ON
← Back to feed
The demolition of a black building in a Roma settlement was not entirely unusual
Slovenia🏛️ PoliticsCenter22 hr. ago

The demolition of a black building in a Roma settlement was not entirely unusual

The article discusses the unusually rapid demolition of an illegal structure in the Romani settlement of Brezje-Žabjak, which took just one day from the time the decision became legally binding. Typically, demolition processes under the building inspectorate are lengthy and legally complex, involving multiple steps and potential legal challenges from the property owner. The local municipality, which owns the land, stated they were unaware of the structure being occupied or having a registered owner. The article highlights that while most illegal structures are voluntarily removed by the owners, only 25 cases were enforced through external contractors between 2021 and 2025. The inspectorate explained that enforcement actions are typically reserved for cases posing significant risks to people or the environment, or where there is a major impact on public interest. The speed of the Brezje-Žabjak case was attributed to the lack of legal challenges from the property owners.

A second demolition of unauthorized construction has been planned in the town of Novo mesto, following the recent removal of a structure in the Roma settlement of Brezje-Žabjak. The local municipality confirmed that they hold another binding decision from the building inspectorate requiring the removal of an illegally constructed object. Despite efforts over several months, the execution of this decision has yet to take place, with the timing still unclear. The demolition of the illegal structure in Brezje-Žabjak occurred on July 10, after the decision from the building inspectorate became final. The wooden cabin, built by a young Roma couple, was removed without their knowledge, just one day after the ruling took effect. According to officials, the municipality already holds another such binding decision, which requires the removal of another unauthorized structure. However, the exact date for the new demolition has not been determined. Efforts to enforce the previous decision have been ongoing for many months, but were hindered due to actions taken by other state authorities. Officials emphasized that the decision is binding and that further steps to execute it are currently underway. They did not confirm whether the new structure is located in the same settlement, but noted that it stands on green areas where residential construction is prohibited, making legalization impossible. The investors were informed of the decision before the construction began, but according to them, they do not cooperate with the municipality in seeking solutions. The municipal administration stated that it has actively supported the regularization of property statuses and improved living conditions in Roma settlements for years. As part of these efforts, the municipality has signed ten agreements for building rights aimed at legalizing structures with the possibility of later land purchase. It also facilitates temporary connections to public infrastructure for legalized or regulated buildings and co-finances design services for legalization processes for socially vulnerable citizens. To date, ten agreements for building rights have been signed and paid, while only one application for co-financing design services has been received and approved. However, the process has not been completed within the required timeframe. The municipality stressed that all Roma settlements within its area are spatially regulated and can connect to municipal infrastructure. According to the building inspectorate, procedures for demolishing unauthorized constructions are typically lengthy and legally complex. The recent case in Brezje-Žabjak is one of the few exceptions, as the time between the decision becoming final and the actual demolition was only one day. Meanwhile, the municipality claimed it was unaware that the demolished structure had occupants or who its owner was, based on information provided. The building inspectorate indicated that on December 31, 2025, they handled 8,366 administrative inspection cases, with 4,154 resulting in decisions regarding unauthorized construction and 2,837 initiating enforcement proceedings. Most of these decisions were executed voluntarily, meaning the responsible party removed the unauthorized structure themselves. Only 25 were enforced through third parties, usually when the unauthorized structures posed a danger to people or the environment or affected public interest significantly. Enforcement procedures are generally slow due to the legal complexity involved. Responsible parties often use legal remedies and other forms of legal protection provided by law, including regular and extraordinary legal means, requests for deferral of enforcement, court proceedings, protection of the right to home, and selection of enforcement methods. It is common practice for parties to submit various applications shortly before anticipated enforcement, which can significantly delay or temporarily prevent the removal. In the case of the recent demolition in Žabjak, the speed of the action appears to be partly due to the lack of legal challenges from the owners. The municipality, as the landowner, received the decision from the inspection and initiated the demolition process accordingly. They confirmed that there were no obstacles prior to the demolition, as the site was found unoccupied and the investor or owner of the unauthorized construction was unknown. The wooden cabin was reportedly built by the partner of the occupant over five months and occupied since May.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

2 reports

N1 Slovenija logoN1 SlovenijaIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 853 days ago
The demolition of a black building in a Roma settlement was not entirely unusual

The article discusses the unusually rapid demolition of an illegal structure in the Romani settlement of Brezje-Žabjak, which took just one day from the time the decision became legally binding. Typically, demolition processes under the building inspectorate are lengthy and legally complex, involving multiple steps and potential legal challenges from the property owner. The local municipality, which owns the land, stated they were unaware of the structure being occupied or having a registered owner. The article highlights that while most illegal structures are voluntarily removed by the owners, only 25 cases were enforced through external contractors between 2021 and 2025. The inspectorate explained that enforcement actions are typically reserved for cases posing significant risks to people or the environment, or where there is a major impact on public interest. The speed of the Brezje-Žabjak case was attributed to the lack of legal challenges from the property owners.

Bias read (Center): The article presents information from both the building inspectorate and the local municipality without overtly favoring either side. It provides balanced reporting on the unusual nature of the case, the typical process, and the reasons behind the expedited action. There is no clear ideological slan

Why factuality (90): This article provides additional context about the unusual speed of the recent demolition compared to typical procedures. It includes statistics from the building inspectorate regarding the number of cases handled and the usual process, which supports the factual claims made in the first article. Th

Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a balanced tone, explaining both the unique circumstances of the recent case and broader statistical data. While it highlights the exceptional nature of the event, it does not take sides or express strong opinions, maintaining a generally objective stance.

N1 Slovenija logoN1 SlovenijaIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 8022 hr. ago
Another black building is scheduled for demolition in New Town

The municipality of Novo mesto has another court-enforced decision to demolish illegal construction in the Roma settlement of Brezje-Žabjak. After successfully demolishing one such structure on July 10, they now face challenges in executing a second demolition order due to delays caused by other state authorities. The new target building stands on green areas where residential construction is prohibited, making legalization impossible. Despite these efforts, the municipality continues to promote legalizing existing structures through agreements for building rights and infrastructure connections, though progress remains slow.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about municipal actions regarding illegal construction without overtly favoring any political side. It includes both the challenges faced by the municipality and their ongoing efforts to address the issue through legal means, maintaining a balanced tone.

Why factuality (85): The article reports on the demolition of an illegal structure in a Roma settlement in Brezje-Žabjak, citing a decision by the building inspectorate. It mentions the ongoing efforts by the municipality to carry out the demolition, the lack of success over the past year, and details about the location

Why objectivity (80): The tone remains neutral, presenting facts about the situation without overt bias. However, there is some emphasis on the challenges faced by the municipality, which may slightly lean towards highlighting administrative difficulties rather than providing a completely impartial perspective.

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories