The Spiegel has labeled Ulrich Siegmund, the leading candidate of the far-right AfD party in Saxony-Anhalt, as “the most dangerous man in Germany” in its latest cover story. The decision, which features Siegmund in a style reminiscent of a wanted poster, marks a bold move by the magazine to highlight perceived threats to democracy. Siegmund, a 35-year-old politician with little national recognition beyond his home state, has become the subject of intense media scrutiny following this provocative title. The piece, published on August 14, 2026, aims to provoke public debate and raise awareness about the dangers posed by right-wing extremism in Germany. The Spiegel’s choice of Siegmund as its target appears to have backfired. Within days of the cover’s release, social media platforms were flooded with parodies and distortions of the image. Memes featuring figures such as former Chancellor Angela Merkel being called “the honestest politician in Germany” or comedian Räuber Hotzenplotz being dubbed “the cutest dog in Germany” spread rapidly. Even Siegmund himself participated in the trend, posting videos of him signing copies of the magazine and joking about how he would reveal the cost of his campaign support from Hamburg if he won. These responses suggest that the Spiegel’s attempt to elevate Siegmund’s profile as a dangerous figure has instead sparked widespread mockery and confusion. Despite the backlash, the Spiegel maintains that its coverage was intended to strengthen democratic values and expose the risks associated with extremist ideologies. However, critics argue that the approach has been counterproductive. According to reports, the article contains no new revelations or scandals about Siegmund. Instead, it focuses on anecdotal observations, such as a local festival held near his residence that allegedly had racist undertones. Yet, these details fail to establish a clear connection to Siegmund’s political activities or ideology. The text includes quotes from Siegmund, such as “We want our old, secure Germany back,” which some find contradictory to the label of “dangerous man.” The Spiegel’s stance has drawn sharp criticism from within and outside the political spectrum. Former Left Party parliamentary group leader Dietmar Bartsch, speaking to Die Welt, described the labeling of Siegmund as “irresponsible” and “unjust.” He argued that the true danger lies with individuals who engage in reckless behavior, such as driving cars into demonstrations, rather than politicians advocating for traditional values. This critique highlights the broader debate over how media should handle politically sensitive topics, whether through direct confrontation or more nuanced analysis. Meanwhile, Siegmund has embraced the controversy, using it as a platform to promote his candidacy. At a recent campaign event, he referred to the Spiegel cover as “very good advertising,” claiming it showcased someone who loves his country and fights for its future. He shared a video of himself signing the magazine online, accompanied by music from American rapper Dr. Dre and Snoop Dogg. His strategy reflects a calculated effort to turn potential embarrassment into a tool for visibility, leveraging both mainstream and alternative media channels. Behind Siegmund’s campaign stands the Filmkunstkollektiv, a collective of activists and media producers known for their work with the far-right movement. Founded in 2021, the group operates under the premises of the Identitären Bewegung (IB), a network of right-wing extremists. Members of the collective document Siegmund’s rallies, produce high-quality visuals, and distribute them via social media to amplify his message. They have also filmed major political events involving other AfD leaders, including meetings with Austrian far-right figures. The Filmkunstkollektiv plays a crucial role in shaping the public perception of Siegmund and other AfD candidates, blending professional production techniques with ideological messaging. According to political analyst Johannes Hillje, the Filmkunstkollektiv represents a growing trend in the professionalization of right-wing propaganda. “This group exemplifies how extremist movements are increasingly using sophisticated media strategies to gain influence,” he stated. Siegmund himself has praised the collective, calling their work “excellent” and emphasizing that they are part of his team. Despite the group’s ties to the IB, Siegmund dismisses concerns about their political affiliations, stating, “We don’t conduct ideological screenings.” As the Landtag election in Saxony-Anhalt approaches on September 6, Siegmund’s AfD continues to lead in polls with around 41–43 percent of voter support. With no coalition partners in sight, the party hopes to secure an outright majority and govern independently. The Spiegel’s controversial cover, while generating headlines, may ultimately serve as a catalyst for further polarization. Whether it strengthens Siegmund’s position or deepens public skepticism remains uncertain, but one thing is clear: the intersection of media, politics, and activism in Germany is becoming increasingly complex and contentious.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.
Become a Supporter
Germany
