The article reports that the U.S. public debt has reached a record high of $40 billion, marking a psychological threshold. This increase is attributed to rapid growth in government spending during the administrations of Donald Trump and Joe Biden. Concerns are growing as the national debt has more than doubled over the past decade. The average American citizen, including newborn babies, now owes over $100,000. Despite this, President Trump and his administration do not view the situation as catastrophic. They argue that the debt is relatively smaller compared to market trading levels and believe economic growth will resolve the issue. However, analysts disagree, noting that the economy is slowing, financial habits are difficult to change, and more money is leaving the treasury than entering it. The article also attributes the rising debt to reduced taxes on wealthy corporations, increased military spending due to the Iran conflict, and Trump’s fluctuating tariff policies. Critics accuse Trump of creating unnecessary enemies through tariffs and suggest he may lose public support in upcoming elections. Trump remains confident in his policies and threatens the most severe economic war
Bias read (Center): While the article presents criticism of Trump's economic policies and mentions opposition views, it does not clearly favor one side over another. It includes perspectives from both the administration and analysts, though it leans slightly toward critical commentary. However, it avoids overtly biased
Why factuality (75): The article provides generally accurate information about the U.S. national debt exceeding $40 trillion and attributes the increase to both Trump and Biden administrations. It quotes Scott Bessent and Michael Peterson, though some statements may lack sufficient contextual support. The claim that the
Why objectivity (65): The article presents a somewhat balanced perspective but leans slightly toward the administration’s viewpoint when quoting Scott Bessent. It uses emotionally charged terms such as 'rekordni' (record) and 'psihološkom granicom' (psychological limit) which can imply judgment. The framing suggests a na






