Another embarrassment of the Golob's mandate: Slovenia this year, according to NATO estimates, the only member with defense spending below two percent of GDP

VečerIndependent🔒CenterFactual 95Objective 856 days ago

The article discusses difficulties encountered by supporters of a referendum on a proposed amendment to Slovenia's law on parliamentary investigations. According to the initiative 'Proti politični policiji,' some citizens faced delays at local administrative units when attempting to submit signatures for the referendum. Some were reportedly told that submissions could not be processed due to system issues. The collection of signatures began on June 10 and was expected to end on July 14, with the group having collected 34,104 signatures out of the required 40,000. The proposed amendment, passed by the National Assembly in late May, would limit individuals under investigation from challenging decisions before the Constitutional Court and prevent the National Assembly from initiating new investigations into the same matter after issuing a final report.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both the challenges faced by the referendum organizers and the content of the proposed legal amendment without overtly favoring either side. It includes direct quotes from the initiative representatives and mentions the official stance of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and the

Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 85): Factual account of the challenges faced by signatories and the government’s response. Maintains neutrality while presenting both sides.

N1 SlovenijaIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 856 days ago

The article reports on challenges faced by referendum organizers in Slovenia while collecting signatures for a referendum on a parliamentary inquiry law amendment. According to the organizers, some citizens cannot submit their signatures at local administrative units or via the eUprava portal. The Ministry of Internal Affairs and Public Administration attributes these issues to occasional technical problems, though they claim to have received no complaints. As of mid-July, 34,144 signatures have been collected, falling short of the required 40,000. The proposed law amendment would limit the ability of individuals subjected to inquiries to challenge the decision to initiate an inquiry before the Constitutional Court, which organizers argue removes a key safeguard against political abuse of parliamentary inquiries.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both the concerns raised by referendum organizers and the official response from the Ministry of Internal Affairs, without overtly favoring either side. It provides factual information about the signature collection process and the legal implications of the proposed law change,

Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 85): Highly factual with detailed reporting on technical issues during signature collection. Slightly biased toward the protesters' perspective but remains mostly neutral.

Slovenske noviceIndependentProgressiveFactual 95Objective 858 days ago

The article reports on recent developments in Slovenia's parliamentary politics, focusing on opposition efforts to hold an extraordinary session of the National Assembly (DZ) to establish two parliamentary investigations. The opposition, led by the Freedom Party (Svoboda), plans to submit another request for such a session if the current scenario repeats. They are also considering a constitutional complaint against the speaker of parliament. A referendum initiative to amend the law on parliamentary investigations has collected over three-quarters of the required signatures, with more needed by July 14. The proposed amendment could threaten human rights, according to the initiators, who include former members of the Human Rights Protection Committee. The day’s agenda for the extraordinary session, which aimed to address investigations into Black Cube and party financing, was not approved. The Speaker of the National Assembly ended the session due to this failure. Opposition leaders criticized the session as an attack on democracy, while the ruling party accused the opposition of lacking attendance and transparency. There were also technical issues with voting equipment, leading to a

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the opposition's actions as a defense of democratic principles and human rights, using strong language like 'teptanje demokracije' (assault on democracy). It highlights the opposition's efforts to challenge the ruling party's control over parliamentary procedures, emphasizing the

Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 85): The article accurately summarizes the events and includes relevant quotes. It maintains a mostly neutral stance but uses strong language like 'teptanje demokracije' which slightly affects objectivity.

DemokracijaParty-alignedProgressiveFactual 95Objective 704 days ago

The article reports that Slovenia’s Constitutional Court, after years of delay, has approved a law regarding RTV Slovenia, effectively retroactively legitimizing 'political purges' carried out by the government of Robert Golob within the public media. The decision has sparked strong criticism, with European Parliament member Milan Zver accusing the court of confirming systemic violations of institutional independence. Zver cites the involvement of former EU Commissioner Vera Jurova during the constitutional review process, suggesting political and international influence aimed at removing obstacles and protecting interests of colleagues from the Renew group. He warns this sets a dangerous precedent, undermining checks and balances and the division of power in Slovenia. Local mayor Nejc Brence also criticizes the ruling, stating it enables future governments to replace leadership in public institutions if they align with the 'right colors.' Critics argue the law allows politically motivated changes to public media management, despite concerns over the erosion of media independence.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the Constitutional Court's decision as a confirmation of systemic corruption and political manipulation, emphasizing the role of external actors like Vera Jurova and highlighting the potential for abuse of power. It uses emotionally charged language such as 'dangerous precedent,''

Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 70): The article presents facts accurately regarding the constitutional court decision. However, the tone is strongly critical of the ruling, showing a clear bias against the government and the court.

DnevnikIndependent🔒ProgressiveFactual 90Objective 808 days ago

The article reports on a referendum initiative in Slovenia aimed at repealing a law amendment related to parliamentary investigations. As of June 30, 2026, over 30,442 signatures have been collected, exceeding three-quarters of the required 40,000 needed to trigger the referendum. The campaign warns that if the amendment passes, it would threaten human rights by limiting the ability of individuals subjected to investigation to challenge the decision to reopen the inquiry before the Constitutional Court. The signatories, including former members of the Human Rights Protection Committee, argue the change enables political abuse of parliamentary inquiries. They emphasize the importance of legal protection and democratic principles, urging citizens to submit remaining signatures through local authorities or the eUprava portal.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the proposed law amendment as a threat to human rights and democracy, using emotive language such as 'threatening human rights' and 'political abuse.' It emphasizes the potential negative consequences of the amendment while highlighting the concerns of the petitioners, who are all

Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 80): Accurate information on the number of signatures collected and the deadline. Language leans slightly towards the protesters' concerns but remains relatively balanced.

ReporterIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 703 days ago

The article discusses housing policies in Slovenia, focusing on the number of public rental apartments built under the previous government led by Robert Golob and the plans of the new government led by Janez Janša. It states that during Golob's tenure, approximately 2000 public rental apartments were constructed using European recovery funds and the Housing Fund's resources. The current government aims to increase this number through budget allocations, including €100 million annually over ten years for public housing projects. The article highlights challenges such as the lengthy process from planning to construction, which takes between five to seven years, and the shortage of around 20,000 rental units nationwide. The new government has pledged to streamline procedures and stimulate the activation of vacant properties.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual data on housing numbers and policy proposals from both the previous and current governments without overtly favoring either side. It includes quotes from various stakeholders and provides context on the housing crisis, maintaining a balanced tone.

Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 70): Facts about housing projects are accurate but the tone shows clear support for Golob's policies.

DemokracijaParty-alignedConservativeFactual 90Objective 604 days ago

The article discusses the controversy surrounding a new law on parliamentary investigations introduced by Slovenia's new government led by Janez Janša. The law aims to strengthen parliamentary oversight over the executive branch by limiting the ability to block investigations using constitutional review and shifting legal protection to after the completion of a committee report. Left-wing opposition parties and their activists, including those affiliated with the umbrella organization CNVOS (which receives public funds), are running a campaign against the reform, claiming it creates a 'political police force.' The article criticizes these groups for previously misusing parliamentary committees during their time in power to target political opponents and journalists, while now pretending to defend media freedom and democracy. The opposition has collected over 3 million euros in public funding and is gathering signatures for a referendum to block the reform.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the opposition's actions as hypocritical and politically motivated, accusing them of past misuse of parliamentary institutions and portraying the new law as a necessary reform to prevent such abuses. It uses strong language to criticize the left-wing opposition and their allies, e

Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 60): Factuality is high as it references specific claims by Anja Bah Žibert and mentions CNVOS receiving funds from ERAR. However, objectivity is lower due to strong political bias, accusations of hypocrisy, and emotionally charged language.

VečerIndependent🔒CenterFactual 85Objective 805 days ago

The Constitutional Court of Slovenia is set to decide whether the amended law governing RTVS (Radio Television of Slovenia) is constitutional. The amendment, which came into effect after a referendum in December 2022, introduced changes to the management structure of RTVS, including the early termination of mandates for members of the Program Council, Supervisory Board, and General Director, as well as the directors of radio and television. In February 2023, the court temporarily suspended parts of the amendment related to the formation of new governing bodies, but later revoked this suspension in May 2023 due to differing opinions among judges. The court has until July 20th to issue final rulings, with some judges possibly revising their positions. Two judges were excluded from the decision-making process due to potential conflicts of interest.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the legal proceedings and decisions of the Constitutional Court regarding a controversial law amendment without overtly favoring any side. It provides factual information about the timeline of events, judicial actions, and reasons for exclusions of certain judges, maintaining a

Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 80): Provides detailed information matching the primary source, including the timeline and the 5-2 vote. Maintains an objective stance without bias.

Žurnal24IndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 805 days ago

The Constitutional Court of Slovenia has ruled that the new law on RTVS (Radio Televizija Slovenija) is constitutional after nearly two years of legal proceedings. The court initially suspended parts of the law in February 2023 but later lifted the suspension in May 2023, citing disagreements among judges. The ruling was based on a law passed in December 2022, which was approved by a referendum in November 2022. Critics argued that the law prematurely ended mandates for members of the program and supervisory boards and the general director, prompting a constitutional challenge. The court allowed further review and potential reconsideration of individual judges' votes before July 20. Key judges were excluded from the decision due to conflicts of interest.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the constitutional ruling as a balanced outcome, noting both the initial suspension and subsequent lifting of the law. It reports the positions of different judges without overtly favoring any side, though it highlights the controversy surrounding the law’s implementation and affi

Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 80): Accurately reports on the decision by the Constitutional Court regarding the RTV Slovenia law, aligning with the primary source. Mentions the 5-2 vote but does not confirm the content of the ruling, maintaining objectivity.

RTV Slovenija (MMC)State / PublicCenterFactual 85Objective 756 days ago

The article reports on difficulties encountered by citizens while collecting signatures for a parliamentary inquiry referendum in Slovenia. Citizens report issues both online via e-Government services and at local administrative offices, where they face technical problems and delays. Some users claim the system is intentionally blocking signature submissions, leading to frustration and concerns of sabotage. The Ministry of Internal Affairs and Public Administration states they have not received complaints but acknowledges occasional technical disruptions on the national information infrastructure. As of July 2, 2026, 34,104 signatures have been collected, falling short of the required 40,000 needed to trigger the referendum.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of citizen experiences and official responses without overtly favoring either side. It highlights concerns raised by referendum supporters and acknowledges the ministry’s lack of direct complaints, maintaining neutrality in framing.

Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 75): The article reports on challenges faced during signature collection for a referendum, citing user experiences and quotes from a representative. It aligns with cross-source consensus on technical issues. Objectivity is slightly compromised by the inclusion of emotional quotes suggesting sabotage, tho

Radio OgnjiščeParty-alignedCenterFactual 85Objective 756 days ago

In an interview on the program 'Spoznanje več,' former constitutional judge Prof. Dr. Klemen Jaklič discussed the significance of Slovenia's statehood and its role in establishing a free democratic society. He emphasized that while the existence of a state is necessary for ensuring freedom and human dignity, it is not sufficient on its own. Jaklič outlined additional prerequisites for a functioning democracy, including media pluralism, independent institutions, absence of totalitarian remnants, and equitable access to education and capital. He criticized the premature labeling of Slovenia as a fully functioning democracy, arguing that despite having achieved statehood 35 years ago, the country has yet to meet all the conditions required for a true free democratic society.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced discussion of political concepts and critiques without overtly favoring any particular ideological stance. It focuses on theoretical and institutional aspects of governance rather than specific political actors or policies.

Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 75): The article reports on an interview with Prof. Dr. Klemen Jaklič discussing constitutional matters and the role of state institutions. It accurately reflects his statements about the purpose of the state and conditions for a free democratic society. The content aligns with typical political discours

ReporterIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 706 days ago

The article discusses a dispute within Slovenia's National Assembly (DZ) regarding the recording of votes during an extraordinary session. Opposition members accused the ruling party of manipulating the voting process, citing technical issues with the voting equipment and alleged interference by the assembly president. The opposition member Tina Brecelj claimed she voted but her vote was not recorded, while the ruling party's representative, Stevanović Mescu, argued that she did not participate. The situation has sparked accusations of procedural irregularities and calls for greater transparency, including the potential use of polygraphs to verify claims. The opposition also criticizes the ruling party for shifting focus away from ongoing parliamentary inquiries into corruption and financial misconduct.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the controversy around the alleged manipulation of the voting process by the ruling party, emphasizing the opposition's claims of procedural irregularities and suggesting a lack of transparency. It highlights the opposition's demands for accountability and transparency, which are傾

Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 70): The article reports conflicting accounts from both Brecelj and Stevanović regarding whether Brecelj voted. It presents both perspectives but lacks resolution. Factuality is high as it accurately reflects the reported statements and procedural issues. Objectivity is lower due to potential bias in emp

Nova24TVParty-alignedConservativeFactual 85Objective 707 days ago

The article discusses the controversy surrounding a proposed amendment to Slovenia’s law on parliamentary investigations, which has sparked a referendum campaign led by figures such as Pavel Gantar, Dušan Keber, and Spomenka Hribar. The campaigners claim the amendment would establish a 'political police' by allowing investigations into individuals’ communications and devices, allegedly violating citizens' rights. However, Jelka Godec, an SDS MP, refutes these claims by citing specific legal provisions, emphasizing that the law targets public officials, politicians, and entities linked to public interests, not ordinary citizens. She criticizes opponents of the amendment for spreading misinformation and failing to provide concrete legal references. Meanwhile, former Prime Minister Robert Golob and other influential figures have actively promoted the referendum, using emotionally charged rhetoric to encourage public support.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the debate around the proposed law as a defense of legal clarity and parliamentary oversight against exaggerated fears of surveillance. It emphasizes the legal framework provided by the law and critiques opponents for spreading misinformation, aligning more closely with the pro-am

Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 70): Accurately describes the failed session and the accusations against the president of the DZ. It includes specific details about the alleged misuse of voting equipment and the responses from both sides. The tone is somewhat biased toward the opposition, though it remains largely factual.

DemokracijaParty-alignedCenterFactual 85Objective 707 days ago

The article discusses a referendum campaign against a proposed law amendment regarding parliamentary investigations, which opponents claim introduces a 'political police' by allowing intrusive measures like checking citizens' phones and personal data. Supporters argue the amendment enhances legal protection and accountability. The article highlights concerns raised by lawmakers and activists who believe the law violates civil liberties, while defenders, including former Prime Minister Robert Golob and SDS MP Jelka Godec, assert the law is necessary for transparency and legal security. The debate centers on balancing investigative powers with individual rights.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both sides of the debate—opponents warning of overreach and supporters defending the need for accountability—with balanced language and no clear ideological slant. It reports on claims from both sides without overtly favoring one perspective.

Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 70): Accurately reports on the legal action against Bratušek and includes relevant background information. Maintains a relatively neutral tone throughout.

Info360IndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 655 days ago

The article discusses the final decision by Slovenia’s Constitutional Court regarding the law on RTV Slovenia, which was controversial and led to a major purge of staff within the public broadcaster. The court delayed its ruling for years, with the decision being made shortly after Janez Janša regained power. The law, introduced under Robert Golob’s government, resulted in the dismissal of numerous employees and was criticized as politically motivated. While the court has now issued a decision, the content remains undisclosed, and there are reports suggesting a majority vote in favor of the law’s constitutionality. The article highlights concerns over the politicization of the media and potential implications for journalistic independence.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the law as a politically motivated purge, implying that the ruling party used legal mechanisms to remove critics. It emphasizes the influence of political pressure on the Constitutional Court and suggests that the decision aligns with the interests of the ruling coalition. The use

Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 65): The article accurately describes the re-establishment of the Museum of Slovenian Independence and mentions Dr. Jože Dežman's appointment. However, it includes some subjective language about the political implications, which affects objectivity.

Nova24TVParty-alignedConservativeFactual 85Objective 554 days ago

The article discusses the political conflict surrounding a new law introduced by Slovenia's new government led by Janez Janša, aimed at strengthening parliamentary oversight over the executive branch. The law limits the misuse of constitutional review to block investigations and shifts judicial protection to after an investigation report is completed. Left-wing opposition and their activists, supported by the non-governmental organization network CNVOS, which receives public funds, are opposing this reform through a referendum campaign. They argue the law creates a 'political police force,' while the government claims it prevents past abuses of parliamentary committees for political purposes. The article criticizes the left's hypocrisy, noting they previously used similar mechanisms against the ruling party and journalists.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the new law as a necessary reform to prevent past abuses of parliamentary oversight by the left, using strong language to criticize the opposition's actions and their reliance on publicly funded NGOs. It presents the government's position as legitimate and the opposition's efforts

Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 55): Factual content aligns with previous articles, referencing Anja Bah Žibert’s claims and CNVOS funding. Objectivity remains low due to similar biased language and focus on opposition figures.

VečerIndependent🔒CenterFactual 80Objective 759 days ago

The article discusses the situation in the Slovenian Parliament (DZ), where the Speaker, Zoran Stevanović, has not yet determined the agenda for an extraordinary session regarding a parliamentary inquiry into the Black Cube affair. The opposition is concerned that the agenda might not be approved, leading to uncertainty. The inquiry aims to investigate whether a secret recording of conversations with notable individuals was ordered by an Israeli firm and who paid for it, as well as whether this could have influenced the March 22 parliamentary election results. Additionally, there are calls to investigate potential hidden funding of political parties through business and media connections, including foreign contributions. The SDS-led coalition supports these inquiries, while the opposition argues that the previous parliamentary commission cannot be re-established and that new information may emerge justifying further investigation.

Bias read (Center): The article presents multiple perspectives without clear ideological leaning. It reports on both the support for and opposition to the parliamentary inquiry, quoting various political figures from different parties. There is no evident slanted language or one-sided sourcing, and the narrative is non

Why these scores (Factual 80 · Objective 75): Factual content is solid with clear reporting on the referendum and related activities. Objectivity is good as it presents information without overt bias.

RTV Slovenija (MMC)State / PublicCenterFactual 80Objective 759 days ago

The collegium of the President of the National Assembly of Slovenia has not set the agenda for an extraordinary session regarding the opposition's request for parliamentary inquiry into the Black Cube affair and allegations of circumvention financing of parties. The opposition parties Freedom, SD, Left, and Vesna voted in favor of the agenda, but the ruling coalition did not support it. The SDS party believes that a parliamentary inquiry into the Black Cube case would lead to political reckoning, while they argue that an inquiry into alleged circumvention financing has already been conducted and cannot be repeated. The opposition wants to investigate who ordered secret recordings by the Israeli company Black Cube involving prominent figures and whether funds were sourced from abroad. They also want to examine why representatives of Black Cube visited the SDS headquarters and if this was an attempt to influence the March 22 parliamentary election results.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both the opposition's stance and the ruling coalition's arguments without overtly favoring either side. It includes quotes from multiple political entities and does not exhibit clear biased language or selective sourcing.

Why these scores (Factual 80 · Objective 75): This article provides a clear summary of the failed agenda and the opposition's concerns. It includes relevant details about the proposed investigations and the coalition's response. It maintains a relatively neutral tone but has minor discrepancies compared to the primary source, particularly regar

Zanima.meIndependentProgressiveFactual 80Objective 705 days ago

The Constitutional Court of Slovenia has finalized its decision regarding the amendment to the RTV Slovenia Act, which was introduced by Prime Minister Robert Golob at the start of his mandate in 2022. The law aimed to restructure the leadership of RTV Slovenia, leading to early term ends for certain positions and subsequent changes in management and staff. The court’s decision, which remains undisclosed until July 20th, has been the subject of speculation among legal experts. Some suggest the ruling might align with the government's position, while others believe the court could have taken a more critical stance. Notably, two judges were excluded from the deliberation due to potential conflicts of interest—one having ties to RTV Slovenia and another associated with the Institute for Peace, which participated in a campaign supporting the law. The amendment has sparked debate over the influence of political agendas on state media governance, drawing comparisons to similar actions in other countries like Hungary.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the constitutional court's decision within a broader context of political maneuvering, suggesting that the amendment was used to remove opposition figures from RTV Slovenia. It highlights the involvement of political actors such as European Commissioner Verda Jourova and criticzes

Why these scores (Factual 80 · Objective 70): Reports on government decisions regarding museums, partially related but not central to the primary source.

DemokracijaParty-alignedProgressiveFactual 80Objective 705 days ago

The Constitutional Court of Slovenia has reportedly made a decision in the case involving RTV (Radio Television of Slovenia), with five judges voting against two. This decision could be seen as a blow to the rule of law, as critics argue the entire process surrounding the new RTV law has been heavily influenced by politics rather than legal or professional standards. The court previously stated it would not make content-related decisions, which confused many due to the significance of the issue for a key public institution. Two judges were excluded from the decision-making process due to potential conflicts of interest, including President Rok Čeferin, who has ties to a law firm associated with RTV, and Neža Kogovšek Šalamon, who worked at the Peace Institute involved in the referendum campaign related to the RTV law. Critics argue the new RTV law was politically motivated, giving significant influence over editorial policies to a leftist faction. The process was further complicated by legal challenges and lack of broad consensus, with opponents claiming the law allows any ruling party to reshape RTV according to their agenda. The visit of European Commission Vice-President Vera Jú

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the Constitutional Court’s decision as a setback for the rule of law and highlights concerns about political influence over RTV. It criticizes the court’s handling of the case, questions the independence of certain judges, and portrays the new RTV law as a politically driven move,

Why these scores (Factual 80 · Objective 70): Article provides factual information about the parliamentary session and potential investigations. Maintains neutrality in reporting events without clear bias.