Chicago’s violent night unfolded with six people shot and one stabbed, underscoring the persistent challenges posed by gun violence in the city despite stringent regulations. The incident occurred overnight into Sunday morning, spanning multiple neighborhoods in the city. According to reports, the stabbing victim, a woman, was found unresponsive in the 4800 block of N. Avers Ave. around 1:50 a.m. and pronounced dead at the scene. Less than 30 minutes later, a 32-year-old man was shot in the temple during a drive-by shooting in the 300 block of S. Kilpatrick Ave. at approximately 2 a.m. Another 29-year-old man was killed in a separate drive-by shortly thereafter in the 2800 block of S. Kedzie Ave. Two of the shooting victims, along with the stabbing victim, succumbed to their injuries. Chicago, governed by Democratic leaders, maintains a complex web of gun control measures, including a 72-hour waiting period for gun purchases, a red flag law, an assault weapons ban, a high-capacity magazine ban, and concealed carry permit requirements. These policies extend beyond state mandates, as the city and Cook County impose additional restrictions. Despite these layers of regulation, the city recorded 241 homicides in 2026 through mid-August, reflecting ongoing concerns about gun violence. The incident highlights the difficulty of curbing gun-related deaths despite legal barriers. Meanwhile, the Trump administration faced mounting pressure over its response to a recent judicial ruling that significantly altered federal gun regulations. On August 13, 2026, a Texas-based federal judge ruled that portions of the National Firearms Act (NFA), enacted in 1934, were unconstitutional due to changes in federal tax policy. This ruling effectively deregulated silencers, short-barreled rifles, and shotguns, removing the requirement for federal registration and taxation of these items. The decision followed a one-week window during which the Justice Department could have requested a stay, but it chose not to act. Kris Brown, president of the gun-control organization Brady, criticized the decision, stating, “Our government is failing us.” She emphasized that the removal of the $200 tax on transfers of these firearms rendered the NFA’s regulatory framework unconstitutional. The ruling was based on a provision in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which eliminated the tax on non-machinegun and non-destructive-device firearms. Judge James Wesley Hendrix, the presiding judge, ruled that the NFA’s justification for regulating these weapons was no longer valid. Gun rights advocates celebrated the ruling, noting that it marked the first time since the NFA’s enactment in 1934 that Americans could legally acquire suppressors without federal registration. The Gun Owners of America and Silencer Shop announced that two of its members had successfully completed unregistered suppressor transfers, signaling a shift in the legal landscape. The decision also affected the National Firearms Act’s role in tracking firearm ownership, potentially complicating efforts to trace weapons used in crimes. The ruling was the culmination of two consolidated lawsuits, bringing together numerous organizations, including the Texas State Rifle Association, the Gun Owners of America, and several conservative advocacy groups. While the Justice Department has not yet appealed the decision, it stated that it is reviewing the implications of the ruling. Legal experts suggest that the decision reflects a broader trend of challenging federal overreach in gun regulation, emphasizing the limits of congressional authority under the Constitution. As the situation unfolds, both sides continue to argue their positions. Gun control advocates warn that the deregulation of powerful firearms could lead to increased violence, while proponents of Second Amendment rights celebrate the expansion of individual freedoms. The outcome of this legal battle will likely shape future discussions on gun policy, balancing public safety with constitutional rights. For now, the immediate consequences remain uncertain, with the nation watching closely.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.
Become a Supporter
United States
