Student apologizes to students for non-payment of salary: "We will solve it as soon as possible"
Approximately 800 students in Croatia, including around 200 in Split, have not received their wages for work done at Studenac stores during September. The students claim they completed agreed shifts, including cash register duties and other tasks, but have not been paid. They argue that regular employees received their salaries, while their compensation is being treated as debts owed to suppliers. In response, Studenac issued an apology, explaining that legal restrictions related to the initiation of a pre-insolvency procedure have affected the payment process. They stated that they obtained approval late yesterday to directly settle obligations to student centers for work done by September 29 and requested the centers to submit invoices immediately to begin payments as soon as possible. Studenac emphasized the importance of students to their business and expressed gratitude for their efforts. The issue is linked to the pre-insolvency proceedings initiated by the Commercial Court in Split on September 29 after Studenac requested it due to financial difficulties and inability to agree on extending credit arrangements.
Go to the primary sources (1)
The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.
Approximately 800 students across Croatia, including around 200 in Split, have not yet received their stipends for work done at Studenac stores during September. The students plan to protest if the money is not paid soon. In response, Studenac issued an apology, explaining that legal restrictions related to the initiation of a pre-trial procedure delayed payments. They obtained approval late yesterday to directly settle obligations with student centers and requested invoices early today to begin immediate payments. Studenac emphasized the importance of students to their business and expressed gratitude for their contributions.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both the students' claim and Studenac's explanation without overtly favoring either side. It includes direct quotes from Studenac's statement and does not introduce external commentary or biased language.
Why factuality (100): This article is identical to the primary source document, so it is perfectly faithful to the original content. All numbers, statements, and explanations from Studenac are presented exactly as they appear in the primary source.
Why objectivity (100): As this article is identical to the primary source document, it is completely neutral and objective, presenting only the facts and Studenac’s formal statement without any added interpretation or bias.
Approximately 800 students in Croatia, including around 200 in Split, have not received their wages for work done at Studenac stores during September. The students claim they completed agreed shifts, including cash register duties and other tasks, but have not been paid. They argue that regular employees received their salaries, while their compensation is being treated as debts owed to suppliers. In response, Studenac issued an apology, explaining that legal restrictions related to the initiation of a pre-insolvency procedure have affected the payment process. They stated that they obtained approval late yesterday to directly settle obligations to student centers for work done by September 29 and requested the centers to submit invoices immediately to begin payments as soon as possible. Studenac emphasized the importance of students to their business and expressed gratitude for their efforts. The issue is linked to the pre-insolvency proceedings initiated by the Commercial Court in Split on September 29 after Studenac requested it due to financial difficulties and inability to agree on extending credit arrangements.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a neutral account of the situation involving unpaid wages to students working at Studenac, citing both the students' claims and Studenac's explanation regarding legal constraints from the pre-insolvency process. There is no evident ideological framing or biased language; the报道is
Why factuality (95): This article closely follows the primary source document, quoting Studenac’s full statement verbatim and accurately reporting the number of affected students (~800 nationwide, ~200 in Split). The information about the legal restrictions due to the predstečajni postupak (pre-bankruptcy procedure) is
Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone, focusing on the facts and quoting Studenac’s official response without overtly favoring either side. It avoids strong emotional language and presents the situation objectively, though it does mention the students’ threat of protests, which is reported
Approximately 800 students across Croatia, including around 200 in Split, have not received their September wages from Studenac, a retail chain undergoing insolvency proceedings. The Students' Council at the University of Split estimates that the total unpaid amount owed to these students is around 200,000 euros, with an average of 1,000 euros per student. According to the council, students worked similar shifts to employees but were treated differently under the insolvency process, with their earnings classified as claims rather than wages. The council is demanding immediate payment and threatening protests if their demands are not met. They are also calling for legal reforms to ensure students' earnings receive the same protection as employee salaries during insolvency procedures.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the situation objectively, citing the Students' Council's claims and referencing the ongoing insolvency proceedings. It does not take a clear stance on the issue, instead providing information about the students' demands and the legal framework surrounding them. There is no明显的倾向
Why factuality (90): The article accurately reports the resolution reached between Studenac and the students’ centers, stating that all overdue payments will be made by the end of the week. It also correctly references the relevant laws and the role of the students’ centers. However, it slightly overstates the situation
Why objectivity (80): The article remains largely neutral, presenting both sides of the story, Studenac’s apology and the students’ demands. It avoids overly emotional language and focuses on the procedural aspects of the resolution, maintaining a balanced tone overall.
Thousands of students across Croatia are facing serious financial issues after working at the retail chain Studenac during September but receiving no payment. The company is undergoing reorganization due to significant financial obligations and struggles with paying suppliers. A preliminary insolvency procedure was initiated by the Split Commercial Court on September 29, 2026, aiming to reach agreements with creditors and stabilize operations. This process includes closing some stores and reducing the number of employees, raising concerns about job security and the future of the business. Despite legal protections ensuring wages for workers, students are being treated differently, with their work considered a 'debt to suppliers' rather than legitimate employment. Around 200 students in Split and 800 nationwide still haven’t received their September pay, amounting to approximately €1,000 per student for work done at cash registers and in stores. Students argue they deserve the same rights as other workers and warn that if this issue isn’t resolved soon, they may resort to protests outside Studenac stores.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the situation of unpaid wages for student workers at Studenac without overtly favoring any side. It highlights the legal distinction between regular employees and students, which is a point of contention, but does not take a clear stance on whether the treatment of students is正当
Why factuality (75): The article accurately reports the core facts from the primary source document, including the number of affected students (~800 nationwide, ~200 in Split), the delay in payment, and Studenac’s apology. However, it adds some interpretive elements not explicitly stated in the primary source, such as t
Why objectivity (50): The article has a clear bias toward the students, using emotionally charged language like 'nova drama', 'neisplaćeno', and 'ustanak' (uprising). It frames the situation as an injustice against students, implying that Studenac is deliberately withholding payments, which could be seen as editorializin
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.
Croatia
