ON
← Back to feed
VP trial Day 10: Prosecution to present 1st witness for CF misuse
PH🏛️ PoliticsCenter34 min. ago

VP trial Day 10: Prosecution to present 1st witness for CF misuse

The trial of Vice President Sara Duterte entered its 10th day with the prosecution set to present its first witness regarding her alleged misuse of P612.5 million in confidential funds. The first witness, Violeta Constantino, a former Land Bank of the Philippines (LBP) branch manager, will testify about transactions involving Duterte's special disbursing officer, Gina Acosta, who allegedly withdrew P125 million from December 2022 to September 2023. Another former LBP branch manager, Nenita Camposano, will follow with testimony about P32.5 million withdrawals linked to Duterte's former SDO in 2023. The scheduling of these testimonies was delayed due to procedural requests and the State of the Nation Address by President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. The prosecution requested the court to address each impeachment article sequentially, but the defense opposed this change, and the court proceeded with Article I.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Go to the primary sources (1)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

12 reports

Philippine Daily Inquirer logoPhilippine Daily InquirerIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 853 days ago
BI denies spreading false info on Romualdez’s alleged bid to leave PH

The Bureau of Immigration (BI) denied allegations that it spread false information about former House Speaker Martin Romualdez's alleged attempt to leave the Philippines. Romualdez' legal team claimed the BI's statements were misleading and requested an apology, arguing they falsely suggested the lawmaker was trying to flee the country to avoid criminal investigations. The BI stated it provided factual information based on media inquiries and clarified that the alleged travel plans referred to a scheduled trip in April 2026, which was approved but did not proceed. The BI emphasized its commitment to transparency and accuracy, while Romualdez' camp argued the information unfairly portrayed him as evading justice.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both sides of the dispute: the BI maintains it acted responsibly by responding to legitimate inquiries, while Romualdez' legal team claims the information was misleading. There is no clear ideological slant in the framing, and the reporting remains balanced between the two sides

Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports the BI's denial of spreading false information about Romualdez's alleged attempts to leave the country. It includes direct quotes from BI Commissioner Joel Anthony Viado and mentions the specific date (April 2026) of the alleged travel plans. The article also reference

Why objectivity (85): The article presents both sides of the issue, quoting BI officials and Romualdez's spokesperson. While it uses terms like 'alleged' and 'supposed,' it avoids overtly biased language. However, the title implies the BI denied spreading false information, which may slightly frame the narrative in favor

Philippine Daily Inquirer logoPhilippine Daily InquirerIndependentCenterFactual 93Objective 804 days ago
Romualdez camp to BI: Apologize over fake news on attempt to leave PH

Leyte Representative Ferdinand Martin Romualdez's legal team has requested an apology from the Bureau of Immigration (BI) over what they describe as false and unverified reports about his alleged attempt to leave the Philippines. The BI reportedly received information suggesting Romualdez had plans to depart, which was cited by the Office of the Ombudsman in accusations that he was evading judicial proceedings. Romualdez's lawyers argue these reports are misleading and damage his reputation, asserting that the BI's statements unfairly imply he tried to avoid the Sandiganbayan's jurisdiction. They emphasize that the claims lack factual basis and infringe on his presumption of innocence. Earlier in 2026, Romualdez had been approved for a medical trip abroad but later canceled due to ongoing legal cases.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both sides of the dispute: the BI's claim of receiving information about Romualdez's potential departure and the legal team's rebuttal that the reports are false and damaging. There is no clear ideological leaning in the framing of the story, which focuses on the legal and reput

Why factuality (93): The article accurately conveys that Romualdez's legal team has demanded an apology from the BI for what they claim are false reports about his attempts to leave the country. It cites the demand letter and quotes directly from it, including the reference to the Sandiganbayan case. This aligns closely

Why objectivity (80): The article leans more toward presenting the perspective of Romualdez's legal team, using phrases such as 'false and unverified reports' and 'gravely prejudicial.' While it does include some direct quotes from the demand letter, it frames the situation primarily from the viewpoint of Romualdez's cam

Philippine Daily Inquirer logoPhilippine Daily InquirerIndependentCenter34 min. ago
WATCH: Sara Duterte impeachment trial | July 29, 2026

The Senate impeachment court has resumed the trial of Vice President Sara Duterte, with House prosecutors preparing to present evidence regarding the alleged misuse of P612.5 million in confidential funds. This development occurs on the 10th day of the trial, following a two-day recess. The charges fall under Article I of the Articles of Impeachment, which outlines specific allegations against Duterte. The resumption of the trial indicates ongoing legal proceedings aimed at addressing these financial misconduct claims.

Bias read (Center): The article provides a factual account of the resumption of the impeachment trial without apparent bias. It does not exhibit loaded language, one-sided sourcing, or editorializing that would indicate a clear leaning towards either the prosecution or defense. The focus remains on the procedural resum

Philippine Daily Inquirer logoPhilippine Daily InquirerIndependentCenter2 hr. ago
Sara Duterte to meet detained politicians, their supporters

Vice President Sara Duterte announced plans to meet with politicians and their supporters upon her return to the Philippines. She made the statement during an interview in The Hague, Netherlands, following her visit to Senator Rodante Marcoleta, who is currently detained on plunder charges. Duterte mentioned she would speak with Marcoleta again once she returns to the country and expressed intent to engage with other politicians and supporters in detention. While she did not specify the identities of those involved, the article notes that Marcoleta faces non-bailable plunder charges related to alleged violations of a presidential decree. Another detained individual linked to Duterte is Senator Jinggoy Estrada, who is also facing multiple corruption charges.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about Duterte’s planned meetings with detained politicians and their supporters without overtly favoring any particular political stance. It provides background on the legal cases against Marcoleta and Estrada but does not frame the situation in a clearly pro

Philippine Daily Inquirer logoPhilippine Daily InquirerIndependentCenter4 hr. ago
VP trial Day 10: Prosecution to present 1st witness for CF misuse

The trial of Vice President Sara Duterte entered its 10th day with the prosecution set to present its first witness regarding her alleged misuse of P612.5 million in confidential funds. The first witness, Violeta Constantino, a former Land Bank of the Philippines (LBP) branch manager, will testify about transactions involving Duterte's special disbursing officer, Gina Acosta, who allegedly withdrew P125 million from December 2022 to September 2023. Another former LBP branch manager, Nenita Camposano, will follow with testimony about P32.5 million withdrawals linked to Duterte's former SDO in 2023. The scheduling of these testimonies was delayed due to procedural requests and the State of the Nation Address by President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. The prosecution requested the court to address each impeachment article sequentially, but the defense opposed this change, and the court proceeded with Article I.

Bias read (Center): The article provides a balanced account of the proceedings, detailing both the prosecution's plans and the defense's opposition to changes in the trial order. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or omissions that would indicate a clear ideological lean. The focus is on陈述

Philippine Daily Inquirer logoPhilippine Daily InquirerIndependentCenter5 hr. ago
Marcoleta asks peers: ‘Find  ways’ to include me, Jinggoy Estrada

Senator Rodante Marcoleta has called on his fellow senators to find ways to allow him and Senator Jinggoy Estrada, who are currently detained and facing nonbailable charges of plunder, to participate in the impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte. Both Marcoleta and Estrada are members of the minority bloc in the Senate. Their detention raises questions about their ability to engage in legislative processes, particularly in high-profile cases like the impeachment trial. The situation highlights potential challenges in ensuring due process and participation for lawmakers who are under legal scrutiny.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a straightforward account of Senator Marcoleta’s request without overtly favoring any political side. It reports on the legal status of two senators and their involvement in a significant political process—the impeachment trial—without using biased language or selectively omitte

Philippine Daily Inquirer logoPhilippine Daily InquirerIndependentCenter11 hr. ago
Time to uncover truth behind VP Duterte’s P612.5-M confidential funds – Chua

Rep. Joel Chua, leading the House prosecution in the impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte, announced that evidence regarding her alleged misuse of P612.5 million in confidential funds will be presented to the Senate impeachment court. The evidence includes documents, witness testimonies, and financial records collected over months of public hearings. These hearings investigated the handling of confidential funds by Duterte's office and the Department of Education, uncovering unverified recipient names and other irregularities. The findings formed part of the basis for the impeachment complaint. Chua emphasized that the trial should focus on factual evidence rather than political considerations.

Bias read (Center): While the subject involves high-level political figures and potential misconduct, the article presents the case as a legal proceeding focused on evidence and transparency. The framing emphasizes due process and factual presentation, avoiding overtly partisan language. The tone remains objective, and

Philippine Daily Inquirer logoPhilippine Daily InquirerIndependentCenter14 hr. ago
Impeachment won’t hit budget talks, at least for House – Sandro Marcos

Ferdinand Alexander Marcos, the House of Representatives Majority Leader in the Philippines, stated that the ongoing impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte will not interfere with the House's discussions on the 2027 national budget. He emphasized that the House can proceed with its duties as the impeachment proceedings are not being conducted by them. This statement comes amid political tensions surrounding Duterte's potential removal from office due to alleged misconduct. The situation highlights the separation of powers within the Philippine government, where different branches handle distinct responsibilities.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a neutral report on a political figure's statement regarding the impact of an impeachment trial on legislative processes. There is no evident bias in the framing, word choice, or emphasis. The content does not favor any particular political side but rather reports on the stance,

Philippine Daily Inquirer logoPhilippine Daily InquirerIndependentCenter14 hr. ago
Padilla chief of staff confirms resigning before impeachment trial

Rudolf Philip Jurado, the former chief of staff to Senator Robin Padilla, has confirmed his resignation dated June 22, which predates the start of impeachment proceedings against Vice President Sara Duterte on July 6. The resignation was communicated to the Philippine Daily Inquirer through a statement. Jurado's departure comes amid ongoing political tensions related to the impeachment process. His resignation suggests internal changes within Padilla's office ahead of the legal challenges involving Sara Duterte.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information regarding the resignation of a senior aide to a senator prior to impeachment proceedings. There is no overt ideological framing or emphasis on specific political perspectives. The narrative remains neutral, focusing on the timeline and confirmation of the辞职,

Philippine Daily Inquirer logoPhilippine Daily InquirerIndependentCenter16 hr. ago
Jinggoy Estrada stays in jail as Sandiganbayan denies plea to post bail

Senator Jinggoy Estrada remains in custody as the Sandiganbayan Fifth Division rejected his request to post bail in his plunder case. The court's decision, issued on July 24 but made public on Tuesday, denied Estrada's motion to set bail. The ruling underscores ongoing legal proceedings against the former senator, who faces charges related to corruption. The denial suggests that the court does not believe Estrada poses a flight risk or threatens witness testimony.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information regarding a judicial decision without overtly favoring any political side. It reports on the court's action and its implications without commentary on Estrada's guilt or innocence, maintaining neutrality.

Philippine Daily Inquirer logoPhilippine Daily InquirerIndependentCenter17 hr. ago
Marcoleta to Senate: Find ways for me, Estrada to join impeachment trial

Senator Rodante Marcoleta has called on his fellow senators to find ways for himself and detained Senator Jinggoy Estrada to participate in the impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte. Both lawmakers, part of the minority bloc seen as supportive of Duterte, are facing plunder charges from the Sandiganbayan. The request comes amid ongoing legal proceedings against them, highlighting the intersection of personal legal issues and political accountability.

Bias read (Center): The article presents Marcoleta's call for participation in the impeachment trial without overtly endorsing or criticizing either side. It focuses on the procedural aspect of allowing detained legislators to take part, rather than taking a clear ideological stance. While the subject involves high-sta

Rappler logoRapplerIndependentCenter21 hr. ago
Sandiganbayan junks Jinggoy Estrada’s bail request

The Sandiganbayan 5th Division has rejected Senator Jinggoy Estrada's request for bail in his plunder case, which involves alleged kickbacks from flood control projects between 2024 and 2025. In a ruling dated July 24 but released on July 28, Associate Justice Gener Gito stated that Estrada's motion lacked legal basis and was filed too early. The court emphasized that bail cannot be determined without first establishing whether it should be granted. The decision follows several previous denials of Estrada's motions, including his attempt to attend the impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte and his request to consolidate multiple charges under one division. Estrada faces charges of graft and plunder in different divisions of the Sandiganbayan, with his arraignment delayed due to procedural motions.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the judicial rulings and procedural decisions regarding Senator Jinggoy Estrada's legal matters without overt ideological slant. While the subject involves high-profile political figures and legal proceedings, the reporting focuses on the legal process and does not take a clear,

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories