ON
← Back to feed
SC voids vessel tracking rule: What the decision means
PH🏛️ PoliticsCenternow

SC voids vessel tracking rule: What the decision means

The Supreme Court of the Philippines has ruled that Fisheries Administrative Order (FAO) No. 266, which mandated electronic monitoring of commercial fishing vessels, is unconstitutional. The court determined that the regulation exceeded what was necessary to combat illegal fishing and infringed upon constitutional rights. The order required vessels to install a Vessel Monitoring System (VMS) and use an Electronic Reporting System (ERS), aimed at enhancing fisheries management, enforcing laws, and aiding in disaster response. The court ordered the Department of Agriculture to address deficiencies in the order and report back. This decision raises questions about the future of vessel monitoring and whether commercial fishing vessels can operate freely in municipal waters.

Advertisement

1 reports

Philippine Daily Inquirer logoPhilippine Daily InquirerIndependentCenternow
SC voids vessel tracking rule: What the decision means

The Supreme Court of the Philippines has ruled that Fisheries Administrative Order (FAO) No. 266, which mandated electronic monitoring of commercial fishing vessels, is unconstitutional. The court determined that the regulation exceeded what was necessary to combat illegal fishing and infringed upon constitutional rights. The order required vessels to install a Vessel Monitoring System (VMS) and use an Electronic Reporting System (ERS), aimed at enhancing fisheries management, enforcing laws, and aiding in disaster response. The court ordered the Department of Agriculture to address deficiencies in the order and report back. This decision raises questions about the future of vessel monitoring and whether commercial fishing vessels can operate freely in municipal waters.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the legal challenge and judicial decision regarding a government regulation without overtly favoring any side. It provides background on the regulation, the court's reasoning, and the implications, maintaining neutrality in tone and framing.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories