Zakaj se opozicijski poslanci bojijo preiskave o Black Cube?
The parliamentary investigation into the Black Cube affair, which involved allegations of illegal financing of political parties, was rejected during a session of the National Assembly on Tuesday. The investigation had initially aimed to look into claims that the Slovenian Democratic Party (SDS) ordered surveillance and recordings implicating individuals linked to the previous government in deep-state activities. However, the investigation was halted due to the failure to confirm the agenda of the extraordinary session. Left-wing opposition members, including those from the Freedom Party (LS), Social Democrats (SD), and the Left (Leva), contributed to the rejection by either not attending or abstaining from voting. Notably, prominent figures such as Robert Golob and Matjaž Han did not attend the session. The recordings from the Black Cube scandal implicated several high-profile individuals, including former Justice Minister Dominika Švarc Pipan, who claimed that then-Prime Minister Robert Golob still exerted significant influence over GEN-I, despite his formal resignation. These revelations were seen as exposing deep-state operations involving politicians like Zoran Janković and ex
The controversy surrounding the comments made by Zoran Stevanović, President of the National Council, regarding the behavior of members of the Freedom Party during parliamentary sessions has sparked significant political unrest and public debate. The incident began when Stevanović posted a statement on social media platform X, criticizing certain female MPs for their "streetwise" conduct, which he described as inappropriate and unbecoming of representatives of the state. This remark, while seemingly directed at specific individuals, quickly escalated into a broader ideological clash between political factions, particularly between the left-wing parties and the right-leaning coalition led by Prime Minister Janez Janša.
Stevanović's comment was interpreted by many as a thinly veiled attack on women in politics, especially those who have been vocal about gender equality and social justice. Members of the Freedom Party, including Janja Sluga and Lena Grgurevič, responded swiftly, condemning the remarks as sexist and inflammatory. Sluga accused Stevanović of using derogatory language to undermine all women in the country, while Grgurevič took to her social media account to accuse him of being a "liar and abuser," emphasizing that clothing does not define a person’s character and that his actions were a clear violation of democratic norms.
The situation intensified further when the Freedom Party decided to file a lawsuit against Stevanović, demanding formal apologies and legal consequences for what they deemed a serious breach of decorum and respect. The response from the opposition, particularly from the Left and the Social Democrats, was equally strong, with some accusing Stevanović of engaging in a campaign of systematic harassment and misinformation. They argued that the use of such language was not just offensive but also a deliberate attempt to delegitimize the voices of women in politics, thereby undermining the principles of democracy and equal representation.
This conflict highlights deeper tensions within Slovenian politics, where issues of gender equality, political correctness, and the role of social media in shaping public discourse have become increasingly contentious. The incident has also brought to light the broader implications of how political leaders use rhetoric to influence public perception and mobilize support. For instance, the use of terms like "streetwise" and "prostitute" has been criticized as both degrading and strategically manipulative, designed to provoke emotional responses rather than engage in constructive dialogue.
The backlash against Stevanović's remarks has not only affected his standing among the public but has also influenced the political landscape, with several high-profile figures calling for greater accountability and transparency in political communication. The ongoing legal proceedings and public debates reflect a growing awareness of the need for ethical standards in political discourse, particularly concerning the treatment of marginalized groups such as women in politics.
As the situation continues to unfold, the outcome will likely depend on how these legal and political challenges are resolved. It remains to be seen whether this incident will lead to meaningful reforms in political practices or merely serve as another episode in the ongoing struggle for power and influence in Slovenian politics. Regardless of the resolution, the controversy underscores the importance of maintaining respectful and inclusive political environments, where diverse perspectives can coexist without resorting to divisive rhetoric.
Go to the primary sources (4)
The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.
The article discusses an incident where several members of the Slovenian parliament, including Matjaž Han (SD), Robert Golob (Svoboda), and others, did not attend a session that could have led to the formation of an investigative committee. This absence prevented the committee from being established, which would have looked into whether the opposition party SDS ordered and paid for interviews by the private security firm Black Cube with representatives of the left-wing political, business, and legal elite. The investigation was previously conducted by Tamara Vonta (Svoboda) in the previous parliamentary term but was reportedly revived due to new information. The failure to form the committee is attributed to the absence of key members from both the left and SDS parties.
Bias read (Left): The article frames the absence of certain MPs as a potential sabotage or negligence, implying that their non-participation hindered the establishment of an investigative committee targeting the SDS party. The language used suggests criticism toward the SDS and highlights actions taken by left-wing (
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 85): The article accurately reports the events described in the primary source document, including the lack of voting by specific MPs and the failure to establish an investigative committee. It provides detailed context about the political parties involved and the reasons behind the failed vote. However,
DomovinaIndependentLeftFactual 90Objective 853 days ago
The Slovenian opposition party Resni.ca has decided not to sign a partnership agreement proposed by Prime Minister Janez Janša aimed at developing Slovenia. The decision was made after internal discussions within the party, with the leadership stating they see no meaningful purpose in signing the agreement. They emphasized that their support for legislative proposals will continue based on whether they benefit Slovenia, without needing a separate agreement. Party leader Zoran Stevanović criticized the proposal as overly formal and lacking concrete development plans. State Secretary Vinko Gorenak responded that the decision will not affect the government’s work, which is based on coalition agreements and parliamentary processes.
Bias read (Left): The article frames the decision of Resni.ca as a principled stand against a perceived lack of substance in the proposed partnership, aligning with left-leaning critiques of centrist or right-leaning governance. The emphasis on 'development' and 'benefiting Slovenia' reflects a progressive agenda, as
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 85): Factual accuracy is strong as it directly quotes Zoran Stevanović and details the party’s decision. Objectivity remains high with balanced reporting on the political stance.
Info360IndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 854 days ago
The Slovenian political party Resni.ca has decided not to sign a proposed partnership agreement for 'Successful Slovenia' offered by Prime Minister Janez Janša and his SDS party. Zoran Stevanović, acting on behalf of the party, stated that most members of Resni.ca opposed the agreement, arguing it lacks concrete content that would justify signing it. The party emphasized that they will adhere to their commitments to voters and reject anything inconsistent with their program or not beneficial to Slovenia. They welcomed the coalition's openness to dialogue but noted the agreement does not include any substantive commitments aligned with their policies or provide practical solutions for Slovenia's development. Opposition parties are also expected to refrain from signing such partnerships.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the decision of Resni.ca to reject the partnership offer in a balanced manner, quoting the party's reasoning and emphasizing their commitment to their platform. There is no evident bias toward either side, and the framing remains neutral, focusing on the party's internal deliber
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 85): This article directly references Zoran Stevanović and Resnica’s refusal to sign the partnership proposal, aligning closely with the primary source. It maintains an objective tone by presenting the official stance of the party without emotional bias.
MladinaIndependentRightFactual 90Objective 855 days ago
The article discusses how the Slovenian political party Resnica, led by Zoran Stevanović, has been revealed as a right-wing populist party after entering parliament. It criticizes the party for prioritizing neoliberal reforms over an anti-system stance, aligning them with economically elite groups while using popular slogans that appeal to the general population. The piece highlights the party’s opportunistic approach and its focus on policies that benefit economic elites rather than the broader populace.
Bias read (Right): The article frames Resnica as a right-wing populist party aligned with economic elites, emphasizing their support for neoliberal reforms and criticism of their anti-system rhetoric. The language used suggests a right-leaning perspective, particularly in portraying the party’s actions as opportunism,
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 85): The article is highly factual, citing specific details about Resnica's transformation and political positioning. It remains objective by presenting expert opinions and avoiding overt bias.
Nova24TVParty-alignedCenterFactual 90Objective 8511 days ago
Former head of the Slovenian Intelligence and Security Agency (SIS), Joško Kadivnik, appears to be ending his career despite having expressed plans earlier this spring to carry out additional operations related to the agency, known as 'Sova'. The new government seems to have blocked these plans, possibly because Kadivnik had expected another leftist government to keep him in his position. His departure from intelligence circles is not coincidental, as many have criticized his role in the Black Cube affair, which aimed to discredit Prime Minister Janez Janša and prevent his election victory. The SDS party, along with members of Resni.ca and NSi, has already requested a parliamentary investigation into potential misuse of Sova for political purposes during this incident. Kadivnik was notable for seeking media attention, which is unusual for a leader of a secret service. He worked at Sova since 2002 and focused primarily on counterintelligence tasks.
Bias read (Center): The article presents information from multiple sources including Info360 and mentions political parties such as SDS, Resni.ca, and NSi. It discusses allegations against Kadivnik and the potential misuse of Sova for political purposes but does not exhibit clear bias toward any side. The tone remains
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 85): High factuality with clear reporting on the referendum petition process. Objectivity is maintained through balanced reporting of both sides of the issue.
MladinaIndependentLeftFactual 90Objective 8515 days ago
The article discusses the controversial business practices of Boris Mijič, a member of the Resnica party and MP, focusing on his company Progros. It highlights allegations against Mijič, including the restructuring of his company Progros 1, which previously operated under the name Alusistem and went bankrupt. The article also mentions Mijič's father, Miladin Mijič, who took over the management of the company after Boris assumed ownership.
Bias read (Left): The article presents information suggesting potential misconduct by Boris Mijič, a member of the Resnica party, without explicitly endorsing any political stance but with an emphasis on uncovering alleged wrongdoing. The framing implies scrutiny of a political figure’s business dealings, aligning it
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 85): The article thoroughly examines the allegations against Mijič and Progros, providing clear and supported facts. It maintains a balanced perspective and aligns well with the primary source document's focus on political and business misconduct.
RTV Slovenija (MMC)State / PublicCenterFactual 90Objective 8515 days ago
The article discusses an interview with lawyer and former board chairman of Dars Jože Oberstar, who was caught on camera, along with other guests including lawyers and security experts. The focus is on the 'Black Cube' affair involving the Slovenian Democratic Party (SDS), where representatives of the Israeli company Black Cube allegedly visited the SDS headquarters. A taxi driver claims he transported four men to the SDS office on Trstenjakova Street on December 22, 2025, based on a note provided to him.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information without overtly biased language or selective sourcing. It reports on an ongoing investigation and includes multiple perspectives without clear ideological framing.
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 85): Factual accuracy is strong with direct quotes from witnesses and details about the Black Cube affair. Objectivity remains high as it presents both sides of the story without clear bias.
DomovinaIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 8525 days ago
The article reports that Josko Kadivnik, former director of the Slovenian Intelligence and Security Agency (Sova), admitted during a closed parliamentary committee session that Sova has no evidence that the operation involving leaked videos published on the website 'Corruption in Slovenia' was conducted by the Israeli private agency Black Cube. This admission reportedly surprised even opposition MPs, as it contradicts previous claims by Kadivnik that Sova had such evidence. Kadivnik was replaced by Janez Stušek after the first session of the new government. The article also mentions that Vojko
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual report without overtly biased language or selective sourcing. It focuses on the admission made by Kadivnik and the reactions to it, without taking a clear stance on the implications or assigning blame.
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 85): The article accurately reports on Joško Kadivnik’s admission that Sova has no evidence regarding Black Cube, aligning closely with the primary source. It remains largely neutral, presenting facts without overt bias.
DeloIndependent🔒CenterFactual 90Objective 7021 days ago
The article reports that the company of MP Boris Mijič (Resnic) is under investigation for alleged violations of workers' rights and forgery of employee signatures on resignations. The claims involve non-payment to employees and possible falsification of signatures.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information without overtly biased language or selective sourcing. It mentions an ongoing investigation involving a politician and their company but does not take a clear stance or emphasize one side over another.
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 70): High factuality as it details legal actions against Mijič and Progros, matching the primary source. Objectivity is moderate as it presents facts but uses terms like 'sum' and 'domnevno' which could imply bias, though not overtly.
N1 SlovenijaIndependentCenterFactual 88Objective 8516 days ago
Poslanec Resnice Boris Mijič ni več direktor podjetja Progros. Na ta položaj je 15. junija nadomestil njegov oče, Miladin Mijič. Mijič ostaja 100-odstotni lastnik podjetja. Sprememba je bila vpišana v register okrožnega sodišča v Ljubljani 15. junija. V času spremembe je podjetje Progros pod drobnogledom medijev zaradi Mijičevega delovanja kot poslanca. Mediji so poročali, da policija preverja sume kršitve pravic delavcev in ponarejanja listin. Podjetje naj bi nekaterim delavcem neizplačalo plače in regresa ter ponaredilo podpise delavcev pod odpovedmi. Predsednik stranke Resnica Zoran Stevanо
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a change in leadership at a company owned by a politician without taking a clear stance on the implications or framing the event with overtly positive or negative language. It presents facts about the director change, legal registration, and allegations against the company but
Why these scores (Factual 88 · Objective 85): Reports on internal party investigations with factual details. Maintains balanced perspective on organizational accountability. Aligns with primary source on internal oversight processes.
N1 SlovenijaIndependentCenterFactual 88Objective 8010 days ago
The Slovenian Democratic Party (SD), led by President Matjaž Han, has decided not to accept an invitation to enter into a partnership with Prime Minister Janez Janša's government. Han emphasized that while dialogue is a core value of politics, partnerships cannot be formed merely through signing documents. The SD acknowledges the opposition's role and their responsibility, stating they will participate in laws that improve the country. This decision was made during a meeting of the SD leadership and communicated to State Secretary Vinko Gorenc, who had extended the partnership offer on behalf of Janša. Han reiterated that the party took the invitation seriously but wanted to discuss it thoroughly within the party before deciding. He noted that broader political agreements were previously part of SD's collaboration during Janša's first government but stressed that current conditions are different. Han criticized the new coalition government for making changes to labor regulations, particularly regarding union membership deductions, which he views as a major error requiring reversal. He also mentioned that SD will remain in opposition this term but sees opportunities for cooperation,
Bias read (Center): The article presents the SD's decision to reject a government partnership and explains their reasoning without overtly favoring either side. It includes quotes from both SD leaders and the government, providing balanced perspectives.
Why these scores (Factual 88 · Objective 80): The article accurately reports on SD's response to Janša's offer, maintaining a balanced perspective. It provides clear statements from SD leadership without overt bias.
Siol.netState / PublicCenterFactual 88Objective 704 days ago
The leader of the Resni.ca party, Zoran Stevanović, announced that his party would not sign the Partnership Agreement for a Successful Slovenia, which was proposed by Prime Minister Janez Janša to parliamentary parties and members of national minorities after the formation of the government. Stevanović stated that the agreement lacks substantive content and is purely formal, and therefore they would not enter into any agreement with the coalition. The agreement would require the coalition to submit laws for approval at least ten days before their consideration by the government. Several opposition groups, including the Left, Vesna, and Movement Freedom, have rejected the partnership due to doubts about its sincerity, particularly regarding some actions taken by the coalition at the start of their mandate. Additionally, Stevanović criticized Janša's plans to move Slovenia's embassy to Jerusalem and freeze recognition of Palestine, calling them contrary to international law.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both the decision of the Resni.ca party not to sign the agreement and the reasons provided by Stevanović, while also mentioning the opposition's skepticism towards the agreement and Stevanović's criticism of Janša's foreign policy proposals. There is no clear ideological framing
Why these scores (Factual 88 · Objective 70): Factual alignment with the primary source on SD’s rejection of the partnership. Objectivity is good as it reports both sides’ positions fairly, though some language leans towards supporting SD’s stance.
Siol.netState / PublicLeftFactual 85Objective 802 days ago
The opposition parties—Svoboda, SD, and Levice—have submitted a new request for an extraordinary session of the Slovenian Parliament (DZ), aiming to initiate parliamentary inquiries into the Black Cube case and local party financing. This time, they have expanded the agenda to include proposals for amendments to the pension and disability insurance law, as well as changes to the law regarding national symbols like the flag, coat of arms, and anthem. The newspaper Resni.ca has proposed adding a clause to the law stating that only flags with legal basis can be displayed at public institutions, effectively banning the occasional practice of displaying foreign flags such as those of Ukraine and Palestine. The State Council (DS) proposes expanding annual and winter supplements to pensions for retirees who were previously covered under narrower benefit scopes and recipients of rural pensions. The bill will be considered under expedited procedures, supported by several parliamentary groups. The opposition accuses the coalition and Resni.ca of maneuvering, claiming the move violates the constitution and parliamentary rules, with constitutional lawyer Rajko Pirnat supporting this claim.
Bias read (Left): The article frames the opposition's actions as legitimate efforts to expand parliamentary oversight and reform social policies, while criticizing the ruling coalition and Resni.ca for procedural manipulation. It emphasizes the opposition’s focus on transparency and constitutional compliance, which倾向
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 80): Detailed account of procedural issues and constitutional concerns. Presents facts clearly and maintains a neutral tone.
Žurnal24IndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 803 days ago
The parliamentary investigation into the Black Cube affair has been blocked by MPs who did not approve the agenda for an extraordinary session of the National Assembly. The session was closed by President Zoran Stevanović after the agenda failed to pass. The proposed investigations would have looked into allegations of covert financing of political parties and whether representatives of Black Cube visited the headquarters of the SDS party, potentially influencing this year's parliamentary elections. The ruling coalition, consisting of Freedom, Left, and Green Party, voted against approving the agenda, while opposition parties such as SDS, NSi, SLS, Focus, and Justice supported it. The Democratic Party members were absent or abstained. The opposition criticized the ruling coalition for blocking the inquiry, calling it undemocratic.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both sides of the debate regarding the parliamentary investigation into the Black Cube affair and the alleged covert financing of political parties. It does not show clear favoritism toward either the ruling coalition or the opposition but rather provides a balanced account of a
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 80): Factual accuracy is good with direct quotes and clear reporting on the party's decision. Objectivity is maintained through balanced coverage of political positions.
24ur (POP TV)IndependentLeftFactual 85Objective 804 days ago
The article discusses ongoing debates in Slovenia regarding a parliamentary inquiry into the Black Cube scandal, which involves alleged secret surveillance by an Israeli firm. The opposition parties—Sloboda, Ljudska demokracija, and Vesna—seek to investigate who ordered the covert recording of conversations involving prominent figures and whether there was foreign funding through business and media ties. They also want to explore potential influence on the March 22 parliamentary election results. Meanwhile, the ruling SDS party, along with other coalition members NSi, SLS, and Fokus, supports the inquiry into suspected illegal financing of political parties. However, the opposition argues that the coalition is attempting to block the inquiry through procedural maneuvers, such as refusing to approve the agenda or abstaining during votes. Some opposition leaders warn this could undermine democratic processes and the rights of parliamentarians to investigate matters within their mandate.
Bias read (Left): The article frames the opposition's stance as defending democratic principles and transparency against what it describes as procedural obstruction by the ruling coalition. It emphasizes the opposition’s call for accountability and highlights concerns over the coalition’s attempts to limit the scope,
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 80): The article provides a summary of the new government's start, including comparisons with previous governments and interviews. It maintains a balanced approach while covering various political aspects.
Maribor24IndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 804 days ago
The article discusses Zoran Stevanović's statement regarding Resni.ca's decision not to sign the Partnership for Development agreement offered by Prime Minister Janez Janša. Stevanović explained that after careful consideration at all levels of their party, they decided not to sign the agreement because they saw no meaningful purpose in it. He emphasized that the party would support initiatives beneficial to Slovenia and reject those not aligned with their program. Despite being satisfied with the offer, they concluded there was no specific reason to sign the agreement, which they viewed as purely formal with no substantive content. Stevanović noted that their decision does not require justification to any other party.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a neutral account of Resni.ca's decision-making process and reasoning behind rejecting the partnership agreement. It includes direct quotes from Stevanović without apparent bias or loaded language, providing balanced context about the party's stance and rationale.
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 80): The article covers the legal aspects of political oversight and references a literary work to illustrate concerns. It remains objective and fact-based throughout.
Nova24TVParty-alignedRightFactual 85Objective 809 days ago
The article describes a heated political debate during the '24ur Zvečer' program on Nova24TV, where Zoran Stevanović, leader of the Resnica party and head of the National Council, confronted Luka Mesec, coordinator of the Left party. The discussion centered around a call by the Left party for the resignation of Resnica MP Boris Mijič due to unpaid obligations to workers and alleged misconduct. Stevanović firmly rejected these calls, while Mesec became visibly agitated and lost control when the issue of the Fotopub scandal was raised. Stevanović accused Mesec of double standards and lack of accountability, highlighting past instances where the Left party failed to address similar issues while in power. He outlined measures taken by his party, including demanding Mijič settle debts and assist workers through personal savings. Mesec, as a minister, was criticized for not taking action in severe cases of non-payment of wages. The confrontation ended with Stevanović challenging Mesec to take legal action against him.
Bias read (Right): The article frames the debate as a clear ideological clash between Stevanović, representing a more conservative and accountable stance, and Mesec, portrayed as emotionally unstable and lacking principle. The language used to describe Mesec’s behavior—such as ‘losing composure,’ ‘losing control,’ and
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 80): This article details Resnica’s formal consideration of joining Janša’s partnership, aligning with the primary source’s discussion of their shifting stance. It remains objective, reporting on the internal discussions within the party without taking sides.
DeloIndependent🔒CenterFactual 85Objective 8016 days ago
The article reports that MP Boris Mijič is no longer the director of Progros, following an entry in the registry by the Ljubljana district court on June 15. This change occurs amid scrutiny of Mijič's business activities due to his role as an MP. According to reports, police have investigated Mijič and the company for alleged violations of workers' rights and document forgery, including failure to pay wages and falsifying employee signatures on resignation forms. Zoran Stevanović, president of the Resni.ca party and the National Assembly, has urged affected employees to contact him and stated他
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information without overtly biased language or selective sourcing. It reports on legal and business developments involving a politician without taking a clear stance on the allegations or outcomes.
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 80): Accurately describes corporate leadership change and related legal issues. Maintains neutral tone while reporting on business and political developments. Aligns with primary source on personnel changes.
MladinaIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 8019 days ago
The Freedom Party (Svoboda), led by Robert Golob, has decided not to join Prime Minister Janez Janša's proposed partnership for 'Successful Slovenia.' The party claims the document outlining the partnership lacks substantive content, particularly regarding education, healthcare, and other key areas. Instead, they plan to form a shadow cabinet in early July and will later present their core policy framework.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a political decision without overtly favoring any side. It presents the reasoning provided by Svoboda and does not include biased language or one-sided sourcing. The framing remains neutral, focusing on the lack of content in the proposed partnership and the party's subsequent
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 80): Article provides detailed information about Stevanović's stance on cooperation with Janša, aligning with the primary source's discussion of political conditions and party strategies. It maintains a balanced perspective.
Nova24TVParty-alignedCenterFactual 85Objective 8020 days ago
Zoran Stevanović, predsednik politične stranke Resnica, je v videoposnetku na družbenih omrežjih poudaril, da bo iz svojih osebnih prihrankov pomagal delavcem, če se izkaze, da imajo neporavnane obveznosti. Stevanović je rekel, da čuti moralno in politično odgovornost za razjasnitev okoliščin, povezanih z poslovno preteklostjo poslanca Borisa Mijića in podjetja Progros. V stranki so začeli notranji postopek preverjanja vseh okoliščin in od Mijića zahtevali popolno sodelovanje.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a political figure's personal commitment to assist workers financially if needed, without taking a stance on the issue itself. The framing is neutral, focusing on the statement made by Stevanović rather than endorsing or criticizing it. There is no evident bias in language, ph
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 80): The article focuses on Stevanović’s public statement regarding helping workers with debts. It accurately reflects the primary source and maintains objectivity by presenting the statement without additional commentary or bias.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Slovenia
