies, emphasizing that the Ministry of Sea has already initiated proceedings to terminate the concession agreement. He criticized past administrations for allowing the shipyard to remain under the control of Brodosplit, noting that thousands of jobs were once created there. In response, representatives of Brodosplit have defended their position, stating that production has been halted due to the blockage of Russian financing and that they have spent nearly a year securing new funding. They argue that the global shift in shipbuilding toward Asian markets, coupled with the war in Ukraine, has made their business model obsolete. Despite these challenges, they insist that work is ongoing, with more than a hundred employees regularly receiving salaries and the construction of a three-masted sailing ship set to conclude in May of the following year. However, Šuta dismisses this as insufficient, arguing that a single vessel does little to justify the scale of the shipyard’s land area. Political dynamics in Split have also been shaped by recent developments within the SDP. The resignation of Sandro Glumac, the head of the Split branch, adds another layer of complexity. His decision to step down comes just months after assuming leadership, with no official explanation given. The reorganization of the SDP in the Split-Dalmatia county continues, with Ante Bilić now leading the regional organization. Potential candidates for the new leader of the Split branch remain unclear, though the political vacuum left by Glumac’s departure could intensify rivalries within the party. As the situation unfolds, the focus remains on whether the city can successfully navigate both the legal and political challenges surrounding Kerum and the Brodosplit shipyard. With the upcoming elections looming, the question of how different factions will align, and whether a unified opposition against HDZ can emerge, remains uncertain. For now, the streets of Split echo with the voices of politicians, journalists, and ordinary citizens, all grappling with the consequences of a rapidly shifting political landscape.
5 reports
Telegram.hrIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 8512 days agoŽeljko Kerum, bivši gradonačelnik Splita, optužuje novinara Telegrama, Denis Mahmutovića, za to da mu naređuje institucije poput DORH-a da ga progone. U epizodi 'Prvi glas' na Telegramu, Mahmutović razgovara o Kerumovim imotenjima, uključujući privatište u Rogoznici koje je proglašeno ilegalnim, te o njegovom dugotrajnom utjecaju u Splitu i Dalmaciji. Mahmutović navodi da je Kerumova reakcija na objave sve nervoznija i paranoičnija, posebno nakon što je objavio optužbe protiv institucija. Također se diskutira mogućnost da splitsko Gradsko vijeće ostane bez Kerumove većine ako dođe do političkog pada, te status SDP-a u Splitu.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced discussion between Željko Kerum and Denis Mahmutović, highlighting both Kerum's claims and Mahmutović's counterpoints without overtly favoring either side. The framing remains neutral, focusing on factual allegations and responses rather than taking a clear stance.
Why factuality (90): The article provides detailed and factual information about the project to convert Hotel Zagreb into a senior citizens’ home, including quotes from officials, financial figures, and procedural steps. It aligns with the cross-source consensus regarding the project’s development and administrative cha
Why objectivity (85): The tone remains neutral and informative, presenting the project developments without taking sides or injecting personal opinions. The focus is on the process and stakeholders involved, maintaining an objective perspective.
N1 HrvatskaIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 8011 days agoBranko Bačić, potpredsjednik vlade i ministar graditeljstva, komentirao je izlazak Branka Kolarića iz SDP-a, naglašavši da je to normalan proces unutar političkih stranaka. Kolarić je nakon 19 godina članstva napustio stranku, tvrdeći da više ne dijeli ideje s trenutnim vodstvom. Bačić je istaknuo da je razlog izlaska moguće nesporazum između Kolarića i SDP vodstva, ali nije dao detaljnije informacije. Također, Bačić je obradio pitanje prenamjene dijela Brodosplita za potrebe Grada Splita, naglašavši da je to kompliciran proces koji zahtijeva rješavanje s koncesionarom. Ministar je istaknuo da je koncesionar neplaća koncesiju, što stvara zakonske uvjete za raskid ugovora, dok koncesionar osporava ovaj stav i traži sudsku deciziju.
Bias read (Center): Artikl neutralno opisuje izlazak Kolarića iz SDP-a i proces unutar stranke, bez jasne strane slante. Bačić daje objektivne informacije o situaciji, ne izražava personalnu podršku jednoj strani ni izbjegava političku agitaciju. U pogledu prenamjene Brodosplita, objašnjava kompleksnost i pravne aspekt
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports on Marijana Puljak’s call for a united opposition effort against HDZ, quoting her written statement and referencing past events like Davor Matijević’s departure from SDP. It aligns with the cross-source consensus on political strategy and coalition-building.
Why objectivity (80): The tone is largely neutral, presenting the political message as stated by Puljak. While it frames the political context, it does so without overt bias or emotional language, keeping the focus on the public statement and strategic goals.
tportalIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 8014 days agoMarijana Puljak, a member of the Social Democratic Party (SDP) and a local councilor in Split, has called for unity among opposition parties and independent candidates to challenge the Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ) in upcoming local elections. She criticized past failures to present a united front against HDZ, particularly in Split, where she accused the SDP leadership of supporting a compromised candidate who later defected to become an independent. Puljak emphasized the need to learn from these mistakes and unite under a common goal of defeating HDZ at all levels of governance.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the call for unity among left-wing and independent groups as a strategic move to oppose the center-right HDZ. The tone emphasizes collective action against a dominant political force, using language that suggests HDZ's current dominance is due to past disunity among oppositions. S
Why factuality (85): This article mirrors the content of item 4, providing the same quote from Marijana Puljak and similar context about the coalition against HDZ. It aligns with the cross-source consensus and presents the same factual information.
Why objectivity (80): The tone is consistent with item 4, remaining neutral and focused on the political message. There is no evident bias or emotional language, though the content is repetitive and slightly redundant.
N1 HrvatskaIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 8015 days ago Split's SDP has lost its president: Actor resigns irrevocablySandro Glumac, predsjednik splitske organizacije SDP-a, podnio je neopozivu ostavku na dužnost, kao što je objavljeno u njegovom priopćenju. Odluka je donesena nakon 'temeljitog promišljanja' i izrazila je da je konačna i neopoziva. Glumac nije dao komentare o razlogu za ostavku ni dodatne izjave, a zaposlenici i suradnici su zahvaljeni na podršci tokom njegova rukovodstva. Ostavka dolazi u vrijeme reorganizacije SDP-a na području Splitsko-dalmatinske županije, gdje je novi predsjednik izabran kao Ante Bilić, a zamjenici su izabrani. Datum izbora novog predsjednika nije još poznat.
Bias read (Center): Vijest se fokusira na događaj koji je neutralno prijavljen – ostavku predsjednika stranke. Tekst ne koristi pristrane riječi, ne izdvaja jednu stranu, a svi elementi su prikazani kao fakti. Iako je politička tema, vijest se drži neutralnog stava i ne pokazuje jasnu stransku nagibu.
Why factuality (85): The article reports accurately on Sandro Glumac resigning as president of the Split SDP organization, citing his official statement and confirming the resignation was final and irrevocable. It provides details from his press release and mentions the ongoing reorganization of the SDP in the Split-Dal
Why objectivity (80): The tone remains neutral, reporting facts without overt bias. The article presents the resignation as a factual event without taking sides or expressing personal opinion. However, there is some subtle political framing by mentioning the reorganization and the broader context of SDP politics.
HRT (Hrvatska radiotelevizija)State / PublicProgressiveFactual 60Objective 5011 days agoGradonačelnik Splita Tomislav Šuta naveo je da Grad Split trpi višemilijunske gubitke zbog nepovratnih troškova vezanih uz stanje u Brodosplitu. Šuta zahtijevao je hitno postupanje državnih institucija, ukazujući na mogućnost raskida koncesije i optužujući bivšu gradsku vlast za pogodovanje brodogradilišta. Predstavnici Brodosplita objasnili su da je proizvodnja zaustavljena zbog blokade ruskog financiranja, dok je tvrtka pokušavala pronaći novi izvor sredstava. Glasnogovornik Brodosplita Josip Jurišić odgovorio je da su globalne promjene u brodogradnji, posebno konkurencija iz Azije, uticala na situaciju, a da je Brodosplit neodgovoran za rat u Ukrajini. Šuta je naglasio da je za stanje u Brodosplitu odgovorna uprava, dok su predstavnici tvrtke ističu da brodogradilišta posluju uz kreditno financiranje i da su osigurali sredstva putem drugih subjekata.
Bias read (Progressive): Artikl naglašava problematiku Brodosplita kroz perspektivu lokalne vlasti, podcrtavajući gubitke građanskih interesa i zahtijevajući državnu intervenciju. Usporedba s drugim hrvatskim brodogradilištima i akcent na globalne ekonomsko-političke faktore sugerira tendenciju da se Brodosplit posmatra kao
Why factuality (60): This article contains speculative and emotionally charged content, including claims about 'muljažama' (falsehoods) and conspiracy-like statements. It lacks verifiable sources and appears to present unverified allegations against Željko Kerum. The content does not align with the cross-source consensu
Why objectivity (50): The article has a highly subjective and confrontational tone, using loaded language such as 'muljažama' and implying that institutions are acting against Kerum. This suggests a clear ideological stance and lack of neutrality, making it less objective.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter
Croatia
