ON
← Back to feed
Some of Doge's $110bn saving reports are wrong or lack evidence, US watchdog finds
United Kingdom🏛️ PoliticsCenter7 hr. ago

Some of Doge's $110bn saving reports are wrong or lack evidence, US watchdog finds

A U.S. watchdog, the Government Accountability Office (GAO), has criticized the Department of Government Efficiency (Doge), a short-lived organization led by Elon Musk, for making inaccurate or unsupported claims about government savings. The GAO report found that many of Doge's assertions, including a reported $110 billion in savings, lacked transparency and reliable evidence. Specifically, the report noted that Doge did not adequately explain its calculation methods for most of the savings figures and highlighted cases where claimed savings were based on contracts that were never terminated. The GAO also pointed out that nearly half of the savings attributed to lease terminations were already underway before Doge was formed. While the White House defended the initiative by citing compliance with ethical standards, critics argue that Doge's efforts were disorganized and misleading, undermining trust in government accountability.

1 reports

BBC News (World) logoBBC News (World)State / PublicCenter7 hr. ago
Some of Doge's $110bn saving reports are wrong or lack evidence, US watchdog finds

A U.S. watchdog, the Government Accountability Office (GAO), has criticized the Department of Government Efficiency (Doge), a short-lived organization led by Elon Musk, for making inaccurate or unsupported claims about government savings. The GAO report found that many of Doge's assertions, including a reported $110 billion in savings, lacked transparency and reliable evidence. Specifically, the report noted that Doge did not adequately explain its calculation methods for most of the savings figures and highlighted cases where claimed savings were based on contracts that were never terminated. The GAO also pointed out that nearly half of the savings attributed to lease terminations were already underway before Doge was formed. While the White House defended the initiative by citing compliance with ethical standards, critics argue that Doge's efforts were disorganized and misleading, undermining trust in government accountability.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of the GAO's findings without overtly favoring either political side. It cites both the criticisms from the watchdog and the White House's defense, maintaining neutrality in its framing. There is no clear ideological slant in the language or emphasis, though a

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories