Commission for the Prevention of Corruption: Damian Jaklin's functions are not compatible

RTV Slovenija (MMC)State / PublicProgressiveFactual 95Objective 955 days ago

The article reports on a response by Slovenian State Secretary Damijan Jaklin to allegations of corruption. Jaklin denies any wrongdoing, stating he has never abused his public position for personal gain. He claims to be unaware of any criminal investigations or indictment against him and asserts that he will provide a full response once fully informed. However, the article also mentions that according to unverified information from POP TV, a specialized state prosecutor is investigating Jaklin over corruption allegations. It suggests that Jaklin allegedly accepted nearly 62,000 euros in cash through fictitious contracts and companies to secure contracts for a Serbian firm and another local enterprise. The article further notes that investigators reportedly found a contract draft suggesting Jaklin would receive a 15% commission for securing EU-funded projects, and that Jaklin questions how such information could surface in the media before being disclosed to those involved in the investigation.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the allegations against Jaklin in a manner that emphasizes potential misconduct and corruption, using terms like 'podkupnine' (bribes) and 'pranje denarja' (money laundering). While it presents both Jaklin’s denial and the accusations, the tone leans toward highlighting the legal,

Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 95): Accurately reports Jaklin's denial of wrongdoing and his refusal to comment further. Provides context about his legal stance and maintains an objective tone.

VečerIndependent🔒Centeryesterday

The article discusses the Slovenian Constitutional Court of Justice (KPK) assessing the compatibility of two functions held by Jaklin: state secretary at the Ministry of Infrastructure and Energy and non-professional mayor of Velika Polana. The KPK has determined these roles are incompatible, citing stricter interpretations of the law on integrity and corruption prevention. According to the court, professional civil servants, including state secretaries, cannot perform management, oversight, or representation activities in various legal entities, including municipalities. This applies to both professional and non-professional mayors. While Jaklin previously held both positions during the third Janez Janša government, the legal stance at that time was different. Legal opinions remain divided. Professor Rajko Pirnat explains that while a professional mayor is directly incompatible with a state secretary role, a non-professional mayor presents indirect incompatibility due to potential conflicts of interest. The dilemma has persisted for over 20 years, with similar concerns raised by professor Sasha Zagorc in 2005 regarding access to information and equal treatment of municipalities.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced discussion of differing legal interpretations and expert opinions without overtly favoring any particular political side. It reports on the legal reasoning provided by the KPK and academic experts, without taking a clear ideological position. The framing remains fact-

Svet24IndependentCenteryesterday

The Slovenian anti-corruption agency, KPK, has raised questions about whether Damijan Jaklin can hold two positions at the same time. This inquiry comes amid ongoing scrutiny of potential conflicts of interest involving high-profile individuals in Slovenia.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a question raised by the KPK regarding potential conflicts of interest without taking a clear stance or using biased language. It does not favor one side over another and focuses on the issue itself rather than promoting a particular viewpoint.

24ur (POP TV)IndependentCenteryesterday

Damijan Jaklin, who currently holds the position of state secretary at the Ministry of Infrastructure and Energy and serves as the non-professional mayor of the municipality of Velika Polana, faces scrutiny over whether these roles are compatible under anti-corruption laws. The Anti-Corruption Commission (KPK) has stated that since 2023, they have adopted a stricter stance on the compatibility of multiple functions, emphasizing that the primary role—state secretary—is incompatible with being a mayor. This contrasts with their 2020 opinion, which did not oppose the combination of these roles. The newspaper Nova Slovenska (NSi) argues that no legal changes have occurred since 2020 that would affect this assessment, suggesting the earlier KPK opinion remains valid. Jaklin denies any wrongdoing and refuses to resign, claiming he acted lawfully and that the allegations against him are unfounded. The ruling party, led by Minister Jernej Vrtovec, has not yet decided on further actions.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both the KPK's current stance and the opposing view from Nova Slovenska, including Jaklin's denial of wrongdoing. It does not favor one side over the other but provides the perspectives of different entities involved in the issue.

RTV Slovenija (MMC)State / PublicCenteryesterday

The Slovenian anti-corruption commission (KPK) has announced it will assess the compatibility of functions held by Državni sekretar (State Secretary) and non-professional mayor Damijan Jaklin. The KPK previously stated in 2023 that state secretaries, as professional officials, cannot hold local administrative roles such as that of a mayor. Jaklin currently holds both positions, having served as mayor of Velika Polana since 2006 and as State Secretary at the Ministry of Infrastructure and Energy since his appointment. He was involved in a criminal investigation related to allegations of abuse of position, accepting bribes, and money laundering during the construction of the Pomurska water pipeline. Jaklin denies the allegations, calling them a construct and personal vendetta. His political party, NSi, claims that legal opinions obtained before he took office suggest there is no conflict of interest, as the relevant legislation did not change after 2020. However, the party was not informed of the KPK’s 2023 stance. Legal experts have differing views on whether holding both positions constitutes a conflict of interest.

Bias read (Center): The article presents information from multiple perspectives, including the KPK's stance, Jaklin's defense, and the party's legal opinion. It does not overtly favor one side over another, though it highlights the controversy surrounding the issue. The framing remains balanced, focusing on the legal,劾

N1 SlovenijaIndependentCenteryesterday

The Commission Against Corruption (KPK) in Slovenia has stated that the functions held by Damijan Jaklin—state secretary at the Ministry of Infrastructure and Energy and non-professional mayor of Velika Polana—are incompatible. The KPK clarified that while they previously held this view, their stance was based on a stricter interpretation of the law on integrity and corruption prevention. They emphasized that the primary function, which is the state secretary role, takes precedence, making the mayor’s role incompatible. Jaklin has been holding both roles since 2006, but the issue resurfaced after he became a state secretary in 2023. Jaklin’s political party claims he obtained legal advice suggesting the law had not changed since 2020 and thus there was no new reason for concern. However, the KPK’s updated position, introduced in 2023, was not communicated to the party before the decision. Legal experts like Prof. Rajko Pirnat argue that while professional mayors are incompatible with state secretary roles, non-professional mayors present indirect conflicts of interest. This dilemma has persisted for over two decades, with similar concerns raised by legal scholars such as Prof. Saša

Bias read (Center): The article presents the KPK’s legal reasoning and the conflicting interpretations from Jaklin’s political party and legal experts. It does not take a clear ideological stance but rather reports on the legal debate and differing viewpoints. While the KPK’s position is presented as authoritative, the

Zanima.meIndependentCenteryesterday

The article reports on a police document that challenges a key accusation against State Secretary Damijan Jaklin regarding his alleged influence in selecting a Serbian contractor for the construction of the Pomur water supply system. The document, released by POP TV, reveals that police were unable to prove Jaklin’s involvement in ensuring the selection of MPP Jedinstvo a.d. Sevojno as the most favorable bidder in 2013. This finding adds new context to ongoing corruption allegations against Jaklin, which include accusations of abuse of position, receiving illicit benefits, and money laundering related to the project. Jaklin denies all charges and maintains he is innocent, while the police investigation continues. The article highlights concerns about the completeness of media coverage, suggesting that public attention has focused primarily on the accusatory aspects rather than the investigative findings.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both the allegations against Jaklin and his denial, without overtly favoring either side. It emphasizes the police's inability to confirm a key accusation, which suggests a balanced approach. However, there is a subtle critique of media coverage, implying potential bias, but the