Stevanovic won't give up on Mijica that easily.

24ur (POP TV)IndependentProgressiveFactual 95Objective 8814 days ago

The article discusses the situation of Borisa Mijič, a parliament member whose activities at his company Progros are under scrutiny by the Anti-Corruption Commission. Since mid-June, Mijič has not been present in parliamentary sessions. Zoran Stevanović, president of the National Assembly and leader of the Resnica party, comments on the potential consequences if Mijič fails to meet obligations set by the party, including repaying debts and avoiding legal issues. He states that if Mijič is found guilty of wrongdoing before October 10th, he will demand his resignation. While some within the party question Mijič’s credibility and mandate, Stevanović maintains confidence in the party’s position and rejects external pressure. The article also mentions similar allegations against Mijič by Stevanović last week, which were denied by SSI Schäfer, citing unverified claims from a former lawyer.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the situation around the potential removal of Mijič due to alleged misconduct, emphasizing the political implications and the role of the party leadership. It highlights the internal party dynamics and the influence of the party leader, suggesting a left-leaning perspective by foc

Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 88): Fully factual and maintains objectivity in reporting on Stevanović’s payment of debts to former employees.

ReporterIndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 6514 days ago

The article discusses the situation involving Zoran Stevanović, president of the Resnica party, regarding the potential removal of Mijič from his parliamentary mandate. Stevanović states that he will request Mijič's resignation if proven guilty of wrongdoing, emphasizing the importance of legal proceedings and adherence to party agreements. He highlights the need for thorough investigation by competent authorities before any decision is made. The article mentions that Mijič faces allegations related to debts owed to employees, financial authorities, and subcontractors. Stevanović also outlines possible scenarios, including the possibility of holding replacement elections if Mijič fails to meet obligations within six months of his mandate confirmation. Additionally, he notes that the party is assisting affected workers of Progros through a committee, with three individuals having already approached them.

Bias read (Center): While the article involves political figures and their internal party decisions, it presents the stance of Stevanović without overtly favoring one side over another. It reports on the conditions under which Mijič might lose his mandate and outlines procedural steps without clear ideological slant. S

Why these scores (Factual 80 · Objective 65): Factual about Mijič's financial status and Stevanović's position. Objectivity is lower due to strong calls for Mijič's resignation and emotional language from critics.

Svet24IndependentCenterFactual 35Objective 2017 days ago

The article questions whether Stevanović has replaced Delavska with Mr. Mijič in an advisory role. It appears to focus on potential personnel changes within an organization or institution, possibly related to politics or governance. The specific roles of Stevanović, Delavska, and Mijič are not detailed in the provided text. The change raises questions about the motivations behind such a shift and its implications for decision-making processes. No further information is available regarding the nature of their roles or the reasons for the replacement.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a question without taking a clear stance or providing evidence that would indicate a particular ideological leaning. It does not exhibit biased language, one-sided sourcing, or omission of context that would suggest a left or right lean. The framing remains neutral, focusing on疑

Why these scores (Factual 35 · Objective 20): The article repeats the same question twice without providing any substantive information or context. It lacks clarity and fails to present facts or perspectives from multiple sources. The repetitive phrasing suggests poor journalistic practice and an absence of meaningful reporting.