The Supreme Court of the United States closed its public access to the building 16 years ago due to security concerns. This decision was made in response to increasing threats against the court and other government institutions, reflecting broader trends in heightened security measures across the federal government during that period.
Bias read (Center): The headline presents a factual statement about the Supreme Court closing its doors due to security threats. There is no evident ideological framing or biased language. The event itself is a matter of public policy and national security, which are inherently political but the report appears neutral.
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 75): Factuality is high as the claim aligns with historical records of increased security measures at the Supreme Court, though the exact phrasing 'shut its front doors' may be an overstatement. Objectivity is moderate as the article presents the event without overt bias but uses emotionally charged lang





