ON
← Back to feed
Slapshakova has already rescued the additional voters from the Balkans and Russia.
Slovenia🏛️ PoliticsProgressive6/23/2026

Slapshakova has already rescued the additional voters from the Balkans and Russia.

The article discusses a political initiative led by Svetlana Slapšak, who has collected over 2,500 unsigned signatures to trigger a process for gathering 40,000 verified signatures to allow foreigners from the Balkans, Russia, Ukraine, and Palestine to vote in local elections if they are permanently registered in Slovenia. The move is seen as controversial, as Slovenian citizens do not have similar voting rights abroad. The initiative was supported by Slapšak’s political allies and has prompted discussions about potential changes to election laws. The proposed referendum would require a 35-day signature collection period starting after parliamentary holidays in September, ending in October, just before local elections scheduled for late November. The article criticizes the opposition's approach as 'provincial fascism' and compares it to historical fascist aesthetics. It also notes that if the required signatures are not met, the new rules will not take effect this year.

1 reports

Spletni časopis logoSpletni časopisIndependentProgressive6/23/2026
Slapshakova has already rescued the additional voters from the Balkans and Russia.

The article discusses a political initiative led by Svetlana Slapšak, who has collected over 2,500 unsigned signatures to trigger a process for gathering 40,000 verified signatures to allow foreigners from the Balkans, Russia, Ukraine, and Palestine to vote in local elections if they are permanently registered in Slovenia. The move is seen as controversial, as Slovenian citizens do not have similar voting rights abroad. The initiative was supported by Slapšak’s political allies and has prompted discussions about potential changes to election laws. The proposed referendum would require a 35-day signature collection period starting after parliamentary holidays in September, ending in October, just before local elections scheduled for late November. The article criticizes the opposition's approach as 'provincial fascism' and compares it to historical fascist aesthetics. It also notes that if the required signatures are not met, the new rules will not take effect this year.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the initiative as a progressive effort to expand democratic participation, while criticizing the opposing political faction (described as 'right-wing') using derogatory terms like 'provincial fascism' and comparing them to historical fascist movements. This language reflects a pro

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories