They report cheating in the UNAM online test; what is the Safe Exam Browser and why did your system fail?

El UniversalIndependentProgressiveFactual 95Objective 85yesterday

Students who failed the first virtual entrance exam at the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM) staged a protest in Ciudad Universitaria, demanding the cancellation of the online exam and its rescheduling in person. Demonstrators gathered near the Metro Ciudad Universitaria and Insurgentes Sur, heading towards the Rectorate Tower, chanting slogans against the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in exams and calling for transparency. They accused the university of unfair practices, claiming that some candidates who cheated received higher scores, while those who studied honestly were unfairly penalized. One student, Melanie Maya, expressed frustration over the perceived injustice, stating that many students had sacrificed months of study and felt it was unfair that those who used cheating tactics benefited. She called for the return of in-person exams and the cancellation of the online test for those suspected of misconduct.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the issue as a struggle between honest students and those who allegedly cheated using AI, implying that the university is failing to uphold fairness. The emphasis on transparency, criticism of AI in exams, and calls for in-person testing align with progressive concerns about techn

Why factuality (95): The article accurately describes the protests by rejected applicants and their demands for a return to in-person exams. It includes direct quotes from a student and references the university’s suspension of admissions. These points are consistent with other sources.

Why objectivity (85): While the article presents facts objectively, some phrases like 'examen en línea fue una porquería' may reflect the protesters’ sentiment rather than an impartial analysis. However, these are direct quotes and not editorializing.

ReformaIndependentProgressiveFactual 90Objective 856 days ago

Students in Mexico are planning to march to demand that the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM) conduct in-person exams. The protest comes amid ongoing debates over academic policies during the pandemic, with students arguing that online assessments do not fairly represent their abilities. The demonstration highlights tensions between educational institutions and students regarding assessment methods. While the university has maintained remote learning protocols, student groups are pushing for a return to traditional in-person evaluations. The situation reflects broader discussions about academic standards and institutional flexibility.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the student protest as a legitimate demand for fairness and transparency in academic evaluation, aligning with progressive values that prioritize student rights and institutional accountability. The emphasis on 'exigir' (demand) suggests a push for change rather than acceptance of

Why factuality (90): The article accurately reports that students will march to demand an in-person exam. This is consistent with other sources that describe similar calls for action by rejected applicants.

Why objectivity (85): The tone is neutral and factual, focusing on the planned demonstration without taking sides. It provides necessary context while maintaining a balanced approach.

Animal PolíticoIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 80yesterday

Candidates applying to the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM) organized a protest following alleged irregularities in their virtual entrance exams. The demonstration was reported by Animal Político, a Mexican news outlet known for its progressive stance. The irregularities reportedly involved technical issues and potential unfair advantages during the online testing process. The protesters demanded transparency and accountability from the university authorities. The incident highlights ongoing concerns about the fairness and reliability of remote examinations in higher education.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the protest as a legitimate concern over institutional integrity, aligning with progressive values of transparency and accountability. It emphasizes the candidates' grievances without presenting counterarguments or alternative perspectives, which suggests a left-leaning framing.

Why factuality (85): The article correctly reports that applicants marched due to irregularities in the online exam. This aligns with other sources that describe similar protests and concerns over the exam format.

Why objectivity (80): The article is brief and lacks additional context or perspectives beyond the protest itself. It remains neutral but could provide more background to enhance balance.

Animal PolíticoIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 805 days ago

The headline states that the PAN (National Action Party) is demanding that the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM) conduct an audit of its online entrance exam. The article appears to focus on the political pressure being exerted on UNAM regarding the transparency and integrity of its admissions process. However, the provided text is incomplete and lacks sufficient detail to fully understand the context or implications of the demand.

Bias read (Progressive): The demand by PAN, a center-right political party, for an audit suggests a potential challenge to the current administration's policies or practices at UNAM. While the article does not explicitly frame the issue as left-leaning, the act of demanding an audit could imply scrutiny of existing systems,

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports that the PAN party is demanding an audit of the UNAM entrance exam. This aligns with multiple other sources that mention accusations of irregularities and protests by rejected applicants. The claim is supported by cross-source consensus.

Why objectivity (80): The article is concise but lacks detailed context about the nature of the alleged irregularities or the specific demands of the audit. It does not present any overt bias but could have included more nuance in explaining the situation.

El UniversalIndependentProgressive10 hr. ago

El 17 de julio se revelaron los resultados de los exámenes de admisión a la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), que se llevaron a cabo en formato en línea por primera vez. Esta decisión generó controversia en redes sociales y entornos académicos, con usuarios reportando irregularidades y posibles fraudes. La UNAM suspendió temporalmente el proceso de inscripción tras detectar fallos en el sistema de seguridad. Se informó que el software Safe Exam Browser (SEB), utilizado para garantizar la integridad de la prueba, falló al no bloquear dispositivos externos o monitores adicionales, lo que permitió a algunos aspirantes usar inteligencia artificial para responder preguntas. La Secretaría de Educación Pública (SEP) establece que los exámenes digitales deben incluir autenticación biométrica continua y control del entorno físico. Como consecuencia, ciertas carreras experimentaron un aumento inusual en los puntajes, alcanzando hasta 117 aciertos sobre 120. La UNAM anunció la creación de una comisión técnica para investigar los incidentes y considerar una denuncia penal.

Bias read (Progressive): El artículo destaca las irregularidades en el sistema de evaluación digital de la UNAM, lo cual refleja críticas hacia la implementación tecnológica en educación pública. Mientras menciona la existencia de mecanismos de seguridad, enfatiza la falla del sistema y la necesidad de medidas más estrictas

El UniversalIndependentProgressive14 hr. ago

Students selected through the online entrance exam at the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM) protested at the university's headquarters, demanding that their results be respected. The demonstrators, who were admitted based on their performance in the virtual exam, argued against the possibility of repeating the test in person, citing concerns over the psychological, physical, and emotional effects of such a change. They acknowledged potential cheating but rejected the generalization of these practices across all participants. The students presented a petition to university authorities, calling for the continuation of the enrollment process within the established timeline, respect for the honest selection process, and proper attention to those selected. One student, Frida, shared her experience of passing the exam and being accepted into a design program, emphasizing that the university was unfairly generalizing cheating accusations.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the students' demands as legitimate grievances against institutional unfairness, highlighting their frustration with generalized accusations of cheating and the potential negative impact of requiring a physical exam. The tone supports the students' perspective, portraying them as

El UniversalIndependentProgressiveyesterday

Protesters outside the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM) demanded the cancellation and rescheduling of the university entrance exam in person mode after the institution suspended online testing due to alleged fraud. Demonstrators gathered near the campus, chanting slogans against online exams and calling for transparency. They handed over a petition to university authorities, requesting that future exams be conducted in-person, individual notifications be issued to affected applicants, and mechanisms for appeal and dialogue be established. The university authorities could not meet with the rector and instead received the demands from other officials. One protester, Melanie Maya, criticized the online exam system and called for reinstatement of in-person testing.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the protests as a legitimate call for transparency and fairness, emphasizing concerns about online exam integrity and advocating for in-person assessments. It highlights the frustration of students and their families, portraying them as victims of a flawed system. The emphasis on

La JornadaIndependentProgressiveyesterday

Protesters including professors, students, and applicants from the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM) gathered outside the university's administration building to demand in-person exams and transparency in the admissions process. The demonstration highlights concerns over the current remote assessment methods and lack of clarity regarding admission criteria. Participants argue that these issues undermine academic integrity and fairness, particularly affecting prospective students seeking clearer pathways to enrollment.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the protest as a legitimate call for institutional accountability and transparency, aligning with progressive values of educational equity. It emphasizes the voices of educators and students, suggesting a critique of bureaucratic opacity rather than a partisan attack. While not an