In anticipation of a new coalition maneuver

The Slovenia TimesIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 859 days ago

Slovenia's right-wing majority government has blocked an opposition attempt to establish two parliamentary inquiries into alleged foreign election interference and illegal campaign financing. The opposition parties—Freedom Movement, Social Democrats (SD), and the Left—had proposed these investigations into activities related to the March general election, focusing on claims that the Israeli private intelligence firm Black Cube intervened on behalf of the ruling Democratic Party (SDS). They also wanted to examine potential violations of foreign donation laws. During a scheduled emergency session on 30 June, lawmakers voted down the agenda, preventing the automatic confirmation of the inquiries. The ruling coalition, led by the SDS and supported by the NSi alliance and the Truth party, opposed the motion with 38 votes, while the opposition secured only 34. Several key opposition figures, including former Prime Minister Robert Golob, were absent. Under parliamentary rules, inquiries requested by at least one-third of MPs would typically proceed automatically if the agenda is approved, but the opposition failed to secure enough support. Critics argue that the move undermines democratic

Bias read (Center): The article presents both the opposition's accusations and the ruling party's actions without overtly favoring either side. It includes direct quotes from both sides and does not explicitly endorse one perspective over the other.

Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 85): Clear and factual summary of the failed motion and the procedural maneuver used to block it. The article remains objective and does not favor any particular political group.

Žurnal24IndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 753 days ago

The Slovenian Parliament (DZ) has scheduled an extraordinary session on Friday to decide whether to approve opposition-led parliamentary investigations into the Black Cube affair and potential illegal financing of political parties. The decision was made by the council of the Speaker of the DZ, who unanimously agreed to the agenda. Initially, the agenda was rejected by most deputies during the start of the extraordinary session, with 34 opposition members voting in favor and 38 coalition members opposing. However, the speaker, Zoran Stevanović, concluded the session after the agenda was not approved. The opposition claims the coalition is attempting to block the establishment of investigative committees, while the coalition accuses the opposition of undemocratic maneuvers. The parliamentary investigation would examine who ordered and paid for secret recordings of prominent figures, including politicians and lawyers, and whether representatives of Black Cube visited the headquarters of the SDS party to influence the recent parliamentary election results. Additionally, the investigation would look into alleged hidden funding through connected business and media relations and foreigns

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of the political conflict between the opposition and the ruling coalition regarding the approval of parliamentary investigations. It reports both sides' positions without overtly favoring either side, focusing on procedural developments rather than taking a立场.

Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 75): The article accurately describes the situation where the session was blocked due to failure to approve the agenda. While it provides factual information, it contains some subjective commentary about the ruling coalition's actions being undemocratic.

Spletni časopisIndependentProgressiveFactual 90Objective 7510 days ago

The article reports on an extraordinary parliamentary session held on June 30, 2026, where a vote on the daily agenda was rejected due to insufficient support. The opposition parties, including Svoboda, SD, and Levica, failed to secure enough votes to approve the agenda, leading to the cancellation of a planned investigation into whether the opposition SDS had ordered and paid for interviews with members of the political, business, and legal elites through the firm Black Cube. The investigation would have examined potential misconduct by media outlets and journalists aligned with the right, particularly those previously led by Mojca Pašek Šetinc and Tamara Vonta. The article highlights the absence of several key lawmakers from both the left and right wings, contributing to the failure of the vote. It also includes social media commentary criticizing the behavior of certain politicians during the session.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the situation as a failure of the ruling coalition (right-wing parties) to maintain discipline and accountability, while emphasizing the lack of action from the opposition (left-wing parties) to pursue investigations into alleged misconduct. The tone suggests skepticism toward the

Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 75): The article accurately reports the failed parliamentary session and the reasons behind it. It provides factual information but contains some subjective commentary about the political maneuvering involved.

DnevnikIndependent🔒CenterFactual 88Objective 758 days ago

The article discusses a parliamentary dispute in Slovenia involving President of the National Assembly Zoran Stevanović and opposition leader Luka Mesec. Stevanović accused Mesec of misleading parliamentarians by claiming that voting machines were non-functional during a session, which he called 'the greatest fraud in the history of parliament.' He argued that the majority of the assembly had manipulated the agenda by refusing to approve a special session, thereby preventing two parliamentary investigations into the Black Cube case and regional funding issues. Stevanović also claimed that opposition members, including Tina Brecelj, did not vote because they were instructed not to, despite being present in the chamber. He provided video evidence showing that all voting machines functioned correctly and that Brecelj did not interact with them during the process. The conflict highlights tensions between the ruling coalition and the opposition over procedural legitimacy and transparency.

Bias read (Center): While the article presents allegations from both sides—Stevanović accuses Mesec of misinformation and procedural misconduct, while Mesec is implied to have undermined parliamentary processes—the narrative remains balanced, presenting both perspectives without overtly favoring one side. There is no明显

Why these scores (Factual 88 · Objective 75): Factual reporting on the failed motion and the dispute over the voting machine. The article remains relatively neutral, presenting both sides' arguments without overtly favoring either.

Maribor24IndependentProgressiveFactual 88Objective 729 days ago

Alenka Bratušek, predsednica komisije DZ za nadzor javnih financ, je odgovarjal na kazensko ovadbo, ki jo so zoper njo vložili pravica Fokusa in DS Marko Lotrič ter njena generalna sekretarka Monika Kirbiš Rojs. Opozorila je, da 'nekateri očitno mislijo, da so nedotakljivi', in napovedala nadaljevanje spornih sej komisije. Bratušek trdi, da je delovala v skladu z zakoni in da sta računsko sodišče in Komisija za preprečevanje korupcije pristojna za preverjanje poslovanja državnega sveta in stranke Fokus brez obtoževanja. Kritično je opozorila, da je 'drena v pravo gnezdo' zaradi možnih neposlušnosti v stranki Fokus, in pozvala ljudi, naj oddajajo glas za referendum o zakonu o parlamentarni preiskavi. Fokus in Kirbiš Rojs menita, da je komisija DZ presegla svoje pristojnosti in predlagata preveritev sumov zlorabe uradnega položaja.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the controversy around Bratušek's actions as a legitimate legal process, emphasizing her adherence to laws and the need for transparency. It highlights concerns over potential misuse of public funds by Fokus, which aligns with left-leaning critiques of political corruption and the

Why these scores (Factual 88 · Objective 72): The article accurately conveys Bratušek's stance and the details of the charges against her. It maintains a relatively neutral tone overall but still emphasizes Bratušek's viewpoint, especially in her criticism of others, which affects the balance of the narrative.

Nova24TVParty-alignedConservativeFactual 85Objective 759 days ago

The leaders of the FOKUS political party, President Marko Lotrič and General Secretary Monika Kirbiš Rojs, have filed a criminal complaint against Alenka Bratušek, a former minister and current member of the Freedom Movement party, alleging misuse of her official position and negligence in service. The complaint centers on Bratušek's role as chair of the Committee for Oversight of Public Finances, where she allegedly allowed the committee to discuss a matter outside its jurisdiction—specifically, the financing of the FOKUS party—which is not within the committee’s authority under parliamentary rules. Lotrič and Kirbiš Rojs argue that Bratušek failed to assess whether the issue fell within the committee's scope before proceeding, potentially causing political harm to them while allowing their political rival, Marko Lotrič, to be publicly scrutinized. They claim this action violated procedural guidelines and could constitute a criminal offense.

Bias read (Conservative): The article presents the actions of the FOKUS party leadership as legitimate complaints against Bratušek, using terms like 'misuse of office' and 'negligence,' which frame the situation as wrongdoing by Bratušek. It emphasizes the potential political harm caused to the complainants and criticizes Br

Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 75): Clear reporting on procedural delays and political positions. Neutral in describing events but shows slight bias towards opposition concerns.

Maribor24IndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 7510 days ago

The Slovenian parliament (DZ) failed to approve the daily agenda for today's extraordinary session, leading to the session being adjourned without proceeding with planned parliamentary investigations. The proposed agenda included inquiries into the Black Cube scandal, which involves alleged secret recordings of conversations with public figures, and potential illegal financing of political parties through hidden business and media ties. Opposition parties, including Svoboda, SD, Levice, and Vesna, voted against the agenda, while coalition parties such as SDS, NSi, SLS, Fokus, and Resnice supported it. Four Democratic Party members abstained. Tensions were evident before the session, with opposition expressing concerns over the ruling coalition potentially blocking the establishment of investigative committees. The session also included a minute of silence to honor former DS president Janez Sušnika.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the opposition's rejection of the agenda as a democratic struggle against 'undemocratic maneuvers' by the ruling coalition, suggesting a left-leaning perspective. It emphasizes the opposition's stance and highlights their concerns about transparency and accountability, aligning it

Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 75): This article accurately describes the parliamentary session and the rejection of the agenda. It maintains a neutral tone, presenting both sides of the debate without overt bias, though it does mention specific political groups and their positions.

LokalecIndependentConservativeFactual 85Objective 707 days ago

The article discusses a dispute between President of the Slovenian Parliament Zoran Stevanović and opposition leader Luka Mesec regarding the rejection of a parliamentary session agenda that would have included two parliamentary inquiries. Stevanović accuses Mesec of misleading the parliament by claiming that opposition members, including Tina Brecelj, did not vote due to malfunctioning voting machines, which he disputes. He claims that all voting machines functioned correctly and that Brecelj did not engage with the machine during the vote. Stevanović further criticizes Mesec for allegedly using gestures to signal support to his colleagues during the vote, which he interprets as dishonest behavior. The conflict highlights tensions over procedural integrity and the legitimacy of parliamentary proceedings.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the actions of the opposition (Mesec and Brecelj) as deceptive and undermines their credibility, while supporting Stevanović’s claim that the parliamentary procedures were followed correctly. The language used suggests skepticism toward the opposition’s motives and emphasizes the

Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 70): Accurate in reporting the failed motion and the accusations made by Mesec. The tone is somewhat biased in favor of Stevanović, though the facts are presented fairly.

24ur (POP TV)IndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 708 days ago

The article discusses ongoing controversy surrounding a parliamentary session in Slovenia where opposition parties requested an extraordinary session to investigate the Black Cube scandal and regional funding issues. The parliament rejected the agenda, delaying these investigations. President of the National Assembly Zoran Stevanović responded to accusations from committee chair Luka Mesec (Levica and Vesna), denying claims of boycotting the session and calling the situation the 'greatest fraud in parliamentary history.' Stevanović disputes claims that opposition members, including Levica's Tina Brecelj and Svoboda's Boruta Sajovica, did not vote due to malfunctioning voting machines, stating that all devices functioned correctly and both were present during the vote. He further alleges that Mesec instructed Brecelj not to vote, citing video evidence showing Mesec raised his hand toward his own MPs during the vote.

Bias read (Center): While the article presents conflicting accounts between Stevanović and Mesec regarding the validity of votes and procedural conduct, it does not clearly favor one side over the other through biased language or selective sourcing. Both perspectives are presented with equal emphasis, maintaining a non

Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 70): Accurate in detailing the failed motion and the accusations made by Mesec. The tone is slightly biased in favor of Stevanović, though it presents the facts clearly.

ReporterIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 709 days ago

The article discusses allegations against Alenka Bratušek, the leader of the political party Fokus, regarding potential misuse of her position as chairperson of the parliamentary committee for oversight of public finances. The accusations claim she improperly referred matters related to the party’s funding to this committee, which is not authorized by the parliamentary rules to handle such issues. In response, Fokus has called for an investigation into possible abuse of office, suggesting that the committee’s actions could have allowed political advantage through public parliamentary scrutiny of their political competitor. The article outlines the legal basis for these claims and includes statements from both Fokus members and Bratušek, who denies the allegations and asserts that the committee’s actions were within legal boundaries.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the allegations as a politically motivated attempt to undermine Bratušek, emphasizing the potential for political gain through public scrutiny. It highlights the legal arguments made by Fokus members while downplaying the counterarguments from Bratušek, presenting the situation as

Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 70): Reports on legal actions with specific allegations. Uses somewhat emotive language regarding political consequences but remains largely factual.

RTV Slovenija (MMC)State / PublicCenterFactual 85Objective 653 days ago

The Slovenian parliament (DZ) has scheduled an extraordinary session on Friday to decide whether to establish parliamentary inquiries into allegations against the company Black Cube and potential illegal financing of political parties. The decision was delayed after the initial agenda was rejected by coalition members during an earlier session. The opposition parties (Svoboda, Levica in Vesni) have proposed these inquiries, which would investigate who ordered and paid for covert filming of conversations with prominent figures, including politicians and lawyers, and whether there were attempts to influence the outcome of recent elections. They also seek to examine alleged hidden funding through business and media ties. Additionally, the session will address a proposal to amend the law regarding national symbols, restricting the display of flags without legal basis. The ruling party (Resnic) claims the decision will depend on whether the proposers reconsider their stance on conducting separate sessions for the inquiries.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both sides of the debate: the opposition's push for transparency and the ruling party's concerns over procedural fairness. It does not take a clear ideological stance but reports on the political conflict between the two factions. The framing remains balanced, focusing on the 'd

Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 65): Similar to previous articles, this piece provides factual updates on the DZ session and the rejection of the agenda. It maintains consistency with cross-source information but has a slight partisan tilt in its coverage.

Nova24TVParty-alignedProgressiveFactual 85Objective 658 days ago

Luka Mesec, predsednik DZ Levice, je v javnem pismu očital predsednika DZ Zorana Stevanovića zaradi sabotiranja izredne seje in preiskave o Black Cube, kar je poudarjal kot skupno dejavnost s trenutno koalicijo. Mesec je zadevo povezal z domnevno neprimerno obnašanjem Stevanovića in zmanjkanjem poslancev na seji. Stevanović je odgovoril z opozorilom, da je Mesec signaliziral poslanki Tina Brecelj, da ne glasuje, in dodal, da so glasovalne naprave delovale pravilno. Oba strani so omenili nekatere nejasnosti glede glasovanja, kar je povzročilo napetost.

Bias read (Progressive): Artikel ima levično okvirsko, saj kritika predsednika DZ Zorana Stevanovića poudarja njegovo neprimerno obnašanje in uporabo moči, medtem ko se osredotoča na preiskavo, ki jo podpira levica. Uporaba izrazov kot „nedemokratično“ in „pokvarjenost“ pripomore k levičnemu tonu. Stevanović je odgovoril z

Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 65): The article reports on Luka Mesec's public letter to Zoran Stevanović, alleging sabotage of extraordinary sessions and investigations related to Black Cube. It references specific actions by both parties and includes quotes from Mesec. Factuality is high as it aligns with cross-source consensus on t

Zanima.meIndependentConservativeFactual 80Objective 759 days ago

The leaders of the Fokus party, Marko Lotrič and Monika Kirbiš Rojs, have filed a criminal complaint against parliamentary commissioner Alenka Bratušek, accusing her of misuse of office or official duties and negligence in service. The complaint relates to a committee session on June 19, where Bratušek investigated alleged irregularities in the financing of the Fokus party. Fokus claims the committee was not competent to review their funding because they had not received state funds during the period under scrutiny. They argue the committee cannot assess private payments, event costs, or other political activities unrelated to state budget execution. The session was called at the request of the Freedom parliamentary group, which questioned whether the State Council under Lotrič’s leadership might have been used as an institutional or financial backdrop for Fokus operations. Bratušek maintained the committee oversees state budget implementation, including the State Council and party financing. The session ended in chaos after heated debate and procedural motions.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the actions of Fokus and their legal complaints against Bratušek as legitimate and highlights potential misuse by the opposition, suggesting a narrative that favors Fokus' position. The language implies criticism of Bratušek's actions while emphasizing Fokus' arguments as strong,傾

Why these scores (Factual 80 · Objective 75): Reports the new request for an extraordinary session by the opposition, including the proposed investigations. It aligns with the primary source on the main points but omits some specific details about the legislative proposals. Maintains a neutral tone overall.

Siol.netState / PublicProgressiveFactual 80Objective 708 days ago

The opposition parties—Svoboda, SD, and Levice—have submitted a new request for an extraordinary session of the Slovenian Parliament (DZ), aiming to initiate parliamentary inquiries into the Black Cube case and local party financing. This time, they have expanded the agenda to include proposals for amendments to the pension and disability insurance law, as well as changes to the law regarding national symbols like the flag, coat of arms, and anthem. The newspaper Resni.ca has proposed adding a clause to the law stating that only flags with legal basis can be displayed at public institutions, effectively banning the occasional practice of displaying foreign flags such as those of Ukraine and Palestine. The State Council (DS) proposes expanding annual and winter supplements to pensions for retirees who were previously covered under narrower benefit scopes and recipients of rural pensions. The bill will be considered under expedited procedures, supported by several parliamentary groups. The opposition accuses the coalition and Resni.ca of maneuvering, claiming the move violates the constitution and parliamentary rules, with constitutional lawyer Rajko Pirnat supporting this claim.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the opposition's actions as legitimate efforts to expand parliamentary oversight and reform social policies, while criticizing the ruling coalition and Resni.ca for procedural manipulation. It emphasizes the opposition’s focus on transparency and constitutional compliance, which倾向

Why these scores (Factual 80 · Objective 70): The article provides factual details about the parliamentary session and the issues at stake. It mentions criticisms from the coalition but does not frame them as overly negative, maintaining a reasonable level of objectivity.

N1 SlovenijaIndependentProgressiveFactual 80Objective 653 days ago

The article discusses ongoing tensions between the opposition parties Sloboda and Left in Slovenia and the ruling coalition led by SDS, NSi, and Resnica regarding the establishment of parliamentary inquiry commissions to investigate the Black Cube affair and allegations of illegal financing of political parties. The opposition has repeatedly requested these inquiries, but the coalition has attempted to block them by refusing to include the issues on the agenda. This has led to accusations of undermining democratic standards and political hygiene. Opposition leader Asta Vrečko warns that further underhanded tactics may be used to prevent the formation of the commissions, while the head of the National Assembly, Zoran Stevanović, suggests that the inquiries should take place on a separate session rather than during the current one.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the actions of the ruling coalition and Resnica as attempts to undermine democratic processes and political transparency, using terms like 'undermining democratic standards,' 'political hygiene,' and 'illegal financing.' It highlights the opposition's concerns about the coalition'

Why these scores (Factual 80 · Objective 65): The article focuses on parliamentary maneuvers regarding the Black Cube affair and parliamentary investigations. It presents the positions of both the opposition and the coalition but shows a clear concern about the coalition potentially blocking investigations. The language suggests a cautious stan

Zanima.meIndependentProgressiveFactual 80Objective 658 days ago

The article reports on a controversy during an extraordinary session of the Slovenian Parliament where Luka Mesec, a coordinator of the Left Party, allegedly signaled to a member of parliament, Tina Brecelj, not to vote, potentially leading to accusations of falsifying the functioning of voting machines. The incident was highlighted by Zoran Stevanović, president of the National Council and leader of the Resnica party, who called it 'the greatest fraud in parliamentary history.' Stevanović released a video showing Mesec signaling to Brecelj, suggesting that she might have been instructed not to vote, which could have led to claims that the voting machine did not work. The session ended prematurely due to unconfirmed agenda items, and there were disputes between opposition leaders. Brecelj denied not voting and claimed she pressed a button and saw a '+' sign. Mesec has not responded to inquiries, while Stevanović criticized the session's conclusion despite raised hands indicating procedural questions.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the incident as a deliberate attempt by Luka Mesec to manipulate the voting process, aligning with the narrative of the opposition (Resnica) that accuses the ruling coalition of misconduct. The language used emphasizes the seriousness of the alleged fraud and portrays Mesec’s act,

Why these scores (Factual 80 · Objective 65): Accurate in describing the failed motion and the accusations between Mesec and Stevanović. However, the tone is biased towards the Resnica-Levica side, using emotionally charged language like 'greatest fraud in history.'

Maribor24IndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 658 days ago

The article discusses a dispute between President of the National Council Zoran Stevanović and opposition leader Luka Mesec regarding a parliamentary session where the agenda for establishing investigative committees was rejected. Stevanović denied allegations that he boycotted the session, claiming that Mesec falsely accused him of doing so. He provided video evidence showing that the voting equipment functioned properly and that Mesec instructed a parliament member not to vote. Stevanović criticized Mesec's claims as lies and emphasized that technical issues during voting should be reported immediately rather than used politically. The article highlights tensions over the legitimacy of the session and the handling of voting procedures.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both sides of the dispute without clear ideological leaning. It reports on Stevanović’s denial of accusations and provides his explanation based on video evidence, while also including Mesec’s claims. There is no evident favoring of one side over the other, maintaining a balance

Why these scores (Factual 80 · Objective 65): Correctly describes the failed motion and the controversy around the voting machine. The article suggests some opposition members might have been afraid of the investigation, which introduces a potential bias.

Siol.netState / PublicCenterFactual 80Objective 603 days ago

The Slovenian Parliament (DZ) will decide on Friday whether to revoke opposition-led parliamentary investigations into the Black Cube affair and local funding of parties. The decision was made during a meeting of the Speaker’s collegium, which also confirmed the agenda for the session. Opposition parties had previously attempted to block the approval of the daily schedule, but this time the coalition and Resnička agreed to proceed. The proposed investigation into Black Cube would examine who ordered and paid for secret recordings of conversations involving public figures, including politicians and lawyers, and whether there was an attempt to influence the outcome of recent parliamentary elections. Another proposed investigation would look into potential hidden financing of political parties through connected business and media relations. Additionally, the session will consider a proposal to amend the law regarding national symbols, aiming to restrict the display of flags without legal basis. Other urgent legislative proposals, such as those related to EU regulations and economic measures, will also be addressed.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of the parliamentary proceedings, detailing both the opposition's attempts to block the agenda and the coalition's eventual agreement. It reports on multiple proposed investigations and legislative changes without overtly favoring any particular side. The tone

Why these scores (Factual 80 · Objective 60): The article discusses the opposition's attempt to set an agenda and the coalition's response. While factual about the procedural aspects, it includes speculative language and potential bias in interpreting political motives.

DomovinaIndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 607 days ago

The article discusses a controversy within Slovenia's parliament regarding alleged fraud during a vote. President of the National Assembly Zoran Stevanović accused the opposition party Levica of lying, citing video evidence showing that their representative Tina Brecelj did not move her hand toward the voting machine during the vote. However, Luka Mesec, president of the parliamentary committee on procedures, claimed that Stevanović ignored warnings that the voting machines were malfunctioning, leading to the loss of votes for Levica's representatives. Mesec argued that Stevanović violated the constitution and laws by boycotting an emergency session he had called. Stevanović denied these claims, stating that the voting machines functioned correctly after being checked by technical services and that Mesec had forgotten that sessions are recorded. The dispute centers around whether the voting process was fair and transparent.

Bias read (Center): The article presents conflicting accounts from both sides—Stevanović accuses Levica of dishonesty based on video evidence, while Mesec argues that Stevanović ignored technical issues and violated procedural rules. Neither side appears to dominate the narrative, and the reporting does not clearly sl抗

Why these scores (Factual 80 · Objective 60): This article presents conflicting accounts from different sources, including statements from politicians like Luka Mesec and Zoran Stevanović. While factual claims are generally supported by reported events, the narrative leans towards one side, reducing objectivity.

DemokracijaParty-alignedCenterFactual 80Objective 558 days ago

Luka Mesec, sokoordinator levice, je javno pismo poslal predsedniku Državnega zbora Zoranu Stevanoviću, kjer mu očita sabotažo izredne seje in preiskave o Black Cube. Mesec trdi, da je Stevanović s svojim dejanjem preprečil ustanovitev preiskovalne komisije, vendar je pomembno opaziti, da so bile na seji prisotne le dve poslancki skupini, medtem ko so tri poslance svobode, vključno z Robertom Golobom, bili odsotni. Poleg tega je Mesec pozabil omeniti, da je njegova predhodnica na tem položaju, Urška Klakočar Župančič, imela podobne težave. Stevanović je odgovoril, da so strokovne službe potrdile delovanje glasovalnih naprav, in je objavil posnetek, na katerem se vidi, kako Mesec signalizira svoji poslanki Tina Brecelj, naj ne glasuje.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both sides of the argument without overtly favoring one over the other. It includes claims from Luka Mesec and responses from Zoran Stevanović, providing a balanced view of the situation regarding the parliamentary session and allegations of sabotage. The framing appears neutral

Why these scores (Factual 80 · Objective 55): The article provides factual details about the parliamentary session and the conflict between Stevanović and Mesec. However, it uses loaded language such as 'sabotaža' (sabotage) and frames the situation in a way that appears to support Stevanović, showing a clear bias.