ON
← Back to feed
Wayward SpaceX rocket to slam into moon, leave 16-foot deep crater
United States🏛️ PoliticsCenter7 hr. ago

Wayward SpaceX rocket to slam into moon, leave 16-foot deep crater

A SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket booster, weighing 8,800 pounds, is set to collide with the Moon on Wednesday at 2:35 a.m. Eastern time, creating a 16-foot-deep crater. The rocket, which previously launched two lunar landers in January 2025, has remained in orbit since then. SpaceX's director of NASA Science and Dragon Programs, Julianna Scheiman, stated the company adhered to proper disposal protocols, but solar activity and gravitational forces led to this trajectory. The impact, occurring on the lit side of the Moon, will be too fast and dim to observe with the naked eye or even large telescopes. Scientists note this will be the first artificial impact on the lit side of the Moon, with observations expected to be available within a week or two via the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter. The event highlights the growing presence of human-made debris in lunar orbit.

A SpaceX rocket booster is set to slam into the moon at 5,400 miles per hour on Wednesday morning, creating a crater that could measure up to 16 feet deep. The incident involves the upper stage of a Falcon 9 rocket, which was launched on January 15, 2025, to carry two commercial lunar landers, Firefly Aerospace’s Blue Ghost and ispace’s Resilience, toward the moon. After delivering the landers, the rocket’s upper stage remained in orbit, drifting through space for nearly 19 months before its trajectory was altered by gravitational forces and solar activity. The collision is expected to occur at approximately 2:35 a.m. Eastern Time, near the moon’s Einstein crater. The Falcon 9 upper stage, weighing 8,800 pounds and measuring about 45 feet in length, was originally intended to enter a highly elliptical Earth orbit before eventually burning up in the atmosphere. However, due to the combined influence of Earth, the moon, and the sun, the rocket’s path shifted toward the lunar surface. According to Julianna Scheiman, SpaceX’s director of NASA Science and Dragon Programs, the company adhered to all necessary protocols for the disposal of the rocket stage. Despite these efforts, the stage’s eventual trajectory toward the moon was influenced by unpredictable celestial forces, leading to the collision. The impact will generate a plume of lunar dust and potentially vaporized material, which scientists hope to analyze. The energy of the collision is equivalent to 2.8 tons of TNT, capable of creating a crater between 60 and 100 feet in diameter and 16 feet deep. While the event will not be visible to the naked eye, even with powerful telescopes, orbital satellites such as NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter and South Korea’s Pathfinder Lunar Orbiter are expected to capture images of the crater shortly after the impact. These images will help researchers understand the geological response of the lunar surface to artificial impacts and provide insights into the moon’s composition. This marks the third known artificial object to strike the moon in recent history. The first was a Soviet spacecraft in 1959, followed by U.S. Apollo-era spacecraft and a Japanese probe in 1993. In 2009, NASA intentionally crashed a rocket stage into a permanently shadowed crater at the moon’s south pole to investigate the presence of water ice, confirming its existence and reinforcing the moon’s strategic importance for future exploration. The current collision, while unintended, offers similar opportunities for scientific study, particularly regarding the distribution of water ice beneath the lunar surface. The event has raised concerns about the growing issue of “lunar litter.” As nations and private companies increasingly target the moon for exploration and colonization, the risk of accidental collisions increases. In 2022, a Chinese rocket unintentionally struck the moon following a lunar mission, highlighting the challenges of managing space debris. Experts warn that without stricter guidelines for spacecraft disposal, the moon could become cluttered with defunct hardware, posing risks to active missions and historic sites such as the Apollo landing zones. SpaceX and NASA are collaborating to develop better strategies for handling the disposal of spent rocket stages in the Earth-moon system. Scheiman emphasized the need for improved methods to prevent future collisions, especially as plans for sustained human presence on the moon advance. With NASA’s Artemis program aiming to return humans to the moon by 2028 and private companies like SpaceX and Blue Origin preparing lunar landers for future missions, the likelihood of additional impacts is expected to rise. As the collision approaches, independent astronomers and scientists continue monitoring the situation. While visual confirmation from Earth is unlikely, orbital observatories remain poised to document the aftermath. The data collected from this event will contribute to ongoing research on planetary surface dynamics and inform future space operations. For now, the focus remains on ensuring that the scientific value of the impact is fully realized, despite the unintended nature of the event.

Go to the primary sources (5)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

6 reports

CBS News (US) logoCBS News (US)IndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 80yesterday
Wayward SpaceX rocket to slam into moon, leave 16-foot deep crater

A SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket booster, weighing 8,800 pounds, is set to collide with the Moon on Wednesday at 2:35 a.m. Eastern time, creating a 16-foot-deep crater. The rocket, which previously launched two lunar landers in January 2025, has remained in orbit since then. SpaceX's director of NASA Science and Dragon Programs, Julianna Scheiman, stated the company adhered to proper disposal protocols, but solar activity and gravitational forces led to this trajectory. The impact, occurring on the lit side of the Moon, will be too fast and dim to observe with the naked eye or even large telescopes. Scientists note this will be the first artificial impact on the lit side of the Moon, with observations expected to be available within a week or two via the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter. The event highlights the growing presence of human-made debris in lunar orbit.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual report on a scientific and technical event involving space exploration, without overtly promoting any political agenda. While the topic relates to national space programs and international collaboration, the framing remains neutral, focusing on the scientific outcome,🔭

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the Falcon 9 upper stage impacting the moon on August 5 at 2:35 a.m. Eastern Time, which corresponds to the UTC time mentioned in the study. It correctly identifies the impact site near Einstein Crater and acknowledges the uncertainty regarding visibility from Earth. T

Why objectivity (80): The article maintains a neutral tone throughout, presenting facts without overt bias. It acknowledges the uncertainty around visibility and references the scientific interest in the event without taking a stance. The inclusion of a direct quote from Julianna Scheiman adds context without introducing

Quartz logoQuartzIndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 855 days ago
A discarded SpaceX rocket is about to slam into the moon at 5,400 mph

A discarded SpaceX rocket stage is set to impact the Moon at a speed of 5,400 mph, striking near the Einstein crater. The collision is expected to create a new crater and eject material that could form a visible plume. Scientists are interested in studying this event to gain insights into lunar surface composition and the effects of high-speed impacts. The incident highlights the growing presence of human-made objects in space and the potential for unintended geological changes on celestial bodies.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual report on a scientific event without overt ideological framing. It focuses on the technical aspects of the rocket impact and its potential scientific value, without taking a clear stance on the broader implications of space debris or governmental policies related to太空.

Why factuality (80): The article accurately reports the Falcon 9 upper stage impacting near Einstein Crater at 5,400 mph, which matches the primary document. It correctly highlights the scientific interest in studying the impact plume. However, it omits the exact date and time of the impact, which are specified in the s

Why objectivity (85): The article is highly objective, presenting the event without bias or emotional language. It focuses on the factual aspects of the impact and its scientific relevance without injecting personal opinions or perspectives. The concise nature of the article ensures neutrality while still conveying essen

The Daily Wire logoThe Daily WireIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 75yesterday
A SpaceX Rocket Is About To Crash Into The Moon

A decommissioned SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket is expected to crash into the moon at 2:35 a.m. ET on Wednesday, traveling at 5,400 miles per hour. The incident involves the upper stage of the rocket, which had been drifting in a moon-crossing high-Earth orbit for 19 months. Normally, such stages follow a highly elliptical Earth orbit before re-entering the atmosphere and burning up over the ocean. However, gravitational influences from Earth, the moon, and the sun have shifted its path toward the lunar surface. The rocket was previously used to launch commercial moon landers before being retired.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about a technical event involving a SpaceX rocket without overtly endorsing or criticizing any political entity, ideology, or policy. It focuses on scientific and engineering aspects rather than political implications, maintaining a balanced tone. While the U

Why factuality (75): The article correctly identifies the Falcon 9 upper stage impacting the moon on August 5 at 2:35 a.m. ET and mentions the 19-month drift period. However, it lacks specific details about the impact location (near Einstein Crater) and the scientific significance of the event, which are detailed in the

Why objectivity (75): The article presents the information in a neutral manner, focusing on the event itself rather than taking a particular stance. It avoids emotional language and sticks to factual reporting. However, it lacks the depth of scientific context provided in the primary document, which could affect the comp

The Hill logoThe HillIndependentCenterFactual 65Objective 70yesterday
Space X rocket on course to crash into the moon

A SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket is projected to crash into the moon on Wednesday at 2:35 a.m. EDT, traveling at 5,400 mph and creating an estimated 89-foot-wide crater. Experts note the impact will generate debris and dust, though it likely won't be visible from Earth. The New York Times reports the event, which SpaceX has acknowledged through a press conference. Julianna Scheiman, SpaceX's director of NASA Science and Dragon Programs, attributes the trajectory to 'solar activity and gravity forces' and mentions collaboration with NASA and other agencies to address future risks. The rocket was launched on January 15, 2025, as part of a mission to deploy two lunar landers, one of which, 'Resilience,' crashed on the moon, while the other, 'Blue Ghost,' successfully landed.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about a planned space event without overtly endorsing or criticizing SpaceX, NASA, or any political entity. While the topic involves government agencies and space exploration, the framing remains neutral, focusing on scientific and technical aspects rather on

Why factuality (65): The article mentions the Falcon 9 impacting the moon on August 5 at 06:35 UT, which aligns with the primary document. However, it incorrectly states the impact time as 'Wednesday at 2:35 a.m. EDT' which does not match the UTC time mentioned in the study. It also inaccurately claims the impact will n

Why objectivity (70): The article presents the information neutrally overall but includes some speculative statements like 'likely won’t be visible from Earth' which are not supported by the primary document. It also includes a quote from Julianna Scheiman that is not in the original study, which could introduce bias. Th

The Washington Times logoThe Washington TimesParty-alignedCenter7 hr. ago
Scientists are certain a wayward SpaceX rocket slammed into the moon as predicted

Scientists have confirmed that a spent SpaceX rocket, which had been drifting in space for over a year, collided with the moon as predicted. The uncontrolled rocket stage, part of a January 2025 launch carrying two lunar landers, followed a trajectory set by solar activity and gravitational forces, leading it to slam into a remote area near Einstein Crater on the moon's western limb. This incident adds to growing concerns about 'lunar litter' as nations increase their presence on the moon. While the collision was not intentional, SpaceX stated they are collaborating with NASA to prevent similar occurrences in the future. Visual confirmation of the impact remains pending due to the difficulty of observing such events from Earth, though orbital satellites may provide evidence later this week.

Bias read (Center): The article presents scientific consensus and quotes multiple experts without overtly favoring any political perspective. It discusses the technical aspects of the event and mentions collaboration between SpaceX and NASA, but does not frame the issue in terms of political controversy or ideological

The Daily Wire logoThe Daily WireIndependentCenter11 hr. ago
SpaceX Rocket Crashes Into The Moon

A discarded upper stage from a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket crashed into the moon on January 15, 2025, traveling at approximately 5,400 miles per hour. The impact occurred near the moon’s Einstein crater at around 2:35 a.m. ET, creating a crater estimated to be 60 feet wide and 12 feet deep. NASA and international lunar orbiters will analyze the site for scientific research. The rocket stage, which had been in space since its launch, was placed on a collision course due to solar activity and gravitational forces. While SpaceX claims compliance with safety regulations, scientists warn that routinely sending debris to the moon poses risks to historical sites like the Apollo landers. The event highlights differing regulatory frameworks between government agencies and commercial space operators.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of a technical event involving SpaceX and NASA, focusing on scientific implications and regulatory differences. It does not take a clear ideological stance, balancing perspectives from both government and private sector actors. The framing remains neutral, with

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories