Who decides what knowledge matters? The price and value of disciplines

La TerceraIndependent🔒Center7 hr. ago

The article discusses a seminar titled 'El sentido de ser universidad' held at the University of Finis Terrae, where university leaders debated topics such as the role of artificial intelligence, the importance of humanities, and the future of higher education. Participants included former university leaders Rosa Devés and Ignacio Sánchez, along with current leader Juan Eduardo Vargas. They emphasized the need for universities to preserve their identity while adapting to new technologies, maintain community and dialogue, and uphold academic values despite challenges like polarization and fragmentation. The discussion also touched on recent student movements and institutional responses.

Bias read (Center): While the discussion involves politically sensitive issues such as student activism and institutional governance, the article presents balanced perspectives from multiple university leaders without overtly favoring any particular ideological stance. The focus remains on institutional challenges and

CIPER ChileIndependentProgressive11 hr. ago

The article discusses the growing debate over the value of humanities and social sciences within higher education institutions, questioning whether these disciplines are being undervalued in favor of more economically oriented fields like technology and artificial intelligence. The author suggests that this controversy reflects broader societal concerns about prioritizing measurable outcomes over intrinsic values. They argue that universities play a crucial role in shaping which knowledge is considered important, and that current educational systems increasingly focus on metrics such as employability and financial return rather than the deeper cultural and ethical significance of learning. The piece critiques the tendency to reduce academic worth to economic terms, emphasizing that education should be seen as a space where societies collectively decide what to pass on to future generations.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the discussion around the undervaluation of humanities and social sciences, suggesting that their importance is often overlooked in favor of more commercially viable fields. It criticizes the increasing emphasis on economic returns and metrics, implying a systemic bias toward util