ON
← Back to feed
What has NPOO brought us? Public works have raised GDP, but their effect is one-sided.
Croatia🏛️ PoliticsCenter6 hr. ago

What has NPOO brought us? Public works have raised GDP, but their effect is one-sided.

Croatia has allocated €7.3 billion out of the total €10 billion available under the National Program for Recovery and Resilience (NPOO), achieving full success in processing eight payment requests. The government highlights this as one of the largest development cycles in the country’s history, with investments made across infrastructure, education, healthcare, social care, transportation, energy, water supply, and drainage. Public infrastructure projects funded by European Union funds are visible nationwide, including new kindergartens, schools, mobile health units, elderly care centers, and upgrades to public transport systems. However, economists criticize the allocation strategy, arguing that too much funding was directed toward public infrastructure, which provides a short-term boost to GDP but lacks long-term sustainability. They argue that insufficient investment was made in private sector development, particularly in manufacturing industries that could ensure long-term economic growth. While Croatia’s GDP has accelerated rapidly, this growth is expected to slow down once the NPOO funds are fully utilized.

1 reports

Novi list logoNovi listIndependentCenter6 hr. ago
What has NPOO brought us? Public works have raised GDP, but their effect is one-sided.

Croatia has allocated €7.3 billion out of the total €10 billion available under the National Program for Recovery and Resilience (NPOO), achieving full success in processing eight payment requests. The government highlights this as one of the largest development cycles in the country’s history, with investments made across infrastructure, education, healthcare, social care, transportation, energy, water supply, and drainage. Public infrastructure projects funded by European Union funds are visible nationwide, including new kindergartens, schools, mobile health units, elderly care centers, and upgrades to public transport systems. However, economists criticize the allocation strategy, arguing that too much funding was directed toward public infrastructure, which provides a short-term boost to GDP but lacks long-term sustainability. They argue that insufficient investment was made in private sector development, particularly in manufacturing industries that could ensure long-term economic growth. While Croatia’s GDP has accelerated rapidly, this growth is expected to slow down once the NPOO funds are fully utilized.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both the government's positive assessment of the NPOO program and critical perspectives from economists regarding its allocation strategy. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or omission of context. The framing remains balanced, presenting both the '

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories