ON
← Back to feed
Alleged ₦36m fraud: Court adjourns Blessing CEO’s trial
NG🏛️ PoliticsCenter5 hr. ago

Alleged ₦36m fraud: Court adjourns Blessing CEO’s trial

The trial of social media influencer Blessing CEO (Okoro Blessing Nkiruka) was adjourned until 20 July 2024 after she failed to appear in court due to illness. The Federal High Court in Ikoyi granted the adjournment following defense counsel's claim that she was indisposed and required a medical report. Blessing CEO faces charges of fraud related to an alleged ₦36 million scam involving a property lease in Lagos. The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) alleges she misrepresented the property's availability, which is punishable under Nigerian law. Earlier reports indicated she had returned ₦24 million of the disputed amount, but the EFCC opposed delaying proceedings for potential settlements. Forensic evidence suggests the funds were deposited into accounts linked to her, and the property was confirmed to belong to another individual.

The trial of Okoro Blessing Nkiruka, known professionally as Blessing CEO, a social media influencer and self-styled relationship therapist, was adjourned on Wednesday following her failure to appear in court. The Federal High Court in Ikoyi granted the adjournment, which will see the case resumed on 20 July, after defense counsel, P.I. Nwafuru, informed the court that the defendant was unwell and could not be produced. Officials from the Nigerian Correctional Service confirmed her illness, prompting the request for a brief adjournment. A medical report detailing her condition is expected to be submitted at the next hearing. Blessing CEO faces two charges of fraud, brought by the Lagos Zonal Directorate 1 of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC). The allegations center around an alleged scheme to defraud a complainant, Ifeyinwa Nonye Okoye, of ₦36 million. According to the EFCC, the money was obtained through false pretenses, with the defendant claiming to secure a lease for a six-bedroom detached duplex located at No. 1B Tunbosun Osobu Street, off Kuboye Road, Lekki. The commission asserts that the representation was knowingly false, violating the Advance Fee Fraud and Other Fraud Related Offences Act, 2006. Blessing CEO has pleaded not guilty to these charges. During earlier proceedings, the defense revealed that both parties were considering an out-of-court settlement. It was disclosed that Blessing CEO had returned ₦24 million of the disputed amount. However, the EFCC opposed any delay, emphasizing that criminal prosecution proceeds on behalf of the federal government and cannot be suspended during negotiations. The court allowed settlement discussions to continue but maintained that criminal proceedings would proceed uninterrupted. In a prior report, the court deferred a decision on the defendant's bail application while examining evidence from the EFCC’s investigating officer, Bufa Regina Okangbe. Ms. Okangbe testified that forensic analysis indicated the disputed funds were deposited into two bank accounts associated with the defendant: ₦25 million into a Guaranty Trust Bank account and ₦11 million into an Access Bank account. She further stated that the Lekki property in question belonged to Tunbosun Osobu, who had leased it to the defendant. The complainant had started renovations on the property before the landlord requested her departure. The EFCC’s investigation suggests that the accused misrepresented her ability to secure the lease, leading to the financial loss. The defense has yet to provide detailed arguments regarding the authenticity of the claims or the nature of the alleged misrepresentation. The upcoming hearing on 20 July will include the presentation of the medical report confirming Blessing CEO’s inability to attend the previous session. This information is critical for the court to assess the validity of the adjournment request and to determine whether further legal action should be taken against the defendant. The case highlights ongoing challenges in handling high-profile fraud cases, particularly when individuals involved have significant public presence. The outcome of this trial could set precedents for how such matters are handled in future legal proceedings. As the court prepares to reconvene, all eyes remain on the developments surrounding the case and the potential implications for both the defendant and the broader legal landscape.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

1 reports

Premium Times Nigeria logoPremium Times NigeriaIndependentCenter5 hr. ago
Alleged ₦36m fraud: Court adjourns Blessing CEO’s trial

The trial of social media influencer Blessing CEO (Okoro Blessing Nkiruka) was adjourned until 20 July 2024 after she failed to appear in court due to illness. The Federal High Court in Ikoyi granted the adjournment following defense counsel's claim that she was indisposed and required a medical report. Blessing CEO faces charges of fraud related to an alleged ₦36 million scam involving a property lease in Lagos. The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) alleges she misrepresented the property's availability, which is punishable under Nigerian law. Earlier reports indicated she had returned ₦24 million of the disputed amount, but the EFCC opposed delaying proceedings for potential settlements. Forensic evidence suggests the funds were deposited into accounts linked to her, and the property was confirmed to belong to another individual.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual legal proceedings without overt ideological slant. It reports on a high-profile fraud case involving a public figure, focusing on judicial actions and legal arguments rather than taking sides. While the subject involves corruption allegations, the framing remains neutral

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories