Liveblog Eclipse: The moon is now moving in front of the sun in northern Germany
A partial solar eclipse has begun in Germany, with the moon gradually moving in front of the sun. The event started in northern Germany around 7:11 PM local time, with Munich experiencing the start at approximately 7:23 PM. According to astronomer Carolin Liefke, the eclipse begins at the lower right edge of the sun, forming a crescent shape that rotates slowly. The maximum coverage of the sun by the moon is expected to reach up to 85–90% in Germany between 8:05 PM and 8:15 PM. The eclipse ends with sunset across Germany, between 8:30 PM and shortly after 9:00 PM. Unlike regions where the eclipse reaches totality, Germany will not experience complete darkness due to the partial nature of the event. Meanwhile, both NASA and the European Space Agency (ESA) are broadcasting live views of the eclipse from Spain, including telescope images, drone footage, and interviews. Additionally, a special flight operated by Iberia Airlines has taken passengers to the path of totality over Spain, offering live GoPro footage of the event.
The total solar eclipse of August 12, 2026, captivated thousands of observers across Europe, with many gathering at elevated viewpoints such as the Feldberg in Germany to witness the celestial event. The maximum obscuration occurred around 20:05 to 20:15 local time, during which the Sun was partially obscured by the Moon, reaching up to 90 percent coverage in parts of Germany. Although the eclipse did not reach totality over German territory, the spectacle was still impressive enough to draw large crowds to hilltops and open fields. Police officials noted that access to the summit area had been restricted due to the high number of spectators, urging them to view the event from lower elevations for safety reasons. The eclipse began its journey across Europe in the early evening, starting in northern regions around 19:11 and progressing southward, reaching southern areas such as Munich by 19:23. The event reached its peak in central Europe around 20:05, with the Sun’s light gradually dimming as the Moon moved into position. The partial eclipse lasted until approximately 21:00, after which the Sun slowly reappeared, marking the end of the celestial display. Observers across the continent were advised to use proper eye protection, as direct viewing without appropriate filters can cause serious harm to the eyes. Despite these precautions, the demand for solar eclipse glasses surged, with many retailers reporting shortages. The phenomenon was visible in multiple locations across Europe, including Spain, Portugal, Iceland, and Greenland, where the total eclipse was observable. In particular, the totality zone stretched along the Iberian Peninsula, with the Moon fully covering the Sun for several minutes in certain regions. In Spain, especially in cities like A Coruña, the eclipse reached its maximum duration, with the Sun vanishing behind the Moon for nearly two minutes. The event was also captured by satellite imagery, providing stunning visuals of the shadow moving across the Atlantic and the Iberian Peninsula. European weather satellites, such as Meteosat-12 and GOES-19, recorded the movement of the lunar shadow, offering detailed images of the darkened region on Earth's surface. In Germany, the eclipse was observed as a partial event, with varying levels of darkness depending on location. The highest degree of obscuration was reported in the western and southern parts of the country, where the Sun was covered by up to 90 percent. Many people gathered on hillsides, near lakes, and in public parks to watch the event. Some used cameras equipped with filters, while others relied on projection methods to safely observe the changing light conditions. Local authorities warned against attempting to view the eclipse directly without protective eyewear, emphasizing the potential risk to vision. The astronomical event sparked widespread interest, drawing both amateur astronomers and casual observers. Social media platforms buzzed with photos and videos capturing the moment, while live streams allowed those unable to travel to experience the spectacle remotely. Scientists and educators seized the opportunity to engage the public, using the event as a chance to explain the mechanics of eclipses and their significance in astronomy. Educational institutions and science centers organized viewing sessions, ensuring that even those who could not attend the event in person had access to information and safe observation techniques. Looking ahead, the next major solar eclipse visible from Germany will occur on August 2, 2027, when another partial eclipse will take place. This will be followed by yet another eclipse on January 26, 2028, which will be annular in nature, creating a ring-like appearance of the Sun. These upcoming events have already begun to generate excitement among the scientific community and the general public, highlighting the ongoing fascination with celestial phenomena. As the world continues to look skyward, the August 12, 2026, eclipse stands as a memorable chapter in the year’s astronomical calendar.
Go to the primary sources (3)
The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.
A partial solar eclipse has begun over Germany, visible to millions across Europe, North America, and parts of Africa. The event started around 7 PM local time and reached its peak between 8:05 PM and 8:15 PM, during which up to 90% of the sun was obscured by the moon. Unlike total eclipses seen in regions like Iceland, Greenland, and the Iberian Peninsula, Germany experienced only a partial eclipse. Optimal viewing conditions were reported in much of Germany, though observers needed to find locations with clear western or northwest views. Experts emphasized the importance of using certified eclipse glasses to protect eyes, as looking directly at the sun, even partially covered, can cause serious damage. Following the eclipse, viewers could also witness the peak of the Perseid meteor shower, with up to 100 meteors per hour expected overnight.
Bias read (Center): The article provides factual information about a natural astronomical event, focusing on timing, visibility, safety precautions, and related phenomena such as the Perseid meteor shower. There is no political framing, bias, or commentary on policy, governance, or ideology.
Why factuality (98): This article provides precise details from the primary source, such as the start time around 19:00, the peak coverage of 85–90%, and the duration until sunset. It also emphasizes the need for certified sunglasses, matching the official warnings against using regular sunglasses.
Why objectivity (95): The tone remains largely objective, presenting facts about the event and its visibility across Europe. The only slight deviation is the phrase 'Himmelsschauspiel der Sonderklasse,' which adds a mildly enthusiastic tone but doesn't compromise neutrality.
The article titled 'Search for the Sun Protection Glasses Before Solar Eclipse: Has No One Seen It Coming?' from Süddeutsche Zeitung discusses the lack of preparedness among people for viewing the solar eclipse. The piece highlights concerns about public safety, emphasizing the importance of using proper eye protection during such astronomical events. It raises questions about why there was insufficient awareness or preparation despite the event being predictable and widely announced. The article does not take a political stance but focuses on public education and safety.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual inquiry into public behavior regarding a scientific event rather than taking a partisan position. While it touches on societal responsibility and governance in ensuring public safety, it does not frame the issue through a political lens or advocate for any specific ide
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports the shortage of certified eclipse glasses and provides reliable information on where to obtain them, such as through opticians and specialized retailers. It also emphasizes the importance of proper eye protection, which is consistent with other sources.
Why objectivity (95): The article is presented in a neutral and informative style, offering practical advice without taking sides or injecting personal opinions. It focuses on factual reporting and public safety concerns.
The article from the Frankfurter Allgemeine (FAZ) discusses an upcoming partial solar eclipse visible in Germany on August 12, 2026. It highlights the event as a special astronomical phenomenon where the Moon will cover approximately 90% of the Sun. The piece emphasizes the importance of eye protection during observation, warning against potential harm to the retina without proper safeguards. It recommends using certified solar viewing glasses or building a pinhole camera from everyday materials like a chip bag or shoebox. The article advises against using film rolls or welder’s goggles for safe viewing.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about a natural astronomical event without taking a political stance. It provides practical advice on safe observation methods and does not frame the issue through any ideological lens. The content is purely informational and educational, focusing on science,
Why factuality (95): The article accurately quotes the Federal Office for Radiation Protection’s advice on safe eclipse viewing, including the recommendation of certified eclipse glasses and the warning against using film rolls or welder’s goggles. These statements align with other sources and reflect standard safety gu
Why objectivity (95): The article presents the information in a neutral and informative manner, focusing on factual guidance rather than opinion or bias. It provides clear warnings and recommendations without editorializing or taking sides.
Die ZeitIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 908/12/2026
The article reports on a solar eclipse observed at the Große Feldberg in Germany on August 12, 2026. The parking area was already crowded more than an hour before the event, with police advising people to view the eclipse from lower areas due to restricted access at the summit. Hundreds gathered on the plateau, using camping chairs and blankets to watch the celestial event. In parts of Hesse, the Sun was partially obscured by the Moon, with up to 85-90% coverage in Germany. The maximum obscuration was expected between 20:05 and 20:15, ending with sunset between 20:30 and 21:00 across the country.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual report on a natural astronomical event without any political implications. It focuses on the scientific observation of a solar eclipse, describing the event's timing, visibility, and crowd response without taking a stance on any political issue.
Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports the timing and location of the partial solar eclipse in Germany, including specific details like the maximum coverage in Freiburg at 90% and the time window between 20:05 and 20:15. It also mentions the safety precautions advised by authorities, aligning closely with t
Why objectivity (90): The article presents the information neutrally, focusing on the event itself and the crowd response. It avoids overtly emotional language but does highlight the popularity of the event, which could slightly skew toward positive framing.
The article discusses the total solar eclipse expected to occur over Europe on August 12, 2026. It explains where the event will be visible, including parts of Greenland, Iceland, Spain, a small region of Portugal and Russia, and partially in Germany. The piece highlights the scientific significance of such events and quotes Carole Mundell, Director of Science at the European Space Agency (ESA), emphasizing the shared human experience and curiosity sparked by celestial phenomena. The article serves as a preview of a longer piece available through heise+ subscription.
Bias read (Center): The article presents information about a natural astronomical event without taking a political stance. It focuses on scientific explanation, visibility locations, and quotes from a scientific authority (ESA) without expressing ideological bias. There is no indication of partisan framing or agenda.
Why factuality (95): The article accurately describes the date and location of the total solar eclipse, matching the cross-source consensus. It also mentions the scientific significance and includes references to ESA missions, which adds credibility without introducing inaccuracies.
Why objectivity (85): While the article includes a quote from an ESA official, it maintains a balanced approach by focusing on both the astronomical event and its scientific importance without injecting strong emotional or ideological content.
The article discusses a solar eclipse occurring in the evening and highlights the shortage of protective eyewear, which has led people to seek alternative methods for safely observing the event. It provides a step-by-step guide on constructing a pinhole camera using household items such as a chip container, dark cardboard, pins, bread paper, and tape. The method involves creating a small hole in the bottom of the container and projecting the image of the sun onto the bread paper inside, allowing viewers to observe the eclipse indirectly without damaging their eyes. The instructions emphasize safety precautions, such as not looking directly at the sun and keeping one eye closed while viewing through the device.
Bias read (Center): The article focuses on a scientific explanation and practical DIY solution for observing a natural phenomenon, with no mention of political figures, policies, or contentious issues. There is no framing that suggests ideological bias.
Why factuality (92): This article provides detailed, accurate instructions for constructing a pinhole camera using common household items. It correctly explains the science behind the pinhole effect and emphasizes the necessity of eye protection during solar observation. The content is consistent with standard education
Why objectivity (88): The article maintains a neutral and informative tone throughout. It presents both the phenomenon of the solar eclipse and the recommended safety measures objectively, without introducing personal bias or emotional language.
Die ZeitIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 958/12/2026
The article announces a solar eclipse event occurring on Wednesday, August 12, 2026, at 19:31 Uhr, which is described as the most spectacular since 20 years. The event will be visible in parts of Spain, where the moon will completely cover the sun. The article promotes a live stream offering views from Iceland and Spain, highlighting the best places and times to observe the eclipse. It also includes a compilation of 20 facts to share during the viewing experience.
Bias read (Center): The article presents information about a natural astronomical event without any political implications. It focuses on scientific facts, observational tips, and educational content related to the solar eclipse. There is no indication of ideological leaning or partisan framing in the presentation of信息
Why factuality (90): The article gives correct information about the timing and location of the eclipse, noting that parts of Spain will experience a total eclipse. However, it lacks some specifics found in the primary source, such as the exact percentage of coverage in different cities.
Why objectivity (95): The article maintains a neutral tone, emphasizing the importance of safe viewing practices and providing a link to a livestream. It avoids any biased language or opinionated commentary.
The article reports on an expected solar eclipse visible in wide parts of Western Europe. It mentions that the event is anticipated to be observable in various regions across the continent. The piece provides basic information about the occurrence without delving into detailed scientific explanations or political implications.
Bias read (Center): The subject matter is apolitical, focusing on a natural astronomical event. There is no indication of political framing or bias in the reporting.
Why factuality (90): The article accurately describes the event as a partial solar eclipse visible in parts of Western Europe, including Germany. It aligns closely with the primary document’s factual content without adding or omitting key details.
Why objectivity (95): The article presents the information in a straightforward manner, avoiding any subjective commentary or emotional language. It remains highly neutral and balanced in its reporting.
On August 12, 2026, a partial solar eclipse was visible across Germany around 8 PM. People gathered on hills, fields, and viewpoints wearing dark paper glasses to safely observe the event. The moon gradually moved in front of the sun, reaching its peak around 8:00 PM local time. While Germany did not experience a total eclipse, approximately 90 percent of the sun was obscured, creating a fascinating celestial display. Astronomers, photographers, and curious observers across Europe watched the phenomenon using specialized equipment such as solar eclipse glasses, projections, filtered cameras, and telescopes. In Spain, parts of Portugal, and Iceland, people witnessed a total solar eclipse. The article includes images and reflections from those who observed the event.
Bias read (Center): The article discusses a natural astronomical event, focusing on observations and safety measures during a solar eclipse. There is no political framing, controversy, or ideological emphasis present in the content.
Why factuality (90): The article accurately describes the event as a partial solar eclipse in Germany, noting the time frame and the use of protective eyewear. It aligns closely with the primary document's factual content and includes relevant details about the viewing experience.
Why objectivity (90): The article maintains a neutral and factual tone throughout, focusing on the event itself and viewer experiences without injecting personal opinions or biases.
The article discusses the partial solar eclipse visible over Germany on Wednesday evening and advises readers on how to safely observe it. It highlights the need for specialized eye protection, such as solar viewing glasses, which are in high demand and may be unavailable at short notice. The Zentralverband der Augenoptiker und Optometristen (ZVA) recommends checking with local opticians, while planetariums and observatories may offer protective eyewear. Online retailers like MediaMarkt, Amazon, and specialty astro shops also sell 'SoFi' glasses, though delivery times may vary. The article explains that the retina lacks pain receptors, making damage difficult to detect early. It also notes that some TV stations, including ZDF, have adjusted their programming to broadcast live coverage of the event.
Bias read (Center): The article presents balanced information about the solar eclipse, focusing on practical advice and scientific explanations without taking a clear ideological stance. It provides equal attention to various sources of protective eyewear and mentions both direct observation methods and indirect ones.
Why factuality (90): The article accurately describes the traffic congestion and logistical challenges in Spain due to the eclipse, including the distribution of free protective eyewear and the involvement of security forces. These details match other reports and are well supported by available information.
Why objectivity (90): The article remains neutral in tone, presenting facts about the situation in Spain without expressing approval or criticism. It focuses on describing events and responses objectively.
The article discusses the upcoming total solar eclipse over Spain, which is expected to draw large crowds and cause traffic congestion. Authorities anticipate up to 1.5 million additional car trips, leading to potential delays on major roads heading north and east, particularly towards the Balearic Islands. The Spanish Directorate-General for Traffic (DGT) has implemented special measures, including restrictions on stopping on highways during the event and advising travelers to depart early. The phenomenon is also visible in Germany, where partial eclipses will occur between 7 and 9 PM local time, with the most significant obscuration in the southwest around Freiburg and Lake Constance. The article mentions concerns about power outages due to reliance on solar energy but does not elaborate further.
Bias read (Center): The article presents information about the solar eclipse and its impact on traffic and infrastructure in Spain and Germany without overtly favoring any political stance. It provides factual data from authorities and reports on preparations and safety measures without taking a clear ideological side.
Why factuality (90): The article accurately describes the alternative ways to observe the eclipse safely, such as using a pinhole camera or watching via television. These suggestions align with other sources and are consistent with standard safety guidelines.
Why objectivity (90): The article is presented in a neutral and informative manner, offering practical solutions without promoting any particular method over others. It avoids sensationalism and sticks to factual content.
The article discusses how to safely observe a solar eclipse without using a special 'Sofi-brille' (a type of solar filter). It explains the dangers of looking directly at the sun during an eclipse and provides guidance on safe viewing methods, such as using certified solar filters or indirect observation techniques. The piece emphasizes the importance of eye protection and warns against the risks of improper viewing. No specific scientific or governmental sources are cited, and the focus is purely informational.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about solar safety without any apparent ideological or political framing. It focuses solely on educational content regarding eclipse viewing and does not take a stance on any political issue.
Why factuality (90): The article discusses alternative methods for safely observing the eclipse, such as building a pinhole camera from everyday items. This aligns with other sources like the Federal Office for Radiation Protection and is consistent with established practices for safe eclipse viewing.
Why objectivity (90): The tone remains neutral and informative, offering practical solutions without promoting any particular method over others. It avoids sensationalism and sticks to factual content.
The article discusses the solar eclipse event that occurred on August 13, 2026, focusing on the public's reaction and the availability of specialized eye protection. Despite warnings and prior predictions, many people in Germany attempted to view the eclipse without proper equipment, using makeshift solutions like repurposed containers or old sunglasses. While some opticians and authorities advised DIY methods due to shortages, there were reports of empty shelves at stores and online shops. The article notes that while no significant surge in eye doctor visits was reported, potential long-term effects like retinal damage could still occur. It contrasts Germany's preparedness with other regions that successfully managed the event.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of public behavior during the solar eclipse, highlighting both the lack of preparation and the creative efforts by individuals to comply with safety guidelines. There is no overt ideological framing or emphasis on specific political groups, making the overall傾
Why factuality (90): The article accurately describes the surge in searches related to 'eye pain' following the eclipse and references the widespread availability of certified eclipse glasses. It also mentions the creative alternatives used when glasses were unavailable, which matches other reports.
Why objectivity (85): While the article is largely factual, it has a slightly critical tone toward those who ignored safety warnings, which introduces a subtle bias. However, it still maintains a mostly objective stance overall.
The article reports on the partial solar eclipse that occurred over Germany on August 12, 2026, describing it as a rare natural spectacle. The event was visible across much of Europe, with varying degrees of darkness depending on location. The maximum obscuration reached up to 90% in some areas, and the phenomenon was accompanied by clear skies in many regions. The article notes that while the eclipse was partially visible in Germany, total solar eclipses were observable in parts of Spain, Iceland, Greenland, and the Canary Islands. Experts advised against looking directly at the sun without proper eye protection, which was in high demand. Additionally, the article mentions that the Perseid meteor shower reached its peak around the same time, offering further astronomical interest.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual, observational report on a natural astronomical event without any political implications. It focuses on scientific data, public observation, and safety advice, maintaining a neutral tone throughout. There is no indication of ideological leaning or partisan framing.
Why factuality (90): The article gives precise details about the timing of the eclipse, its maximum coverage in Germany, and mentions optimal weather conditions. These points align directly with the information provided in the primary source document.
Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a neutral tone throughout, presenting factual observations and expert explanations without evident bias. It covers both the event itself and public response in a balanced way.
A partial solar eclipse has begun in Germany, with the moon gradually moving in front of the sun. The event started in northern Germany around 7:11 PM local time, with Munich experiencing the start at approximately 7:23 PM. According to astronomer Carolin Liefke, the eclipse begins at the lower right edge of the sun, forming a crescent shape that rotates slowly. The maximum coverage of the sun by the moon is expected to reach up to 85–90% in Germany between 8:05 PM and 8:15 PM. The eclipse ends with sunset across Germany, between 8:30 PM and shortly after 9:00 PM. Unlike regions where the eclipse reaches totality, Germany will not experience complete darkness due to the partial nature of the event. Meanwhile, both NASA and the European Space Agency (ESA) are broadcasting live views of the eclipse from Spain, including telescope images, drone footage, and interviews. Additionally, a special flight operated by Iberia Airlines has taken passengers to the path of totality over Spain, offering live GoPro footage of the event.
Bias read (Center): The article provides factual information about a natural astronomical event, focusing on timing, visibility, and observational details. There is no political commentary, framing, or bias detectable in the content. The tone remains neutral and informative.
Why factuality (90): The article provides precise details about the timing of the eclipse, its visibility in different parts of Germany, and mentions expert commentary. These elements correspond closely with the information given in the primary source document.
Why objectivity (85): The article presents information in a neutral manner, quoting experts and providing factual updates without showing clear bias. It balances observational details with scientific explanations effectively.
The article describes the solar eclipse observed on Wednesday evening, highlighting satellite imagery captured by European and American weather satellites. The event was visible across parts of Europe and North America, with detailed images showing the movement of the Moon's shadow over the North Atlantic and the Iberian Peninsula. The article notes that while the core shadow could not be seen directly, the dark spot moving across Earth was clearly visible. It also mentions the technical capabilities of newer satellites like Meteosat-12 and GOES-19, which provide high-resolution images compared to their predecessors. The eclipse marked the beginning of a series of three eclipses expected in Spain between now and early 2028, with the Spanish government creating a dedicated website for information.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual description of a natural astronomical event without any political framing or ideological emphasis. It focuses on scientific observation, satellite technology, and celestial phenomena, making it apolitical in nature.
Why factuality (85): The article accurately describes the event as a partial solar eclipse in Germany and mentions satellite imagery capturing the event. It aligns with the primary document's core facts but omits some specific details about the eclipse's coverage percentages.
Why objectivity (90): The article presents the information in a neutral and factual manner, focusing on the technical aspects of the event and the satellite observations without introducing personal opinions or biases.
The article reports on a solar eclipse that captivated millions of people across Europe. The event was widely observed and appreciated by many, drawing significant public interest. While the piece highlights the popularity of the phenomenon, it does not delve into specific details such as the exact dates, locations, or scientific explanations behind the eclipse. The focus remains on the general enthusiasm and visual impact experienced by viewers.
Bias read (Center): The subject of the article is a natural astronomical event, which is generally considered apolitical. There is no indication of political controversy or ideological framing in the content. The tone is purely observational and celebratory of a public spectacle.
Why factuality (85): The article accurately describes the event as a partial solar eclipse visible in Europe and highlights public interest. It aligns with the primary document's core facts but omits some specific details about the eclipse's coverage percentages and safety precautions.
Why objectivity (90): The article maintains a neutral and factual tone, focusing on the public response and the event's impact without injecting personal opinions or biases.
Der SpiegelIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 908/12/2026
The article discusses a solar eclipse being streamed live today, allowing viewers to witness the sudden darkness caused by the event. It provides information on how to watch the phenomenon and highlights the experience of observing the eclipse in real time. The content focuses on the astronomical event itself, offering insights into the viewing experience and the scientific aspects of the eclipse.
Bias read (Center): The article covers a natural astronomical event, which is inherently non-political. There is no indication of ideological framing, biased language, or emphasis on any particular political perspective. The focus remains on the scientific and observational aspects of the solar eclipse.
Why factuality (85): The article references the event but lacks detailed factual content beyond the headline. It includes a call-to-action for readers to report errors, suggesting limited engagement with the actual event details.
Why objectivity (90): The article is neutral in tone, offering no clear bias or subjective interpretation. Its focus is more on inviting user feedback than reporting on the event itself.
The article discusses the solar eclipse expected in 2026 and provides information on where and when it will be visible in Germany. It outlines the dates and locations within Germany where the eclipse will be observable, emphasizing the astronomical event's significance. The piece aims to inform readers about the timing and visibility of the solar eclipse, encouraging public interest and preparation for viewing the phenomenon.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about a natural astronomical event without any political framing or ideological slant. It focuses solely on scientific data and observational details related to the solar eclipse, making it apolitical in nature.
Why factuality (85): The article title and content suggest it covers where and when the eclipse can be seen in Germany, but it lacks specific details like the exact times or safety recommendations present in the primary source.
Why objectivity (90): The article appears to be neutral in tone, focusing on the event’s occurrence rather than expressing any particular viewpoint or emotion.
The article reports on a solar eclipse visible across wide parts of Europe, North America, and other regions worldwide. It invites viewers to watch live streams of the event from Europe. The content focuses on providing information about the visibility of the eclipse and directs readers to a live stream for viewing.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about a natural astronomical event without any political implications. It does not discuss policies, governance, or societal issues, making it apolitical in nature.
Why factuality (85): The article references the event and provides a link to a livestream but lacks specific details about the eclipse's timing, coverage, or safety guidelines. It is less comprehensive compared to the primary source.
Why objectivity (90): The tone is neutral, focusing on directing viewers to the livestream without injecting personal opinions or biases.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.
Germany
