Roma sleeping in a tent after house demolition, organization warned of unconstitutionality

Maribor24IndependentProgressive7 hr. ago

Amnesty International Slovenia and the Network for Democracy Protection have issued a public statement warning that the municipality of Nova Gorica recently demolished the home of a young pregnant woman in the Roma settlement Brezje-Žabjak. They argue this action violates the constitution, judicial practices, and human rights. The report highlights that the demolition occurred without prior notice, alternative solutions, or access to legal protection, which constitutes a violation of Article 36 of the Slovenian Constitution, which guarantees the right to housing and protection of one’s home. The organizations emphasize that demolition is permitted only as a last resort and note that international agreements, including the European Convention on Human Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, support this principle. They criticize the municipality for pushing marginalized and geographically segregated residents into inadequate living conditions, citing ongoing issues such as lack of water, electricity, and proper relocation options. The municipality explained that the illegal structure was removed based on a valid decision by the building inspect

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a serious human rights violation, emphasizing constitutional and international law protections. It criticizes the local government for discriminatory actions against marginalized Roma communities and highlights systemic failures in providing adequate housing and legal

N1 SlovenijaIndependentProgressive7 hr. ago

In the Romani settlement of Brezje-Žabjak, a young pregnant woman's home was demolished by the Nova Kozara municipality on July 10th without prior notice. The non-governmental organizations Amnesty International Slovenia and the Legal Network for Democracy Protection claim this action violated the rule of law, judicial practices, the constitution, and seriously breached human rights. They argue that the woman should have been informed beforehand and had the opportunity to present circumstances affecting her right to housing before any legal proceedings. The municipality, which illegally demolished the structure, did not have information about who owned the property or whether it was occupied. The organizations called on the municipality to provide appropriate and safe housing, compensate for damages, and address criminal responsibility. They emphasized that the demolition constitutes a violation of the constitution, particularly Article 36, which protects the right to housing and protection of one’s home. They also pointed out that such actions violate international agreements like the European Convention on Human Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Civil,

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the demolition as a serious human rights violation, emphasizing constitutional and international law breaches. It highlights the lack of due process and the impact on a vulnerable individual, aligning with progressive values. The focus on systemic issues rather than individual mis