ON
← Back to feed
‘Frustrated, disappointed’: Kiren Rijiju slams Opposition for ‘running away’ from debates in Parliament
India🏛️ PoliticsLean Conservative11 days ago

‘Frustrated, disappointed’: Kiren Rijiju slams Opposition for ‘running away’ from debates in Parliament

Kiren Rijiju, India's Minister of Parliamentary Affairs, criticized the Opposition for allegedly avoiding debates in Parliament, expressing frustration that the government is willing to engage in discussions while the Opposition refuses to participate. Rijiju accused the Opposition of disrupting parliamentary proceedings through disruptive behavior such as holding placards, raising slogans, and using abusive language. He responded to claims that Home Minister Amit Shah had written to the Lok Sabha Speaker requesting a discussion on student protests and the NEET exam paper leak, stating that the government is prepared for a full discussion but the Opposition is obstructing it. Amit Shah emphasized that the government is ready to address these issues in Parliament but noted that the Opposition has not agreed to allow the debate to proceed.

Sonam Wangchuk, an environmentalist and education reformer, recently revealed that his wife, Geetanjali Angmo, attempted to seek assistance from Rahul Gandhi, the Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha, to end his 26-day hunger strike. However, according to Wangchuk, there was no positive response from Gandhi. This revelation comes amid ongoing controversy surrounding the circumstances under which Wangchuk concluded his protest. Wangchuk stated that he had initially hoped for a joint participation from leaders of both the ruling and opposition parties, along with student representatives, in the ceremony marking the end of his fast. His wife reportedly worked to engage Rahul Gandhi in this effort. Despite these efforts, Wangchuk claimed that the political leaders failed to respond positively, leading to further tensions. Additionally, he accused Union ministers of breaching a prior agreement not to release images of the midnight meeting where he ended his protest. According to Wangchuk, the images were published prematurely, undermining the conditions he had set for concluding his fast. The situation escalated when Wangchuk found himself facing accusations of having reached an informal agreement with the government. In response, he rejected such claims outright, emphasizing that he had no intention of making a deal during the protest. He argued that if he had wanted to negotiate, he could have done so much earlier and on more favorable terms. Instead, his goal was to push for systemic changes in the educational assessment system, focusing on accountability and reform rather than personal gain. Meanwhile, the protests in Jharkhand continued as the state government attempted to engage with the protesting students. Officials from the district collectorate met with student representatives, offering a meeting with the state government. However, the students remained undecided on whether to accept the offer. Their spokesperson, Piyush Kumar Singh, indicated that a decision might be made later in the evening. The students considered options ranging from a closed-door meeting to a public discussion, but ultimately postponed any resolution until further notice. Support for the protesters grew as prominent figures, including Sonam Wangchuk, voiced their backing. Wangchuk participated in a video call with Devendra Nath Mahto, a leader from the Jharkhand Krantikari Loktantrik Morcha (JKLM) who is on an indefinite hunger strike over alleged recruitment irregularities in the state. During the call, Wangchuk encouraged Mahto to consume at least water and salt while continuing his protest, stating that the aim was to awaken the government, not to resort to self-harm. This gesture of solidarity resonated with the protesters, prompting Mahto to agree to take some sustenance while maintaining his strike. Further support came from Bollywood actress Sonakshi Sinha, who shared her endorsement of the movement on social media. NSUI national president Vinod Jakhar also visited the protest site to meet with the students, reinforcing the growing public interest in the cause. These developments underscored the broader significance of the protests, drawing attention beyond the immediate issues of exam irregularities to larger concerns about transparency and governance. As the protests unfolded, the narrative around Wangchuk's actions became increasingly complex. While he maintained that his intentions were purely reform-oriented, the lack of engagement from political leaders and the premature release of images raised questions about the integrity of the process. Wangchuk emphasized that he had no regrets about his actions, viewing the challenges faced as part of a necessary test of his commitment to change. He expressed a determination to continue his work in education and environmental innovation, supporting others in their struggles for justice.

4 reports

India Today logoIndia TodayIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 7811 days ago
Live: Kharge raises 'purification' at his Uttarakhand rally, JP Nadda responds

The final day of the Indian Parliament's Monsoon Session saw continued tensions between the ruling BJP and the opposition Congress party. Congress leader Mallikarjun Kharge accused BJP members of conducting 'purification' rituals at a planned rally venue in Uttarakhand, which he claimed was an act of caste discrimination and untouchability. In response, Union Minister JP Nadda denied the allegations, stating that the BJP does not support such practices and promised to take action after an investigation. Kharge emphasized that all parties should reject untouchability and called for accountability for those involved. Despite these accusations and counterclaims, the Lok Sabha was adjourned sine die, ending the session amidst ongoing disputes and disruptions.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both sides of the dispute without overtly favoring one party. It includes direct quotes from both Kharge and Nadda, allowing readers to form their own opinions based on the opposing claims. No explicit bias or loaded language is used to frame the narrative in favor of either the

Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports the ongoing situation in the Parliament Monsoon Session, including the standoff over student protests and the potential for extending the session. It references the opposition's rejection of Amit Shah's offer and the government's conditional stance. While it doesn't pr

Why objectivity (78): The tone of the article leans towards criticizing the Opposition for disrupting Parliament, using emotionally charged language like 'disruptions and sloganeering.' This suggests a partial bias toward the government's position, though it remains within the bounds of reporting political tensions.

Hindustan Times logoHindustan TimesIndependentConservativeFactual 90Objective 7511 days ago
‘Frustrated, disappointed’: Kiren Rijiju slams Opposition for ‘running away’ from debates in Parliament

Kiren Rijiju, India's Minister of Parliamentary Affairs, criticized the Opposition for allegedly avoiding debates in Parliament, expressing frustration that the government is willing to engage in discussions while the Opposition refuses to participate. Rijiju accused the Opposition of disrupting parliamentary proceedings through disruptive behavior such as holding placards, raising slogans, and using abusive language. He responded to claims that Home Minister Amit Shah had written to the Lok Sabha Speaker requesting a discussion on student protests and the NEET exam paper leak, stating that the government is prepared for a full discussion but the Opposition is obstructing it. Amit Shah emphasized that the government is ready to address these issues in Parliament but noted that the Opposition has not agreed to allow the debate to proceed.

Bias read (Conservative): The article presents the perspective of the ruling party's minister, criticizing the Opposition for not engaging in parliamentary debates. The framing emphasizes the government's willingness to discuss issues while accusing the Opposition of obstruction, which aligns with a right-leaning narrative.

Why factuality (90): The article provides specific details about Mallikarjun Kharge's statements regarding 'purification' and JP Nadda's rebuttal. It captures the essence of the exchange between the two politicians and the resulting uproar in the House. While some context may be missing, the information presented is con

Why objectivity (75): The article presents the dialogue between Kharge and Nadda but frames the incident as a dispute where the Opposition is accused of making false allegations. The language used implies a judgment about the validity of Kharge's claim, suggesting a slight editorial tilt.

The Indian Express logoThe Indian ExpressIndependentCenterFactual 65Objective 7016 days ago
‘Comes daily, stays till late night’: Kiren Rijiju amid calls for Amit Shah in House

The article reports on comments made by Kiren Rijiju regarding the frequent presence of Amit Shah at parliamentary sessions, amidst calls for his involvement in the House. It highlights the ongoing discussions around the role and visibility of Amit Shah within legislative processes.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of the situation without overtly favoring either side. It focuses on the statements of Kiren Rijiju and the general sentiment surrounding Amit Shah's participation in parliamentary activities, without taking a clear ideological stance.

Why factuality (65): The article reports on statements made by Kiren Rijiju regarding Amit Shah's presence in the House, but lacks specific details or quotes from primary sources. It aligns with the general narrative found in other media outlets covering the same event, contributing to the cross-source consensus.

Why objectivity (70): The tone remains neutral, focusing on reporting the events as they are presented by officials. There is no overt bias or emotional language, though the headline slightly emphasizes the frequency of Amit Shah's visits.

NDTV logoNDTVParty-alignedCenterFactual 60Objective 4512 days ago
Parliament Monsoon Session 2026: 'Don't Run Away': Kiren Rijiju Challenges Rahul Gandhi To Face Amit Shah In Parliament

During the Parliament Monsoon Session 2026, there were repeated disruptions related to a particular issue. The Opposition demanded explanations from the government, and Rahul Gandhi called for a response from Amit Shah. Kiren Rijiju challenged Rahul Gandhi to face Amit Shah directly in Parliament, indicating growing tensions around the matter.

Bias read (Center): The article reports on parliamentary proceedings involving political figures and their interactions, but it does not exhibit clear bias toward either side. It presents the situation neutrally without overtly favoring any individual or party.

Why factuality (60): The article discusses the Jharkhand protests and mentions the parliamentary session, but it focuses primarily on Rahul Gandhi and Amit Shah rather than the specific details of the Jharkhand protests. It lacks direct reference to the primary source document's content about the protests, arrests, and

Why objectivity (45): The tone is highly partisan, focusing on political confrontation between Rahul Gandhi and Amit Shah. It frames the protests as a political issue rather than a civic concern, showing bias toward the opposition and lacking neutrality.

🎬 Videos from this story (1)

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories