In June 2024, a group of MPs led by Katja Kokot from the political party Resnica introduced a proposed amendment to Slovenia’s Veterinary Act. The amendment aimed to introduce a potential tax on owners of dogs and cats, which would fund emergency veterinary services and shifts for private vets. According to the proposal, the amount each owner would pay would be determined by the ministry responsible for veterinary affairs, in coordination with the finance ministry, and would not exceed 20 euros per year. This funding was intended to ensure continuous readiness and response capabilities for emergencies involving pets, particularly in areas where private veterinary clinics would need to provide round-the-clock support.
The idea behind this tax was to address concerns raised by the legislative legal service of the National Assembly, which pointed out that the initial draft of the law did not clearly specify how the necessary emergency veterinary care would be financed. Under the new proposal, private veterinary clinics would be required to offer emergency services only if the state funded these obligations. Otherwise, they would handle such cases within their regular working hours. The goal was to create a dedicated financial resource for organizing a regional system of emergency veterinary care for domestic animals, especially for shifts, constant preparedness, coordination among providers, and informing pet owners.
Katja Kokot, who is also a veterinarian herself, stated that the proposal was made in the name of a group of veterinarians who feel overburdened by the current system of mandatory public-private partnerships. She argued that the government imposes obligations—such as constant preparedness and emergency shifts—without providing adequate financial support. Veterinarians have expressed concern that these responsibilities are often undervalued, placing the burden on veterinary organizations and their employees without proper compensation.
Despite the introduction of the proposal, the process faced immediate challenges. The Council of the President of the National Assembly decided that the topic warranted expedited processing. However, the debate became complicated when more than one-fifth of the members of the Committee for Agriculture, Forestry, and Food Sovereignty opposed the accelerated procedure. As a result, the session scheduled to discuss the proposal was postponed. In response, the proposers withdrew their request for an extraordinary session of the National Assembly, stating that they wanted to further refine the text of the bill. They indicated that the discussion would continue after the summer break, likely in September.
At the same time, the Anti-Corruption Commission (KPK) received a complaint related to the submission of the proposed amendment to the Veterinary Act. While the commission noted that MPs have the constitutional right to propose laws and vote on them, it emphasized that it could not comment on conflicts of interest regarding general acts affecting all similar subjects. Nevertheless, the commission highlighted that it would consider systemic recommendations regarding the overall drafting and adoption of legislation.
The proposed amendment had sparked significant controversy within the veterinary community. Both the Veterinary Association of Slovenia and the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine at the University of Ljubljana expressed concerns about the lack of collaboration during the preparation of the proposal. They warned that the changes could threaten the effectiveness of the existing public veterinary service, which plays a crucial role in ensuring biosafety and food safety in Slovenia. Additionally, the union representing workers in the veterinary field raised concerns about the possible consequences for shift organization, bee health, and other areas.
Support for the proposal came primarily from some private veterinarians specializing in small animals, who felt that the current system disproportionately burdens smaller clinics. The Council of State generally supported the proposal, acknowledging its importance in addressing questions regarding the distinction between public and commercial veterinary activities and the financing of these services.
Ultimately, the proposers of the amendment decided to withdraw their request for an extraordinary session of the National Assembly, citing the need to align the text of the bill further. They confirmed that the discussion would resume later in the year, specifically in September. Despite the delay, both the proposers and representatives from the Social Democrats (SDS) emphasized that the law would eventually undergo revisions, given the need for updating the existing legislation due to previous government policies. They also mentioned plans to collaborate with the veterinary profession during the preparation of the new version of the law.
7 reports
Žurnal24IndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 7016 days agoThe parliamentary group Resnica, led by MP Katja Kokot, has proposed an amendment to the veterinary law that would allow for the taxation of dog and cat owners. The tax would fund emergency veterinary services provided by private veterinarians. The amount would be determined by the ministry responsible for veterinary affairs, in agreement with the finance ministry, and would not exceed €20 per year. This proposal aims to ensure continuous availability of emergency veterinary care for pets.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the proposal objectively without overtly favoring any side. It outlines the content of the proposed amendment, including details such as the potential tax limit and purpose, without using biased language or selectively omitting perspectives. The framing remains neutral, focusing
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 70): The article provides detailed information about the proposed amendment, including the potential tax on pet owners and the purpose of the funds. It cites specific financial figures and explains the rationale behind the proposal. While it mentions that Kokot has been reported to KPK, it remains largel
MladinaIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 6015 days agoThe article discusses proposed reforms to Slovenia's veterinary service by the parliamentary group Resnica, led by Katja Kokot. The group has submitted amendments to the Veterinary Law that would eliminate the current system of state-concessions and allow private entities to operate without obligations to the state. These changes aim to introduce market-based activities into the veterinary sector.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about legislative proposals without overtly favoring any side. It describes the actions of the Resnica parliamentary group and their proposed changes to the Veterinary Law but does not include biased language, one-sided sourcing, or editorializing.
Why these scores (Factual 75 · Objective 60): The article accurately reports the proposed changes to the veterinary law by Poslanska skupina Resnica led by Katja Kokot, including the removal of the public service model and introduction of private sector involvement. However, it lacks specific details on the exact nature of the reforms and does
DnevnikIndependent🔒Center10 days agoThe article discusses the proposed amendment to the veterinary law introduced by the parliamentary group Resnica, which has only five members but holds significant influence over the ruling coalition. Despite the amendment being highly controversial and requiring extensive consultation with the Ministry of Agriculture and the veterinary profession before submission, Resnica managed to push it through using an expedited legislative process. This has raised concerns among other parties, who argue that such a process is inappropriate for a major reform. The article highlights how Resnica's support enables the ruling coalition to function, allowing them to demand concessions in return.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both sides of the situation—Resnica's influence and the criticism from other parties—without overtly favoring either. It describes the controversy around the proposed law and the expedited process used, while noting the strategic dynamics between Resnica and the ruling coalition
DomovinaIndependentCenter11 days agoThe proposed amendment to Slovenia's Veterinary Act, introduced by the parliamentary group Resnica, aimed to separate public veterinary services from private veterinary activities. The proposal sought to address concerns that the current system overly relies on the public veterinary service and its concessions, which limits the development of private veterinary clinics and practices. Key elements included establishing a register of private veterinary providers under the Veterinary Association of Slovenia to ensure transparency and prevent unethical practices such as 'mazaštvo' (bribery or corruption). The amendment also aimed to clarify regulations around continuous veterinary services and shift responsibilities primarily onto public veterinary services rather than private entities. However, after complications in the parliamentary committee and criticism from opposition groups, the proposers withdrew their request for an extraordinary session of the National Assembly to expedite the process, opting instead to further refine the draft law.
Bias read (Center): The article provides a balanced overview of the proposed legislative changes, including both the arguments made by the proposers and the opposition raised by other parliamentary groups. It does not exhibit clear bias through loaded language, selective sourcing, or omission of perspectives. The focus
Žurnal24IndependentCenter11 days ago Truth withdraws the controversial veterinary proposalMembers of the Resnica parliamentary group have withdrawn their proposal for amending the Veterinary Act, which aimed to more clearly differentiate commercial veterinary activities from public veterinary services. The proposed amendment was submitted on June 8 and initially sought approval through an expedited process. However, opposition from the Left and Freedom parties, along with criticism from professional circles such as the Slovenian Veterinary Association and the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine at the University of Ljubljana, led to concerns over potential risks to the existing public veterinary service system. These groups argued the proposed changes could threaten the effectiveness of Slovenia’s biosecurity and food safety framework. In response, Resnica members withdrew their request for an extraordinary session of the National Assembly, stating they would align the wording of the law. The debate has been postponed until after the summer break, with plans to revise the law later this year.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both the proposal by Resnica and the opposition from Left and Freedom, alongside expert criticisms. It does not favor one side but reports on the withdrawal of the proposal due to multiple factors, including professional concerns and procedural adjustments. There is no clear slm
Maribor24IndependentCenter11 days agoThe proposed amendment to Slovenia's Veterinary Act, initially introduced by the Resnica parliamentary group with support from Katja Kokot, aimed to clarify the distinction between private veterinary services and public veterinary services. The proposal included more precise regulations for private veterinarians, registration processes, and funding for continuous public veterinary services. However, after criticism from professional circles and opposition from members of the Freedom and Left parties, the Resnica group withdrew their request for an extraordinary session of parliament to approve the amendment. They stated they would revise the wording of the bill. According to SDS MP Luke Simonič, the law will now be reconsidered after the summer break, though he emphasized that changes to the existing law are still necessary due to previous government actions.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both the introduction of the proposed amendment and the subsequent withdrawal due to criticism and opposition. It includes perspectives from different political groups and professional organizations without overtly favoring any side. The framing remains neutral, focusing on the撤
N1 SlovenijaIndependentCenter11 days agoThe parliamentary group of Resnica has withdrawn their proposal for amending the Veterinary Law, which aimed to more clearly differentiate between commercial veterinary activities and public veterinary services. The proposal was initially submitted on June 8 with a request for an expedited procedure, but faced criticism from professional circles and opposition from members of the Freedom and Left Green parties. The National Assembly's committee for agriculture, forestry, and food sovereignty did not proceed with the expedited process due to written objections from over a fifth of the MPs. Professional organizations such as the Slovenian Veterinary Association and the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine at the University of Ljubljana expressed concerns that the proposed changes could threaten the effectiveness of the existing public veterinary service system, which plays a crucial role in ensuring biosafety and food safety in Slovenia. Resnica and SDS MPs have since withdrawn their request for an extraordinary session of the National Assembly, stating they would align the wording of the law. According to SDS MP Luke Simonič, the discussion will be postponed until after the summer break,
Bias read (Center): The article presents both the withdrawal of the proposal by Resnica and the criticisms from professional groups and opposing MPs without overtly favoring any side. It includes quotes from multiple stakeholders, including the proposers, opponents, and professional organizations, providing a balanced,
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter
Slovenia
