Puljak: "If this doesn't happen, it's proof that HDZ is still continuing the trade coalition with Kerum"
The political party Centar has called on Split mayor Tomislav Šuta to initiate changes to the city's General Urban Plan (GUP), revoke the concession for the beach of Bene, and dismiss Željko Kerum's employees from municipal companies and supervisory boards. Marijana Puljak stated that previous governments had prepared the process for changing the GUP, which only requires the mayor's signature. She argued that without Kerum's influence, there is no reason to delay the process, emphasizing the interest of citizens over construction lobbies. Puljak also demanded the cancellation of the Bene concession, claiming it belongs to Kerum's son-in-law and that contractual obligations have been violated for years. Additionally, she requested the removal of all Kerum's staff from director positions and supervisory boards, advocating for transparency and merit-based appointments. Saborski representative Damir Barbir criticized Prime Minister Andrej Plenković for not responding to two parliamentary questions regarding Bene and investigations against Kerum, despite legal deadlines. Gorana Rosandić, a local council member of Centar, stated that conditions for unilaterally terminating the Bene lease
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.
Željko Kerum, bivši predsjednik Hrvatske građanske stranke (HGS), odstupio je s mjesta predsjednika stranke nakon što je pušten na slobodu nakon kaznenog postupka. Istraga protiv njega je pokrenuta zbog optužbe za ilegalnu gradnju i poticanje nekadašnjeg gradskog službenika na nezakonitu legalizaciju ranije ilegalno izgrađenih objekata. Vođenje stranke preuzima Igor Stanišić, trenutni predsjednik Gradskog vijeća Grada Splita. Istražitelji sumnjaju da je Kerum, zajedno s nećakom Igorom Sapunarom, od struke za prostorno uređenje Andrije Polića zatražio izdavanje rješenja o legalizaciji zgrada koje su bile izgrađene bez dopuštenja. Polić je, prema optužbama, naveo neistinite činjenice u službenoj bilješci, koristeći ortofoto kartu iz 2017. umjesto iz 2011., što je omogućilo legalizaciju objekata koji nisu bili dopušteni.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of the resignation of Željko Kerum from his position as leader of the HGS party due to legal issues related to illegal construction. It includes quotes from multiple sources, including the Index.hr journalist and the lawyer representing Kerum, and provides a nu
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports on Kerum's resignation from his party position and the ongoing investigation, aligning with the primary source document.
Why objectivity (85): The article remains objective in its reporting, focusing on the facts of the investigation and Kerum's actions without showing clear bias.
Former mayor of Split, Željko Kerum, and his associate Andrija Polić were released after interrogation by the Agency for Combating Corruption and Organized Crime (USKOK), which had suspected Kerum's restaurant 'Pršut' of illegal activities. Their lawyers confirmed that the prosecution did not request a custodial investigation. Polić’s lawyer stated all witnesses were interviewed and that her client actively defended himself. Kerum’s lawyer, Željko Gulišija, noted that USKOK did not seek a custodial investigation, which he expected given the case status. He mentioned Kerum has withdrawn from politics during the ongoing criminal proceedings and that the party will be taken over by Igor Stanišić, who also steps back from active political work.
Bias read (Center): The article presents information from both sides through the statements of the lawyers involved, without overtly favoring either the accused or the authorities. It reports on the legal process and the decisions made by the parties involved without clear ideological leaning.
Why factuality (95): The article accurately conveys the outcome of the investigation, stating that Kerum and Polić were not placed under investigative detention, as per the primary source document.
Why objectivity (85): The article remains largely objective, quoting the defense lawyers' statements without showing clear bias.
The article reports on legal proceedings related to corruption allegations against former Split mayor Željko Kerum and former city employee Andrija Polić. Both individuals are set to defend themselves from outside custody during an investigation into potential corruption. The court is expected to decide later in the day whether to impose investigative detention on Igor Sapunar, who is accused of possibly influencing witnesses. The investigation was initiated on Friday over suspicions of illegal legalization of a building known as 'Pršut.' Prosecutors and police authorities allege that Polić abused his position between 2017 and 2023, while Kerum and Sapunar are accused of encouraging such abuse. The prosecutors launched the case in May, but Kerum has denied all accusations, claiming everything was lawful.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about ongoing legal investigations without overtly favoring any political side. It reports on the charges against multiple officials without taking a clear ideological stance, maintaining neutrality in its framing.
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports on the release of Kerum and Polić and the status of the investigation, aligning with the primary source document.
Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a neutral tone, focusing on the legal aspects of the case without overtly favoring any side.
Novi listIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 85yesterday
The Croatian State Judicial Administration (USKOK) has launched an investigation into three Croatian citizens—former Kaštela municipal employee Andrija Polić, former Split mayor and entrepreneur Željko Kerum, and Kerum’s nephew Igor Sapunar—for alleged abuse of position and encouraging such abuse. The investigation centers on suspicions that Polić, while working at the City of Kaštela, illegally facilitated the legalization of unlawfully constructed buildings owned by Kerum and his companies within the former Konoba Pršut complex, now operating under the name Hacijenda Amora. According to police and USKOK, Kerum and Sapunar requested Polić to issue decisions legalizing these structures despite knowing they lacked legal grounds. Polić allegedly fabricated evidence by using outdated maps and submitted false documentation to justify the legalization of five buildings. The investigation could lead to pre-trial detention for one suspect.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about an ongoing investigation involving public officials and allegations of corruption. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or omission of context. The framing remains neutral, focusing on the procedural aspects of the case and陈述
Why factuality (95): The article accurately represents the primary source, providing detailed information about the charges against Kerum, Polić, and Sapunar, and the nature of the investigation.
Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting the facts without overt bias or emotional language.
The article reports that the Public Prosecutor's Office has initiated an investigation against former city employee Andrej Polić, former Split mayor and president of the Croatian Civic Party (HGS) Željko Kerum, and his grandson Igor Sapunar, over allegations of illegal legalization of the 'Pršut' villa. According to police and the prosecutor, Polić, while working as a senior specialist for spatial planning and construction at the City of Kastela’s Department of Spatial Planning and Environmental Protection, allegedly abused his position by providing false information during the legal process for the regularization of illegally built structures. The investigation claims that Polić used incorrect data, including an outdated orthophoto map from 2011, to justify the legalization of five buildings, some of which were not visible on the map. The prosecutors argue that this allowed Kerum and his company to construct buildings significantly larger than those built before June 21, 2011, in an area outside the urban development plan.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the allegations made by the Public Prosecutor's Office and the police without overtly endorsing any particular political stance. It provides factual descriptions of the charges and the procedural steps taken, without emphasizing ideological positions or taking sides beyond the依法
Why factuality (95): The article accurately summarizes the investigation into Kerum and his associates, aligning with the primary source document and providing relevant legal details.
Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting the facts of the investigation without overtly favoring any party.
The Croatian anti-corruption agency Uskok has launched an investigation against former Kaštel city employee Andrija Polić, former Split mayor and HGS leader Željko Kerum, and Kerum’s nephew Igor Sapunar, allegedly for illegally legalizing buildings constructed by Kerum’s company. According to police and Uskok reports, Polić, while working as a senior expert in spatial planning for the City of Kaštel, issued false documents to legitimize unauthorized constructions between October 2017 and January 2023. The investigation claims that Polić used outdated maps and misrepresented the status of the buildings, allowing Kerum’s firm to construct significantly larger structures than permitted under local regulations. Uskok highlights that these illegal constructions occurred outside urban zones designated by the general urban plan of Kaštel.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information based on police and Uskok reports without overtly favoring any side. It outlines allegations and actions taken by authorities without editorializing or using biased language.
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reflects the primary source, detailing the charges against Kerum, Polić, and Sapunar, and the specific allegations related to the 'Konoba Pršut' affair.
Why objectivity (85): The article is presented in a neutral manner, focusing on the factual aspects of the investigation without injecting personal opinion.
The article discusses an investigation by the Croatian State Judicial Administration (USKOK) into allegations involving former Split mayor Željko Kerum, his nephew Igor Sapunar, and a former municipal employee, Andrija Polić. The trio faces charges related to the illegal legalization of construction projects at the Pršut complex in Kaštela Štafilić. According to the investigation, Polić, while working as a senior expert in spatial planning and construction for the municipality of Kaštela, allegedly facilitated the legalization of buildings constructed after June 2011, despite not meeting legal requirements. Kerum and Sapunar deny any wrongdoing, claiming they were merely acting within their roles. The investigation suggests that some of the constructions were not visible on the 2011 orthophoto map provided by the State Geodetic Administration and did not match the size and area described in submitted documentation. However, Polić reportedly submitted a 2017 image showing the structures already built, which may have misled the process. As a result, five buildings totaling nearly 2,000 square meters were legalized, allowing Kerum and his company to construct significantly larger and,
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about an ongoing legal investigation involving public officials and alleged misuse of authority. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or editorializing. The content remains focused on the legal proceedings and the claims made by US
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reflects the primary source, detailing the charges against Kerum, Polić, and Sapunar, and the nature of the investigation into the 'Konoba Pršut' affair.
Why objectivity (85): The article is presented in a neutral manner, focusing on the factual aspects of the investigation without injecting personal opinion.
Jutarnji listIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 852 days ago
Željko Kerum, a prominent local figure, fell from grace due to controversies surrounding his restaurant 'Pršut' in Kaštel Štafilić. The establishment became central to a major political and construction scandal in Dalmatia after media raised questions about its legality and how it was legalized. In 2019, the building inspection determined that the structure was constructed without proper permits on land classified as 'particularly valuable arable land,' leading to an order for its removal that was never enforced. In early 2021, during the pandemic, the restaurant hosted a private celebration attended by several Split judges, which led to police investigations and fines for violating health regulations. In 2023, a local official from the City of Kaštel, Andrija Polić, issued a decision recognizing the existing state of the buildings, but satellite images showed discrepancies, indicating parts of the structure did not exist at the time. By 2025, concerns over the restaurant’s compliance with technical requirements for hospitality operations emerged, and in May 2026, a Telegram investigation alleged that much of the complex was built illegally and later legalized through documentation
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of the controversy involving Željko Kerum and the restaurant 'Pršut', detailing various incidents and legal issues without overtly favoring any side. It includes multiple timelines and events, providing a balanced view of the situation.
Why factuality (95): The article thoroughly covers the background of the case, including the illegal construction of the restaurant and previous scandals, aligning closely with the primary source document.
Why objectivity (85): The article remains objective in presenting the facts and historical context surrounding Kerum's case without showing clear bias.
Telegram.hrIndependentProgressiveFactual 95Objective 852 days ago
Željko Kerum, bivši gradonačelnik Splita i političar, je uhićen u vezi s nekoliko građevinskih i finansijskih krivičnih djelata. Među najznačajnijim su nelegalna gradnja njegovog restorana 'Pršut' u Kaštelima, gdje je građevinska inspekcija već ranije utvrdila nelegalnu gradnju, a Kerum je dalje razvio poslovni projekt bez isprave. Također je uključen službenik Andrija Polić, koji je dao dokument koji je omogućio legalizaciju nelegalnih zgrada. Daljnji pregled pokazao je da je Kerum sagradio luksuzni hotel 'Perla' u Rogoznici, gdje je ilegalno gradnja prekršila pomorsko dobro, koje je kasnije založio kao jamstvo za velike kredite. Ove aktivnosti su bile moguće zbog dugotrajne propuste Državnog odvjetništva u zaštiti javnih dobara.
Bias read (Progressive): The article presents detailed evidence of illegal activities by a prominent politician, focusing on his misuse of public resources and corruption. The tone is critical of Kerum’s actions and highlights systemic failures in governance, which aligns with a left-leaning perspective emphasizing social正义
Why factuality (95): The article accurately describes the reasons behind Kerum's arrest, referencing the primary source document and providing detailed information about the investigation.
Why objectivity (85): The article maintains an objective stance, presenting the facts of the investigation and the charges against Kerum without overtly favoring any side.
Net.hrIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 852 days ago
Željko Kerum, bivši splitski gradonačelnik, bio je uhićen zajedno s nećakom Igorom Sapunarom i Tomislavom Režićem, vlasnikom tvrtke 'Lazina' d.o.o., u vezi s istragom oko konobe 'Pršut' u Kaštelu Štafiliću. Istraživačka akcija povezana je s nezakonitim građenjem objekta na poljoprivrednom zemljištu bez dozvole, što je bilo uočeno još 2019. godine. Iako je bilo izdano rješenje o rušenju, nije bilo provedeno, a 2023. godine gradske službe su izdali rješenje o izvedenom stanju, što je doprinijelo nastanku istrage. Kerum je bio u zatvoru i kraju prošle godine zbog vožnje pod zabranom upravljanja. USKOK je započeo istražujući koruptivne kazneni djela, a odluka o daljnjem postupanju bit će donesena nakon ispitivanja osumnjičenika.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual developments related to the legal proceedings against Željko Kerum and his associates, focusing on the investigation into the illegal construction of the 'Pršut' tavern. While the subject involves high-profile individuals and potential corruption, the article does not明显偏
Why factuality (95): The article presents facts from the primary source accurately, including the charges against Kerum, Polić, and Sapunar, and the nature of the investigation into the 'Konoba Pršut' affair.
Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a balanced tone, presenting the facts without overt bias or emotional language.
Net.hrIndependentProgressiveFactual 90Objective 852 days ago
The article reports on the arrest of Željko Kerum, a former mayor of Split, by the Croatian Intelligence Service (USKOK) and police. Kerum was detained at his villa in Meajma after a search, with his brother-in-law, Saša Horvat, opening the door. The investigation centers on allegations of abuse of position and corruption related to the legalization of restaurants in Kastela and associated properties. Kerum was arrested during a concert in Velika Luka with his family, where he was also joined by his nephew Igor Sapunar and Andrija Polić, president of the Split Sports Union. Polić had previously issued permits for Kerum’s property that did not align with legal conditions. The article highlights the surprise among locals in Velika Luka regarding the arrest. Kerum’s nephew, Igor Sapunar, has been interviewed by RTL’s Rade Županović, who notes that Sapunar is under investigation and may be detained soon. Legal representatives state they lack information on the charges against Kerum but suspect illegal construction. They emphasize the unusual nature of the arrests, particularly for individuals without prior criminal records.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the arrests as part of a broader pattern of corruption involving local officials and their associates, which aligns with left-leaning narratives critical of political elites and systemic corruption. The emphasis on the 'spectacular' nature of the arrests and the focus on legal mis
Why factuality (90): The article closely follows the primary source, accurately reporting the arrest of Kerum and the investigation into corruption. It includes direct quotes from the lawyer and official statements, reflecting the core facts without significant deviation.
Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a balanced tone, presenting both the actions of the authorities and the responses from the defense without leaning toward either side.
The article reports on an investigation initiated by the State Prosecutor's Office (USKOK) against former employee of the City of Kastel, Andrej Polić, Željko Kerum, and his grandson Igor Sapunar, regarding suspected illegal legalization of buildings within the former Konoba Pršut facility, now known as Hacijenda Amora. Polić was the first accused, Kerum the second, and Sapunar the third, facing charges of abuse of position and encouraging such abuse. The investigation alleges that they sought legal recognition of illegally built structures after June 2011, which violated legal requirements. It is claimed that Polić, as a senior specialist in spatial planning and construction, improperly issued a false report in August 2022 stating that illegal constructions existed on the 2011 orthophoto map, despite them not being visible on that map. Instead, he used a 2017 orthophoto map where the structures were clearly visible. All three individuals have denied the allegations and attempted to explain their actions during the investigation. USKOK has requested that only Sapunar face preventive detention, while Kerum and Polić remain free due to lack of evidence. The police have confirmed that
Bias read (Center): The article presents the facts of the investigation without overtly favoring any particular political stance. While the case involves local officials and potential corruption, the reporting remains objective, focusing on the procedural aspects of the investigation rather than taking a clear partisan
Why factuality (90): The article accurately reports the details of the investigation into Kerum and his associates, aligning with the primary source document and providing relevant legal information.
Why objectivity (80): The article presents the information in a neutral manner, though it does include some commentary from the defense lawyers.
Telegram.hrIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 802 days ago
Željko Kerum, bivši splitski gradonačelnik i poduzetnik, bio je uhićen u okviru akcije USKOK-a zbog sumnje u koruptivna kaznena djela. Akcija se provodi na području Splitsko-dalmatinske i Dubrovačko-neretvanske županije i uključuje više osoba. Uskok je potvrdio uhićenja putem službenog priopćenja i naveo da će nakon ispitivanja donijeti odluku o daljnjem postupanju. Bivši splitski vijećnik Bojan Ivošević komentirao je incident na Facebooku, naglašavajući važnost neovisnog novinarstva. HDZ-ov gradonačelnik Splita Tomislav Šuta izrazio je stalu suradnju sa strankom Keruma, čime je sugerirao da njegovo uhićenje neće utjecati na političku saradnju.
Bias read (Center): Vijesti su neutralno prikazane bez jasne stranih ili lokalne strane perspektive. Napominje se uhićenje kao zakonska mjera, a reakcije političara su izraženi bez evidentnog opterećenja riječi. Iako se radi o političkom subjektu, tekst ne pokazuje značajnu stransku manipulaciju.
Why factuality (90): The article accurately reflects the arrest of Željko Kerum and the involvement of USKOK, matching the primary source document. It provides relevant details about the investigation and the individuals involved.
Why objectivity (80): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone, focusing on the facts of the arrest and the ongoing investigation without overt bias.
Večernji listIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 802 days ago
Former Split mayor and entrepreneur Željko Kerum was arrested on Wednesday in Velika Luča as part of an operation related to the 'Konoba Pršut' scandal. The arrest has sparked memories of his controversial career, which saw him rise from poverty in Dalmatia to becoming a symbol of transitional success, political power, and spectacular business downfall. His life story, beginning in the village of Ogorje and moving to Split in 1974, includes working as a mining equipment operator, later serving in Iraq under Saddam Hussein, and eventually establishing a successful retail empire through ventures like the Joker shopping center. At the height of his wealth, he employed over 1,000 people and had an estimated net worth of 200 million euros. However, his business success did not satisfy him, leading to further ambitions that ultimately led to legal troubles.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced overview of Kerum's life and career, highlighting both his achievements and controversies without overtly favoring any particular political stance. It describes his rise to power, business ventures, and eventual legal issues without taking a clear ideological position
Why factuality (90): The article provides a comprehensive overview of Kerum's life and career, aligning with the primary source document and offering additional context.
Why objectivity (80): The article presents the information in a somewhat narrative style, which may slightly affect its perceived neutrality.
Jutarnji listIndependentProgressiveFactual 90Objective 752 days ago
The article discusses the political implications of the arrest of Željko Kerum, president of the Croatian Civic Party (HGS) and former mayor of Split, who was detained for illegal construction of his villa in Kaštel Štafilić. Kerum, a key coalition partner of the HDZ in the City Council of Split, has suspended his mandate and is not participating in council activities. The article highlights concerns within political circles in Split that Kerum might not challenge the current administration from prison, as it would jeopardize his political leverage. Meanwhile, Tomislav Šuta, the mayor of Split and head of the HDZ in the city, maintains that cooperation with Kerum continues, emphasizing that legal proceedings are being handled by authorities. However, some HDZ members suggest that this situation presents an opportunity for new elections, as Šuta’s authority in the City Council depends on Kerum’s support and the influence of Davor Matijević, a former SDP leader now independent. The article also notes that Kerum has secured lucrative positions for his allies within Split, including roles in local businesses and sports organizations, raising questions about potential corruption and the
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the situation as an opportunity for political change, suggesting that the detention of Kerum could lead to new elections and a break from his influence. It implies that Kerum's continued involvement in politics despite his legal troubles undermines democratic processes and raises疑
Why factuality (90): This article provides a clear account of the search at Kerum’s home, including the time frame, actions taken by investigators, and the involvement of media. It aligns closely with the Telegram report and offers specific details about the operation without introducing conflicting information.
Why objectivity (75): The article uses descriptive language to convey the atmosphere during the operation, which could be seen as more journalistic style than strictly objective reporting. However, it maintains a neutral tone overall.
The article discusses new developments in the investigation involving Željko Kerum, Andrija Polić, and Igor Sapunar, focusing on allegations of abuse of position and encouraging such abuse. According to the Ministry of the Interior (MUP), Polić, as a senior expert in spatial planning and construction for the City of Kaštela, allegedly issued decisions to legalize illegally built structures between October 2017 and January 2023 at the request of Kerum and Sapunar. These decisions were made despite knowing that the conditions for legalizing these buildings were not met. The article highlights that Polić used false information in an official note, referencing an orthophoto map from 2017 rather than the 2011 map, which showed no visible structures. This allowed Kerum and his company to construct significantly larger buildings in areas outside the urban zoning plan where such construction was prohibited.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual details of an ongoing criminal investigation without overtly favoring any side. It relies on official sources from the Ministry of the Interior and does not include subjective commentary or biased language. The content focuses on the alleged misconduct by public figures,
Why factuality (90): The article accurately reports the charges against Kerum and others, but includes some interpretative statements that may not be directly supported by the primary source.
Why objectivity (70): The tone is generally neutral, though there is some emphasis on the potential for an investigative detention, which might suggest a particular viewpoint.
An investigation has been opened against Andrija Polić, a former employee of the City of Kaštela, Zeljko Kerum, a former Split mayor and leader of the Croatian Civic Party (HCS), and Kerum's nephew Igor Sapunar, regarding suspected illegal regularization of the Pršut restaurant. According to the police and the State Prosecutor's Office, Polić is accused of abuse of position, while Kerum and Sapunar face charges of inciting abuse of position. The investigation suggests that between October 2017 and January 2023, Polić, as a senior technical assistant for spatial planning and construction at the City of Kaštela, illegally facilitated Kerum and his company by issuing decisions to legalize buildings constructed unlawfully after June 2011. Polić allegedly provided false information during administrative procedures, using outdated maps to justify the legalization of structures that were not visible on the 2011 orthophoto map. He issued a decision in January 2023 to legalize five buildings totaling 1,965.65 square meters, which exceeded the allowed size and was built outside the urban area defined by the general urban plan of Kaštela.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual details of an ongoing investigation involving high-profile individuals and alleged misconduct in local governance. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or editorializing. The content remains focused on the procedural aspects of the case and is
Why factuality (90): The article accurately reports the charges against Kerum and others, but includes some interpretative statements that may not be directly supported by the primary source.
Why objectivity (70): The tone is generally neutral, though there is some emphasis on the potential for an investigative detention, which might suggest a particular viewpoint.
The article recounts how journalist Denis Mahmutović uncovered corruption related to Željko Kerum, a local figure involved in illegal construction activities. Mahmutović initiated an inquiry by asking the relevant authorities about building permits for a restaurant called 'Pršut' located at address 1134/1 and 1134/5 in Kaštel Štafilić. The restaurant had opened just a month prior, and Kerum was promoting it aggressively. Mahmutović’s investigation revealed that the construction was illegal, having been built on protected agricultural land. Despite this, the construction continued, including the addition of multiple buildings and facilities. In 2023, the city authorities legally recognized the structures, citing outdated aerial maps that suggested the buildings existed since 2011. However, upon verification, these buildings were not present, indicating potential falsification of documents.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a case of corruption and abuse of power, highlighting the illegality of Kerum's construction and the complicity of local authorities. It emphasizes the misuse of public resources and the lack of accountability, which aligns with left-leaning critiques of political and
Why factuality (90): The article accurately describes the situation around Kerum’s arrest, including his role in the coalition and the political implications. It references the primary source document and adds context about the ongoing investigations. No significant discrepancies are noted.
Why objectivity (70): There is a subtle political undertone, particularly in the suggestion that the arrest might be an opportunity for new elections. While this is a reasonable interpretation, it introduces a potential bias in framing the event.
Jutarnji listIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 702 days ago
Željko Kerum, bivši gradonačelnik Splita, bio je uhvaćen nakon pretrage njegove kuće u Mejama, koja trajala dva sata. Istražitelji su ga odveli u službenom vozilu kroz garažni prostor, a njegovi bliski suradnici pomažu u organizaciji tog procesa. Akcija je bila dio istraživanja povezanog s aferom 'Konoba Pršut', koja uključuje sumnje u nezakonitu gradnju i legalizaciju objekata u Kaštel Štafiliću. Osim Keruma, ispitani su i neki ljudi iz njegove poslovne i obiteljske zajednice. Istražitelji su potvrdili da se provode hitne dokazne radnje zbog sumnji na korumpivna kaznena djela.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a police operation involving a former mayor linked to a corruption investigation. The framing is neutral, presenting facts without overtly favoring any side. It includes quotes from official sources and provides context about the investigation without editorializing or biased措
Why factuality (90): The article accurately describes the arrest and the police procedures involved, including the use of handcuffs and the presence of journalists. It matches the details from the Telegram report and provides visual context through photos, which is appropriate for a news story.
Why objectivity (70): The tone is somewhat sensational, emphasizing the dramatic elements of the arrest and the use of handcuffs. While not overtly biased, it leans toward a more engaging narrative style.
tportalIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 702 days ago
Željko Kerum, nekadašnji gradonačelnik Splita i predsjednik Hrvatske građanske stranke (HGS), bio je uhićen u Veloj Luci na Korčuli, prema neslužbenim izvorima bliskim policiji. Uhićenje je povezano s incidentom s konobom Pršut u Kaštel Štafiliću, gdje je Kerum bez prava izgradio objekt, te s procesom legalizacije tog objekta. Tportalu je potvrđeno da je Kerum uhićen u ranim satima četvrtka, a ne sinoć kao što su špekulirali mediji. Policija je stigla na njegov brod u šest sati ujutro, nakon sinoćnog koncerta. Uhićeni su i njegovi suradnici, rodbina i nećak Igor Sapunar, kao i bliski suradnik Tomislav Režić. Splitski gradonačelnik Tomislav Šuta, kojemu je Kerum koalicioni partner, otkazao je razne obaveze, uključujući potpisivanje ugovora za izgradnju novog doma umirovljenika. USKOK provodi istraživanje oko korumpiranih djela, a Kerum će biti zastupan odvjetnikom Željkom Gulišijem.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual developments around the arrest of Željko Kerum, a prominent political figure, without overtly endorsing or criticizing any side. It reports on the legal proceedings, the involvement of authorities like USKOK, and reactions from local officials such as Tomislav Šuta. The
Why factuality (90): The article aligns closely with the primary source, mentioning Kerum's arrest, the 'Konoba Pršut' affair, and the involvement of other individuals. It provides accurate contextual information.
Why objectivity (70): The tone remains relatively neutral, though it includes some commentary on the political implications of the arrest.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Croatia
