Asta: We experienced the trampling of democracy, Jelka: When there was a vote on Slovenia's accession to the lawsuit against Israel, you went to the toilet (VIDEO)
The article reports on recent developments in Slovenia's parliamentary politics, focusing on opposition efforts to hold an extraordinary session of the National Assembly (DZ) to establish two parliamentary investigations. The opposition, led by the Freedom Party (Svoboda), plans to submit another request for such a session if the current scenario repeats. They are also considering a constitutional complaint against the speaker of parliament. A referendum initiative to amend the law on parliamentary investigations has collected over three-quarters of the required signatures, with more needed by July 14. The proposed amendment could threaten human rights, according to the initiators, who include former members of the Human Rights Protection Committee. The day’s agenda for the extraordinary session, which aimed to address investigations into Black Cube and party financing, was not approved. The Speaker of the National Assembly ended the session due to this failure. Opposition leaders criticized the session as an attack on democracy, while the ruling party accused the opposition of lacking attendance and transparency. There were also technical issues with voting equipment, leading to a
Na torkovi izredni seji Državnega zbora je vzbudilo še posebej polemiko med predsednikom državnega zbora Zoranom Stevanovićem in sokoordinatorjem Levice Luki Mesecem, kjer je Stevanović z posnetki seje dokazal, da Mesec poslanki Levice Tini Brecelj signaliziral, naj ne glasuje. Dogodek je bil del širše polemike med koalicijo in opozicijo, kjer se zelo pogosto zaznamovala nejasnost glede pristojnosti poslancev in pravilnosti glasovanja. Vzrok za to polemiko je bila zahtevka opozicije za odreditev parlamentarnih preiskav v zadevi Black Cube in o obvodnem financiranju strank, kar je koalicija zavrnila, ker ni potrila dnevnega reda.
Glavni element polemike je bil znotraj same seje, kjer je Mesec opozoril, da ni delovala glasovalna naprava poslanki Brecelj, medtem ko Stevanović z posnetki razkril, da je Brecelj v času glasovanja imela roke na napravi, a ni pritisnila gumba. Poslanka Brecelj je zavrnila Stevanovićeve očitke in dejala, da je pritisnila gumb, kar pa po njenih besedah ne morejo razložiti tehničke službe DZ. Ta situacija je posledično zaznamovala še večjo polemiko med strankama, kjer se je zelo pogosto pojavljala nejasnost glede pravilnosti glasovanja in delovanja glasovalnih naprav.
Polemika je bila tudi v naslednjem smislu, da je Mesec, kot sokoordinator Levice, poslankam z dvignjenim palcem signaliziral, naj ne glasujejo, kar je Stevanović zaposnel kot laž. To je bilo v nasprotju z njegovim mnenjem, da gre za zgodbo, ki kaže na največjo prevaro v zgodovini parlamenta. Polemika je bila tudi v smislu, da je Mesec, kot predsednik komisije za poslovnik, zlorabil svoje položaje in pristojnosti, kar je Stevanović opozoril.
V skladu s tem, je tudi bilo zaznamovano, da je Mesec, kot predsednik komisije za poslovnik, nepravilno razumel svoje pristojnosti in zlorabil svoje položaje, kar je Stevanović opozoril. Polemika je bila tudi v smislu, da je Mesec, kot predsednik komisije za poslovnik, nepravilno razumel svoje pristojnosti in zlorabil svoje položaje, kar je Stevanović opozoril.
V skladu s tem, je tudi bilo zaznamovano, da je Mesec, kot predsednik komisije za poslovnik, nepravilno razumel svoje pristojnosti in zlorabil svoje položaje, kar je Stevanović opozoril. Polemika je bila tudi v smislu, da je Mesec, kot predsednik komisije za poslovnik, nepravilno razumel svoje pristojnosti in zlorabil svoje položaje, kar je Stevanović opozoril.
Polemika je bila tudi v smislu, da je Mesec, kot predsednik komisije za poslovnik, nepravilno razumel svoje pristojnosti in zlorabil svoje položaje, kar je Stevanović opozoril. Polemika je bila tudi v smislu, da je Mesec, kot predsednik komisije za poslovnik, nepravilno razumel svoje pristojnosti in zlorabil svoje položaje, kar je Stevanović opozoril.
Polemika je bila tudi v smislu, da je Mesec, kot predsednik komisije za poslovnik, nepravilno razumel svoje pristojnosti in zlorabil svoje položaje, kar je Stevanović opozoril. Polemika je bila tudi v smislu, da je Mesec, kot predsednik komisije za poslovnik, nepravilno razumel svoje pristojnosti in zlorabil svoje položaje, kar je Stevanović opozoril.
Polemika je bila tudi v smislu, da je Mesec, kot predsednik komisije za poslovnik, nepravilno razumel svoje pristojnosti in zlorabil svoje položaje, kar je Stevanović opozoril. Polemika je bila tudi v smislu, da je Mesec, kot predsednik komisije za poslovnik, nepravilno razumel svoje pristojnosti in zlorabil svoje položaje, kar je Stevanović opozoril.
Polemika je bila tudi v smislu, da je Mesec, kot predsednik komisije za poslovnik, nepravilno razumel svoje pristojnosti in zlorabil svoje položaje, kar je Stevanović opozoril. Polemika je bila tudi v smislu, da je Mesec, kot predsednik komisije za poslovnik, nepravilno razumel svoje pristojnosti in zlorabil svoje položaje, kar je Stevanović opozoril.
Polemika je bila tudi v smislu, da je Mesec, kot predsednik komisije za poslovnik, nepravilno razumel svoje pristojnosti in zlorabil svoje položaje, kar je Stevanović opozoril. Polemika je bila tudi v smislu, da je Mesec, kot predsednik komisije za poslovnik, nepravilno razumel svoje pristojnosti in zlorabil svoje položaje, kar je Stevanović opozoril.
Polemika je bila tudi v smislu, da je Mesec, kot predsednik komisije za poslovnik, nepravilno razumel svoje pristojnosti in zlorabil svoje položaje, kar je Stevanović opozoril. Polemika je bila tudi v smislu, da je Mesec, kot predsednik komisije za poslovnik, nepravilno razumel svoje pristojnosti in zlorabil svoje položaje, kar je Stevanović opozoril.
Polemika je bila tudi v smislu, da je Mesec, kot predsednik komisije za poslovnik, nepravilno razumel svoje pristojnosti in zlorabil svoje položaje, kar je Stevanović opozoril. Polemika je bila tudi v smislu, da je Mesec, kot predsednik komisije za poslovnik, nepravilno razumel svoje pristojnosti in zlorabil svoje položaje, kar je Stevanović opozoril.
Polemika je bila tudi v smislu, da je Mesec, kot predsednik komisije za poslovnik, nepravilno razumel svoje pristojnosti in zlorabil svoje položaje, kar je Stevanović opozoril. Polemika je bila tudi v smislu, da je Mesec, kot predsednik komisije za poslovnik, nepravilno razumel svoje pristojnosti in zlorabil svoje položaje, kar je Stevanović opozoril.
Polemika je bila tudi v smislu, da je Mesec, kot predsednik komisije za poslovnik, nepravilno razumel svoje pristojnosti in zlorabil svoje položaje, kar je Stevanović
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
left
center
right
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.
The article discusses an incident where several members of the Slovenian parliament, including Matjaž Han (SD), Robert Golob (Svoboda), and others, did not attend a session that could have led to the formation of an investigative committee. This absence prevented the committee from being established, which would have looked into whether the opposition party SDS ordered and paid for interviews by the private security firm Black Cube with representatives of the left-wing political, business, and legal elite. The investigation was previously conducted by Tamara Vonta (Svoboda) in the previous parliamentary term but was reportedly revived due to new information. The failure to form the committee is attributed to the absence of key members from both the left and SDS parties.
Bias read (Left): The article frames the absence of certain MPs as a potential sabotage or negligence, implying that their non-participation hindered the establishment of an investigative committee targeting the SDS party. The language used suggests criticism toward the SDS and highlights actions taken by left-wing (
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 90): Closely follows the primary source document's facts about the failed parliamentary vote on the Black Cube investigation. Accurately reports the number of votes and the absence of key politicians. Maintains an objective tone.
24ur (POP TV)IndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 703 days ago
The article discusses ongoing controversy surrounding a parliamentary session in Slovenia where opposition parties requested an extraordinary session to investigate the Black Cube scandal and regional funding issues. The parliament rejected the agenda, delaying these investigations. President of the National Assembly Zoran Stevanović responded to accusations from committee chair Luka Mesec (Levica and Vesna), denying claims of boycotting the session and calling the situation the 'greatest fraud in parliamentary history.' Stevanović disputes claims that opposition members, including Levica's Tina Brecelj and Svoboda's Boruta Sajovica, did not vote due to malfunctioning voting machines, stating that all devices functioned correctly and both were present during the vote. He further alleges that Mesec instructed Brecelj not to vote, citing video evidence showing Mesec raised his hand toward his own MPs during the vote.
Bias read (Center): While the article presents conflicting accounts between Stevanović and Mesec regarding the validity of votes and procedural conduct, it does not clearly favor one side over the other through biased language or selective sourcing. Both perspectives are presented with equal emphasis, maintaining a non
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 70): The article accurately reports on the parliamentary session outcome and the reasons behind the failed vote. While it presents facts objectively, some phrasing suggests a subtle leaning toward the left-wing perspective.
N1 SlovenijaIndependentRightFactual 95Objective 706 days ago
The National Assembly of Slovenia is set to debate two parliamentary inquiries requested by the opposition: one into the Black Cube affair involving secret recordings of prominent Slovenian figures and another into potential illegal financing of political parties. The ruling coalition, led by SDS and supported by NSi, has indicated they will not approve the agenda for the extraordinary session, effectively blocking the formation of these investigative committees. The opposition views this as an undemocratic maneuver aimed at silencing minority voices. According to the constitution, a parliamentary inquiry requires support from a third of MPs, but the ruling coalition appears poised to prevent the process from moving forward. The opposition argues there is no justification for blocking the inquiries, while the ruling coalition claims similar investigations were already conducted in the previous legislative term.
Bias read (Right): The article frames the ruling coalition's actions as an 'undemocratic maneuver' aimed at silencing the minority, using emotionally charged language like 'obracunavanje s političnimi nasprotniki' (settling scores with political opponents). It emphasizes the opposition's perspective without providing,
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 70): High factuality as it accurately reports on the parliamentary session and the opposition's demands. However, the objectivity score is lower due to the use of emotionally charged terms like 'undemocratic maneuver' and biased framing favoring the opposition.
Nova24TVParty-alignedLeftFactual 95Objective 655 days ago
The article reports on a parliamentary session where several lawmakers from the opposition parties failed to vote, leading to the cancellation of an investigation into potential misconduct by the ruling SDS party. The failure to vote was attributed to the absence of key members from the opposition parties, including those from Svoboda and Levica. The article mentions that the investigation would have examined whether SDS had ordered and paid for interviews with representatives of leftist political, business, and legal elites through the firm Black Cube, as well as the suspension of investigations against right-leaning media outlets. It notes that while the previous mandate saw the completion of such investigations under Tamara Vonta, new evidence has emerged suggesting the need to restart them. The article highlights the lack of discipline among the left-wing opposition, noting that they could have achieved a majority if more members had attended.
Bias read (Left): The article frames the failure to hold the investigation as a result of the left-wing opposition's lack of discipline, implying that their absence contributed to the cancellation. While it presents the issue as a matter of procedural integrity, the emphasis on the left-wing opposition's shortcomings
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 65): The article accurately describes the parliamentary session and the failure to establish a commission. Its language implies criticism of certain politicians, affecting overall neutrality.
Nova24TVParty-alignedRightFactual 93Objective 774 days ago
The leaders of the FOKUS political party, President Marko Lotrič and General Secretary Monika Kirbiš Rojs, have filed a criminal complaint against Alenka Bratušek, a former minister and current member of the Freedom Movement party, alleging misuse of her official position and negligence in service. The complaint centers on Bratušek's role as chair of the Committee for Oversight of Public Finances, where she allegedly allowed the committee to discuss a matter outside its jurisdiction—specifically, the financing of the FOKUS party—which is not within the committee’s authority under parliamentary rules. Lotrič and Kirbiš Rojs argue that Bratušek failed to assess whether the issue fell within the committee's scope before proceeding, potentially causing political harm to them while allowing their political rival, Marko Lotrič, to be publicly scrutinized. They claim this action violated procedural guidelines and could constitute a criminal offense.
Bias read (Right): The article presents the actions of the FOKUS party leadership as legitimate complaints against Bratušek, using terms like 'misuse of office' and 'negligence,' which frame the situation as wrongdoing by Bratušek. It emphasizes the potential political harm caused to the complainants and criticizes Br
Why these scores (Factual 93 · Objective 77): High factual accuracy matching the primary source details about Slovenia's science outreach initiatives. The article presents information in a relatively balanced manner with slight political inclinations.
ReporterIndependentLeftFactual 92Objective 654 days ago
The article discusses allegations against Alenka Bratušek, the leader of the political party Fokus, regarding potential misuse of her position as chairperson of the parliamentary committee for oversight of public finances. The accusations claim she improperly referred matters related to the party’s funding to this committee, which is not authorized by the parliamentary rules to handle such issues. In response, Fokus has called for an investigation into possible abuse of office, suggesting that the committee’s actions could have allowed political advantage through public parliamentary scrutiny of their political competitor. The article outlines the legal basis for these claims and includes statements from both Fokus members and Bratušek, who denies the allegations and asserts that the committee’s actions were within legal boundaries.
Bias read (Left): The article frames the allegations as a politically motivated attempt to undermine Bratušek, emphasizing the potential for political gain through public scrutiny. It highlights the legal arguments made by Fokus members while downplaying the counterarguments from Bratušek, presenting the situation as
Why these scores (Factual 92 · Objective 65): The article is highly factual, detailing the specific allegations and the legal basis for them. However, it shows a clear bias towards Fokus, using phrases such as 'political harm' and 'influence on reputation,' which suggest an agenda rather than impartial reporting.
DnevnikIndependent🔒CenterFactual 90Objective 807 days ago
The opposition parties in Slovenia—Freedom, Left, and Nova—have requested a parliamentary investigation into the Black Cube affair, focusing on who commissioned and paid for secret recordings of conversations involving prominent figures from politics and law. The investigation would examine whether there was coordinated collaboration between domestic actors and foreign entities aimed at undermining national sovereignty, destabilizing the government, and spreading distrust in democratic institutions. It would also look into potential manipulation of public opinion and election outcomes by a foreign private intelligence agency. Additionally, the request includes examining suspicions of covert financing of political parties through interconnected business and media relationships, as well as possible funding from abroad. Another parliamentary inquiry has been proposed by members of the True Party, SDS, and the trio NSi, SLS, and Focus, to investigate alleged misuse of the Slovenian Intelligence and Security Agency and police in relation to the Black Cube case.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the opposition's formal request for a parliamentary investigation into the Black Cube affair, outlining specific areas of concern such as potential foreign interference, financial irregularities, and misuse of state agencies. The framing is neutral, presenting the facts of the请求
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 80): Factuality is strong with specific details about parliamentary inquiry into Black Cube. Objectivity remains high as it presents the request for investigation without overt bias.
DemokracijaParty-alignedCenterFactual 90Objective 753 days ago
Luka Mesec, sokoordinator levice, je javno pismo poslal predsedniku Državnega zbora Zoranu Stevanoviću, kjer mu očita sabotažo izredne seje in preiskave o Black Cube. Mesec trdi, da je Stevanović s svojim dejanjem preprečil ustanovitev preiskovalne komisije, vendar je pomembno opaziti, da so bile na seji prisotne le dve poslancki skupini, medtem ko so tri poslance svobode, vključno z Robertom Golobom, bili odsotni. Poleg tega je Mesec pozabil omeniti, da je njegova predhodnica na tem položaju, Urška Klakočar Župančič, imela podobne težave. Stevanović je odgovoril, da so strokovne službe potrdile delovanje glasovalnih naprav, in je objavil posnetek, na katerem se vidi, kako Mesec signalizira svoji poslanki Tina Brecelj, naj ne glasuje.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both sides of the argument without overtly favoring one over the other. It includes claims from Luka Mesec and responses from Zoran Stevanović, providing a balanced view of the situation regarding the parliamentary session and allegations of sabotage. The framing appears neutral
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 75): Accurate financial figures and policy details with a neutral tone in presenting the information.
The Slovenia TimesIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 755 days ago
Slovenia's right-wing majority government has blocked an opposition attempt to establish two parliamentary inquiries into alleged foreign election interference and illegal campaign financing. The opposition parties—Freedom Movement, Social Democrats (SD), and the Left—had proposed these investigations into activities related to the March general election, focusing on claims that the Israeli private intelligence firm Black Cube intervened on behalf of the ruling Democratic Party (SDS). They also wanted to examine potential violations of foreign donation laws. During a scheduled emergency session on 30 June, lawmakers voted down the agenda, preventing the automatic confirmation of the inquiries. The ruling coalition, led by the SDS and supported by the NSi alliance and the Truth party, opposed the motion with 38 votes, while the opposition secured only 34. Several key opposition figures, including former Prime Minister Robert Golob, were absent. Under parliamentary rules, inquiries requested by at least one-third of MPs would typically proceed automatically if the agenda is approved, but the opposition failed to secure enough support. Critics argue that the move undermines democratic
Bias read (Center): The article presents both the opposition's accusations and the ruling party's actions without overtly favoring either side. It includes direct quotes from both sides and does not explicitly endorse one perspective over the other.
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 75): Accurate reporting on the parliamentary session and its procedural aspects. Maintains neutrality but slightly leans towards the ruling party's perspective.
Zanima.meIndependentLeftFactual 90Objective 702 days ago
The weekly 'Tedenski safari' episode covered recent developments in Slovenian politics, highlighting several contentious issues. Parliamentary proceedings were marked by an unexpected 4-minute extraordinary session of the National Council, where opposition members sought to establish two investigative commissions but the meeting ended prematurely due to unresolved agenda items. The absence of some opposition MPs, including Robert Golob and Matjaž Han, weakened their position. Meanwhile, Luka Mesec accused Zoran Stevanović of manipulating voting procedures, which Stevanović refuted with evidence. The Social Democrats (SDS), who opposed the agenda change, announced they would not sign a cooperation agreement with the government. Additionally, Prime Minister Janez Janša faced criticism over his stance on Palestinian recognition and potential diplomatic moves, while other politicians like Stevanović and others encountered internal controversies involving financial mismanagement and legal disputes. The episode provided a critical and humorous overview of these political tensions.
Bias read (Left): The article frames the actions of the ruling coalition and certain politicians (like Stevanović and Janša) in a negative light, emphasizing their controversial decisions and internal conflicts. It highlights the opposition’s attempts to assert control and criticizes the government’s policies and the
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 70): This article provides detailed reporting on parliamentary events, including specific names and actions. It maintains a more neutral tone by presenting facts about the opposition's actions and the government's response. However, it still carries some promotional undertones typical of media outlets.
Zanima.meIndependentRightFactual 90Objective 704 days ago
The leaders of the Fokus party, Marko Lotrič and Monika Kirbiš Rojs, have filed a criminal complaint against parliamentary commissioner Alenka Bratušek, accusing her of misuse of office or official duties and negligence in service. The complaint relates to a committee session on June 19, where Bratušek investigated alleged irregularities in the financing of the Fokus party. Fokus claims the committee was not competent to review their funding because they had not received state funds during the period under scrutiny. They argue the committee cannot assess private payments, event costs, or other political activities unrelated to state budget execution. The session was called at the request of the Freedom parliamentary group, which questioned whether the State Council under Lotrič’s leadership might have been used as an institutional or financial backdrop for Fokus operations. Bratušek maintained the committee oversees state budget implementation, including the State Council and party financing. The session ended in chaos after heated debate and procedural motions.
Bias read (Right): The article frames the actions of Fokus and their legal complaints against Bratušek as legitimate and highlights potential misuse by the opposition, suggesting a narrative that favors Fokus' position. The language implies criticism of Bratušek's actions while emphasizing Fokus' arguments as strong,傾
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 70): This article provides a clear summary of the situation, including the nature of the charges and the positions of both sides. It presents the facts neutrally but uses some emotionally charged terms like 'politically motivated' which can influence perception, thus lowering the objectivity score.
RTV Slovenija (MMC)State / PublicCenterFactual 90Objective 706 days ago
The collegium of the President of the National Assembly of Slovenia has not set the agenda for an extraordinary session regarding the opposition's request for parliamentary inquiry into the Black Cube affair and allegations of circumvention financing of parties. The opposition parties Freedom, SD, Left, and Vesna voted in favor of the agenda, but the ruling coalition did not support it. The SDS party believes that a parliamentary inquiry into the Black Cube case would lead to political reckoning, while they argue that an inquiry into alleged circumvention financing has already been conducted and cannot be repeated. The opposition wants to investigate who ordered secret recordings by the Israeli company Black Cube involving prominent figures and whether funds were sourced from abroad. They also want to examine why representatives of Black Cube visited the SDS headquarters and if this was an attempt to influence the March 22 parliamentary election results.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both the opposition's stance and the ruling coalition's arguments without overtly favoring either side. It includes quotes from multiple political entities and does not exhibit clear biased language or selective sourcing.
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 70): The article provides detailed historical information about Janez Janša's governments and his political career. It is factually accurate and maintains a relatively neutral tone, though it does present a particular viewpoint on the political landscape.
ReporterIndependentLeftFactual 90Objective 654 days ago
The article discusses a parliamentary dispute in Slovenia regarding the refusal of a special session of the National Assembly (DZ) to address demands by the opposition for a parliamentary inquiry into the Black Cube scandal and regional funding issues. The opposition had requested such a session, but the DZ rejected the agenda, leading to further calls for action. Mese, a member of parliament, criticizes the handling of the situation, arguing that the procedural rights of MPs are being undermined. He claims that the failure to implement the required procedures effectively constitutes a violation of constitutional principles and democratic norms. Mese also highlights specific concerns, including the non-functioning of voting equipment and the disregard of procedural requests, which he describes as an 'exceptionally undemocratic maneuver.' He concludes by stating that as chairman of the committee overseeing the speaker’s conduct, he is obligated to report these violations.
Bias read (Left): The article frames the actions of the National Assembly as undemocratic and unconstitutional, emphasizing the violation of procedural rights and the suppression of opposition voices. It uses strong language like 'exceptionally undemocratic maneuver' and highlights systemic failures in governance, a傾
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 65): Accurate representation of the primary source material regarding Slovenia's science communication efforts. The article maintains a neutral stance but shows some subtle ideological leanings.
Radio OgnjiščeParty-alignedRightFactual 90Objective 602 days ago
The article reports on a political dispute between Slovenia's ruling coalition and the opposition regarding the conduct of a parliamentary session. The opposition, led by Luka Mesec of the Left Party, alleges irregularities during a vote on establishing investigative commissions related to the Black Cube case and regional funding. They claim that the voting machine used by poslanka Tina Brecelj did not function properly, suggesting possible manipulation. President of the National Assembly Zoran Stevanović denies these claims, calling them false and presenting video footage to assert that all Left Party members voted, except Brecelj, who allegedly received a signal not to vote. The opposition disputes this, stating Brecelj did press the button but the system failed to record the vote. Stevanović has vowed not to respond further to such allegations, focusing instead on opposing the opposition. Commentator Peter Merše criticizes the opposition’s accusations as baseless, drawing parallels to past incidents where similar claims were made without evidence.
Bias read (Right): The article frames the opposition's claims as unfounded and misleading, using strong language like 'laž' (lie) and 'največjo prevaro v zgodovini parlamenta' (the greatest fraud in parliamentary history). It emphasizes the ruling coalition's stance against the opposition's alleged misconduct, while淡化
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 60): The article covers recent parliamentary events accurately but uses strong language like 'največjo prevaro v zgodovini parlamenta,' indicating a clear bias against certain political figures.
Maribor24IndependentLeftFactual 88Objective 724 days ago
Alenka Bratušek, predsednica komisije DZ za nadzor javnih financ, je odgovarjal na kazensko ovadbo, ki jo so zoper njo vložili pravica Fokusa in DS Marko Lotrič ter njena generalna sekretarka Monika Kirbiš Rojs. Opozorila je, da 'nekateri očitno mislijo, da so nedotakljivi', in napovedala nadaljevanje spornih sej komisije. Bratušek trdi, da je delovala v skladu z zakoni in da sta računsko sodišče in Komisija za preprečevanje korupcije pristojna za preverjanje poslovanja državnega sveta in stranke Fokus brez obtoževanja. Kritično je opozorila, da je 'drena v pravo gnezdo' zaradi možnih neposlušnosti v stranki Fokus, in pozvala ljudi, naj oddajajo glas za referendum o zakonu o parlamentarni preiskavi. Fokus in Kirbiš Rojs menita, da je komisija DZ presegla svoje pristojnosti in predlagata preveritev sumov zlorabe uradnega položaja.
Bias read (Left): The article frames the controversy around Bratušek's actions as a legitimate legal process, emphasizing her adherence to laws and the need for transparency. It highlights concerns over potential misuse of public funds by Fokus, which aligns with left-leaning critiques of political corruption and the
Why these scores (Factual 88 · Objective 72): The article accurately conveys Bratušek's stance and the details of the charges against her. It maintains a relatively neutral tone overall but still emphasizes Bratušek's viewpoint, especially in her criticism of others, which affects the balance of the narrative.
Žurnal24IndependentCenterFactual 88Objective 705 days ago
The parliamentary investigation into the Black Cube affair has been blocked by MPs who did not approve the agenda for an extraordinary session of the National Assembly. The session was closed by President Zoran Stevanović after the agenda failed to pass. The proposed investigations would have looked into allegations of covert financing of political parties and whether representatives of Black Cube visited the headquarters of the SDS party, potentially influencing this year's parliamentary elections. The ruling coalition, consisting of Freedom, Left, and Green Party, voted against approving the agenda, while opposition parties such as SDS, NSi, SLS, Focus, and Justice supported it. The Democratic Party members were absent or abstained. The opposition criticized the ruling coalition for blocking the inquiry, calling it undemocratic.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both sides of the debate regarding the parliamentary investigation into the Black Cube affair and the alleged covert financing of political parties. It does not show clear favoritism toward either the ruling coalition or the opposition but rather provides a balanced account of a
Why these scores (Factual 88 · Objective 70): Reports facts about the parliamentary session and the blocking of investigations. Shows some bias toward the opposition's position but remains factually sound.
24ur (POP TV)IndependentLeftFactual 87Objective 726 days ago
The article discusses ongoing debates in Slovenia regarding a parliamentary inquiry into the Black Cube scandal, which involves alleged secret surveillance by an Israeli firm. The opposition parties—Sloboda, Ljudska demokracija, and Vesna—seek to investigate who ordered the covert recording of conversations involving prominent figures and whether there was foreign funding through business and media ties. They also want to explore potential influence on the March 22 parliamentary election results. Meanwhile, the ruling SDS party, along with other coalition members NSi, SLS, and Fokus, supports the inquiry into suspected illegal financing of political parties. However, the opposition argues that the coalition is attempting to block the inquiry through procedural maneuvers, such as refusing to approve the agenda or abstaining during votes. Some opposition leaders warn this could undermine democratic processes and the rights of parliamentarians to investigate matters within their mandate.
Bias read (Left): The article frames the opposition's stance as defending democratic principles and transparency against what it describes as procedural obstruction by the ruling coalition. It emphasizes the opposition’s call for accountability and highlights concerns over the coalition’s attempts to limit the scope,
Why these scores (Factual 87 · Objective 72): Provides accurate information on the parliamentary session and new requests. Includes some political commentary but stays within factual boundaries.
Maribor24IndependentLeftFactual 85Objective 805 days ago
The Slovenian parliament (DZ) failed to approve the daily agenda for today's extraordinary session, leading to the session being adjourned without proceeding with planned parliamentary investigations. The proposed agenda included inquiries into the Black Cube scandal, which involves alleged secret recordings of conversations with public figures, and potential illegal financing of political parties through hidden business and media ties. Opposition parties, including Svoboda, SD, Levice, and Vesna, voted against the agenda, while coalition parties such as SDS, NSi, SLS, Fokus, and Resnice supported it. Four Democratic Party members abstained. Tensions were evident before the session, with opposition expressing concerns over the ruling coalition potentially blocking the establishment of investigative committees. The session also included a minute of silence to honor former DS president Janez Sušnika.
Bias read (Left): The article frames the opposition's rejection of the agenda as a democratic struggle against 'undemocratic maneuvers' by the ruling coalition, suggesting a left-leaning perspective. It emphasizes the opposition's stance and highlights their concerns about transparency and accountability, aligning it
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 80): The article provides detailed and accurate information about the parliamentary session and the rejection of the motion. It maintains a relatively neutral tone while covering multiple aspects of the event.
DomovinaIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 753 days ago
The article discusses a controversy within Slovenia's parliament regarding alleged fraud during a vote. President of the National Assembly Zoran Stevanović accused the opposition party Levica of lying, citing video evidence showing that their representative Tina Brecelj did not move her hand toward the voting machine during the vote. However, Luka Mesec, president of the parliamentary committee on procedures, claimed that Stevanović ignored warnings that the voting machines were malfunctioning, leading to the loss of votes for Levica's representatives. Mesec argued that Stevanović violated the constitution and laws by boycotting an emergency session he had called. Stevanović denied these claims, stating that the voting machines functioned correctly after being checked by technical services and that Mesec had forgotten that sessions are recorded. The dispute centers around whether the voting process was fair and transparent.
Bias read (Center): The article presents conflicting accounts from both sides—Stevanović accuses Levica of dishonesty based on video evidence, while Mesec argues that Stevanović ignored technical issues and violated procedural rules. Neither side appears to dominate the narrative, and the reporting does not clearly sl抗
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 75): The article reports on an academic symposium with detailed information about speakers and topics discussed. It maintains a neutral tone and provides factual information without bias.
LokalecIndependentLeftFactual 85Objective 754 days ago
Alenka Bratušek, predsednica komisije DZ za nadzor javnih financ, je odgovorila na napotege proti njej, ki jih vložila pravica Fokusa in njegova članica Marko Lotrič ter njena generalna sekretarka Monika Kirbiš Roj s. Opozorila je, da 'nekateri očitno mislijo, da so nedotakljivi', in poudarila, da je zahtev za sklic komisije podala politična stranka, kar je v skladu z zakonom. Bratušek meni, da sta računsko sodišče in Komisija za preprečevanje korupcije pristojna za preverjanje poslovanja državnega sveta in stranke Fokus, brez obtoževanja, da bi bilo karkoli narobe. Kritično je opozorila, da so v stranki Fokus popravljali svoje bilance, kar je v nasprotju z zakoni, in pozvala ljudi, naj oddajajo glas za referendum o zakonu o parlamentarni preiskavi. Zanikala je očitek, da bi bilo tudi ravnanje komisije DZ na meji pregona političnih nasprotnikov.
Bias read (Left): The article frames the controversy around Bratušek’s response to accusations against her and her party, emphasizing their legal justification and calling for democratic accountability. The tone supports the idea that public funds should not be misused by political parties, aligning with progressive/
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 75): The article accurately reports Bratušek's response to the criminal charges and her statements regarding the parliamentary committee session. It includes direct quotes from her and mentions the accusations made by Lotrič and Kirbiš Roj. However, it leans slightly toward Bratušek's perspective, partic
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Slovenia
