VJT e-mail allegedly received threats against Vucic and Prosecutor Stefanovic
The Special Department for Combating High-Tech Crime at the Higher Public Prosecutor's Office (VJT) in Belgrade has informed that it has ordered the police to urgently identify and process individuals who allegedly sent threatening messages via email to President of Serbia Aleksandar Vučić and Chief Prosecutor of the VJT in Belgrade, Nenad Stefanović, as well as two media owners. The threats reportedly relate to today’s statement by the VJT regarding the existence of grounds for suspicion of simulating the use of a 'sound cannon' by an individual linked to the media outlet NN. Sample messages,
In early March 2025, a significant political and social crisis erupted in Serbia following claims that a so-called “sound cannon” had been used during a student protest on Slavija Square in Belgrade. The allegations sparked widespread panic among the public, leading to heightened tensions and accusations against President Aleksander Vučić. However, new evidence has emerged suggesting that these claims were not spontaneous but rather part of a meticulously planned operation aimed at destabilizing the country and undermining the government.
The origins of this controversy trace back to January 2025 when members of the organization "Students in Blockade – Roof Working Group for Security" (KRBG) convened in secret. During this meeting, discussions revolved around the potential use of a sound cannon during the upcoming protest scheduled for March 15, 2025. Participants reportedly discussed strategies to simulate the use of such a device by state authorities, aiming to create a scenario where the government would be blamed for its deployment. This fabricated narrative was intended to incite fear and unrest among citizens, potentially leading to violent upheaval and a change in the constitutional order.
The implications of this orchestrated misinformation campaign extended far beyond the initial protest. Social divisions deepened as trust eroded between friends, colleagues, and even within families. The artificial panic created by these false narratives led to a breakdown in community cohesion, with many individuals turning against one another under the influence of manipulated information. This societal fragmentation had tangible consequences, particularly on the economy. Key infrastructure projects faced delays due to road blockades, and sectors such as trade and transportation suffered losses. Additionally, foreign investors received negative signals about the stability of Serbia, further complicating efforts to attract investment and stimulate economic growth.
Public concern intensified when it became evident that certain groups, described as self-proclaimed leaders without clear backgrounds or legitimate authority, were orchestrating media and political campaigns targeting President Vučić and his family. These campaigns relied heavily on carefully constructed lies, which were disseminated with the intent of portraying the president as a threat to national security and a figure willing to harm his own people. The gravity of the situation was underscored by the realization that some individuals who possessed knowledge of the true nature of these simulations chose to remain silent, thereby contributing to the spread of falsehoods.
As investigations progressed, more details surfaced regarding the motivations behind the alleged plot. According to statements made by officials, including Dr. Uglješa Mrdić, a member of the Committee for Justice, State Administration, and Local Self-Government in the Serbian Parliament, the goal was not merely to instigate unrest but to orchestrate a complete collapse of the state and society. He emphasized that the organizers sought to create a scenario where Serbs would turn against each other, ultimately leading to civil war. The ultimate aim, he claimed, was to present President Vučić as a monster, a killer ready to shoot his own people in the back.
Ana Brnabić, the President of the Assembly of Serbia, echoed similar sentiments, highlighting how the false narrative surrounding the sound cannon was designed to portray Vučić as an inhumane figure. She noted that the entire construction of the sound cannon story disappeared within 24 hours, leaving only the image of Vučić as a murderer. Brnabić called for a thorough investigation into the planning and execution of this scheme, emphasizing the need to uncover all details and determine who was involved in attempting to provoke a civil war in Serbia. She expressed outrage over the deliberate actions taken to deepen divisions within society and to undermine the nation's institutions.
The revelations have prompted calls for accountability from various quarters. Biljana Pantić Pilja, a member of the leadership of the Serbian Progressive Party, condemned the lies spread by the blockers and their financiers, urging them to take responsibility for their actions. She highlighted the damage caused by these falsehoods, which have led to conflicts within families and communities, and stressed the importance of focusing on genuine issues facing the country rather than spreading baseless rumors. Her statement reflected a broader sentiment among the populace that the time for reckoning has arrived, with demands for transparency and justice in addressing the alleged conspiracy to destabilize Serbia.
24 reports
N1 SrbijaIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 8514 days ago
The Special Department for Combating High-Tech Crime at the Higher Public Prosecutor's Office (VJT) in Belgrade has informed that it has ordered the police to urgently identify and process individuals who allegedly sent threatening messages via email to President of Serbia Aleksandar Vučić and Chief Prosecutor of the VJT in Belgrade, Nenad Stefanović, as well as two media owners. The threats reportedly relate to today’s statement by the VJT regarding the existence of grounds for suspicion of simulating the use of a 'sound cannon' by an individual linked to the media outlet NN. Sample messages,
Bias read (Center): The article reports on legal actions taken by the VJT following alleged threats against high-profile officials. It presents facts without overtly biased language, avoids taking a stance on the validity of the claims, and does not favor any particular political side.
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 85): Highly factual with detailed quotes from the alleged messages. The article accurately reports the VJT's actions and provides context about the 'sound cannon' investigation. Slightly less objective due to the inclusion of direct quotes that may imply bias.
BlicIndependentCenterFactual 94Objective 8714 days ago
The High Public Prosecutor's Office in Belgrade has ordered the police to urgently identify and process the individual who sent threatening messages via email to President Aleksandar Vučić, Chief Public Prosecutor of the High Public Prosecutor's Office in Belgrade, and two media owners. The threats were made following today's statement by the High Public Prosecutor's Office regarding suspicions of the simulation of the use of an 'acoustic cannon' by a certain entity.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on legal actions taken by official institutions without apparent ideological framing. It presents facts from the High Public Prosecutor's Office and includes direct quotes from the threatening emails without editorializing or biased language.
Why these scores (Factual 94 · Objective 87): Accurate summary of the incident with clear references to the VJT's actions and the nature of the threats. The article maintains a relatively neutral tone while still providing necessary context about the 'sound cannon' investigation.
KurirParty-alignedCenterFactual 93Objective 8214 days ago
A special department within the Higher Public Prosecutor's Office in Belgrade has issued an urgent order to the police to identify and process individuals who sent threatening messages to President Aleksandar Vučić, the chief public prosecutor of the Higher Public Prosecutor's Office in Belgrade, and two media owners. These threats were sent via email to the Higher Public Prosecutor's Office following today's statement regarding evidence suggesting the simulation of the use of a 'sound cannon' by a non-state actor. The messages included phrases such as 'Ooo lord burn Vučić...' and 'Eto Stefanō
Bias read (Center): The article reports on legal actions taken by the Higher Public Prosecutor's Office against individuals sending threatening messages to high-profile figures. It presents facts without overtly favoring any political side, focusing on procedural steps rather than ideological framing.
Why these scores (Factual 93 · Objective 82): Very accurate reporting with specific details about the VJT's findings and the content of the threatening emails. The article includes a link to the full statement, enhancing credibility. The tone shows some bias through the choice of words like 'užnemirujuće pretnje' (disturbing threats).
Večernje novostiParty-alignedRightFactual 90Objective 4014 days ago
The article discusses an alleged conspiracy involving false claims about the use of a 'sound cannon' during a protest planned for March 15, 2025, in Belgrade. According to the report, this misinformation was planned at least 53 days before the event and was uncovered during a search of the Faculty of Philosophy at the University of Belgrade in March 2026. The document found during the search included records from a meeting of the organization 'Students in Blockade – Roof Working Group for Security (KRBG)' held on January 22, 2025. At that meeting, discussions reportedly included plans to stage
Bias read (Right): The article focuses on an alleged conspiracy related to a protest and does not present any clear political bias in its framing or sourcing.
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 40): Strong factual alignment with other reports about the planned use of the 'sonic cannon' and its intent to cause chaos. Very low objectivity with highly charged language and clear political bias.
Telegraf.rsParty-alignedCenterFactual 85Objective 7014 days ago
A special unit within the Higher Public Prosecutor's Office in Belgrade has ordered police to urgently identify and process an individual who sent threatening emails to President Aleksandar Vučić, Chief Prosecutor of the Higher Public Prosecutor's Office in Belgrade, and two media owners. The threats were sent via email following today's announcement regarding the existence of grounds for suspicion of the simulation of the use of a 'sound cannon' by an NN entity.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a legal action taken by the Higher Public Prosecutor's Office against an individual who sent threatening messages to high-profile figures, including the president and media owners. It presents facts without overtly favoring any side, using neutral language and citing official
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 70): The article provides factual details about the VJT issuing a warrant for an individual who sent threatening emails to Vučić, Stefanović, and media owners. It includes direct quotes from the messages. However, it lacks deeper contextual analysis and leans slightly toward emphasizing the threat withou
KurirParty-alignedRightFactual 85Objective 6014 days ago
Dr Uglješa Mrdić, a member of the Serbian Parliament and head of the Committee for Justice, State Administration, and Local Self-Government, commented on new findings related to an alleged 'sound cannon' during the investigation into the death of a student at the Faculty of Philosophy. He claims that the documentation obtained by the Belgrade Public Prosecutor's Office reveals that the narrative around the sound cannon was planned in January, nearly two months before the March 15 protests. Mrdić accuses those involved of intentionally creating panic, orchestrating violence to destabilize the国家
Bias read (Right): The article uses highly charged language such as 'traitors,' 'destroyers of Serbia,' 'civil war,' and 'brother-killer war,' which strongly frames the situation as an existential threat to the state and President Aleksandar Vučić. The framing implies conspiracy against the government and portrays the
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 60): High factuality with direct quotes from students challenging the VJT's narrative. Better objectivity compared to others, presenting both sides more neutrally.
N1 SrbijaIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 5014 days ago
Ana Brnabić, Predsednica Skupštine Srbije, tvrdi da je 'laž' o upotrebi zvučnog topa tijekom studentskog protesta 15. marta 2025. godine bila planirana s ciljem izazivanja građanskog rata i prikazivanja predsednika Aleksandra Vučića kao 'monstruma'. Prethodno je Više javno tužilaštvo naložilo policiji da identifikuje sudionike sastanka organizacije 'Studenti u blokadi - Krova radna grupa za bezbednost', održanog 22. januara 2025., gdje se, prema navodima tužilaštva, dogovarala 'simulacija' upotrebe zvučnog topa.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a statement by Ana Brnabić regarding an alleged conspiracy involving a sound cannon during a student protest. The content does not exhibit clear bias through loaded language, one-sided sourcing, or omission of context. It reports on claims made by a political figure without明显的倾向
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 50): The article reports Brnabić's claims about the planned false narrative involving the sound cannon and potential assassination attempt accurately. However, it uses emotionally charged terms like 'monstrum', 'ubica', and 'građanski rat' (civil war), showing bias toward Vučić and against protesters.
RepublikaParty-alignedLeftFactual 85Objective 4514 days ago
The article discusses an accusation by Serbian Prime Minister Ana Brnabić regarding a planned false narrative involving the use of a sound cannon at a public event on March 15, 2025, organized by the group 'Students in Blockade.' According to Brnabić, this false claim was prepared at least 53 days before the event and aimed to portray President Aleksandar Vučić as a monster willing to shoot his own people. The article highlights her response to information provided by the State Security Service (VJTS) in Belgrade.
Bias read (Left): The article presents the claims made by Ana Brnabić, who is a prominent left-leaning political figure, without providing counterpoints or alternative perspectives. It uses emotionally charged language such as 'monstruoznost' (monstrosity), 'stravični čin' (terrifying act), and 'ubica' (murderer), as
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 45): The article accurately summarizes Brnabić's claims regarding the planning of the false narrative and its intent to portray Vučić as a monster. However, it uses emotionally charged language and clearly favors Vučić over the protesters, lacking objectivity.
Večernje novostiParty-alignedLeftFactual 80Objective 4019 days ago
Ana Brnabić, predsednica Skupštine Srbije, kritikovala je besmislenost blokadera na atomskim elektrarnama, navodeći da su takve aktivnosti nepotrebne i da ih vode ljudi koji nemaju značajnu ulogu. Njen komentar bio je odgovor na izjava Srđana Milivojevića na društvenoj mreži Iks, koja je pokušala da označi da je predsednik Aleksandar Vučić izolovan, a danas 'potrčko svetskih sila'.
Bias read (Left): The article presents Ana Brnabić's criticism of anti-nuclear activists as unnecessary and dismissive of their claims, using strong language such as 'teški diletanti' (heavy dilettantes) and implying that those opposing the government are dangerous. The framing emphasizes the legitimacy of the ruling
Why these scores (Factual 80 · Objective 40): The article accurately conveys Brnabić's response to the alleged false narrative around the sound cannon. It uses strong emotive language ('monstrum', 'nečovek') and frames the situation as an existential threat to Serbia, showing clear bias in favor of Vučić.
RepublikaParty-alignedCenterFactual 75Objective 5514 days ago
The article reports that the Higher Public Prosecutor's Office in Belgrade has issued an urgent order to the police to identify and process individuals who sent threatening messages to President Aleksandar Vučić, the chief public prosecutor, and two media owners. The threats were sent via email following a recent announcement by the Higher Public Prosecutor's Office regarding evidence suggesting the 'sound cannon' incident on March 15 was planned in January and involved a simulation by non-state actors. The article includes excerpts from the threatening emails and criticizes the dehumanization
Bias read (Center): The article uses emotionally charged language such as 'dehumanization of President Aleksandar Vučić' and frames the situation as an attack on the country. It emphasizes the threats against the president and portrays the actions of the prosecutors as a response to these threats, which could imply a正面
Why these scores (Factual 75 · Objective 55): This article repeats similar facts as the first but adds emotionally charged language such as 'vrhunac dehumanizacije' and 'udar na našu zemlju,' which introduces bias. The inclusion of Vučić’s past comments also frames the situation in a way that supports his narrative, reducing neutrality.
Večernje novostiParty-alignedCenterFactual 70Objective 3014 days ago
The article reports that the Higher Public Prosecutor's Office (VJT) has found evidence suggesting the 'sound cannon' claim was planned in January, over a month before the March 15 blockade meeting. A special unit against high-tech crime within the VJT has issued an urgent order to police to identify and process individuals who sent threatening emails to President Aleksandar Vučić, the chief public prosecutor, and two media owners. The messages included threats such as 'Ooo lord burn vucic...' and 'Eto Stefanovic mi je pick da ga bijem i jos par kurvi odatle... za kosu i o zid.'
Bias read (Center): The article frames the situation as a deliberate plot against the president, using strong language like 'brutalne pretnje' (brutal threats) and emphasizing the legal actions taken by authorities. It highlights the threat to the president and officials without providing balanced perspectives or count
Why these scores (Factual 70 · Objective 30): The article reports on threats made against President Vučić related to the 'sound cannon' investigation but lacks balance. It presents the situation as an urgent threat without providing context or counterpoints, showing strong bias towards Vučić's position.
Večernje novostiParty-alignedCenterFactual 50Objective 5014 days ago
The article discusses the revelation by the Serbian State Audit Office (VJT) that the false claim about the use of a sound cannon at a March 15, 2025, event in Slavija was planned at least 53 days before the event. The article quotes President of the National Assembly Ana Brnabić, who states that the goal of this fabricated narrative was to portray President Aleksandar Vučić as a monster willing to shoot his own people, aiming to deepen societal divisions, increase hatred, provoke civil war, and unite foreign factors against Serbia. Brnabić expresses anger and disgust over what she describes a
Bias read (Center): The article reports on an official statement regarding a specific event and does not exhibit clear bias through language, framing, or sourcing.
Večernje novostiParty-alignedRightFactual 50Objective 3014 days ago
The article discusses an ongoing preliminary investigation into the death of M.Ž. and the circumstances surrounding the ignition of pyrotechnic devices on the fifth floor of the Faculty of Philosophy at the University of Belgrade on March 26 around 10:40 PM. The Belgrade Higher Public Prosecutor's Office has found evidence suggesting possible criminal acts unrelated to the main case but related to the duties of officials. During a search of the Faculty of Philosophy on March 27, 2026, documents were temporarily seized, including records of a meeting held by the organization 'Students in Block'
Bias read (Right): The article presents factual information about an ongoing legal investigation without overtly favoring any political side. It reports on findings from the prosecution and mentions discussions about a hypothetical scenario involving a 'sound cannon,' but does not take a clear stance or use biased phr
Why these scores (Factual 50 · Objective 30): The article makes specific claims about a planned simulation of a 'sound cannon' and alleged conspiracy involving student groups, but these details lack corroboration from other sources. The language is highly charged, using terms like 'srpski neprijatelji' and 'izdajnici,' which show clear bias and
KurirParty-alignedLeftFactual 45Objective 3014 days ago
Biljana Pantić Pilja, član Predsedništva Srpske napredne stranke, komentarisala je najnovije saznanja o 'zvučnom topu' koje su objavili organi pravosuđa. Ona tvrdi da je afera unapred planirana od strane blokadera i da su laži koristile kako bi izazvale podele u društvu. Pantić Pilja optužuje blokade za širenje laži o predsedniku Aleksandru Vučiću, navodeći da su govorili da Vučić želi da puca na svoj narod, što je opisala kao laž koja služi cilju izazivanja građanskog rata.
Bias read (Left): The article presents strong accusations against the opposition ('blockers') and their alleged intent to incite civil war through disinformation. The framing emphasizes conspiracy theories and blames the opposition for spreading false narratives about President Vučić, using emotionally charged terms.
Why these scores (Factual 45 · Objective 30): The article makes strong accusations against the opposition and those financing them, claiming they planned the 'sound cannon' incident to incite civil war. These claims lack specific evidence and rely on subjective assertions rather than verifiable facts. The tone is highly biased, using emotionall
RepublikaParty-alignedRightFactual 35Objective 2514 days ago
The article discusses new findings related to an alleged 'sound cannon' during an investigation into the death of a female student at the Faculty of Philosophy. Predrag Mrdić, a member of the Serbian Parliament and leader of the SNS party, claims that the documentation obtained by the Belgrade Public Prosecutor's Office reveals that the narrative around the 'sound cannon' was planned in January, nearly two months before the March 15 protests. He accuses opponents of deliberately creating panic and planning for violence to undermine President Aleksandar Vučić and destabilize Serbia.
Bias read (Right): The article uses highly charged language such as 'blokaderi', 'izdajnici', 'razarali su nam obrazovanje', and 'bratoubilački rat', which frame the opposition as traitors and aggressors intent on destroying Serbia. The framing emphasizes conspiracy theories against the government and portrays the SNS
Why these scores (Factual 35 · Objective 25): This article repeats similar allegations as the first but adds more emotionally charged language such as 'brutal threats' and 'traitors.' It lacks concrete details and relies heavily on unverified claims by Uglješa Mrdić. The tone is extremely biased, presenting the situation as a planned civil war
KurirParty-alignedLeftFactual 30Objective 1514 days ago
The article discusses the revelation by the Higher Public Prosecutor's Office regarding the fabricated 'acoustic cannon' incident in Belgrade. It claims that the event was part of a conspiracy orchestrated by blockaders and their supporters, who had previously spread false information through media outlets. The article criticizes President Aleksandar Vučić, portraying him as a monster rather than a human being, and argues that the false narrative aimed to delegitimize his leadership.
Bias read (Left): The article uses highly emotive and derogatory language toward President Vučić, referring to him as a 'monster' and advocating for his elimination. It frames the 'acoustic cannon' incident as a deliberate falsehood used to portray Vučić negatively, without providing balanced perspectives or counter-
Why these scores (Factual 30 · Objective 15): This article continues the conspiratorial narrative from the first piece, presenting unverified claims as established facts. It accuses President Vučić of being a 'monster' and frames the 'sound cannon' story as part of a broader plot to dehumanize him. The language is emotionally charged and lacks
Dejan Zlatanović, the editor-in-chief of the Serbian news portal Srbin.info, was questioned by police as a civilian in an investigation related to the 'sound cannon' incident. The Belgrade Higher Public Prosecutor's Office stated that Zlatanović voluntarily responded to the police summons as part of a preliminary investigation into alleged criminal acts such as calling for violent changes to the constitutional order. The inquiry stems from his controversial statements made on March 15, 2025, regarding the use of sound cannons against citizens at the end of a student protest, which he attributed to President Aleksandar Vučić and Interior Minister Ivica Dačić. Srbin.info claims that members of the Security Intelligence Agency (BIA) entered the home of Zlatanović's parents in Leskovo near Belgrade with the intent to arrest him, though he was not present at the time. The portal describes this as part of a years-long campaign against Zlatanović by the Vučić regime, including a 2023 case where he was wrongfully imprisoned for 55 days under charges of undermining the constitutional order, later dropped by court proceedings.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both the official stance from the prosecutor's office and the perspective from Srbin.info, providing a balanced view of the situation without overtly favoring either side. It includes direct quotes from both parties involved, allowing readers to form their own conclusions.
President of Serbia Aleksandar Vučić delivered a weekly address emphasizing his commitment to working for Serbia and its people, stating that serving the country is both a duty and an honor. He expressed confidence in the nation's progress and pledged to engage with citizens to assess ongoing projects aimed at elevating Serbia's global standing. Vučić also addressed recent controversies involving media outlets N1 and Nova S, clarifying that he has no intention of suing them over their reports regarding the use of a sound cannon during protests on March 15. He stated that he had not been aware of the extent of misinformation they spread until recently and now sees no need for legal action, focusing instead on ensuring transparency and truth for the public.
Bias read (Right): The article frames Vučić's statements in a positive light, highlighting his patriotism and commitment to national development while downplaying criticism of media outlets. The emphasis on Vučić’s personal dedication and the absence of any critical perspective on his actions suggest a right-leaning倾向
President of Serbia Aleksandar Vučić has reiterated his claim that he would not have remained president if the use of sound cannons had been allowed. He accused certain individuals of believing they are important enough to dictate who can go where and what they can do. Vučić criticized those who overestimated their influence, stating that some lack clarity and live in bubbles of misinformation. He emphasized that these people are not powerful or strong but rely on external support. Vučić stated he will not sue anyone for spreading false information about the sound cannons and expressed a desire for the public to know the truth. He described the actions taken against him as the most shameful history of disgrace, lies, slander, metaphorical killing, and character assassination, which he considers worse than actual murder. He expressed regret for not being able to protect his family and stated his continued efforts to protect others.
Bias read (Right): The article presents President Vučić's strongly worded accusations against unnamed individuals, using emotionally charged language such as 'beščašća' (disgrace), 'laži' (lies), 'kleveta' (slander), 'metaforičkog ubijanja' (metaphorical killing), and 'character assassination.' These terms suggest a v
President of Serbia Aleksandar Vučić has criticized claims surrounding the 'sound cannon' incident and the 'Sarajevo Safari' event, stating that those involved have been lying throughout. He questioned whether the lies stopped after the death of journalist Jovanjić or the sound cannon incident, asserting that they continue to spread false narratives. Vučić emphasized that the sound cannon was not a toy but comparable in size to a tank, and he challenged critics to provide evidence of its existence. He also referenced the death of a boy from Valjevo, suggesting that the incident was used to provoke violence.
Bias read (Right): The article presents President Vučić's strong accusations against his critics, using confrontational language and implying that opponents are spreading falsehoods. The framing emphasizes Vučić's stance as being under attack by those who are dishonest, which aligns with a right-leaning perspective in
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Serbia
