ON
← Back to feed
See which jobs could grow fastest — and slowest — over the next decade
United States🏛️ PoliticsCenter8/28/2026

See which jobs could grow fastest — and slowest — over the next decade

A new report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics predicts significant changes in U.S. employment over the next decade. Healthcare and social assistance jobs are expected to grow by 9.5%, adding 2.2 million positions, due to an aging population and increasing prevalence of chronic diseases. Utilities are forecasted to be the fastest-growing industry, expanding by 9.8% driven by AI-related energy demands, though this will add only 58,800 jobs. Professional, scientific, and technical services are projected to gain nearly 927,000 jobs, largely due to AI development. However, administrative roles and certain creative fields may face job losses, with federal government jobs declining by 3.4%. Experts note the impact of AI will create both opportunities and challenges across various sectors.

The U.S. labor market is set for significant transformation over the next decade, with certain industries poised for rapid expansion while others face contraction, according to recent government labor data. The Bureau of Labor Statistics projects that the healthcare and social assistance sector will experience the most substantial job growth, with employment expected to rise by 9.5% between 2025 and 2035. This increase would result in the creation of approximately 2.2 million new positions, accounting for around 37% of all anticipated U.S. job growth during this period. The surge in healthcare jobs is attributed primarily to the nation’s aging population and the increasing prevalence of chronic diseases such as heart disease, cancer, and diabetes. The utilities sector is forecasted to be the fastest-growing industry in terms of percentage increase, with a projected 9.8% expansion through 2035. However, due to its relatively small size compared to other sectors, this growth will translate into only about 58,800 additional jobs over the decade. The anticipated rise in the utilities sector is largely driven by the escalating demand for energy required to support the development and operation of artificial intelligence technologies. Another area expected to benefit significantly from advancements in AI is the professional, scientific, and technical services sector. This field is predicted to generate nearly 927,000 new jobs as a result of increased demand for AI-based systems, tools, and related research and development activities. According to Breyon Williams, chief labor market economist at Groundwork Collaborative, many of these roles will involve software developers, consultants, and engineers working on AI-related projects. Despite the positive outlook for certain sectors, the integration of AI into the workforce is anticipated to lead to job displacement in several areas. Administrative functions, including roles such as office clerks, customer service representatives, and secretaries, are projected to lose around 752,000 positions over the next ten years. These reductions are expected to occur as businesses adopt automation and AI solutions to streamline operations and reduce costs. The impact of AI on employment is not limited to administrative roles alone. The Labor Department has noted that some positions within the arts, design, entertainment, sports, and media fields may also see reduced demand due to the capabilities of AI-driven tools. While these changes present challenges, they also highlight the need for workers to adapt and acquire new skills to remain competitive in the evolving job market. The federal government is also facing a reduction in its workforce, with employment numbers projected to decrease by 3.4% from 2025 to 2035. This decline reflects broader trends in public sector employment and underscores the importance of policy decisions regarding staffing levels and resource allocation. As the landscape of work continues to evolve, individuals and organizations must prepare for both opportunities and challenges presented by technological advancements. The shift toward AI and automation necessitates a focus on reskilling and upskilling initiatives to ensure that workers can transition effectively into emerging fields. Employers, policymakers, and educators play crucial roles in facilitating this adaptation process, ensuring that the benefits of technological progress are equitably distributed across the economy.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 2 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

Go to the primary sources (1)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

2 reports

CBS News (US) logoCBS News (US)IndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 908/28/2026
See which jobs could grow fastest — and slowest — over the next decade

A new report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics predicts significant changes in U.S. employment over the next decade. Healthcare and social assistance jobs are expected to grow by 9.5%, adding 2.2 million positions, due to an aging population and increasing prevalence of chronic diseases. Utilities are forecasted to be the fastest-growing industry, expanding by 9.8% driven by AI-related energy demands, though this will add only 58,800 jobs. Professional, scientific, and technical services are projected to gain nearly 927,000 jobs, largely due to AI development. However, administrative roles and certain creative fields may face job losses, with federal government jobs declining by 3.4%. Experts note the impact of AI will create both opportunities and challenges across various sectors.

Bias read (Center): The article presents balanced information about future job trends without overtly favoring any political ideology. It reports on economic forecasts and expert opinions without taking a clear ideological stance, focusing on factual projections rather than advocating for specific policies or parties.

Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports the 9.5% growth projection for healthcare and social assistance adding 2.2 million jobs, matching the primary source document. It correctly mentions the 9.8% growth for utilities but notes the limited job addition due to sector size. The mention of AI driving jobs in p

Why objectivity (90): The article presents facts neutrally, using descriptive language rather than emotive terms. It includes a quote from an external expert to provide perspective without taking a stance. The only minor deviation from perfect neutrality is the phrase 'likely to be' regarding the fastest-growing industry

MarketWatch logoMarketWatchIndependentCenterFactual 30Objective 758/28/2026
AI wants to help you pick a Medicare plan. Should you let it?

The article discusses the use of artificial intelligence tools to assist individuals in selecting a Medicare plan during the open-enrollment period. It highlights the potential benefits of using AI to simplify a complex decision but raises questions about whether individuals should rely on such technology. The piece does not take a clear stance on the effectiveness or ethical implications of AI in this context.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the topic of AI-assisted Medicare plan selection without overtly favoring either technological assistance or traditional methods. It acknowledges the complexity of the decision but does not frame the issue as inherently positive or negative. There is no strong ideological slant,

Why factuality (30): The article does not address the employment projections or AI-related job growth mentioned in the primary source document. Instead, it focuses on AI's role in Medicare enrollment, which is unrelated to the labor statistics report. There is no reference to the 5.9 million total jobs projected or the

Why objectivity (75): The article maintains a neutral tone discussing AI's potential role in Medicare decisions. It avoids taking a clear position on the technology's effectiveness or ethical implications, presenting both sides of the argument without bias. However, it completely ignores the core content of the primary s

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories