Roberts-Smith says failed court case cost Kerry Stokes 'upwards of $30m'
Australian war veteran Ben Roberts-Smith stated in a recent media interview that his failed defamation lawsuit against Nine Newspapers cost billionaire Kerry Stokes more than AUD 30 million. The civil case concluded with a Federal Court ruling that allegations regarding Roberts-Smith’s involvement in the deaths of four detainees in Afghanistan were substantially true. Roberts-Smith, who is currently awaiting trial on five counts of war crime murder related to his service in Afghanistan between 2009 and 2012, denied any wrongdoing and asserted that he strictly followed rules of engagement. He expressed no regret for his military actions, claiming he acted correctly to protect his comrades. The criminal trial is scheduled to resume in December, and Roberts-Smith indicated he intends to contest all charges.
War veteran Ben Roberts-Smith disclosed that his unsuccessful defamation lawsuit against Nine Newspapers cost billionaire Kerry Stokes upwards of $30 million. The revelation came during a two-and-a-half-hour interview with 2GB radio, conducted while Roberts-Smith awaits trial on war crime charges. He stated he does not regret any aspect of his military service and maintains that he strictly followed rules of engagement. Roberts-Smith, a Victoria Cross recipient, has been charged with five counts of war crime murder. Prosecutors allege he killed unarmed Afghan nationals who were not participating in hostilities during his deployments with the Special Air Service Regiment in Afghanistan between 2009 and 2012. The victims were either shot directly by Roberts-Smith or by soldiers acting under his command. His criminal case is scheduled to return to court in December. During the interview with host Ben Fordham, Roberts-Smith denied all wrongdoing. He asserted that he would fight the allegations and charges in their entirety. When asked if he would change anything about his career, even non-criminal aspects, he replied that he would not change a single thing. He claimed he knew he did the right thing and was prepared to die for his country each time he entered combat zones. He emphasized that he worked to keep his comrades alive without ever breaking engagement protocols. The financial disclosure regarding Stokes relates to the civil proceedings that concluded with a Federal Court ruling. The court found it substantially true, on the balance of probabilities, that Roberts-Smith was responsible for or complicit in the deaths of four detainees in Afghanistan. Roberts-Smith described himself as naive regarding the civil court system. He noted that Stokes supported him from the start of the legal battle, including by covering legal fees. While Roberts-Smith could not provide an exact total, he estimated the expenditure exceeded thirty million dollars. He clarified that he could not discuss specific details of the ongoing criminal proceedings but wished to present certain facts to the public. He urged listeners to form their own opinions, referring to them as punters. Roberts-Smith raised concerns about the fairness of his upcoming criminal trial, which he acknowledged might be delayed by more than five years. He questioned how judges could select twelve jurors who had not already formed an opinion due to extensive media coverage. He asked rhetorically how one finds individuals without pre-existing positions and whether a fair trial is possible under such circumstances. Despite these doubts, he expressed comfort with the prospect of ordinary citizens hearing the case. He believed the defense could explain military complexities to the jury, allowing them to identify flaws in the prosecution's evidence. The interview marked Roberts-Smith's first major media appearance since his arrest at Sydney Airport six months prior. He criticized the public nature of his detention at the airport. He cited high levels of support from the general public. Roberts-Smith recently attended an event marking the 25th anniversary of the Afghanistan war in October. He has remained on bail throughout the period leading up to his trial. The media outlet conducting the interview, 2GB, is owned by Tapt Media. Roberts-Smith’s statements contrast with the findings of the earlier civil suit, though he continues to deny criminal liability. The legal team for the prosecution has not responded to his comments regarding juror selection. The next step in the legal process involves the resumption of court proceedings in December.
Australian war veteran Ben Roberts-Smith stated in a recent media interview that his failed defamation lawsuit against Nine Newspapers cost billionaire Kerry Stokes more than AUD 30 million. The civil case concluded with a Federal Court ruling that allegations regarding Roberts-Smith’s involvement in the deaths of four detainees in Afghanistan were substantially true. Roberts-Smith, who is currently awaiting trial on five counts of war crime murder related to his service in Afghanistan between 2009 and 2012, denied any wrongdoing and asserted that he strictly followed rules of engagement. He expressed no regret for his military actions, claiming he acted correctly to protect his comrades. The criminal trial is scheduled to resume in December, and Roberts-Smith indicated he intends to contest all charges.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced report on a highly sensitive national issue involving military accountability and the rule of law. It quotes the accused directly while simultaneously providing the factual context of the prior civil court loss and the specific criminal charges. There is no evident sl
Why factuality (95): Highly accurate and well-sourced. It provides specific details (charges, dates, costs, quotes) that align with the general premise of Articles 0 and 1. It clearly attributes claims to the subject ('said', 'revealed') and cites the specific media outlet (2GB/Tapt Media), ensuring high fidelity to the
Why objectivity (95): Extremely balanced. It presents the defendant's strong denials and personal feelings alongside the specific legal charges and the prosecutor's allegations. The language is dispassionate, using terms like 'alleged' and 'charged' rather than accusatory or exculpatory adjectives.
The AgeIndependentCenterFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 90
Australian military figure Ben Roberts-Smith has participated in two extensive interviews regarding his legal situation, marking his first public comments since his arrest approximately six months ago. He was detained on charges related to serious war crimes allegations arising from his service history. The article highlights these conversations as significant developments in a high-profile case involving international criminal law and military accountability. No specific details of the interview contents or new evidence were provided in the text.
Bias read (Center): The provided text consists primarily of metadata, headlines, and boilerplate website elements rather than substantive body copy. While the headline uses the adjective 'explosive,' which suggests sensationalism, there is insufficient narrative content to determine a clear ideological lean, specific o
Why factuality: no official source document/info detected
Why objectivity (90): The limited text present uses standard journalistic phrasing ('breaks silence', 'explosive'). While 'explosive' is slightly sensationalist, the overall tone remains neutral and lacks any visible bias or editorializing.
The Sydney Morning HeraldIndependentCenterFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 90
Australian military figure Ben Roberts-Smith has participated in two extensive interviews regarding his legal situation. These discussions take place approximately six months after his arrest, which stemmed from serious allegations of war crimes. The article highlights that this marks the first time he has publicly addressed these specific charges since his detention.
Bias read (Center): The provided text is extremely brief and consists solely of a headline and a single introductory sentence. It states the fact of the interviews and the timing relative to his arrest but does not provide any substantive content, quotes, or framing that would indicate a political lean. Without access,
Why factuality: no official source document/info detected
Why objectivity (90): Maintains a neutral, objective tone. The use of the word 'explosive' is common in tabloid/feature journalism headlines but does not significantly skew the presentation of the facts.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.
Australia
![[Ruth Pollard] The world courts Kim Jong-un](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=www.lexpress.fr%2Fresizer%2Fv2%2FD3IZXNO2UZBUJCJO5MQX3ULULY.JPG%3Fauth%3Dbeff8911aaab2c90e32f72660a59443e940bb324f6d27fad58bf6040702def37%26smart%3Dtrue%26width%3D5028%26height%3D3352&w=3840&q=75&output=webp&we)