In July 2026, new information emerged about Zoran Stevanović, the current president of the National Assembly and leader of the parliamentary party Resnica. The revelations stem from a court decision from 2004, which was recently published by media outlets such as POP TV and N1. According to this legal document, Stevanović was found guilty of threatening someone's life with serious intent back in 2003 when he was still a police officer. He reportedly told the victim that he would destroy them, ensure they could no longer drive, and even shoot them. This act was deemed a criminal offense under the law at the time, classified as endangering someone’s safety with a grave threat to their life. The case took place on May 30, 2003, around 2 AM, near a hotel where the alleged victim was present. At that time, Stevanović was working as a police officer. The court noted that his threats caused fear because, as a police officer, he had access to weapons. As a result, the court ruled that Stevanović committed a criminal act of endangering safety. He was fined 150,000 tolar and ordered to pay the costs of the proceedings. In its reasoning, the court considered mitigating factors, including the fact that Stevanović had not been previously convicted and that the victim and their friends had made comments against the police and the officer’s alcohol consumption, since he was not on duty at the time. No aggravating circumstances were found regarding the accused, according to media reports. At trial, Stevanović denied the allegations, claiming he did not make the threats and asserting that the victim falsely reported him due to dissatisfaction with how he treated him as a police officer, treating him equally to other offenders. He also claimed that the victim later boasted about the complaint to his friends. In February 2026, Stevanović told journalists that he did not remember the incident. However, on social media, he stated that he intended to give the victim, who controlled all spheres of social life in that environment, some strong words because the person deserved it. The cabinet of Stevanović responded to inquiries from the STA, stating that the issue has been publicly raised since the campaign before the parliamentary elections and that Stevanović has already given his position on the matter multiple times. They added that there will be no further comment on the issue. Meanwhile, members of the Resnica party wrote on social media that no one hides what Stevanović did 23 years ago. The revelations have sparked renewed calls for Stevanović to step down from his role as president of the National Assembly. The Left party emphasized that these disclosures confirm why Stevanović should not hold the position, arguing that someone who deceives the public and conceals their convictions while protecting a member of parliament facing serious accusations of exploiting employees lacks the credibility needed to lead the highest legislative body. Additionally, the Left criticized the leaders of coalition parties, including SDS's Janez Janša, NSi's Jernej Vrtovec, and Demokratov's Anže Logar, for relying on the support of Resnica and purchasing their political services at the expense of everyone else. This is not the first time Stevanović has faced scrutiny over past convictions. Earlier this year, it was revealed that he was sentenced in November 2008 by the District Court in Kranj for attempting a criminal act of fraud, and that conviction became final in mid-2010. Both of these convictions have since been erased from his criminal record. During the election campaign, Stevanović claimed he had never been finally convicted, although he requested confirmation of his non-criminal status from his candidates. Media outlets POP TV and N1 obtained the 2004 court ruling based on a request to the Information Commissioner, highlighting that the public interest in Stevanović's case outweighs his right to legal rehabilitation after the erasure of the conviction from his criminal record. The publication of the court documents has reignited discussions about Stevanović's past actions and their implications for his current political career. Further controversy arose with the revelation of another court case involving two brothers named Aksalić, who attended a Resnica party convention. It was disclosed that both brothers were sentenced in 2022 for causing general danger by shooting at another vehicle using semi-automatic pistols in 2019. Stevanović had previously claimed that the brothers had no connection to the party and were part of the organization and security team during the convention. These developments continue to cast doubt on Stevanović's integrity and raise questions about the transparency of his past. As the situation unfolds, the public and political landscape in Slovenia remains watchful, awaiting further responses and actions from Stevanović and the relevant authorities.
9 reports
24ur (POP TV)IndependentCenterFactual 100Objective 1003 days agoIn 2003, Zoran Stevanović, who was then a police officer, allegedly threatened an individual with serious harm, including stating he would destroy and shoot them. This occurred around 2 AM outside a hotel, according to a court ruling obtained by the information commissioner. The local court in Radovljica ruled on June 23, 2004, that Stevanović had committed the criminal act of endangering someone’s safety through a serious threat. He was fined 150,000 tolar, payable within three months after the judgment became final. If he failed to pay, the fine would be converted into days in jail at a rate of one day per 10,000 tolar. The court considered mitigating factors such as his lack of prior convictions and possible provocations from the victim and their friends toward the police and alcohol-related driving. However, no aggravating circumstances were found. Stevanović denied making the threats and claimed the victim falsely reported him due to personal grievances. The court heard testimony from six witnesses, reviewed the victim’s complaint, police reports, and other documents. Stevanović has previously insisted he was never convicted of any crime, though this case remains unresolved.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a legal ruling against a former police officer, focusing on the facts of the case, the court's reasoning, and both the prosecution and defense arguments. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or editorializing. The content is balanced in presenting the
Why these scores (Factual 100 · Objective 100): Directly quotes from the primary source document verbatim, accurately representing the facts, legal consequences, and defense arguments without adding or omitting information.
LokalecIndependentCenterFactual 98Objective 953 days agoIn 2003, Zoran Stevanović, who is now the President of the National Assembly and leader of the parliamentary group Resnica, was found guilty of threatening someone's life by a local court. The judgment, obtained by journalists from N1 and 24ur, states that he threatened to kill the victim and destroy their life around 2 AM at a hotel. The court ruled that his actions constituted a criminal offense of endangering safety. He was fined 150,000 tolar and ordered to pay process costs. During the trial, Stevanović denied the allegations, claiming the victim falsely reported him due to personal grievances. The court considered mitigating factors such as his lack of prior convictions and the victim’s alleged complaints about police conduct and alcohol-related driving. Stevanović has since commented on the incident on social media, stating that the victim deserved some strong words. This information was revealed during the campaign for the parliamentary elections.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the historical legal case against Zoran Stevanović, a current political figure, but does not take a clear stance on the matter. It reports the facts of the case, including the court's findings and Stevanović's denial, without overtly favoring either side. The framing remains non
Why these scores (Factual 98 · Objective 95): Accurately summarizes the core facts from the primary source, but includes some minor editorial phrasing like 'dodatno pa tega ne komentira' which introduces slight subjectivity.
Maribor24IndependentProgressiveFactual 98Objective 953 days agoThe article reports on a 2004 criminal conviction against Zoran Stevanović, then a police officer, for threatening someone's safety with serious threats of harm, including stating he would destroy and shoot the victim. The court ruled that these threats caused fear due to Stevanović’s possession of weapons as a police officer. He was fined 150,000 tolar and ordered to pay legal costs. Stevanović denied the charges, claiming the victim falsely reported him due to dissatisfaction with police treatment. Recently, during a campaign for parliamentary elections, the incident has been brought up again, with Stevanović denying any wrongdoing and his party stating they do not hide past actions. The article highlights the controversy surrounding his past behavior and its relevance to current political discourse.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the incident as part of ongoing political scrutiny, emphasizing the controversy around Stevanović's past actions and linking them to his current political role. It presents the allegations and court findings without overtly criticizing his current position but highlights the moral
Why these scores (Factual 98 · Objective 95): Accurately presents the main facts from the primary source, though it includes some minor editorial commentary and has formatting inconsistencies.
DnevnikIndependent🔒ProgressiveFactual 95Objective 903 days agoThe article reports on a past criminal conviction of Zoran Stevanović, current president of the parliament and leader of the Resnica party, who was convicted in 2003 for threatening someone's safety with a serious threat to attack their life, including stating he would destroy them and shoot them. The court ruled that this constituted a crime against personal safety, resulting in a fine of 150,000 tolar and payment of legal costs. The conviction was revealed during a campaign period, and the media outlets N1 and 24ur obtained the judgment through an information request. Stevanović denied the allegations, claiming the victim falsely reported him and that the victim had previously complained about being treated unfairly by police. His office stated they have already addressed the issue publicly and will not comment further. The article notes that the incident occurred 20 years ago, and Stevanović has not changed his stance on the matter.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the revelation of Stevanović’s past conviction as a significant political issue, highlighting it during a campaign period and emphasizing the contradiction between his current position as a respected political figure and his past actions. While the article presents factual details
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 90): Provides an accurate account of the event and legal outcome, but contains formatting issues and incomplete sentences, suggesting potential transcription errors rather than factual inaccuracies.
RTV Slovenija (MMC)State / PublicCenterFactual 95Objective 903 days agoIn 2003, Zoran Stevanović, then a police officer and now President of the National Assembly and leader of the Resni.ca party, was convicted for threatening someone's life by saying he would destroy them and shoot them. The court in Radovljica sentenced him to a fine of 150,000 tolar, noting that this was his first offense. At the time, Stevanović denied making the threats and claimed he had been falsely accused. Recently, the case has resurfaced amid political controversy, with the Left Party calling for his resignation as head of the National Assembly, citing his failure to disclose this conviction during his campaign. The conviction was later erased from criminal records under rehabilitation laws. Additionally, Stevanović previously faced another conviction in 2008 for attempted fraud, which was also erased from his record. During the election period, he stated he had no convictions, but media outlets obtained the court documents through an information commissioner process.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about past legal convictions of a high-profile politician without overtly favoring any side. It includes direct quotes from both the accused and opposing parties, providing balanced context regarding the legal proceedings and their implications on current政治地位
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 90): Accurately summarizes the key facts from the primary source, but includes some editorial commentary and lacks specific details about the defense arguments presented in the original document.
N1 SlovenijaIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 903 days agoThe article reveals a legally binding verdict against Zoran Stevanović, who was then a police officer, for threatening to destroy and shoot someone in May 2003. The court ruled that his actions constituted a threat to safety under the then-applicable criminal code, resulting in a fine of 150,000 tolar (approximately 632 euros). The verdict became final in March 2005 and was later removed from his criminal record due to public interest in transparency. The article also mentions that Stevanović’s brother, Aksalić, was similarly convicted for firing at another vehicle with semi-automatic pistols during the same period. The article highlights the legal process, including the court’s consideration of witness testimony and documentary evidence, and notes that Stevanović denied making the threats but was ultimately found guilty. He has claimed he does not remember whom he threatened.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of the legal proceedings against Zoran Stevanović, detailing both his defense and the court’s ruling. It includes quotes from the verdict and Stevanović’s denial, while also explaining the context of his current political role. There is no overt ideological sl
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 90): Accurate summary of the primary source document, including the date, location, and nature of the offense. However, it adds extra details about 'brata Aksalić' not present in the original text, slightly reducing factual accuracy.
MladinaIndependentProgressiveFactual 95Objective 904 days agoThe article reports on past misconduct allegations against Zoran Stevanović, who was formerly a police officer but now serves as the president of the National Assembly and head of his political party, Resnica. In 2003, he was convicted of threatening someone’s safety by claiming he would 'destroy' and 'shoot' them, which caused fear due to his status as a police officer with weapons. The conviction included a fine of 150,000 tolar and payment of legal costs. Stevanović denied the accusations during his trial, claiming the victim fabricated the complaint and acted out of personal vendetta. Recent media outlets, including N1 and 24ur, obtained the court ruling through a request to the Information Office, revealing additional details about the case. His political opponents argue this history disqualifies him from holding office.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the past criminal record of Zoran Stevanović as a justification for questioning his suitability for public office, aligning with left-leaning critiques of political figures with controversial histories. It emphasizes the gravity of his past actions and their implications for his现任
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 90): Correctly reports the core facts from the primary source, but includes additional political commentary from the Left party, introducing some bias into the reporting.
Žurnal24IndependentProgressiveFactual 90Objective 853 days agoThe Supreme Court in Radovljica convicted Zoran Stevanović of threatening someone's safety with a serious threat to kill them, based on documents obtained by journalists from 24ur.com and N1. The incident occurred on May 30, 2023, when Stevanović, then employed as a police officer, allegedly threatened a person at night with harm and shooting. The court imposed a fine of 150,000 tolar and potential imprisonment if the fine was unpaid. The court considered mitigating factors such as Stevanović being previously unpenalized and observations from the victim and their friends regarding police conduct and alcohol influence. Stevanović denied the criminal act, claiming it was a false report by the victim who later boasted about it. During the election campaign, Stevanović claimed he had never been legally convicted. He has since commented on social media, dismissing the allegations as recycled stories and criticizing media outlets. The Left has called for his resignation as head of the National Assembly, citing his lack of credibility due to past legal issues and alleged protection of a parliament member with credible accusations against workers.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the conviction of Zoran Stevanović, a politician, as a significant issue affecting public trust in leadership. It highlights the Left's call for his resignation, emphasizing his lack of credibility due to past legal issues and alleged support for a parliament member accused of mis
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 85): Contains mostly accurate information from the primary source, but incorrectly states the date of the incident as May 30, 2023 instead of 2003, and includes some editorial commentary.
Svet24IndependentCenterFactual 0Objective 03 days agoA Slovenian court has convicted a pastor of abusing a woman and threatening her, sentencing him to a significant prison term. The case involved allegations of sexual abuse and intimidation by the religious leader against his congregant. The higher court upheld the conviction, confirming the severity of the crimes committed. This ruling highlights the legal system's stance on such misconduct within religious institutions.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a judicial outcome without overt ideological framing. It focuses on the legal proceedings and the court's decision without emphasizing political agendas or partisan perspectives. The tone remains objective, detailing the charges and the verdict without leaning toward any side.
Why these scores (Factual 0 · Objective 0): Irrelevant article discussing a completely different case involving a pastor, unrelated to Zoran Stevanović or the 2003 incident described in the primary source document.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter
Slovenia
