Almost a third of MEPs did not report on their financial situation

Almost a third of current members of the Slovenian Parliament have failed to report their financial status to the Commission for the Prevention of Corruption (KPK), according to recent reports. The commission requires all MPs to submit information about their assets within one month of taking office, but as of June 5, 2026, 28 out of 90 MPs had not fulfilled this obligation. This failure has prompted the KPK to take action, sending reminders to some lawmakers and planning to contact others in the coming days.

The requirement for asset declarations stems from the law on integrity and prevention of corruption, which mandates transparency among public officials. By verifying the financial status of MPs, the KPK aims to ensure that there is no unjustified increase in wealth during their term of office. This measure supports the broader goal of maintaining accountability and preventing potential conflicts of interest. Transparency is considered crucial in upholding democratic standards and ensuring that elected representatives act in the public interest rather than personal gain.

Among the MPs who did not file their financial statements, several belong to major political parties. Specifically, 17 members from the Slovenian Democratic Party (SDS), four from the Freedom party (Svoboda), three from the Democracy party (Demokrati), three from the Left and New Slovenia (Levice in Vesna), and one each from the National Liberal Party (NSi), the Slovenian People's Party (SLS), and Focus. Notably, none of the members from the Social Democrats (SD) and the Slovenian People’s Party (Resnič) failed to submit their reports. This discrepancy raises questions about compliance across different political factions.

Tina Divjak, deputy chairwoman of the KPK, highlighted that among the non-reporters were also three former ministers. She noted that it was particularly interesting that three members of the Democracy party—whose platform explicitly includes a fight against corruption—had not submitted their financial information. This situation underscores the importance of holding even those advocating anti-corruption measures accountable to the same standards they promote.

In addition to checking financial disclosures, the KPK has introduced broader oversight mechanisms. These include monitoring reports on entities subject to business restrictions and assessing the compatibility of functions held by MPs. Such measures aim to prevent situations where public duties might conflict with private interests. For example, Minister for Health Tadej Ostrc, who previously served as a member of parliament, recently submitted a declaration regarding his additional professional activities. The KPK issued him a conditional license allowing him to engage in dental care and prosthetics, but warned that he must apply again once he becomes a minister.

Similarly, the KPK received a declaration from SDS MP Vinka Levstka regarding his additional activities, although a decision on this matter has yet to be made. These cases illustrate how the KPK is actively enforcing its mandate to maintain integrity and transparency among public figures. The commission continues to monitor these developments closely, emphasizing that adherence to legal obligations is essential for preserving public trust in the legislative process.

Looking ahead, the KPK plans to continue its efforts to ensure full compliance with asset disclosure requirements. It will follow up with those MPs who have not yet submitted their reports, potentially leading to further actions if necessary. The ongoing scrutiny reflects a commitment to upholding ethical standards and reinforcing the principles of accountability in governance. As the KPK intensifies its oversight, it remains a critical institution in safeguarding the integrity of public life in Slovenia.